Site by Bennett Web & Design Co.
2007 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 6(3):461–470
Population Demographics of Hiodon tergisus (Mooneye) in
the Lower Tallapoosa River
Costas T. Katechis1, Peter C. Sakaris1,3, and Elise R. Irwin2,*
Abstract - We describe age structure, growth, and fecundity of Hiodon tergisus
(Mooneye) from the lower Tallapoosa River, AL. Mooneye (N = 49, 214–316 mm
total length, 79–284 g) were aged using otoliths, and a von Bertalanffy growth model
was derived for the species (L = 316, K = 0.285, to = -0.7). Growth rates of Mooneye
differed between the Tallapoosa River population and a previously studied population
from the northern extent of the species’ range (Assiniboine River, MB, Canada).
In addition, fecundity of Mooneye from the Tallapoosa River was similar to the
northern population, ranging from 5321 to 7432 eggs per female. Because the species
is declining throughout its range in Alabama, we recommend that managers use our
findings in conservation efforts. Future studies should investigate how hydrology
influences the spawning success and early growth and development of Mooneye in
regulated systems. More information about this species is needed regarding their
early life history, including early growth, survival, and habitat use.
Hiodon tergisus Lesueur (Mooneye) biology has been documented at
northern latitudes in the Great Lakes region and Canada (Glenn 1975a,
1975b, 1976, 1978, 1980; Glenn and Williams 1976; Johnson 1951). However,
in the southern extent of their range, Mooneye have been rarely studied
(Jandebeur 1972, Wallus and Buchanan 1989), and life-history characteristics
of Mooneye have not been reported in the Mobile River Basin (AL),
where they are becoming increasingly rare (Boschung and Mayden 2004).
Age structure, growth, and fecundity information are important for developing
conservation and management strategies for fish species of concern.
A life-history study of Mooneye is needed within the Mobile River Basin
of Alabama. Boschung and Mayden (2004) recommended that the status of
Mooneye be listed as special concern, primarily because abundance of the
species has dramatically declined, especially in the Mobile River Basin.
Habitat fragmentation and altered flow and water-quality regimes resulting
from dam construction, land-use activities, and the introduction of exotic
species have been implicated as major causes for the reduction of fish
diversity and distribution in Alabama rivers (Freeman et al. 2005). Mooneye
1Alabama Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, 3301 Forestry and Wildlife
Building, Auburn University, AL 36849. 2United States Geological Survey, Alabama
Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, 3301 Forestry and Wildlife Building,
Auburn University, AL 36849 3Current address - Southern Polytechnic State University,
Department of Biology, Chemistry, and Physics, Marietta, GA 30060. *Corresponding
author - firstname.lastname@example.org.
462 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 3
populations presumably only existed in the Cahaba River of the Mobile
Basin (Boschung and Mayden 2004), but we recently encountered a population
in the lower Tallapoosa River within the historical range of the species.
Fecundity of Mooneye has been estimated for northern populations (Glenn
and Williams 1976, Johnson 1951), but little fecundity information exists for
southern populations (Wallus and Buchanan 1989). Fecundity of Mooneye in
the Mobile River Basin has not been documented. Although otoliths have
been the preferred structures for aging a variety of fishes (Erickson 1983),
scales have been the only structures used for aging Mooneye.
The goal of this project was to describe the life history of Mooneye in the
lower Tallapoosa River, Alabama. Specific objectives were to develop
methodology for using otoliths to age Mooneye and evaluate the age structure,
growth, and fecundity of this species. In addition, we compared growth
rates and fecundity with a northern population from the Assiniboine River,
Mooneye is a silvery, insectivorous fish that has unusually large eyes
with adipose eyelids and an anal fin posterior to its dorsal fin origin (Mettee
et al. 1996). The anal fin has 26 to 29 rays, and the dorsal fin has 11 or 12
rays. Spawning generally occurs in late April and early May, and fish
typically spawn in clear, large tributaries over rocks and gravel shoals
(Boschung and Mayden 2004). Etnier and Starnes (1993) reported that adult
Mooneye exhibit upstream spawning migrations into clear rivers in Tennessee.
Female Mooneye lack oviducts; therefore, eggs are released into their
body cavities prior to being shed. Habitats of Mooneye include tailwaters of
locks and dams (Mettee et al. 1996), deep pools, backwaters of medium to
large rivers, and lakes and impoundments (Page and Burr 1991). Mooneye
are distributed from the St. Lawrence River (Canada) to the Mobile River
Basin, including the Mississippi River drainage and the Hudson Bay Basin
(Page and Burr 1991). In the Mobile basin, Mooneye have been collected
below the fall line in the Alabama, Cahaba, Coosa, and Tallapoosa rivers
(Mettee et al. 1996).
Adult Mooneye were collected from the Tallapoosa River below Thurlow
dam near Tallassee and Ft. Toulouse, AL (Fig. 1). Sampling was conducted in
spring, summer, and fall of 2002 and in spring and summer of 2003 using boat
electrofishing. Fish were euthanized in tricaine methanesulfonate (300 mg/L,
MS-222), placed on ice, and then brought to the laboratory for processing.
Total length (TL, mm) and weight (g) were recorded, and the sex of each
fish was determined. Saggital otoliths were extracted by cutting into the dorsal
2007 C.T. Katechis, P.C. Sakaris, and E.R. Irwin 463
surface of the head posterior to the eye using a scalpel. Otoliths were then
removed with forceps, dried, and placed in vials with appropriate labels.
Three 2-gram sub-samples of mature eggs were removed from anterior,
middle, and posterior sections within the body cavity of gravid females. Ten
randomly selected eggs from each sub-sample were measured using a calibrated
ocular micrometer to the nearest 0.01 mm to determine diameter
(10X, Olympus dissecting microscope, Model SZH - ILLK). After egg
diameters were measured, all eggs within the body cavity were removed,
weighed (i.e., total egg weight) and manually counted for fecundity estimation
(i.e., fecundity = total number of eggs in the body cavity of a female).
Because the body cavities of all gravid females were entirely full with eggs,
we assumed that females did not deposit their eggs before they were collected.
Eggs were placed into labeled jars with 5–10 percent formalin for
preservation (Murphy and Willis 1996). Eggs contained little connective
tissue; therefore, Gilson’s fluid was not needed to facilitate the disintegration
of connective tissue (Murphy and Willis 1996).
For aging, otoliths were burned on a hotplate (Model # HP - 46825,
Thermolyne Corporation, Dubuque, IA) for 30–60 seconds on medium heat
until they were light brown (Buckmeier et al. 2002). Otoliths were then
mounted in crystalbond mounting wax (40-8150, Aremco Products, Inc.,
Valley Cottage, NY) similar to the methods described by Nash and Irwin
(1999) for mounting Pylodictis olivaris Rafinesque (flathead catfish) otoliths.
After the crystalbond hardened, otoliths were ground to the nucleus with wet
sand paper (600 grit). During grinding, otoliths were frequently viewed under
a dissecting microscope (5–25X) to determine when the nucleus was visible.
After reaching the nucleus, a fiber optic light source was used to illuminate the
Figure 1. Study area and boat electrofishing sampling sites on the Tallapoosa River
near Tallassee and Ft. Toulouse, AL.
464 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 3
sectioned otolith and facilitate the discrimination of annuli. A drop of mineral
oil was applied to the otolith’s surface to enhance the visibility of annuli. Two
technicians, with numerous years of experience, recorded the number of
annuli with knowledge of only fish ID number and date of collection. All
discrepancies in age between readers were reconciled with concert reads (i.e.,
mutual examination; Buckmeier et al. 2002). We also attempted to use scales
to age Mooneye (N 20), but annuli were not distinct and interpretation of age
was difficult due to the presence of false annuli. After final ages were
determined, we used an image-analysis system to measure otolith radii (mm)
from the nucleus to each annulus and the outer edge of each otolith (Image-Pro
Plus®, Media Cybernetics, Inc., Silver Spring, MD). Total lengths at previous
ages were back-calculated using the direct proportion method (DeVries and
A von Bertalanffy (1938) growth model (Lt = L*[1-e-k (t – t
)]) was derived
for Mooneye using SAS (Statistical Analysis System, version 8, SAS Institute,
Inc., Cary, NC). Regression analyses were used to evaluate relations
between: 1) Log 10 (Wt) and Log 10 (TL), 2) otolith radius and TL, 3) TL and
Log 10 (age), and 4) Fecundity and TL. Relations were considered significant
at the = 0.05 level. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to
compare the slopes and elevations of TL-to-log (age) regressions between
Mooneye populations from the Assiniboine River (MB, Canada; Glenn
1975a) and the Tallapoosa River. We used analysis of variance (ANOVA) to
compare egg diameter among posterior, middle, and anterior sections within
the body cavity of Mooneye.
A total of 49 Mooneye (214–316 mm, 79–284 g) were collected from the
lower Tallapoosa River. The majority of Mooneye were collected during
March and April of 2002 and 2003 (40/49 [82%] of the sample; Table 1).
Catch per unit of effort was also highest during these months ranging from
0.61 to 1.34 fish per shocking hour (Table 1). Catch rates were very low in
May, June, and July of 2002 and 2003 (8/49 [16%] of the sample), and only
one fish was collected in fall 2002 (Table 1).
Ages of Mooneye ranged from 2 to 9 years. We collected 31 males, 12
females, and six fish with undeterminable sex. A relation between Log 10
(WT) and Log 10 (TL) was significant (P < 0.01); Log 10 (TL) accounted for
85% of the variability in Log 10 (WT) (r2 = 0.85; Fig. 2). Total length of
Mooneye was positively related to otolith radius (r2 = 0.54, P < 0.01). Backcalculated
lengths-at-age indicated that fish growth varied among year
classes (Table 2). The von Bertalanffy growth model predicted the following
lengths (mm) at age: 121 at age-one, 170 at age-two, 206 at age-three, 233 at
age-four, 254 at age-five, 269 at age-six, 281 at age-seven, and 290 at ageeight
(L = 316, K = 0.285, to = -0.7, P < 0.01).
2007 C.T. Katechis, P.C. Sakaris, and E.R. Irwin 465
A positive linear relation between mean TL and Log 10 (age) was significant
(P < 0.01); Log 10 (age) explained 99.8% of the variability in TL of
Table 2. Back-calculated mean total lengths (mm) at age for Mooneye (year classes 1993–2001)
collected from the lower Tallapoosa River (Alabama) below Thurlow Dam.
Year class N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
2001 4 142 220
2000 2 163 237 283
1999 7 139 201 251 275
1998 20 128 190 235 268 280
1997 6 121 174 215 251 280 292
1996 7 100 157 194 226 253 280 288
1995 1 91 145 190 220 250 270 294 316
1994 1 88 138 180 207 232 256 280 300
1993 1 83 113 147 168 202 228 251 269 291
Grand mean 117 175 212 231 250 265 278 295
S.D. 28.2 40.7 43.4 37.3 29.7 24.8 19.1 24.0
Table 1. Sampling periods, effort, and catch per unit of effort for Mooneye (N = 49) collected
from the lower Tallapoosa River (Alabama) below Thurlow Dam.
Year Month N Effort (shocking hours) CPUE (no. fish/hr)
2002 March 6 9.88 0.61
April 20 14.87 1.34
May 1 6.31 0.16
June 1 12.36 0.08
July 1 7.93 0.13
October 0 1.84 0.00
November 1 1.27 0.79
2003 March 10 9.25 1.08
April 4 5.70 0.70
May 5 13.57 0.37
June 0 5.46 0.00
July 0 1.99 0.00
Figure 2. Log
Log 10 (TL) regression
Mooneye (n =
b e l o w
on the Tallapoosa
466 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 3
Mooneye from the Tallapoosa River (Fig. 3). For Mooneye from the
Assiniboine River (Glenn 1975a), mean total length was also positively
related to Log 10 (age) (r2 = 0.998, P < 0.01; Fig. 3). The slope of the TL-to-
Log 10 (age) regression for Mooneye in the Assiniboine River (slope = 227.0)
was higher (ANCOVA: t = 6.20, P < 0.01) than the slope for the Tallapoosa
River population (slope = 192.3). Elevations of TL-to-Log 10 (age) regressions
were similar between the populations (Tallapoosa intercept = 117.2;
Assiniboine intercept = 110.2; ANCOVA: t = 1.93, P = 0.08).
On 17 April and 24 April 2002, three gravid females (271–299 mm TL,
192–260 g) were collected when water temperatures were 20 and 22 ºC,
respectively. In 2003, five gravid females (264–316 mm TL, 183–274 g)
were collected from 13 March to 1 May when water temperatures ranged
from 12 to 17 ºC. Ages of gravid females ranged from 3 to 8 years (mean ±
SD = 5.3 ± 1.7). Fecundity ranged from 5321 to 7432 total eggs (mean ± SD
= 6412 ± 847), and total egg weight ranged from 23.9 to 60.0 g per female
(mean ± SD = 42 ± 11). Fecundity was positively related to total length of
Mooneye (r2 = 0.67, P = 0.01). Egg diameter ranged from 2.16 mm to 2.77
mm; no significant differences were recorded among anterior (mean ± S.D. =
2.47 mm ± 0.24), middle (mean = 2.50 mm ± 0.22), and posterior (mean
= 2.49 mm ± 0.20) sections within the body cavities of the fish (ANOVA:
F = 0.02, P = 0.98).
Figure 3. Mean TL-to-Log 10 (age) regressions for Mooneye (n = 669) collected in the
Assiniboine River (Canada, Glenn 1975a) and for Mooneye collected in the
Tallapoosa River (AL; error bars = S.D.).
2007 C.T. Katechis, P.C. Sakaris, and E.R. Irwin 467
Our results demonstrated that Mooneye in the Assiniboine River
(Canada) grew faster than fish in the lower Tallapoosa River (Alabama).
Because our sample consisted mostly of Mooneye undergoing spawning
migrations, our results were slightly biased with larger and possibly faster
growing fish at younger ages (ages 2 and 3). For example, mean backcalculated
lengths at ages 2 and 3 were 175 and 212 mm TL, respectively
(Table 2); in contrast, mean lengths of age-2 and age-3 fish from the original
sample were 224 and 267 mm TL, respectively. Glenn and Williams (1976)
reported that only 23% of Mooneye were mature at age 3 in the Assiniboine
River. Therefore, we probably did not account for a large proportion of
immature two- and three-year-old fish, which likely resulted in the overestimation
of Mooneye growth in the Tallapoosa River system. However, fish
growth still appeared to be faster in the Assiniboine River than in the
Tallapoosa River. Faster growth in the northern population could have been
related to system-specific (biotic and abiotic) factors (e.g., food resource
levels and water quality). However, we hypothesize that growth of Mooneye
varies along a latitudinal gradient. Because our analysis was limited to only
two populations, Mooneye should be studied across their range to determine
if latitudinal variation in growth rate truly exists. Latitudinal variation in
growth rate has been observed in other fishes (Brown et al. 1998, Conover
and Present 1990, Conover et al. 1997, Schultz et al. 1996); fish from
northern populations have exhibited inherently higher growth rates than
their southern counterparts to counteract the negative effect of a shortened
growing season (i.e., countergradient variation in growth).
Longevity was similar between northern and southern populations.
Maximum age in the Assiniboine and Tallapoosa rivers was 9 years. Northern
fish were aged using scales, which may underestimate the ages of older
fish (Donald et al. 1992, Glenn 1975a). Fecundity appeared to be similar
between northern and southern populations. Fecundity of Mooneye ranged
from 4956 to 8912 ova per female in the Assiniboine River and 5321 to
7432 ova per female in the lower Tallapoosa River. Wallus and Buchanan
(1989) also reported similar fecundity estimates for Mooneye, ranging
from 3037 to 7773 eggs per female in the Tennessee and Cumberland river
systems. However, more fecundity data should be collected from Mooneye
in the Tallapoosa River to conduct a reliable comparative test among the
Glenn and Williams (1976) reported that the mean diameter of ripe ova
of Mooneye was 1.98 mm in the Assiniboine River. Mean diameter of eggs
of Mooneye from the Tallapoosa River ranged from 2.16 to 2.77 mm, which
was similar to the egg diameters reported for Mooneye in the Tennessee and
Cumberland river systems (2.0–2.5 mm; Wallus and Buchanan 1989). Glenn
and Williams (1976) found no significant differences among diameters of
eggs removed from anterior, middle, and posterior portions of the same
ovary, which was consistent with our findings. Our results indicated that all
468 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 3
eggs in our gravid females were ripe (i.e., fully mature), and these fish were
in close proximity to spawning. Because all eggs were at the same maturity
level, Mooneye were probably complete spawners releasing all of their eggs
at one time.
In early spring, Mooneye were typically collected from habitats that
appeared to be conducive for spawning (i.e., clear, flowing water, over rocky
or coarse substrate; Boschung and Mayden 2004). Furthermore, forty-four
of 49 fish (90%) were age-3 or older, indicating that most of our fish were
probably mature individuals either beginning or ending their spawning runs.
Wallus and Buchanan (1989) also suggested that Mooneye undergo spring
spawning migrations to flowing areas of the Tennessee River. Glenn and
Williams (1976) reported that spawning began after May 8 and was completed
by June 12 in the Assiniboine River. We did not collect any juvenile
fish (age-0 or age-1 fish); immature fish were probably occupying other
habitats while spawning fish moved into the sampling area.
Conservation and management implications
Fluctuating flows below dams may have negative impacts on Mooneye
populations, due to increased temperature variation, decreased prey abundance
(i.e., aquatic insects), and increased sedimentation and turbidity that
can strand larvae and smother eggs (Cereghino and Lavandier 1998,
Cushman 1985, Freeman et al. 2001). Irwin and Freeman (2002) proposed a
plan for adaptively managing regulated systems, which included providing
periods of stable flow during the spawning season that would potentially
enhance survival and development of fish larvae and juveniles (Freeman et
al. 2001). Moderate discharges are believed to facilitate egg transport downstream
and larval transport and feeding, whereas high and low flows are
considered detrimental to recruitment (Rulifson and Manooch 1990). Mooneye
eggs are buoyant and non-adhesive and develop as they drift in the
current (Boschung and Mayden 2004); therefore, this species probably requires
moderate discharges and stable flow conditions for successful egg
development. Future studies should investigate how hydrology influences
the spawning success and early growth and development of Mooneye in
regulated systems. In addition, flow requirements for successful recruitment
of Mooneye should be identified. More information about this species is
needed regarding their early life history, including early growth, survival,
and habitat use.
Mooneye populations may also be negatively affected by the presence of
predator species, specifically striped bass that have been landlocked due to
dam construction (Boschung and Mayden 2004). Several Mooneye were
observed in stomachs of striped bass from the Tallapoosa River (P.C.
Sakaris, pers. observ.), indicating that Mooneye may be vulnerable to striped
bass predation, especially during the spawning season. Because Mooneye
are declining throughout their range in Alabama, we recommend that managers
use our findings in conservation efforts.
2007 C.T. Katechis, P.C. Sakaris, and E.R. Irwin 469
This research was funded by the Alabama Department of Conservation and
Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries. We thank G.
Turner, S. Herrington, B. Ricks, and T. Piper for their contributions to this paper. The
cooperators of the Alabama Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit are: Alabama
Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University; Alabama Department of
Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries;
the Wildlife Management Institute; and the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Boschung, H.T., and R.L. Mayden. 2004. Fishes of Alabama. Smithsonian Books,
Brown, J.J., A. Ehtisham, and D.O. Conover. 1998. Variation in larval growth rate
among striped bass stocks from different latitudes. Transactions of the American
Fisheries Society 127:598–610.
Buckmeier, D.L., E.R. Irwin, R.K. Betsill, and J.A. Prentice. 2002. Validity of
otoliths and pectoral spines for examining ages of channel catfish. North American
Journal of Fisheries Management 22:934–942.
Cereghino, R., and P. Lavandier. 1998. Influence of hydropeaking on the distribution
and larval development of the Plecoptera from a mountain stream. Regulated
Rivers: Research and Management 14:297–309.
Conover, D.O., and T.M.C. Present. 1990. Countergradient variation in growth rate:
Compensation for length of the growing season among Atlantic silversides from
different latitudes. Oecologia 83:316–324.
Conover, D.O., J.J. Brown, and A. Ehtisham. 1997. Countergradient variation in
growth of young striped bass (Morone saxatilis) from different latitudes. Canadian
Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:2401–2409.
Cushman, R.J. 1985. Review of ecological effects of rapidly varying flows downstream
from hydroelectric facilities. North American Journal of Fisheries Management
DeVries, D.R, and R.V. Frie. 1996. Determination of age and growth. Pp. 483–508,
In B.R. Murphy and D.W. Willis (Eds.). Fisheries Techniques, 2nd Edition.
American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
Donald, D.B., J.A. Babaluk, J.F. Craig, and W.A. Musker. 1992. Evaluation of the
scale and operculum methods to determine age of adult goldeyes with special
reference to a dominant year-class. Transactions of the American Fisheries
Erickson, C.M. 1983. Age determination of Manitoban walleyes using otoliths,
dorsal spines, and scales. North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Etnier, D.A., and W. C. Starnes. 1993. The Fishes of Tennessee. The University of
Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN.
Freeman, M.C., Z.H. Bowen, K.D. Bovee, and E.R. Irwin. 2001. Flow and habitat
effects on juvenile fish abundance in natural and altered flow regimes. Ecological
Freeman, M.C., E.R. Irwin, N.M. Burkhead, B.J. Freeman, and H.L. Bart, Jr. 2005.
Status and conservation of the fish fauna of the Alabama River system. American
Fisheries Society Symposium 45:557–585.
470 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 3
Glenn, C.L. 1975a. Annual growth rates of Mooneye, Hiodion tergisus, in the
Assiniboine River. Fisheries Research Board of Canada 32:407–410.
Glenn, C.L. 1975b. Seasonal diets of Mooneye, Hiodion tergisus, in the Assiniboine
River. Canadian Journal of Zoology 53:232–237.
Glenn, C.L. 1976. Seasonal growth rates of Mooneye (Hiodion Tergisus) in the
Assiniboine River. Fisheries Research Board of Canada 33:2078–2082.
Glenn, C.L. 1978. Seasonal growth and diets of young-of-the-year Mooneye
(Hiodion tergisus) in the Assiniboine River, Manitoba. Transactions of the
American Fisheries Society 107(4):587–589.
Glenn, C.L. 1980. Seasonal parasitic infections in Mooneye, Hiodion tergisus
(LeSueur), from the Assiniboine River. Canadian Journal of Zoology 58:252–257.
Glenn, C.L., and R.R.G. Williams. 1976. Fecundity of Mooneye, Hiodion tergisus,
in the Assiniboine River. Canadian Journal of Zoology 54:156–161.
Irwin E.R., and M.C. Freeman 2002. Proposal for adaptive management to conserve
biotic integrity in a regulated segment of the Tallapoosa River, Alabama, USA.
Jandebeur, T.S. 1972. A study of the fishes of the Elk River drainage system in
Alabama and Tennessee. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Alabama, AL. 153 pp.
Johnson, G.H. 1951. An ecological investigation of the Mooneye Hiodion tergisus
(LeSueur). M.Sc. Thesis. University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Mettee, F.M., P.E. O’Neil, and J.M. Pierson. 1996. Fishes of Alabama and the
Mobile Basin. Oxmoor House, Inc., Birmingham, AL. 820 pp.
Murphy, B.R., and D.W. Willis (Eds.). 1996. Fisheries Techniques, 2nd Edition.
American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
Nash M.K., and E.R. Irwin. 1999. Use of otoliths versus pectoral spines for aging
adult flathead catfish. American Fisheries Society Symposium 24:309–316.
Page, L.M., and B.M. Burr. 1991. A Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes. Houghton
Mifflin Co., New York, NY.
Rulifson, R.A., and C.S. Manooch III. 1990. Recruitment of juvenile striped bass in
the Roanoke River, North Carolina, as related to reservoir discharge. North
American Journal of Fisheries Management 10:397–407.
Schultz, E.T., K.E. Reynolds, and D.O. Conover. 1996. Countergradient variation
in growth among newly hatched Fundulus heteroclitus: Geographic differences
revealed by common-environment experiments. Functional Ecology
Von Bertalanffy, L. 1938. A quantitative theory of organic growth. Human Biology
Wallus R., and J.P. Buchanan. 1989. Contribution to the reproductive biology and
early life ecology of Mooneye in the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers. American
Midland Naturalist 122(1):204–207.