Lichens and Allied Fungi of Rouge National Urban Park in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario
R. Troy McMullin1,*, Claudia Cadranel2, Katherine H.I. Drotos3, Jose R. Maloles4, Juliana T. Skuza2, and Carl-Adam Wegenschimmel5
1Canadian Museum of Nature, Research and Collections, Ottawa, ON, K1P 6P4, Canada. 2Rouge National Urban Park, Parks Canada, ON, M1M 1R9, Canada. 3University of Guelph, Integrative Biology, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 Canada. 4Credit Valley Conservation, 1255 Old Derry Rd, Mississauga, ON, L5N 6R4, Canada. 5Dougan & Associates, 77 Wyndham St S, Guelph, ON, N1E 5R3, Canada. *Corresponding Author.
Urban Naturalist, No. 55 (2022)
Abstract
Rouge National Urban Park is in the eastern region of the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) of southern Ontario. It was established in 2015 and is Canada’s first national urban park. To better understand the biodiversity in the park, we conducted a survey of the lichens and allied fungi and discovered 124 species in 69 genera. Three species are reported for the first time from Canada: Arthonia cf. granosa, Verrucaria dolosa, and V. phloeophila. Two additional species are reported for the first time in Ontario: Halecania sp. and Verrucaria praetermissa. Thirty-three species are new to the GTA. Four species have a provincial rank of S3 (vulnerable). Ten species are considered rare in Ontario. Most of the rare species occur in the narrow southern portion of the park that is heavily forested with deep ravines, flood plains, and old-growth forests. Our results show the importance of protected natural areas in urban landscapes for biodiversity, even for taxa that are sensitive to disturbance, such as species of lichens and their related fungi.
Download Full-text pdf
Site by Bennett Web & Design Co.
Volume 9, 2022 Urban Naturalist No. 55
Lichens and Allied Fungi
of Rouge National Urban
Park in the Greater
Toronto Area, Ontario
R. Troy McMullin, Claudia Cadranel,
Katherine H.I. Drotos, Jose R. Maloles,
Juliana T. Skuza, and Carl-Adam Wegenschimmel
Urban Naturalist
The Urban Naturalist (ISSN # 2328-8965) is published by the Eagle Hill Institute, PO Box 9, 59 Eagle Hill Road, Steuben, ME 04680-
0009. Phone 207-546-2821 Ext. 4, FAX 207-546-3042. E-mail: office@eaglehill.us. Webpage: http://www.eaglehill.us/urna. Copyright
© 2022, all rights reserved. Published on an article by article basis. Special issue proposals are welcome. The Urban Naturalist is
an open access journal. Authors: Submission guidelines are available at http://www.eaglehill.us/urna. Co-published journals: The
Northeastern Naturalist, Southeastern Naturalist, Caribbean Naturalist, and Eastern Paleontologist, each with a separate Board of
Editors. The Eagle Hill Institute is a tax exempt 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation of the State of Maine (Federal ID # 010379899).
Board of Editors
Hal Brundage, Environmental Research and Consulting,
Inc, Lewes, DE, USA
Sabina Caula, Universidad de Carabobo, Naguanagua,
Venezuela
Sylvio Codella, Kean University, Union New Jersey, USA
Julie Craves, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn,
MI, USA
Ana Faggi, Universidad de Flores/CONICET, Buenos
Aires, Argentina
Leonie Fischer, University Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
Chad Johnson, Arizona State University, Glendale, AZ,
USA
Sonja Knapp, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental
Research–UFZ, Halle (Saale), Germany
David Krauss, City University of New York, New York,
NY, USA
Joerg-Henner Lotze, Eagle Hill Institute, Steuben, ME.
Publisher
Kristi MacDonald, Hudsonia, Bard College, Annandale-on-
Hudson, NY, USA
Tibor Magura, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
Brooke Maslo, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ,
USA
Mike McKinney, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN,
USA. Journal Editor
Desirée Narango, University of Massachusetts, Amherst,
MA, USA
Zoltán Németh, Department of Evolutionary Zoology and
Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen,
Hungary
Joseph Rachlin, Lehman College, City University of New
York, New York, NY, USA
Travis Ryan, Center for Urban Ecology, Butler University,
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Michael Strohbach, Technische Universität Braunschweig,
Institute of Geoecology, Braunschweig, Germany
Katalin Szlavecz, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore,
MD, USA
Advisory Board
Myla Aronson, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ,
USA
Mark McDonnell, Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria and
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Charles Nilon, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO,
USA
Dagmar Haase, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental
Research–UFZ, Leipzig, Germany
Sarel Cilliers, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South
Africa
Maria Ignatieva, University of Western Australia, Perth,
Western Australia, Australia
♦ The Urban Naturalist is a peer-reviewed and
edited interdisciplinary natural history journal
with a global focus on urban areas (ISSN 2328-
8965 [online]).
♦ The journal features research articles, notes,
and research summaries on terrestrial, freshwater,
and marine organisms and their habitats.
♦ It offers article-by-article online publication
for prompt distribution to a global audience.
♦ It offers authors the option of publishing large
files such as data tables, and audio and video
clips as online supplemental files.
♦ Special issues - The Urban Naturalist welcomes
proposals for special issues that are based
on conference proceedings or on a series of invitational
articles. Special issue editors can rely
on the publisher’s years of experiences in efficiently
handling most details relating to the
publication of special issues.
♦ Indexing - The Urban Naturalist is a young
journal whose indexing at this time is by way of
author entries in Google Scholar and Researchgate.
Its indexing coverage is expected to become
comparable to that of the Institute's first 3 journals
(Northeastern Naturalist, Southeastern Naturalist,
and Journal of the North Atlantic). These 3
journals are included in full-text in BioOne.org
and JSTOR.org and are indexed in Web of Science
(clarivate.com) and EBSCO.com.
♦ The journal's staff is pleased to discuss ideas
for manuscripts and to assist during all stages of
manuscript preparation. The journal has a page
charge to help defray a portion of the costs of
publishing manuscripts. Instructions for Authors
are available online on the journal’s website
(http://www.eaglehill.us/urna).
♦ It is co-published with the Northeastern Naturalist,
Southeastern Naturalist, Caribbean Naturalist,
Eastern Paleontologist, Eastern Biologist,
and Journal of the North Atlantic.
♦ It is available online in full-text version on the
journal's website (http://www.eaglehill.us/urna).
Arrangements for inclusion in other databases
are being pursued.
Cover Photograph: The Rouge River and Rouge River Valley in Rouge National Urban Park in the
Greater Toronto Area of southern Ontario. Photograph © R. Troy McMullin.
1
1Canadian Museum of Nature, Research and Collections, Ottawa, ON, K1P 6P4, Canada. 2Rouge National
Urban Park, Parks Canada, ON, M1M 1R9, Canada. 3University of Guelph, Integrative Biology, 50 Stone
Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 Canada. 4Credit Valley Conservation, 1255 Old Derry Rd, Mississauga,
ON, L5N 6R4, Canada. 5Dougan & Associates, 77 Wyndham St S, Guelph, ON, N1E 5R3, Canada.
*Corresponding Author - tmcmullin@nature.ca.
Associate Editor: Sonja Knapp, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ.
Lichens and Allied Fungi of Rouge National Urban Park
in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario
R. Troy McMullin1,*, Claudia Cadranel2, Katherine H.I. Drotos3,
Jose R. Maloles4, Juliana T. Skuza2, and Carl-Adam Wegenschimmel5
Abstract - Rouge National Urban Park is in the eastern region of the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) of southern
Ontario. It was established in 2015 and is Canada’s first national urban park. To better understand the
biodiversity in the park, we conducted a survey of the lichens and allied fungi and discovered 124 species
in 69 genera. Three species are reported for the first time from Canada: Arthonia cf. granosa, Verrucaria
dolosa, and V. phloeophila. Two additional species are reported for the first time in Ontario: Halecania sp.
and Verrucaria praetermissa. Thirty-three species are new to the GTA. Four species have a provincial rank
of S3 (vulnerable). Ten species are considered rare in Ontario. Most of the rare species occur in the narrow
southern portion of the park that is heavily forested with deep ravines, flood plains, and old-growth forests.
Our results show the importance of protected natural areas in urban landscapes for biodiversity, even for
taxa that are sensitive to disturbance, such as species of lichens and their related fungi.
Introduction
Rouge National Urban Park (RNUP), in the eastern region of the Greater Toronto Area
(GTA), is Canada’s first and only national urban park. Recorded human history in the park area
dates back at least 10,000 years and includes the first farmers from Indigenous communities
who started growing corn and other crops around 700 AD (PCA 2019, 2021). Increased human
disturbances to the landscape as a result of the Euro-Canadian settlement and the proliferation of
industrial agriculture, timber harvesting, and milling in the Rouge Valley dates back to the 18th
century (PCA 2019, 2021). Disturbances intensified in the 20th century, and much of the Rouge
Park landscape was further altered by housing developments, aggregate mineral extraction, the
construction of service and transportation corridors, the introduction of numerous invasive alien
plant species and feral animals, altered hydrological and fire regimes, unmanaged and increasing
park visitation, dumping, and the creation of several unofficial trails through sensitive habitats,
with most of these issues predating Parks Canada’s presence (PCA 2021). Despite these disturbances,
the park still contains a rich biodiversity, including 971 species of vascular plants, 112
breeding birds, 24 mammals, and 19 herpetofauna (TRCA 2015). The 2013 Ontario BioBlitz
(a 24-hour survey) also took place in the area that is now RNUP, and 54 lichen species were
reported (McMullin et al. 2018).
Lichens are stable composite organisms that are comprised primarily of a mycobiont (fungus)
and a photobiont (an alga, cyanobacterium, or both) (Brodo et al. 2001). Many lichen species
are sensitive to disturbance and, consequently, are typically studied outside of urban centers
in Canada, in less disturbed habitats where diversity tends to be higher (e.g., Bell-Doyon et al.
2021, Brodo et al. 2013, Paquette et al. 2019). A lichen study in three southern Ontario cities
Vol. 9, 2022 Urban Naturalist 55:1–19
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
2
(Hamilton, Niagara Falls, and Owen Sound) confirmed this narrative and showed a negative
correlation between urbanization and lichen diversity (McMullin et al. 2016). One of the main
reasons for the lower diversity in urban areas is the presence of pollutants in the atmosphere and
precipitation, from which lichens obtain minerals and nutrients (Richardson 1975, Richardson
and Cameron 2004). They have a range of tolerances to air pollution and, as a result, sensitive
species have been used extensively to monitor air quality (Cameron et al. 2007, Henderson 2000,
Richardson 1992). Lichens are also used to monitor ecological integrity. Due to the narrow environmental
conditions required by particular species, they can be used as indicators of subtle
changes (Allen and Lendemer 2016, McMullin et al. 2017).
Despite the sensitivity of many species, natural environments in urban areas still provide
suitable habitat for many lichens (e.g., Allen and Howe 2016; Allen and Lendemer 2021; Mc-
Mullin et al. 2014; Tumur and Richardson 2017, 2019). For example, old-growth forests in deep
ravines, like those in the southern part of RNUP, could host relic populations in a landscape
where few old-growth forests remain (Bohdan 2014, Henry and Quinby 2010). The species
inhabiting old-growth forests can also become established in maturing stands nearby more easily
as dispersal limitations are reduced (e.g., Hilmo and Såstad 2001). In addition, the habitat
in urban parks is important for recolonization as air quality improves. Ontario’s air quality has
steadily improved since 1988 (Ministry of the Environment 2014). Therefore, lichens may recolonize
suitable habitats in the GTA as they have done in the European cities of London and
Paris when air quality improved (Rose and Hawksworth 1981, Seaward and Letrouit-Galinou
1991). However, to track whether recolonization is occurring or to monitor increases or declines
in populations, baseline data are requuired. Knowing what species are present, where they are
located, and identifying which are rare or sensitive are also essential for developing management
strategies (Reid and Miller 1989, Powell et al. 2000).
The aim of our study is to document the lichen and allied fungi biota in RNUP. Our objectives
were to survey the major ecosystem types, examine as many meso- and micro-habitats as
possible, provide a summary of the lichen and allied fungi species discovered, and highlight rare
species and their location in the park. The results can help to illustrate the importance of natural
space in urban areas for biodiversity, even for taxa that are sensitive to disturbance such as species
of lichens and their related fungi.
Methods
Study Area
Parks Canada, an agency of the Government of Canada, began working towards the establishment
of RNUP in 2011 with municipal and provincial governments, Indigenous partners,
and stakeholders (PCA 2019). The park was officially created in May 2015, and once it is fully
developed, it will cover 19546 acres (49.15 miles2) (PCA 2019), making it the largest protected
urban area in North America.
Rouge National Urban Park is located in the eastern portion of the GTA, Canada’s largest
metropolitan area (with 6,417,516 people), and overlaps the cities of Markham, Pickering,
Toronto, and the Township of Uxbridge (Fig. 1, PCA 2019, Statistics Canada 2017). The park
is centered on the Rouge River and its tributaries, but it also includes portions of the Duffins
Creek and Petticoat Creek watersheds (PCA 2021, TRCA 2015). It stretches north from Lake
Ontario about 14 miles to the Oak Ridges Moraine. This area has been exposed since the Late
Wisconsin glacier retreated about 12,000 years ago (Barnett et al. 1998). The bedrock in the
park is mostly shale (PCA 2019, Sharpe 1980). The ecosystems include forests, meadows,
ravines, and inland and coastal wetlands, along with small remnants of rare habitats such as
oak savannah and some of the northern-most remnants of Carolinian woodlands in Ontario
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
3
(PCA 2021, TRCA 2015). The northern section of the park has scattered wetland and forested
pockets with corridors intertwined, but it is mostly used for agriculture — approximately 50%
of the total park area is actively farmed (PCA 2019). The southern section of the park is at the
northern limit of the Carolinian Life Zone and it contains mature forested ravine complexes
Figure 1. Rouge National Urban Park land cover and collection sites for all lichens and allied fungi.
Red dots = rare species, which are defined in Table 2. Green dots = all other collection sites.
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
4
with steep valley slopes, bluffs, expansive floodplains, and the largest coastal wetland in
Toronto, the Rouge Marsh (PCA 2019, 2021; TRCA 2015). The park is between 43.78974°N
and -79.12129°W in the south, 43.99500°N and -79.19948°W in the north, 43.79476°N,
-79.11678°W in the east, and 43.94834°N, -79.26816°W in the west. The mean annual temperature
in the region is 48.92°F with a mean monthly low of 25.34°F in January and a high
of 72.14°F in July, and the mean annual precipitation is 32.72 inches, with rainfall constituting
86% of the total (Government of Canada 2017). Most of the rain falls in May, August,
and September, while most of the snow falls between December and March (Government
of Canada 2017). The minimum and maximum elevations are 242.78 feet and 1082.68 feet
above sea level (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 2022). Air quality has
been improving in Ontario in recent decades, and there has been considerable improvement
since 2008, as well as fewer smog advisories (Government of Ontario 2014). Nitrogen oxides,
sulphur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and fine particulate matter have decreased in concentration
and emission by over 10% between 2006 and 2015, while ozone increased 3% (Government
of Ontario 2015).
Sampling
Our survey of the lichens and allied fungi of RNUP was conducted from October 25–27,
2020. We also include the results from the Ontario BioBlitz on September 15, 2013. Using land
cover maps, we selected a wide variety of natural habitat types to assess (Figs. 1 & 2, Table 1).
Our survey methods followed Newmaster et al. (2005), who showed that examining large areas
(referred to as floristic habitat sampling) captures cryptogam diversity more effectively than using
smaller representative plots. Using floristic habitat sampling, we surveyed as many ecosystems
in the park as possible. All observed restricted mesohabitats (e.g., streams, rock outcrops)
were examined in each ecosystem. We attempted to assess as many microhabitats (e.g., snags,
different tree species and rock types) as possible at each location. This method was described by
Selva (2003) as an “intelligent meander.”
Identification
Our specimens were identified using light microscopy (compound and stereomicroscopes)
and chemical spot tests with paraphenylenediamine in ethyl alcohol, 50% nitric acid, sodium
hypochlorite, 10% and 20% potassium hydroxide, and Lugol’s iodine following Brodo et al.
(2001). We further examined chemistry using a longwave ultraviolet light chamber (365 nm).
Specimens that we could not reliably identify by morphology, spot tests, or ultraviolet light were
analyzed for secondary metabolites using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) in solvents A, B′,
and C following Culberson and Kristinsson (1970) and Orange et al. (2001). We captured images
with a Leica DVM6 digital microscope (Figs. 3A, C; 4A, C, E). Maps were produced with
ArcGIS v. 10.8.1 (Figs. 1; 2; 3B, D; 4B, D, F). Our specimens are housed at the Biodiversity
Institute of Ontario Herbarium (OAC) at the University of Guelph and at the national herbarium
at the Canadian Museum of Nature (CANL).
Conservation Status
Provincial conservation status ranks (S-ranks) are non-legal designations, which are set in
Ontario by the Natural History Information Centre based on guidelines developed by Nature-
Serve (2021). Species with distributions and frequencies that are well understood receive a rank
between 1 and 5. Ranks are defined as follows: 1 = critically imperilled, 2 = imperilled, 3 =
vulnerable, 4 = apparently secure, 5 = secure, NR = not ranked, U = unrankable (due to a lack
of information), and ? = rank uncertain.
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
5
Figure 2. Major collection areas for lichens and allied fungi in Rouge National Urban Park. Roman
numerals correspond with collections in the annotated species list and the habitat descriptions in Table 1.
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
6
Table 1. Site coordinates and habitat descriptions for localities examined. Roman numerals correspond
with those in Figure 1 and the Annotated Species List.
43.79912 -79.129787
43.80868 -79.14520
43.81425 -79.16157
43.81568 -79.15846
43.81931, -79.17069
43.82598 -79.17140
43.82175 -79.18433
43.82818 -79.15288
43.83439 -79.15556
43.82761 -79.20059
43.84600 -79.19386
43.85550 -79.21053
43.93796 -79.22211
43.89002 -79.20454
43.83147 -79.17113
Site
No. Location Latitude Longitude Habitat
I Ravine S of Hwy 401
II Trails between Glen Rouge
Campground and
Twyn Rivers Dr
III Vista Trail
IV Orchard Trail
V Rouge Valley Conservation
Centre vicinity
VI Cedar Trail and the
Beare Wetlands Loop
VII Toronto Zoo –
Canadian Domain
VIII Finch Ave and Woodview Ave
Cedar Swamp
IX Scarborough Pickering
Townline and 11th Concession
X Sewells Road and Old
Finch Ave Vicinity
XI Woodlands Area
XII Bob Hunter
Memorial Park
XIII Northern Woodlots
XIV Little Rouge Creek
off Hwy 7
XV Plug Hat Rd and
Beare Rd
Mature and old-growth mixed-wood deciduous
dominated forest in a river flood plain in a deep
ravine. Tree cover includes American Beech, Eastern
Hemlock, Maple, and Willow.
Mature American Beech, Eastern Hemlock, Sugar
Maple, and Yellow Birch forest. Located atop a ravine.
Mature Sugar Maple/Red Oak forest on a ravine slope.
Mature American Beech, Eastern Hemlock, and Sugar
Maple forest. Some patches of Freeman Maple/Green
Ash Swamp. Also, some cultural woodlands with
Manitoba Maple.
Mature and young mixed-wood forest. Collections
of exposed trees or trees at forest edge. Tree cover
includes Maple, Russian Olive, Staghorn Sumac,
White Ash, and White Pine.
Wetlands with standing water and scattered trees.
Most collections in the ravine between the two trails
with mature mixed-wood forest that include American
Beech, Eastern Hemlock, Eastern White Cedar, Maple,
and Yellow Birch.
Large scattered trees including Maple and Trembling
Aspen.
Mature and old-growth Freeman Maple/Green Ash
Swamp with a notable flood regime. Second-growth
Freeman Maple/Green Ash forest south of Finch
Avenue. Some patches of Eastern White Cedar swamp.
Mature and old-growth American Beech, Red Oak, and
Sugar Maple forest. Some patches of Freeman Maple/
Green Ash swamp.
Mature and old-growth mixed-wood forest in and atop
a deep ravine. Tree cover includes Ironwood, Maple,
and Oak.
Mature mixed-wood forests. Tree cover includes Ash,
Black Maple, Eastern White Cedar, Red Oak, and
Sugar Maple.
Mature mixed-wood deciduous dominated forest. Tree
cover includes American Beech, Hawthorn, Ironwood,
Maple, and Oak. Also, ornamental calcareous boulders
and old exposed cedar fence posts.
Mature American Beech, Red Oak, and Sugar Maple
forest. Some areas of Freeman Maple, Green Ash, and
Eastern White Cedar swamp. Sporadic Black Cherry
and Ironwood.
Mature and old-growth American Beech/Sugar Maple
forest on a ravine slope. Also, floodplain forest with
Eastern White Cedar, Freeman Maple, Green Ash, and
Yellow Birch. Located adjacent to Little Rouge River.
Mature American Basswood, Black Cherry, Red Oak,
Sugar Maple, and Trembling Aspen forest. Located
along a small creek and adjacent to Little Rouge River.
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
7
Results
From 374 specimens, 124 species in 69 genera are reported. One hundred and twelve species
are lichens and 12 are allied fungi, 2 of which are lichenicolous. Of the lichenized species,
65 (58%) are microlichens (crustose) and 47 (42%) are macrolichens (33 foliose, 14 fruticose).
One hundred and eight (96%) species of lichens have green algae as their primary photobiont
and 4 species (4%) have cyanobacteria as their primary photobiont. Seven species (6%) are
calicioids (1 lichenized and 6 allied fungi).
Three species are reported for the first time from Canada: Arthonia cf, granosa, Verrucaria
dolosa, and V. phloeophila (Figs. 3 & 4, Table 2). Two additional species are reported for the first
time in Ontario: Halecania sp. and Verrucaria praetermissa (Figs. 3 & 4, Table 2). Thirty three
species are reported for the first time from the Greater Toronto Area: Agonimia sp., Anisomeridium
polypori, Arthonia granosa, Aspicilia laevata, Bacidina chloroticula, B. egenula, Caloplaca
microphyllina, Chaenotheca brunneola, Chaenothecopsis perforata, C. savonica, Cladonia ignatii,
Halecania sp., Inoderma byssaceum, Ionaspis alba, Lecania crytella, Lecanora strobilina,
Figure 3. A–B, Reported for the first time from Canada. C–D, Reported for the first time from Ontario.
A, Arthonia cf. granosa thallus and apothecia (Wegenschimmel 166, CANL). Inset showing the twocelled
ascospores with equal sized cells. B, North American distribution of A. cf. granosa. C, Halecania
sp. thallus and apothecia (McMullin 22418, CANL). D, North American distribution of Halecania sp. In
maps, cyan dots = new records, red dots = previous collections.
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
8
Figure 4. A–D, Reported for the first time from Canada. E–F, Reported for the first time from Ontario. A,
Verrucaria dolosa thallus and perithecia (McMullin 22419, CANL). B, North American distribution of
V. dolosa. C, Verrucaria phloeophila thallus and perithecia (Wegenschimmel 177, CANL). Inset showing
the dark exciple that is indistinguishable from the involucrellum. D, North American distribution
of V. phloeophila. E, Verrucaria praetermissa thallus and perithecia (Wegenschimmel 173, CANL).
Inset showing the continuous dark basal area. In maps, cyan dots = new records, red dots = previous
collections.
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
9
Lepraria caesiella, Multiclavula mucida, Physconia leucoleiptes, Placynthiella icmalea, Polyozosia
dispersa, Punctelia bolliana, Ramalina intermedia, Rinodina tephraspis, Ropalospora
viridis, Strigula stigmatella, Trapeliopsis flexuosa, Verrucaria dolosa, V. muralis, V. nigrescens,
V. phloeophila, V. praetermissa, and Xanthomendoza weberi.
Ten species are considered rare in Ontario based on provincial ranks (S1-S3) or are nonranked
species with a small number of collections in the province (see Table 2 for additional
details): Bacidina chloroticula, B. egenula, Halecania sp., Inoderma byssaceum, Phaeophyscia
kairamoi, Verrucaria dolosa, V. praetermissa, V. phloeophila, Viridothelium virens, and Xanthomendoza
weberi.
Table 2. Ten lichen and allied fungi species discovered in Rouge National Urban Park that are considered
rare in Ontario based on provincial ranks (S1-S3) or are non-ranked species with a small number of
collections in the province.
Species Provincial Rank Notes
Bacidina chloroticula SNR
Bacidina egenula SNR
Halecania sp. SNR
Inoderma byssaceum S3
Phaeophyscia kairamoi S3
Verrucaria dolosa SNR
Verrucaria praetermissa SNR
Verrucaria phloeophila SNR
Viridothelium virens S3
Xanthomendoza weberi S3
Three previous collections are known from Ontario -
Brodo et al. 31686 (CANL), Macoun 2801 (CANL) (det.
S. Ekman), and Wong et al. 2712 (CANL) (det. S. Ekman).
The latter two collections were reported by Ekman (1996).
Known from six previous collections in Ontario. Two from
the Ottawa region (Brodo et al. 30406, CANL; Robitaille
149.4, CANL, det. S. Ekman; Ekman 1996), one from
Guelph (McMullin 7101, OAC; McMullin et al. 2014),
two from the Bruce Peninsula (Lay 08-0276, NY; Lewis
240, CANL; Brodo et al. 2013), and one from the Kingston
area (McMullin 22427, CANL).
First known collection in ON and second known collection
in Canada (Brodo et al. 2021).
-
-
Reported for the first time from Canada. Three previous
collections are known: one from British Columbia (Björk
s.n., Ways of Enlichenment- Lichen Photogallery —
www.waysofenlichenment.net), and two from Ontario
on the Bruce Peninsula (Brodo 32132, CANL) and in
Algonquin Provincial Park (Brodo 33065B, CANL).
First known collection in Ontario.
First known collection in Canada.
-
-
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
10
Annotated Species List
• The list is arranged alphabetically by genus and species.
• Species authors are cited following Brummitt and Powell (1992) or the 23rd edition of the
North American Lichen Checklist (Esslinger 2019).
• Nomenclature follows the 23rd edition of the North American Lichen Checklist (Esslinger
2019). Any deviance from Esslinger’s list represents the opinion of the authors.
• Collection numbers follow the names of each collector.
• Collection numbers followed by (TLC) were analysed with thin-layer chromatography.
• Roman numerals correspond to collection sites in Table 1 and they are illustrated in Figure 2.
• Provincial conservation status ranks (S-ranks) are included for each species (S1-S5, SNR, or
SU).
† = non-lichenized fungi traditionally treated with lichens.
* = reported for the first time from the Greater Toronto Area.
** = reported for the first time from Ontario.
*** = reported for the first time from Canada.
Acarospora fuscata (Ach.) Arnold — Saxicolous. McMullin 12529 (IV). S5.
Acrocordia cavata (Ach.) R.C. Harris — Corticolous on Fraxinus sp. (Ash). McMullin 22368 (I). S4.
*Agonimia spp. Corticolous on Acer x freemanii A.E. Murray (Freeman Maple) and Fagus grandifolia
Ehrh. (American Beech). Bryicolous over tree bark, lignicolous on stump. Wegenschimmel 153 (IV),
155 (II), 228 (II), 245 (XIII), 272 (IV), 308 (II), 314 (XV). SNR. Notes: These specimens do not
appear to match any known species of Agonimia. Most of the collections are sterile with scattered
roundish areoles that are strongly convex. One of those specimens, Wegenschimmel 272, was fertile
and had the large (53–67 × 21–23 μm) heavily muriform ascospores characteristic of the genus. All
of the specimens appear to be the same taxon except for two. Wegenschimmel 153 is sorediate, but no
other known species in the genus is known to be sorediate, and Wegenschimmel 228 is sterile and has
a granular thallus. It is possible that the latter two specimens belong to other genera, but we are placing
them here due to their minute size, colour, and general gestalt that is consistent with other species
of Agonimia.
Alyxoria varia (Pers.) Ertz & Tehler — Corticolous on American Beech, Carya cordiformis (Wangenh.)
K.Koch (Bitternut Hickory), and Quercus macrocarpa Michx. (Bur Oak). Maloles 49 (II),
McMullin 22385 (I), Wegenschimmel 158 (VIII), 226 (IX), 247 (IV), 255 (XIV), 269 (IX), 280 (XIII).
S4.
Amandinea punctata (Hoffm.) Coppins & Scheid — Corticolous on Acer nigrum F.Michx. (Black
Maple), A. Saccharum Marshall (Sugar Maple), and Freeman Maple. McMullin 12535 (XI),
Wegenschimmel 258 (XIII), 299 (XV). S5.
*Anisomeridium polypori (Ellis & Everh.) M.E. Barr — Corticolous on Bur Oak, Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Marshall (Green Ash), and Quercus rubra L. (Red Oak). McMullin 22382 (I). S4.
†Arthonia hypobela Nyl. — Corticolous on Pinus strobus L. (Eastern White Pine). McMullin 12570 (V).
S4S5.
***†Arthonia cf. granosa B. de Lesd. — Corticolous on Red Oak. Wegenschimmel 166 (IV). SNR.
Notes: We have observed and collected this taxon frequently in southern Ontario. It is consistent
with the description of A. granosa from Europe in lacking algae, making the host bark paler, having
circular to ellipsoidal ascomata that are epruinose, ascospores that are 2-celled and 15–25 ×8–15 μm
(see inset of Fig. 3A), an epispore that is KI-, and ascomatal gel that is I+ red and KI+ blue (Fig. 3A,
Sundin 1999). However, European material is described with pycnidia present (Sundin 1999), which
all specimens that we have seen lack. Therefore, it is being placed in A. cf. granosa for now, but
further study may reveal the North American material to be a distinct species.
Arthonia helvola (Nyl.) Nyl. — Corticolous on Betula alleghaniensis Britt. (Yellow Birch). McMullin
12557 (III), 22403 (XIII), Wegenschimmel 183 (II). S4.
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
11
Arthonia radiata (Pers.) Ach. — Corticolous on Ash and Freeman Maple. Maloles 41 (IV), McMullin
22387 (XIII), 22400 (I), Wegenschimmel 267 (IV). S5.
*Arthothelium ruanum (A. Massal.) Körb. — Corticolous on Bitternut Hickory, Green Ash, Sugar
Maple, and Tilia americana L. (American Basswood). Wegenschimmel 163 (XV), 194 (IV), 263
(VIII), 311 (II). S4.
*Arthrosporum populorum A. Massal. — Corticolous on Ash. McMullin 22392 (XIII). S1S2.
*Aspicila laevata (Ach.) Arnold — Saxicolous. McMullin 22414TLC (I). S4. TLC: stictic acid.
Bacidia schweinitzii (Fr. ex Tuck.) A. Schneid. — Corticolous on Bur Oak. Wegenschimmel 191 (II). S5.
*Bacidina chloroticula (Nyl.) Vězda & Poelt — Corticolous on Base of American Beech. Wegenschimmel
189 (III). SNR.
*Bacidina egenula (Nyl.) Vězda — Saxicolous on concrete. McMullin 22424 (XII), Wegenschimmel 171
(I). SNR.
*Bacidina sp. — Saxicolous (non-calcareous). Wegenschimmel 161 (XIII). SNR. Notes: This taxon has
minute apothecia ([0.2-]0.3–0.6[-0.7] mm in diameter) with pale brown pigmentation, a granular thallus,
and acicular ascospores. It is inconspicuous in the field.
Bilimbia sabuletorum (Schreb.) Arnold — Bryicolous, corticolous on Thuja occidentalis L. (Eastern
White Cedar). McMullin 22362 (VI), Wegenschimmel 249 (XIII), 257 (XIV). S5.
Caloplaca arenaria (Pers.) Müll. Arg. — Saxicolous (non-calcareous). McMullin 22413 (VI). S5.
Caloplaca cerina (Hedw.) Th. Fr. — Corticolous on Maple and Aspen. McMullin 22377 (XIII), Wegenschimmel
(XIII). S5.
Caloplaca feracissima H. Magn. — Saxicolous on granite and concrete. McMullin 12552 (III), Wegenschimmel
294 (III). S5.
Caloplaca flavovirescens (Wulfen) Dalla Torre & Sarnth. — Saxicolous (calcareous). McMullin 22425
(XII). S4.
*Caloplaca microphyllina (Tuck.) Hasse — Lignicolous on an old fence post. McMullin 22363 (XII).
S5.
Caloplaca pyracea (Ach.) Zwackh — Corticolous on Populus tremuloides Michx. (Trembling Aspen).
McMullin 12542 (VII). S5.
Candelaria concolor (Dicks.) Arnold — Corticolous on American Beech, Fraxinus Americana L. (White
Ash), Rhus typhina L. (Staghorn Sumac), and Sugar Maple. Maloles 23 (XV), McMullin 12545 (VII),
22367 (XIII), Wegenschimmel 209 (VIII), 220 (XIV), 224 (IX), 252 (XV). S5.
Candelariella aurella (Hoffm.) Zahlbr. — Saxicolous on concrete. McMullin 12554 (III). S5.
Candelariella efflorescens R.C. Harris & W.R. Buck — Corticolous on an Eastern White Cedar snag.
McMullin 12522 (IV), 22360 (XIII). S5.
Catillaria nigroclavata (Nyl.) J. Stein. — Corticolous on Elaeagnus angustifolia L. (Russian Olive),
Freeman Maple, and a fallen conifer branch. McMullin 12569 (V), 22416 (XIII), Wegenschimmel 214
(XIV). S4S5.
*Chaenotheca brunneola (Ach.) Müll. Arg. — Lignicolous on a Freeman Maple snag. Maloles 66
(VIII). S4.
†Chaenothecopsis debilis (Sm.) Tibell — Lignicolous on Freeman Maple and Red Oak snags. Maloles
24 (I), 35 (III), 51 (II), 67 (VIII), McMullin 22398 (I). S4.
*†Chaenothecopsis perforata Rikkinen & Tuovila — Resinicolous on Staghorn Sumac. McMullin
22365 (V). SNR.
*†Chaenothecopsis savonica (Räsänen) Tibell — Lignicolous on an Eastern White Cedar stump. Maloles
72 (VIII). S4.
†Chaenothecopsis sp. — Lignicolous on a Freeman Maple snag. Wegenschimmel 318 (XIII). SNR.
Notes: Ascospores 2-celled, 6–7 × 2.5–3 μm, light brown with a distinct septum. Stalk and capitulum
lacking secondary compounds. Stalk <0.6 mm tall. Not associated with lichens or free-living algae.
Chrysothrix caesia (Flot.) Ertz & Tehler — Corticolous on Freeman Maple, Red Oak, Russian Olive,
White Pine, Yellow Birch. McMullin 12563 (V), Wegenschimmel 284 (IX), 284 (XV), 324 (XIII). S5.
Cladonia chlorophaea (Flörke ex Sommerf.) Spreng. — Bryicolous over a log. Wegenschimmel 168TLC
(IV). S5. TLC: fumarprotocetraric acid.
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
12
Cladonia coniocraea (Flörke) Spreng. — Corticolous on Maple. McMullin 12518 (IV), 22417 (X). S5.
Cladonia conista (Nyl.) Robbins — Terricolous. McMullin 12568TLC (IV). SU. TLC: bourgeanic and
fumarprotocetraric acids.
Cladonia cristatella Tuck. — Lignicolous on a log. McMullin 12531 (IV). S5.
Cladonia decorticata (Flörke) Spreng. — Lignicolous on a log. McMullin 12519 (IV). S4?
Cladonia fimbriata (L.) Fr. — Lignicolous on a log and corticolous on Freeman Maple. Maloles 64
(VIII), Wegenschimmel 278TLC (IX), 239 (VIII). S5. TLC: fumarprotocetraric acid.
*Cladonia ignatii Ahti — Bryicolous. McMullin 22372 (X). SNR.
Cladonia incrassata Flörke — Bryicolous and lignicolous on a stump. Wegenschimmel 170 (VIII), 259
(VIII). S4?
Cladonia macilenta var. bacillaris (Ach.) Schaer. — Lignicolous on a log. McMullin 12516 (IV). S5.
Cladonia pocillum (Ach.) O.J. Rich. — Terricolous. McMullin 12526 (IV). S5.
Cladonia pyxidata (L.) Hoffm. — Lignicolous on a log. McMullin 12515 (IV). S5.
Coenogonium pineti (Ach.) Lücking & Lumbsch — Lignicolous, bryicolous on a stump, and corticolous
on a log. McMullin 12555 (III), Wegenschimmel 169 (VIII). S4?
*Cresponea chloroconia (Tuck.) Egea & Torrente — Corticolous on Bur Oak. Maloles 26 (I), 47 (II),
Wegenschimmel 301 (II). S4.
Dictyocatenulata alba Finley & E.F. Morris — Corticolous on Bur Oak and Yellow Birch. McMullin
12558 (III), 22404 (XIII), Wegenschimmel 234 (II). SU.
Evernia mesomorpha Nyl. — Corticolous on Bur Oak. Wegenschimmel 157 (VIII). S5.
Flavoparmelia caperata (L.) Hale — Corticolous on Freeman Maple and Sugar Maple. Maloles 56 (II),
McMullin 12534 (XI), 22359 (XIII), Wegenschimmel 222 (IX), 297 (I), 322 (XIII). S5.
Flavopunctelia soredica (Nyl.) Hale — Corticolous on Freeman Maple and Sugar Maple. Maloles 16
(XV), 60 (VIII). S4.
Graphis scripta (L.) Ach. — Corticolous on American Beech and Betula papyrifera Marshall (White
Birch). Maloles 57 (II), McMullin 22384 (I), Wegenschimmel 248 (XIII), 261 (IX), 262 (VIII), 270
(IX), 279 (XIII), 290 (VIII). S5.
**Halecania sp. — Saxicolous (non-calcareous). McMullin 22418TLC (VI), Wegenschimmel 159TLC
(XIII), 192 (IV). SNR. TLC: argopsin. Notes: the ascospores are 2-celled, hyaline, and 11.5–15 ×
4–5 μm. Asci tips are Catillaria-type. On boulders in a creek valley. Although this taxon is undescribed,
it is known from throughout eastern North America (e.g., Harris and Ladd 2005, Brodo et
al. 2021). There is only one other record of this taxon in Canada, which is from Quebec (Fig. 3D,
Brodo et al. 2021).
Hyperphyscia adglutinata (Flörke) H. Mayrhofer & Poelt — Corticolous on Bur Oak and a Juglans
cinerea L. (Butternut) snag. Maloles 44 (II), McMullin 12564 (V), 22388 (XIII), Wegenschimmel 217
(XIV). S4.
†Illosporiopsis christiansenii (B.L. Brady & D. Hawks.) D. Hawks. — Lichenicolous on Physcia
adscendens and P. stellaris. Maloles 22 (XV), 29 (I), McMullin 22379 (XIII), Wegenschimmel 307
(XIV). S3.
*Inoderma byssaceum (Weigel) Gray — Corticolous on Bur Oak. Wegenschimmel 155 (VIII). S3.
*Ionaspis alba Lutzoni — Saxicolous (non-calcareous). Wegenschimmel 165 (XIII). S4.
†Julella fallaciosa (Stizenb. ex Arnold) R.C. Harris — Corticolous on Sugar Maple and White Birch.
McMullin 12521 (IV), 22390 (XIII), Wegenschimmel 198 (IX), 219 (XIV). S5.
Lecania croatica (Zahlbr.) Kotlov — Corticolous on American Beech, Prunus serotina Ehrh. (Black
Cherry), Sugar Maple, and Ulmus Americana L. (White Elm). McMullin 22366 (XIII), 22386 (I),
Wegenschimmel 221 (IX), 250 (VIII), 251 (XIII), 273 (III), 286 (XV), 293 (III), 312 (XV). S5.
*Lecania cyrtella (Ach.) Th. Fr. — Corticolous on Green Ash. Wegenschimmel 160 (VIII). SNR.
Lecania naegelii (Hepp) Diederich & van den Boom — Corticolous on American Basswood, American
Beech, Freeman Maple, Sugar Maple, and Trembling Aspen. McMullin 12548 (VI), Wegenschimmel
227 (VIII), 264 (VIII), 271 (IX), 274 (IV), 282 (I), 320 (XV). S4.
Lecanora allophana f. sorediata Vain. — Corticolous on Maple and Oak. McMullin 22349TLC, 22349TLC
(XI). SNR. TLC: atranorin and two unknown fatty acids that char with sulphuric acid and heating.
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
13
Lecanora sambuci (Pers.) Nyl. — Corticolous on Trembling Aspen. McMullin 12546 (VII). SNR.
*Lecanora strobilina Ach. — Lignicolous on an Eastern White Cedar snag. Wegenschimmel 187 (VIII),
295 (VIII). S4S5.
Lecanora symmicta (Ach.) Ach. — Corticolous on Maple. McMullin 22364 (VIII). S5.
Lecanora thysanophora R.C. Harris — Corticolous on Green Ash, Red Oak, and Sugar Maple. McMullin
12532 (XI), 22358 (VIII), Wegenschimmel 232 (IX), 256 (XIV), 289 (XV). S5.
*Lepraria caesiella R.C. Harris — Corticolous on Abies balsamea (L.) Mill. (Balsam Fir) and Tsuga
canadensis (L.) Carrière (Eastern Hemlock). Maloles 43 (IV), McMullin 22342 TLC, 22348 TLC (VIII),
Wegenschimmel 316 (XIV). S4S5. TLC: atranorin, pallidic acid, and zeorin.
Lepraria finkii (B. de Lesd.) R.C. Harris — Terricolous, lignicolous on hardwood and corticolous on
the base of Eastern White Cedar and Picea glauca (Moench) Voss (White Spruce). McMullin 22340
TLC (I), 22352 TLC (VI), Wegenschimmel 207 (IV), 265 (VIII), 283 (IV), 288 (XV). S5. TLC: atranorin,
stictic acid, and zeorin.
Melanelixia subaurifera (Nyl.) O. Blanco, A. Crespo, Divakar, Essl., D. Hawks., & Lumbsch — Corticolous
on an Eastern White Cedar snag, Malus sp. (Crabapple), and Rhamnus cathartica L. (European
Buckthorn). McMullin 12520 (IV), 22381 (XIII), Wegenschimmel 237 (XIV). S5.
*Multiclavula mucida (Pers.) R.H. Petersen — Lignicolous on a rotting log (hardwood). Maloles 62
(VIII), McMullin 22389 (VIII), Wegenschimmel 266 (VIII). S4?
Myelochroa aurulenta (Tuck.) Elix & Hale — Corticolous on Sugar Maple. Maloles 46 (II). S5.
*Myriolecis dispersa (Pers.) Śliva, Zhao Xin, & Lumbsch — Saxicolous (calcareous). McMullin 12551
(III). S5. Notes: granules in the epihymenium not dissolving in nitric acid or potassium hydroxide.
Ochrolechia arborea (Kreyer) Almb. — Corticolous on hardwood snag. McMullin 12539 (XI), Wegenschimmel
296 (I). S4S5.
†Ovicuculispora parmeliae (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Etayo — Lichenicolous on Physcia sp. McMullin
22373 (VI). S4, S5.
Parmelia sulcata Taylor — Corticolous on Crabapple, Cherry, Freeman Maple, Staghorn Sumac, Sugar
Maple, and White Ash. Maloles 23 (XV), McMullin 22402 (XIII), 12561 (V), Wegenschimmel 230
(IX), 317 (XIII). S5.
Peltigera elisabethae Gyeln. — Terricolous. McMullin 22409 (VIII). S5.
Peltigera evansiana Gyeln. — Terricolous. Maloles 63 (VIII), McMullin 22394 (VIII). S4.
Peltigera neckeri Hepp ex Müll. Arg. — Terricolous with moss. Wegenschimmel 176 (VIII). S5.
Peltigera praetextata (Flörke ex Sommerf.) Zopf — Terricolous and bryicolous on hardwood log and
stump. Maloles 50 (II), McMullin 12566 (IV), 22354 (VIII), 22395 (VIII), Wegenschimmel 174 (VIII),
212 (VIII), 213 (XIV), 275 (IV). S5.
Pertusaria macounii (Lamb) Dibben — Corticolous on Bur Oak. Wegenschimmel 181TLC (II). S4. TLC:
stictic acid complex, 2,7-dichloroxanthone, and unknowns.
†Phaeocalicium curtisii (Tuck.) Tibell — Corticolous on Staghorn Sumac. McMullin 22356 (VII), Wegenschimmel
190 (III). S5.
†Phaeocalicium polyporaeum (Nyl.) Tibell — Fungicolous on Trichaptum biforme (Fr.) Ryvarden
(Violet-Toothed Polypore). Maloles 53 (II), 59 (VIII), McMullin 22378 (VIII), Wegenschimmel 182
(II). S4?
Phaeophyscia ciliata (Hoffm.) Moberg — Corticolous on Maple. McMullin 22361 (XIII). S4.
Phaeophyscia kairamoi (Vain.) Moberg — Corticolous on Black Maple. McMullin 12537 (XI). S3?
Phaeophyscia orbicularis (Neck.) Moberg — Saxicolous (calcareous), corticolous on Ash and Sugar
Maple. McMullin 12549 (III), 22391 (XIII), Wegenschimmel 210 (IX), 298 (XV). SNR.
Phaeophyscia pusilloides (Zahlbr.) Essl. — Corticolous on Freeman Maple, Sugar Maple, and White
Ash. Maloles 32 (III), McMullin 12528 (IV), 22374 (XIII), Wegenschimmel 201 (IX), 243 (XIII), 315
(XV). S5.
Phaeophyscia rubropulchra (Degel.) Essl. — Corticolous on Freeman Maple and Sugar Maple. Maloles
30 (I), 70 (IX), McMullin 12541 (XI), 22411 (X), Wegenschimmel 231 (IX), 244 (XIV), 285 (XV),
309 (VIII), 313 (XV). S5.
Physcia adscendens H. Olivier — Corticolous on Cherry, Crabapple, Maple, and Staghorn Sumac. Maloles
20 (XV), McMullin 12547 (VII), 22371 (XIII), 22380 (XIII). S5.
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
14
Physcia aipolia (Ehrh. ex Humb.) Fürnr. — Corticolous on Black Maple, a Butternut snag, Green Ash,
and Sugar Maple. Maloles 34 (III), 71 (IX), McMullin 22347TLC (I), Wegenschimmel 253 (XIV), 281
(IV), 323 (XIV). S5. TLC: unknown fatty acids running below norstictic acid.
Physcia millegrana Degel. — Corticolous on Cherry, Freeman Maple, Sugar Maple, and White Ash.
Maloles 18 (XV), 27 (I), McMullin 12565 (V), 22370 (XIII), Wegenschimmel 205 (VIII), 218 (XIV),
240 (IX), 242 (XIII), 287 (XV), 321 (XIII). S5.
Physcia stellaris (L.) Nyl. — Corticolous on Sugar Maple and White Ash. Maloles 12 (XV), McMullin
12562 (V). S5.
Physciella chloantha (Ach.) Essl. — Corticolous on an Ash snag, Crataegus sp. (Hawthorn), Sugar
Maple, and White Ash. McMullin 22396 (XII), 22401 (I), 22412 (XI), Wegenschimmel 254 (XIV),
277 (XV), 302 (II). S4?
Physciella melanchra (Hue) Essl. — Corticolous on Sugar Maple and hardwood. McMullin 22355 (XI),
12543 (VII), Wegenschimmel 200 (IX), 206 (IV), 208 (VIII), 236 (IX), 292 (III), 306 (VIII). S4?
Physconia detersa (Nyl.) Poelt — Corticolous on Freeman Maple, Hawthorn, Sugar Maple, and White
Birch. Maloles 37 (III), McMullin 22408 TLC (XII), Wegenschimmel 235 (IX), 260 (XIII). S5. TLC:
variolaric acid.
*Physconia enteroxantha (Nyl.) Poelt — Corticolous on Freeman Maple and Black Maple. McMullin
22344 TLC (XI), Wegenschimmel 276 (IV), 246 TLC (XIII). S4? TLC: secalonic acid.
*Physconia leucoleiptes (Tuck.) Essl. — Corticolous on Ash and a deciduous shrub. McMullin 22346TLC
(I), 22345TLC (I). S4. TLC: secalonic acid.
Placynthiella icmalea (Ach.) Coppins & P. James — Lignicolous on Eastern White Cedar. Wegenschimmel
151TLC (IV), 152TLC (VIII). S4. TLC: gyrophoric acid.
*Porpidia albocaerulescens (Wulfen) Hertel & Knoph — Saxicolous (non-calcareous). Wegenschimmel
175 (III). S4S5.
Porpidia crustulata (Ach.) Hertel & Knoph — Saxicolous (non-calcareous). McMullin 22341TLC (XII).
S5. TLC: stictic acid.
Protoblastenia rupestris (Scop.) J. Steiner — Saxicolous (calcareous). McMullin 12527 (IV). S5.
Protoparmeliopsis muralis (Schreb.) M. Choisy — Saxicolous. Wegenschimmel 180 (IX). S5.
*Punctelia bolliana (Müll.Arg.) Krog — Corticolous on Fraxinus pennsylvanica. Maloles 58 (VIII). S4,
S5.
Punctelia rudecta (Ach.) Krog — Corticolous on Freeman Maple, Red Oak, and Sugar Maple. Maloles
45 (II), 61 (VIII), 68 (IX), McMullin 12533 (XI), Wegenschimmel 223 (IX). S5.
*Ramalina intermedia (Delise ex Nyl.) Nyl. — Lignicolous on Freeman Maple. Maloles 65 (VIII). S5.
*Rinodina tephraspis (Tuck.) Herre — Saxicolous (non-calcareous). McMullin 22369 (VI). S4.
*Ropalospora viridis (Tønsberg) Tønsberg — Corticolous on American Beech, Balsam Fir, and Maple.
Maloles 33 (III), 48 (II), McMullin 22343TLC (VIII), 22351TLC (VIII), 22353 TLC (XI), Wegenschimmel
197 (II), 211 (VIII). S4, S5. TLC: perlatolic acid.
Sarcogyne hypophaea (Nyl.) Arnold — Saxicolous (non-calcareous). McMullin 12524 (IV), Wegenschimmel
225 (IX), 291 (III), 319 (XIII). SU.
Sarcogyne regularis Körb. — Saxicolous (calcareous). McMullin 12550 (III), 22422 (XII). S5.
*Strigula stigmatella (Ach.) R.C. Harris — Bryicolous and saxicolous. McMullin 22393 (VI). S4, S5.
Trapelia placodioides Coppins & P. James — Saxicolous (non-calcareous). McMullin 12559 (III),
22397 (X), Wegenschimmel 215 (XIII). S5.
*Trapeliopsis flexuosa (Fr.) Coppins & P. James — Lignicolous on old fence post. Wegenschimmel 172
(XIII). S4S5.
***Verrucaria dolosa Hepp — Saxicolous (non-calcareous). McMullin 22419 (VI), 22420 (VI), Wegenschimmel
185 (III), 186 (XIII), 199 (XIII), 300 (XV), 203 (XIV). SNR. Notes: Distinguished from
similar species of Verrucaria on non-calcareous rocks by its thin thallus (25–50 μm thick) that is
continuous (not forming areoles) and green to olive-brown ascospores that are 1-celled and 15–17.5
× 6.5–8.5 μm, and small (100–150[–180] μm wide) semi-immersed to prominent perithecia with a
colourless excipulum (Fig. 4A, Krzewicka 2012). Although this species is reported for the first time in
Canada, it is common in RNUP.
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
15
*Verrucaria muralis Ach. — Saxicolous on concrete. McMullin 22421 (XI), 22423 (XII). S5.
*Verrucaria nigrescens Pers. — Saxicolous (calcareous). Wegenschimmel 156 (VIII). S5.
*** Verrucaria phloeophila Breuss — Corticolous on Eastern White Cedar. Wegenschimmel 177 (XIV),
178 (XIII). SNR. Notes: This species is characterized by its corticolous substrate, an involucrellum
that is indistinguishable from the dark exciple (see inset of Fig. 4C), a dark exciple throughout when
perithecia are mature, and large ascospores (25–30 × 12–14 μm) (Fig. 4C, Lendemer and Breuss
2009).
**Verrucaria praetermissa (Trevis.) Anzi — Saxicolous (non-calcareous). Wegenschimmel 173 (XIV),
241 (XIII). SNR. Notes: Distinguished from other Verrucaria species on non-calcareous rocks by a
well-developed thallus with a grey-brown matt upper surface, a continuous black basal layer (see inset
of Fig. 4E), immersed perithecia that are not in mounds on the thallus, and ascospores that are 18–23
× 7–13 μm (Fig. 4E, Krzewicka 2012).
Viridothelium virens (Tuck. ex Michen.) Lücking — Corticolous on American Beech. Maloles 36 (III),
54 (II), McMullin 22405 (I), Wegenschimmel 195 (IX), 303 (II). S3. Notes: specimens were all sterile.
Xanthomendoza fallax (Arnold) Søchting, Kärnefelt & S.Y. Kondr. — Corticolous on a Butternut
Snag, Green Ash, and Sugar Maple. Maloles 15 (XV), McMullin 12544 (VII), 22399 (XIII), Wegenschimmel
202 (IX), 204 (VIII), 216 (XIII). S5.
Xanthomendoza hasseana (Räsänen) Søchting — Corticolous on Maple. McMullin 22376 (XIII). S5.
Xanthomendoza ulophyllodes (Räsänen) Søchting — Corticolous on Ash and Black Maple. Maloles 69
(IX), McMullin 12536 (XI), 22410 (X), 22415 (I). S4.
Xanthomendoza weberi (S.Y. Kondr. & Kärnefelt) L. Lindblom — Corticolous on Aspen. Maloles 19
(XV). S3.
Xanthoparmelia cumberlandia (Gyeln.) Hale — Saxicolous (non-calcareous). McMullin 12523 (IV).
S5.
Xanthoria parietina (L.) Th. Fr. — Corticolous on Maple. McMullin 22357 (XIII). SNR.
*†Zythia resinae (Fr.) P. Karst. — Resinicolous on Spruce. McMullin 12567 (IV). S4S5.
Discussion
The lichen and allied fungi biota in RNUP includes a high number of rare species (10). The
overall number of species discovered in the park (124) was surprisingly high as well, considering
the urban landscape surrounding the park and the many previous and current disturbances.
However, with no base-line data, it is impossible to know how this community of species compares
to historical ones. Now that there is a base-line, management strategies for rare species can
be developed and changes in populations can be monitored.
Comparisons to lichen communities in other areas in southern Ontario are also difficult to
make because of different ecosystems, disturbances, and sizes (see Table 3 for comparisons).
For example, the Carden Alvar Natural Area is the closest location (54.5 miles north) with a
comparable lichen and allied fungus survey (199 species) (McMullin 2019). Nonetheless, that
area is composed entirely of an alvar ecosystem that does not exist in RNUP. It is also a larger
area (31810 acres vs 19546 acres in RNUP), is far from an urban center, and it lacks Carolinian
forests and deep ravine ecosystems (McMullin 2019). The Arboretum at the University
of Guelph in the City of Guelph is the next closest park (55.5 miles west), and the only other
urban park that has been surveyed in the province (McMullin et al. 2014). It contains 104 species,
but it is smaller (408 acres) and the bedrock is calcareous, which many lichen species are
restricted to (McMullin et al. 2014, Lendemer and Harris 2008). Sandbanks Provincial Park is
94 miles east of RNUP and is the only other coastal park on the north shore of Lake Ontario
that has been surveyed (it contained 128 species) (McMullin and Lewis 2014). However, the
park is largely a dune ecosystem and it has calcareous rock outcrops, which are unlike any of
the ecosystems at RNUP. There appears to be no comparable areas in Ontario that have been
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
16
surveyed for lichens and allied fungi, so the effects of the urbanization cannot be inferred by
the communities in other areas.
Previous collections of lichens and allied fungi have been made in the GTA. McMullin et
al. (2018) summarized all known collections, most of which were made during four bioblitzes
in different watersheds within the GTA. They compiled all historical records with those made
during the bioblitzes and reported 180 species. We discovered an additional 33 species that had
not previously been reported and increase the number of known lichens and allied fungi in the
GTA to 213.
The old forest stands in and around the deep ravines at the southern end of the park contained
the greatest number of rare species (see Fig. 1). The steep slopes of the ravines likely
prevented large scale timber harvesting in the past, and the lichen and allied fungus communities
were preserved except for species that were negatively affected by air pollution.
Rouge National Urban Park is Canada’s only national urban park and, once fully developed,
it will be the largest urban park in North America. The ecological integrity in the park has been
affected considerably by past and current settlement and recreation activities. The park is surrounded
by a dynamic urban environment, including residential, industrial, and commercial
developments and infrastructure such as roads, highways, rail lines, hydro corridors, regional
water mains, pipelines, and sewers that traverse all parts of the park and have the ability to
greatly impact the ecological integrity of RNUP (PCA 2019, 2021). However, since the park was
established in 2015, there have been at least 72 ecological restoration and farmland enhancement
projects completed, in partnership with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Indigenous
partners, and park farmers (PCA 2021). The results include the restoration of more than 173
acres of aquatic habitat, more than 67 acres of forest habitat, 5 acres of meadow habitat, and the
planting of more than 126,000 native trees, perennials, shrubs and aquatic plants (PCA, 2021).
Based on these restoration projects and the improved air quality in the GTA in recent decades
(Ministry of the Environment 2014), we expect the lichen and allied fungus biota to increase in
the park. Future monitoring of the rare species is recommended. Our study shows that, despite
their sensitivities, many lichens and their related fungi can colonize and persist in urban environments
when suitable habitat is available.
Table 3. Survey results from studies of lichens and allied fungi in southern Ontario parks with similar
search effort to that of the study in Rouge National Urban Park.
0 19546 124 -
54.5 31810 199 McMullin 2019
55.5 408 104 McMullin et al. 2014
57 4398 154 McMullin and Lendemer 2013
80 7203 203 McMullin and Lendemer 2016
94 3832 128 McMullin and Lewis 2014
138 12884 280 Lewis 2020
Location
Approximate
distance from
RNUP (miles)
Area
(acres)
Rouge Urban National Park
Carden Alvar Natural Area
Arboretum at the University
of Guelph
Copeland Forest Resource
Management Area
Awenda Provincial Park
Sandbanks Provincial Park
Frontenac Provincial Park
Number
of Species Reference
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
17
Acknowledgements
Thank you to the organisers of the 2013 Ontario BioBlitz and to two anonymous reviewers for helpful
suggestions. Fieldwork conducted in 2020 was completed under the Parks Canada Agency research and
collection permit number 2020-37017.
Literature Cited
Allen, J.L., and N.M. Howe. 2016. Landfill Lichens: A checklist for Freshkills Park, Staten Island, New
York. Opuscula Philolichenum 15:82–91.
Allen, J.L., and J.C. Lendemer. 2016. Climate change impacts on endemic, high-elevation lichens in a
biodiversity hotspot. Biodiversity and Conservation 22:555–568.
Allen, J.L., and J.C. Lendemer. 2021. Urban Lichens: A field guide for Northeastern North America. Yale
University Press, New Haven, CT, USA. 168 pp.
Barnett, P.J., D.R. Sharpe, H.A.J. Russell, T.A. Brennand, G. Gorrell, F. Kenny, and A. Pugin. 1998. On
the origin of the Oak Ridges Moraine. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 35:1152–1167.
Bell-Doyon, P., S.B. Selva, and R.T. McMullin. 2021. Calicioid fungi and lichens from an unprotected
intact boreal forest ecosystem in Québec. Écoscience 28:127–136.
Bohdan, A. 2014. The importance of passive protection to preservation of lichens — relics of the primeval
forests in the Białowieża Forest. Przegląd Przyrodniczy 25:151–161.
Brodo, I.M., R.C. Harris, W. Buck, J. C. Lendemer, and C. Lewis. 2013. Lichens of the Bruce Peninsula,
Ontario: Results from the 17th Tuckerman Workshop, 18–22 Sept. 2008. Opuscula Philolichenum
12:198–232.
Brodo, I.M., R.E. Lee, C. Freebury, P.Y. Wong, C.L. Lewis, and R.T. McMullin. 2021. Additions to the
lichens and lichenicolous fungi of the Ottawa region in Ontario and Quebec, with reflections on a
changing biota. Canadian Field Naturalist 135:1–27.
Brodo, I.M., S.D. Sharnoff, and S. Sharnoff. 2001. Lichens of North America. Yale University Press, New
Haven, CT, USA. 795 pp.
Brummitt, R.K., and C.E. Powell (Eds.). 1992. Authors of Plant Names. Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew,
Greater London, UK. 732 pp.
Cameron, R.P., T. Neily, and D.H.S. Richardson. 2007. Macrolichen indicators of air quality for Nova
Scotia. Northeastern Naturalist 14:1–14.
Culberson, C.F., and H. Kristinsson. 1970. A standardized method for the identification of lichen products.
Journal of Chromatography 46:85–93.
Ekman, S. 1996. The corticolous and lignicolous species of Bacidia and Bacidina in North America.
Opera Botanica 127:1–148.
Esslinger, T.L. 2019. A cumulative checklist for the lichen-forming, lichenicolous and allied fungi of the
continental United States and Canada, Version 23. Opuscula Philolichenum 18:102–378.
Government of Canada. 2017. Canadian climate normal 1981–2010 station data — Toronto. Available
online at https://tinyurl.com/hj4uggl. Accessed 12 Februrary 2021.
Government of Ontario. 2014. Smog advisory statistics. Available online at http://airqualityontario.com.
Accessed 12 Frebruary 2021.
Government of Ontario. 2015. Air quality in Ontario: 2015 report. Government of Ontario, Toronto, ON,
Canada. 37 pp.
Harris, R.C., and D. Ladd. 2005. Preliminary draft: Ozark lichens: Enumerating the lichens of the Ozark
Highlands of Arkansas, Kansas, Illinois, Missouri, and Oklahoma. Prepared for the 14th Tuckerman
Lichen Workshop, Eureka Springs, AR, USA. 249 pp.
Henderson, A. 2000. Literature on air pollution and lichens XLIX. The Lichenologist 32:89–102.
Henry, M., and P. Quinby. 2010. Ontario’s Old-Growth Forests. Fitzhenry & Whiteside, Markham, ON,
Canada. 232 pp.
Hilmo, O., and S.M. Såstad. 2001. Colonization of old-forest lichens in a young and an old boreal Picea
abies forest: An experimental approach. Biological Conservation 102:251–259.
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
18
Krzewicka, B. 2012. A revision of Verrucaria s.l. (Verrucariaceae) in Poland. Polish Botanical Studies
27:1−141.
Lendemer, J.C., and O. Breuss. 2009. Verrucaria thujae (Verrucariaceae, Lichenized Ascomycetes), a new
corticolous species from the Great Lakes Region of North America. Opuscula Philolichenum 7:13–16.
Lendemer, J.C,. and R.C. Harris. 2008. Keys to Lime Loving Lichens. Institute of Systematic Botany, The
New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, USA. 23 pp.
Lewis, C.J. 2020. Checklist of the lichens and allied fungi of Frontenac Provincial Park, Ontario. Rhodora
121:248–296.
McMullin, R.T. 2019. Lichens and allied fungi added to the list of rare species inhabiting the Carden
Alvar Natural Area, Ontario. Natural Areas Journal 39:212–225.
McMullin, R.T., L.L. Bennett, O.J. Bjorgan, D.A. Bourque, C.J. Burke, M.A. Clarke, M.K. Gutgesell,
P.L. Krawiec, R. Malyon, A. Mantione, A.T. Piotrowski, N.Y. Tam, A.C. Van Natto, Y.F. Wiersma, and
S.G. Newmaster. 2016. Relationships between air pollution, population density, and lichen diversity in
the Niagara Escarpment World Biosphere Reserve. The Lichenologist 48:593–605.
McMullin, R.T., K. Drotos, D. Ireland, and H. Dorval. 2018. Diversity and conservation status of lichens
and allied fungi in the Greater Toronto Area: Results from four years of the Ontario BioBlitz. The
Canadian Field Naturalist. 132:394–406.
McMullin, R.T., and J.C. Lendemer. 2013. Lichen biodiversity and conservation status in the Copeland
Forest Resources Management Area: A lichen-rich second-growth forest in southern Ontario. Canadian
Field-Naturalist 127: 240–254.
McMullin, R.T., and J.C. Lendemer. 2016. Lichens and allied fungi of Awenda Provincial Park, Ontario:
Diversity and conservation status. American Midland Naturalist 176:1–19.
McMullin, R.T., and C.J. Lewis. 2014. The unusual lichens and allied fungi of Sandbanks Provincial
Park, Ontario. Botany 92:85–92.
McMullin, R.T., J. Maloles, C. Earley, and S.G. Newmaster. 2014. The Arboretum at the University of
Guelph, Ontario: An urban refuge for lichen biodiversity. North American Fungi 9:1–16.
McMullin, R.T., D. Ure, M. Smith, H. Clapp, and Y.F. Wiersma. 2017. Ten years of monitoring air quality
and ecological integrity using field-identifiable lichens at Kejimkujik National Park and National
Historic Site in Nova Scotia, Canada. Ecological Indicators 81:214–221.
NatureServe. 2021. Conservation Status Assessment. Available online at https://www.natureserve.org/
conservation-tools/conservation-status-assessment. Accessed 12 Frebruary 2021.
Newmaster, S.G., R.J. Belland, A. Arsenault, D.H. Vitt, and T.R. Stephens. 2005. The ones we left behind:
Comparing plot sampling and floristic habitat sampling for estimating bryophyte diversity. Diversity
and Distributions 11:57–72.
Ministry of the Environment. 2014. Air Quality Ontario. Available online at http://www.airqualityontario.
com/. Accessed 12 February 2021.
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. 2022. Ontario Classified Point Cloud (Lidar-
Derived). Available online at https://geohub.lio.gov.on.ca/maps/mnrf::ontario-classified-point-cloudlidar-
derived/about. Accessed 22 April 2022.
Orange, A., P.W. James, and F.J. White. 2001. Microchemical Methods for the Identification of Lichens.
British Lichen Society, London, UK. 101 pp.
Paquette, H.A., N.B. Van Miltenburg, S.B. Selva, and R.T. McMullin. 2019. The calicioids of Forillon
National Park, Quebec, Canada. Opuscula Philolichenum 18:58–73.
Parks Canada Agency (PCA). 2019. Rouge National Urban Park Management Plan. Available online at
https://www.pc.gc.ca/en/pn-np/on/rouge/info/gestion-management/gestion-management-2019. Accessed
12 February 2021.
Parks Canada Agency (PCA). 2021. Multi-species Action Plan for Rouge National Urban Park of Canada
[Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Action Plan Series. Parks Canada Agency, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 57 pp.
Powell, G.V.N., J. Barborak, and M. Rodriguez. 2000. Assessing representativeness of protected natural
areas in Costa Rica for conserving biodiversity: A preliminary gap analysis. Biological Conservation
93:35–41.
Reid, W.V., and K.R. Miller. 1989. Keeping options alive: The scientific basis for conserving biodiversity.
World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA. 128 pp.
Urban Naturalist
R. McMullin, C. Cadranel, K. Drotos, J. Maloles, J. Skuza, and C. Wegenschimmel
Vol. 9, 2022 No. 55
19
Richardson, D.H.S. 1975. The Vanishing Lichens: Their History, Biology and Importance. David &
Charles Publishers, Newton Abbot, Devonshire, UK. 231 pp.
Richardson, D.H.S. 1992. Pollution Monitoring with Lichens. Richmond Publishing, Slough, Berkshire,
UK. 76 pp.
Richardson, D.H.S., and R.P. Cameron. 2004. Cyanolichens: Their response to pollution and possible
management strategies for their conservation in northeastern North America. Northeastern Naturalist
11:1–22.
Rose, C.I., and D.L. Hawksworth. 1981. Lichen recolonization in London’s cleaner air. Nature 289:289–
929.
Seaward, M.R.D., and M.A. Letrouit-Galinou. 1991. Lichen recolonization of trees in the Jardin du Luxembourg,
Paris. Lichenologist 23:181–186.
Selva, S.B. 2003. Using calicioid lichens and fungi to assess ecological continuity in the Acadian Forest
Ecoregion of the Canadian Maritimes. Forestry Chronicle 79:550–558.
Sharpe, D.R. 1980. Quaternary geology of Toronto and surrounding area. Available online at http://www.
geologyontario.mndm.gov.on.ca/mndmfiles/pub/data/records/P2204.html.
Accessed 1 July 2022.
Statistics Canada. 2017. 2016 Census of population. Available online at https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/
en/catalogue/98-316-X2016001. Accessed 1 July, 2022.
Sundin, R. 1999. Phylogenetic and taxonomic studies within Arthonia Ach. (Ascomycetes, Arthoniales).
Ph.D. Dissertation. Stockholm University, Stockholm, Södermanland, Sweden. 162 pp.
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA). 2015. Rouge National Urban Park — Terrestrial Biological
Inventory and Assessment. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Toronto, ON, Canada.
167 pp.
Tumur, A., and D.H.S. Richardson. 2017. The lichen-forming fungi in the Halifax Public Gardens, Nova
Scotia. Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science 49:35–48.
Tumur, A., and D.H.S. Richardson. 2019. The Lichens of Point Pleasant Park, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Northeastern Naturalist 26 (1):63–80.