Regular articles
Special Issues
Caribbean Naturalist
CANA Home
Range and Scope
Board of Editors
Staff
Editorial Workflow
Publication Charges
Subscriptions
Other EH Journals
Northeastern Naturalist
Southeastern Naturalist
Neotropical Naturalist
Urban Naturalist
Prairie Naturalist
Journal of North American Bat
Research
Eastern Paleontologist
Journal of the North Atlantic
eBio
On the Occurrence of Runt Eggs in Morelet’s Crocodile
Steven G. Platt1, Thomas R. Rainwater2,*, Ruth M. Elsey3, Nichole D. Bishop4, and Scott T. McMurry5,6
1Wildlife Conservation Society - Myanmar Program, No. 12, Nanrattaw Street, Kamayut Township, Yangon, Myanmar. 2Tom Yawkey Wildlife Center and Belle W. Baruch Institute of Coastal Ecology and Forest Science, Clemson University, PO Box 596, Georgetown, SC 29442, USA. 3Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge, 5476 Grand Chenier Highway, Grand Chenier, LA 70643, USA. 4School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. 5The Institute of Environmental and Human Health, Department of Environmental Toxicology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-1163, USA. 6Current address - Department of Integrative Biology, 521 Life Sciences West, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA. *Corresponding author.
Caribbean Naturalist, No. 75 (2020)
Abstract
Runt (abnormally small) eggs are widely reported in the avian literature, but the few reports available for crocodilians are ambiguous. From 1992 to 2000, we examined 3015 Crocodylus moreletii (Morelet’s Crocodile) eggs from 117 nests in northern Belize; 9 of these eggs met the criterion for runt eggs. Runt eggs occurred at frequencies (per egg and per clutch) comparable to those reported for wild birds, appeared to be deposited in no particular order within the clutch, and were seemingly viable in some cases. Most runt eggs appeared to be associated with small female body size. In comparison to those of birds, crocodilian runt eggs probably impose minimal energetic costs on females because the maternal investment can be partially recouped by consuming those that fail to hatch.
Download Full-text pdf (Accessible only to subscribers. To subscribe click here.)