Increasing Plant Diversity in Agropryon cristatum Rangeland
      
    Rachael G. Christensen1*, John R. Hendrickson1, and David Toledo1
      
    1USDA-ARS, Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory. Box 459, Mandan, ND 58554, USA. *Corresponding Author.
      
 
	  Praire Naturalist, Special Issue 2 (2025):93–101
    Abstract
Introduced species often become invasive and reduce biodiversity, endanger the health of the environment, and reduce resiliency of a grassland. Therefore, efforts to increase diversity of species are important. Burning, seeding, and use of herbicides are methods used to control unwanted plant species, though they are not often used together. We are reporting the use of burning, seeding, and herbicide treatments to establish native species into a rangeland invaded by Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. (Crested Wheatgrass). The study took place in the Grand River Grasslands, South Dakota. A total of 24 plots separated into 8 blocks of 3 plots similar in plant composition and soil type, were allotted to the study. At the beginning, 4 of the blocks were burned then seeding or chemical treatments were applied with one treatment per plot, as follows: seeding with native grass followed by spraying with glyphosate (SEEDCHEM); seeding with native grass only (SEED); and unseeded control (CON). Results showed percentage of introduced grasses significantly declined due to SEEDCHEM with a trend toward increased percentage native grass in both burned and unburned SEEDCHEM treatments. We showed improved nutritional quality of plots with increased percentage of native grasses that increased kilograms of crude protein per hectare. SEEDCHEM appears to be a way to improve grassland diversity and forage quality.
    
	
	   Download Full-text pdf
Download Full-text pdf 
	   
	   
  	
	
	
	
 
Prairie Naturalist
R.G. Christensen, J.R. Hendrickson, and D. Toledo
2024 Special Issue 2
93
2024 PRAIRIE NATURALIST Special Issue 2:93–101
Increasing Plant Diversity in Agropryon cristatum Rangeland
Rachael G. Christensen1*, John R. Hendrickson1, and David Toledo1
Abstract - Introduced species often become invasive and reduce biodiversity, endanger the health
of the environment, and reduce resiliency of a grassland. Therefore, efforts to increase diversity of
species are important. Burning, seeding, and use of herbicides are methods used to control unwanted
plant species, though they are not often used together. We are reporting the use of burning, seeding,
and herbicide treatments to establish native species into a rangeland invaded by Agropyron cristatum
(L.) Gaertn. (Crested Wheatgrass). The study took place in the Grand River Grasslands, South
Dakota. A total of 24 plots separated into 8 blocks of 3 plots similar in plant composition and soil
type, were allotted to the study. At the beginning, 4 of the blocks were burned then seeding or
chemical treatments were applied with one treatment per plot, as follows: seeding with native grass
followed by spraying with glyphosate (SEEDCHEM); seeding with native grass only (SEED); and
unseeded control (CON). Results showed percentage of introduced grasses significantly declined due
to SEEDCHEM with a trend toward increased percentage native grass in both burned and unburned
SEEDCHEM treatments. We showed improved nutritional quality of plots with increased percentage
of native grasses that increased kilograms of crude protein per hectare. SEEDCHEM appears to be a
way to improve grassland diversity and forage quality.
Introduction
Rangelands cover 40% to 50% of Earth’s total land area and are an important forage
resource for ~ 70% of the global domestic livestock (Brown and Thorpe 2008). Rangelands
also provide important ecosystem services beyond forage for livestock, such as food and
fiber, biological diversity, wildlife habitat, soil protection, and the ability to sequester greenhouse
gases (Sala and Paruelo 1997). The ability of rangelands to provide forage resources
for grazing, as well as ecosystem services, is dependent primarily on the health of the range
(Brown and Thorpe 2008; Toledo et al. 2014). Healthy range is dependent on attributes such
as soil and site stability, hydrologic function, and biotic integrity (Pellant et al. 2020). Plant
community composition has a strong influence on rangeland health attributes, especially
when unexpected species for a particular ecological site are present and when expected
functional and structural plant groups at a site have been altered (Pellant et al. 2020). The
more diverse a rangeland is with a greater number of native plant species in different functional
and structural groups, the more adaptable it is to variability in precipitation and other
weather dynamics (Ernst et al. 2023, Pokorny et al. 2005). It is therefore advantageous to
promote rangeland species diversity.
Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. (Crested Wheatgrass) was established on approximately
10 to 26 million acres (3.2–10.4 million ha) in the western U.S. (Zlatnik 1999) as an effort to
preserve soils in abandoned farm sites in the early 1940s. The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) National Resources Inventory (2018) reports Crested Wheatgrass foliar
cover of approximately 24% in sampled areas in the northern Great Plains of the USA (USDA
NRCS 2018). Crested Wheatgrass is a cool-season grass that is drought tolerant, palatable to
livestock, and easy to establish from seed, resulting in widespread use for both forage and
1USDA-ARS, Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory. Box 459, Mandan, ND 58554, USA. *Corresponding
author: rachael.christensen2@usda.gov.
Associate Editor: Shawn DeKeyser
Perennial Cool-Season Invasive Grasses of the Northern Great Plains
Prairie Naturalist
R.G. Christensen, J.R. Hendrickson, and D. Toledo
2024 Special Issue 2
94
conservation purposes. However, Crested Wheatgrass has been reported to decrease plant
(Henderson and Naeth 2005) and avian (Sutter and Brigham 1998) diversity compared to
native mixed grass prairies, and it lacks the nutritive capacity of native grass when utilized
by livestock. While it is not considered invasive in the warm and dry portions of the Great
Basin where it is present, Crested Wheatgrass may also be considered invasive in parts of the
northern Great Plains, making it a species of concern in many areas (Pellant et al. 2020).
Given that introduced grasses reduce biodiversity, plant succession, and cover, there is
great interest in developing strategies for restoring native perennial grasses (Corbin et al.
2004) and improving rangeland productivity and resiliency in Crested Wheatgrass dominated
communities.
Fire is part of the natural disturbance regime of Great Plains Grasslands (Anderson,
2006). Documented effects of fire include increases in plant diversity (Anderson 2006),
improvement in plant nutrient content (McGranahan et al. 2014), and wildlife habitat (Hovick
et al. 2015), as well as reductions of undesirable plant species (Twidwell et al. 2013).
These fire effects align with the interest of restoring native perennial grasses and improving
rangeland productivity and resiliency in Crested Wheatgrass invaded areas. This study was
conducted to document changes occurring in species composition, biomass, and nutritive
composition during and after a planned restoration by US Forest Service (USFS) on the
Grand River National Grassland district.
We studied two different methods of seeding native grass into burned and unburned
Crested Wheatgrass range and measured changes in plant species composition, biodiversity,
nutritive value, and forage production the first and third year following planting and compared
to unplanted control plots within burned and unburned blocks. A native grass mixture
was developed by the FS and seeded into the burned and unburned plots followed by spraying
with glyphosate or no spraying. Our study objectives were to evaluate if burning plus
seeding a native grass mixture with or without the application of glyphosate will decrease
the amount of Crested Wheatgrass while increasing native grass species, and to determine
if these treatments could increase the carrying capacity and nutritional quality of forage for
livestock.
Materials and Methods
This study was conducted in Perkins County, about 20 km southwest of Lemmon, South
Dakota, on the Grand River National Grassland (45° 44′ 9.6″ N, 102° 21′ 39.6″ W) operated
by the USFS. Vegetation was dominated by Crested Wheatgrass with an understory of
Bouteloua gracilis (Willd. ex Kunth) Lag. ex Griffiths (Blue Grama).
We randomly located four blocks on clayey ecological sites at the research location in
the spring of 2008 (Fig. 1). Each block contained six plots (18.3 x 27.4m) with three burned
on 17 April 2008 three left unburned. Three treatments were randomly applied to the three
burned and three unburned plots for each block. The treatments were (1) Seeded native
grass mixture followed by spraying with glyphosate (SEEDCHEM), (2) Seeded native grass
mixture only (SEED), and (3) Unseeded control (CON).
We seeded the treatments on 12 May 2008 using a no-till grain drill (John Deere 750
model). The seed mixture consisted of Andropogon gerardii Vitman (Big Bluestem; 0.54 kg/
ha), Nassella viridula (Trin.) Barkworth (Green Needlegrass; 2.02 kg/ha), Schizachyrium
scoparium (Michx.) Nash (Little Bluestem; 0.29 kg/ha.), Heterostipa comata (Trin. & Rupr.)
Barkworth (Needle and Thread; 0.43 kg/ha), Calamovilfa longifolia (Hook.) Scribn. (Prairie
Sandreed; 0.22 kg/ha), Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr. (Sideoats Grama; 0.27 kg/ha),
Prairie Naturalist
R.G. Christensen, J.R. Hendrickson, and D. Toledo
2024 Special Issue 2
95
Figure 1. Google Earth map of study section at Grand River Grasslands, near Lemmon, South Dakota,
indicating blocks, plots, and burned areas. Green NFS indicates National Forest Service land, white
PVT indicates private land.
Prairie Naturalist
R.G. Christensen, J.R. Hendrickson, and D. Toledo
2024 Special Issue 2
96
and Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) Barkworth & D.R. Dewey (Western Wheatgrass; 0.12 kg/ha).
Varieties were unknown. Seeding depth was 1.25 cm with no packing; seeding mixture and
rate was determined following FS recommendations. We sprayed glyphosate on plots assigned
SEEDCHEM treatment (2.33 L/ha) on 20 May 2008 prior to seedling emergence.
Meteorological data was downloaded from CLIMOD (High Plains Regional Climate
Center CLIMOD weather database, collected at the nearest weather station (Lemmon, SD)
for the historical and monthly precipitation and temperature for the dates of the study.
We estimated forage productivity using 4 1/8-m2-quadrats randomly placed in each plot.
The timing of sampling coincided with peak standing crop (late July–early August). All forage
material in each quadrat was cut to ground level, sorted by species, placed in paper bags
and dried to a constant weight at 60°C to estimate aboveground biomass in grams per species
per quadrat. We then calculated total number of grams present per species to determine
the percentage of each present species, then grouped collected species by native grasses
(NG), native forbs (NF), introduced grasses (IG), and introduced forbs (IF) for calculation
purposes. We observed 56 different species.
We combined dried biomass by species across replicates and then ground the forage
samples to pass a 2 mm screen (Thomas Wiley Laboratory Mill Model 4, Arthur H. Thomas
and Company, PA, USA). We analyzed biomass samples for the following forage nutritive
values following standard wet chemistry forage lab procedures: dry matter (AOAC, 1990;
Method 967.03), organic matter (AOAC, 1990; Method 942.05) neutral detergent fiber
(NDF; Van Soest et al., 1991), acid detergent fiber (ADF; AOAC, 1990; Method 973.18),
and total nitrogen (AOAC, 1990; Method 990.03). Nitrogen was converted to crude protein
(CP) using 6.25 N:CP factor. Total CP per plot and digestibility of organic matter using
nutritive values for the most common grass species were then calculated.
In vitro determinations of true dry matter disappearance (IVTDMD) were performed
only on grasses. Assays were performed in ANKOM DaisyII incubators (ANKOM Technology,
Fairport, NY). The modified McDougall’s buffer described by ANKOM was inoculated
with rumen fluid (4:1 ratio) collected from ruminally cannulated cows consuming bromegrass
hay. Filter bags (ANKOM F57 filter bags; 25 μm pore size; ANKOM Technology,
Fairport, NY) containing 0.5 g of sample were incubated for 48 h. After removal, bags were
rinsed in neutral detergent solution using an ANKOM200 fiber analyzer (ANKOM Technology,
Fairport, NY) to correct for microbial contamination (Varga et al. 1997).
Data were analyzed as a split-plot with burn as the main plot factor and treatment as the
sub-plot factor using PROC GLIMIX (SAS Institute Inc., 2012). We included a repeated
statement for year in the biomass analysis. Treatment means were considered significantly
different at p ≤ 0.10
Results
Total annual rainfall measured was 47.7, 50.9, 57.7, and 42.0 cm for 2008, 2009, 2010,
and 2011, respectively. Mean annual rainfall near the study site was 130% of the long-term
average for the years of the study. The least precipitation occurred in 2011 and was 109% of
normal. Mean yearly temperatures were greater than the historical mean for 2008, 2009, and
2011; but less than the mean for 2010. Maximum temperatures during the growing season
exceeded the 30-year average all years of the study from May to August, with the maximum
temperatures 106% of historical average maximum temperatures in July and August 2011,
shortly before and during the time of sample collection of peak biomass.
The SEEDCHEM treatment had a lower percentage (< 0.1%) of IG biomass compared
to the CON on both the burned and non-burned plots (Fig. 2). The percent IG biomass
Prairie Naturalist
R.G. Christensen, J.R. Hendrickson, and D. Toledo
2024 Special Issue 2
97
was similar between the burned (81.3 ± 2.6%) and non-burned (76.7 ± 2.9%) plots. Native
grasses (NG) comprised 12.5 ± 2.2% and 6.3 ± 1.2% of relative species composition of
burned and non-burned plots of the SEEDCHEM, respectively.
Though forbs were not planted, the effect of seeding treatment on forbs was measured.
Introduced forbs (IF) were a relatively minor part of the relative species composition in
the seeding year and 2011, however, 2009 had large quantities of sweet clover in all plots,
which skewed the results slightly for that year. Because of this artifact, there were no differences
(p > 0.1) between treatments or burns for IF. Introduced forbs made up 2.5 ± 2.2%
of the relative species composition in the SEEDCHEM treatment compared to 1.4 ± 0.01%
and 2.3 ± 1.4% in the SEED and CON treatments, respectively. There was no difference (p
> 0.1) in IF between burned and unburned plots.
Crude protein and digestible organic matter content for native grasses by plot give an
overall measure of potential livestock productivity due to treatment (Table 1). Plots that
had more crude protein were associated with more plant diversity, though differences were
Figure 2. Total biomass by plant group for the third year following treatment. Treatments are burned or
unburned and seeded followed by glyphosate treatment, burned or unburned seeded only, and burned
or unburned control with no seeding or chemical treatment. Biomass was calculated as grams per
species per meter with species grouped by native grass (NG), native forb (NF), introduced grass (IG)
or introduced forb (IF). Only the seed+chem treatment was significant for native forb and introduced
grass, p < 0.10, indicated by the asterisk.
Table 1. Treatment effect on crude protein mass, biomass, and mass of organic matter for two seeding
treatments compared to control plots on the Grand River National Grasslands near Lemmon, South
Dakota. Means for each nutrient within a year and between treatment types is given in kg/ha (SD),
with different lowercase letters indicating significant statistical mean s (p < 0.10).
Nutrients by Year Control Seed Seed and Chemical
2009
Crude protein 120.2 (29.3) 104.6 (28.6) 104.6 (47.2)
Total biomass 3494.7 (19.3)b 2881.5 (7.6)b 5001.3 (30.3)a
Digestible organic matter 1462.9 (228.3)a 1266.6 (497.2)b 1476,3 (460.6)a
2011
Crude protein 227.4 (22.1) 188.6 (37.9) 215.1 (66.3)
Total biomass 3834.5 (5.0)a 3312.9 (7.5)b 4242.9 (10.6)a
Digestible organic matter 1228.1 (139.5) 1015.9 (345.9) 1131.3 (157.7)
Prairie Naturalist
R.G. Christensen, J.R. Hendrickson, and D. Toledo
2024 Special Issue 2
98
not significant for all treatments. Protein was higher the second year for all treatments, with
CON the highest (227 kg CP/ha; p < 0.10).
There were no differences (p > 0.1) in biomass production between burned and unburned
plots (Table 1). However, biomass was significantly different (p < 0.1) in all treatments in
2009, and the SEEDCHEM and CON treatments were greater (p < 0.1) than the SEED treatment
in 2011.
We found some native grasses assessed in this study were more digestible than Crested
Wheatgrass (Fig. 3). Both Big and Little Bluestem were greater (p < 0.1) in dry matter digestibility
both years than the other grass species (p < 0.1). Dry matter digestibility for Blue Grama
was not different (p > 0.1) by year, and was less digestible (p < 0.1) than the Crested Wheatgrass.
Figure 3. In vitro dry matter digestibility (dry matter basis) by grass species harvested following restoration of Crested
Wheatgrass invaded range using three different methods: glyphosate plus seeding with native grass, seeding only, or
control on burned and unburned plots. Different lowercase letters next to bars in each year cluster indicate significant
differences in digestibility, p ≤ 0.10.
Prairie Naturalist
R.G. Christensen, J.R. Hendrickson, and D. Toledo
2024 Special Issue 2
99
Discussion
The decline in IG biomass in the SEEDCHEM treatment and increase in NG in both the
burn and non-burned plots with the SEEDCHEM treatments suggests that the SEEDCHEM
treatment, regardless of being burned or not burned before application, reduced Crested
Wheatgrass competition to allow for some native grasses to establish, like what Pellant and
Lysne (1998) found. The lack of differences in biomass between SEED and CON treatments
can be attributed to the ability of Crested Wheatgrass to produce many seeds and the survivability
and success rate of these seeds (Marlette and Anderson 1986; Pyke 1990). Chemical
spray at seeding may have provided sufficient control of Crested Wheatgrass enough to allow
NG establishment (Archer and Pyke 1991; Wilson and Partel 2003), though additional
treatments and possibly adding grazing by cattle to the treatment process may prove more
successful than one single treatment and warrant further research. However, grazing alone
may not be sufficient, as Crested Wheatgrass can tolerate high levels of grazing pressure
(Caldwell et al. 1981; Laycock et al. 1981). The SEEDCHEM treatment could be a desired
method for improving diversity in rangelands as the improved biomass carried over for the
3 years of the study.
Since forbs were not planted, forb composition depended completely on the forbs already
present and the forb seed bank within the soil. The results suggest that forb abundance
could be potentially increased in SEEDCHEM treatments if NF were to be planted. Native
forbs can provide important forage to livestock as well as increase native plant diversity of
these invaded areas. Further research on the role of forb seeding in northern Great Plains
grasslands invaded by Crested Wheatgrass is warranted.
This study is unique from other rangeland restoration studies in that we used a nutritive
approach to determine effects of seeding treatments. Forages that are more digestible offer
more energy and nutrient absorption for livestock which can increase the carrying capacity
of the resource. The greater digestibility of the Big Bluestem and Little Bluestem compared
to the Crested Wheatgrass suggests that these native grasses could be focal species used in
restoring crested wheatgrass fields or invaded rangelands, though further research is warranted
in improving methods of establishment, as these seeded species were only present at
small increments in the plots following treatment when compared to the established Crested
Wheatgrass.
We noted a year effect on crude protein yield per plot (kg/ha) which was greater in 2011
but concurrent digestibility was lower. It is possible that the high temperatures present during
the late development phase led to an increase in protein accumulation in the plants’ tissues.
Normally this would increase digestibility, however, decreased digestibility indicates that the
hot conditions during storage and transport following collection may have negatively affected
digestibility, as a possible artifact of heating after collection but before plants could fully dry
for processing, causing a Maillard reaction of the protein to the fiber in the plant tissues. Heat
damage in forages has been associated primarily with alterations in forage protein digestibility.
A Maillard reaction is a heat-induced chemical reaction between protein (amino acids) and
sugars. Maillard products generally result in poorly characterized nutrients in forages in terms
of ruminant nutrition (Coblentz and Hoffman 2008). Conversely, the increased temperatures
present during collection may have indicated stress was occurring in the plants, and individual
digestibility measures were reduced due to this heat stress.
Positive increases in crude protein available per acre support seeding methods that
increase the native grass proportion of the plot. However, it is important to note that only
a few plots had NG proportions greater than 12%. Although these methods show potential
Prairie Naturalist
R.G. Christensen, J.R. Hendrickson, and D. Toledo
2024 Special Issue 2
100
for their use in restoration of grassland, one treatment with glyphosate may not have been
adequate. It is possible that further treatments with glyphosate may enhance the composition
of the treated plots to further improve native species composition.
Restoring native grasses in Crested Wheatgrass stands is difficult and expensive, which
makes finding effective restoration strategies important. We found the most effective strategy
to increase plant diversity in this study was seeding followed by an application of glyphosate,
regardless of fire use. This option would be attractive to managers in regions where burning is
contentious, or difficult to manage. Native species were increased in treatments compared to
control plots, though still well below 50% NG composition. Though differences between burned
and non-burned plots were not found in this study, fire can provide other ecological benefits
which were not measured here. Reestablishing native species presence in invasive-dominated
plant communities is especially difficult because the ecological processes necessary to keep
plant communities diverse may have been altered in a manner that favors the invasive species.
This study showed some methods of restoration that may help shift the plant species composition
despite the underlying challenges. The combination of seeding and chemical control seemed
to be the best method for improving nutritive contents and diversity of species on Crested
Wheatgrass dominated grassland, and burning did not appear to make a difference.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Andrew Carrlson, Yssi Entze, Kaitlyn Heick, Jacie Hauge, and John Mortenson
for forage collection, processing, and analysis, as well as maintenance of the plots and equipment
during the project.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities
based on race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status,
family status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal,
or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all
prohibited bases apply to all programs). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Mention
of commercial products and organizations in this manuscript is solely to provide specific information. It
does not constitute endorsement by USDA-ARS over other products and organizations not mentioned.
Literature Cited
Anderson, R.C. 2006. Evolution and origin of the central grasslands of North America: Climate, fire,
and mammalian grazers. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 133:626– 647.
AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemistry.
Arlington, VA.
Archer, S., and D.A. Pyke. 1991. Plant-animal interactions affecting plant establishment and persistence
on revegetated rangeland. Rangeland ecology & management/Journal of range management
archives, 44(6):558–565.
Brown, J. R., and J. Thorpe. 2008. Climate change and rangelands: Responding rationally to uncertainty.
Rangelands 30:3–6.
Caldwell, M.M., J.H. Richards, D.A. Johnson, R.S. Nowak, and R.S. Dzurec. 1981. Coping with
herbivory: Photosynthetic capacity and resource allocation in two semiarid Agropyron bunchgrasses.
Oecologia, 50(1):14–24.
Coblentz, W., and P.C. Hoffman.2008. Heat damaged forages: Effects on forage quality. Available
online at https://fyi.extension.wisc.edu/forage/heat-damaged-forages-effects-on-forage-quality
Accessed on 20 December 2023.
Corbin, J.D., C.M. D’Antonio, and S. Bainbridge. 2004. Tipping the balance in the restoration of native
plants: Experimental approaches to changing the exotic:native ratio in California grassland. In
Gordon. M., Bartol S. (Eds.) Experimental approaches to conservation biology, University of California
Press, Berkeley. 344 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520240247.003.0011
Prairie Naturalist
R.G. Christensen, J.R. Hendrickson, and D. Toledo
2024 Special Issue 2
101
Ernst, A.R., R.S. Barak, M-C. Glasenhardt, A.T. Kramer, D.J. Larkin, H.E. Marx, R.P. Kamakura,
and A.L. Hipp. 2023. Dominant species establishment may influence invasion resistance more
than phylogenetic or functional diversity. Journal of Applied Ecology 60: 2652–2664. doi.
org/10.1111/1365-2664.14534.
Henderson, D.C., and M.A. Naeth. 2005. Multi-scale impacts of Crested Wheatgrass invasion in
mixed-grass prairie. Biological Invasions 7:639–650.
Hovick, T.J., R.D. Elmore, S.D. Fuhlendorf, D.M. Engle, and R.G. Hamilton. 2015. Spatial heterogeneity
increases diversity and stability in grassland bird communities. Ecological Applications
25:662–672.
High Plains Regional Climate Center CLIMOD. Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University
of Nebraska-Lincoln. http://climod.unl.edu. Accessed 20 December 2023.
Laycock, W.A., and P.W Conrad. 1981. Responses of vegetation and cattle to various systems of grazing
on seeded and native mountain rangelands in eastern Utah. Rangeland Ecology & Management/
Journal of Range Management Archives, 34(1):52–58.
Marlette, G.M., and J.E. Anderson. 1986. Seed banks and propagule dispersal in Crested Wheatgrass
stands. Journal of Applied Ecology 2:161–175.
McGranahan, D.A., C.B. Henderson, J.S. Hill, G.M. Raicovich, W.N. Wilson, and C.K. Smith. 2014.
Patch burning improves forage quality and creates grass-bank in old-field pasture: Results of a
demonstration trial. Southeastern Naturalist 13:200–207.
Pellant, M., and C.R. Lysne. 1998. Strategies to enhance plant structure and diversity in Crested
Wheatgrass seedings. Proceedings Rangeland Management Restoration Society 38:81.
Pellant, M., P.L. Shaver, D.A. Pyke, J.E. Herrick, N. Lepak, G. Riegel, E. Kachergis, B.A. Newingham,
D. Toledo, and F.E. Busby. 2020. Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health, Version 5.
Tech Ref 1734–6. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Operations
Center, Denver, CO.
Pokorny, M.L., R.L. Sheley, C.A. Zabinski, R.E. Engel, T.J. Svejcar, and J.J. Borkowski. 2005.
Plant functional group diversity as a mechanism for invasion resistance. Restoration Ecology
13:448–459.
Pyke, D.A., 1990. Comparative demography of co-occurring introduced and native tussock grasses:
Persistence and potential expansion. Oecologia, 82(4), pp.537–543.
Sala, O.E., and J.M. Paruelo. 1997. Ecosystem services in grasslands. In: GC Daily (Ed). Nature’s
services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC, Island Press.
Sutter, G.C., and R.M. Brigham. 1998. Avifaunal and habitat changes resulting from conversion of
native prairie to crested wheat grass: Patterns at songbird community and species levels. Canadian
Journal of Zoology 76:869–875.
Twidwell, D., W.E. Rogers. S.D. Fuhlendorf, C.L. Wonkka, D.M. Engle, J.R. Weir, U.P. Kreuter, and
C.A. Taylor Jr. 2013. The rising Great Plains fire campaign: Citizens’ response to woody plant
encroachment. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11:e64–e71.
Toledo, D., M. Sanderson, J. Herrick, and S. Goslee. 2014. An integrated approach to grazing land
ecological assessments and management interpretations. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.
69:110A–114A. doi:10.2489/jswc.69.4.110A.
USDA NRCS. 2018. National Resources Inventory (NRI) Rangeland Resource Assessment. USDA
Natural Resources Conservation Service. Available online at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/national/technical/nra/nri/
Varga, G.A., and E.S. Kolver. 1997. Microbial and animal limitations to fiber digestion and utilization.
Journal of Nutrition 127:819S–823S.
Van Soest, P.J, J.B. Robertson, and B.A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent
fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science
74:3583–3597. doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.
Wilson, S.D., and M. Pärtel. 2003. Extirpation or coexistence? Management of a persistent introduced
grass in a prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology 11(4):410–416.
Zlatnik, E. 1999. Agropyron cristatum. Fire Effects Information System. U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Available
online at http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/graminoid/agrcri/all.html. Accessed 20 December
2023.