Site by Bennett Web & Design Co.
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
1
Introduction
Anthropologists have increasingly recognized
the importance of relational ontologies in the study
of hunter-gatherer cosmology. For many huntergatherer
groups, relationships between humans and
other entities are conceived of as social, and serve
to define identities (e.g., Betts et al. 2012, 2015;
Descola 2013a, b; Hill 2011, 2013; Ingold 2006;
McNiven 2013; Pauketat 2012; Watts 2013; Zedeño
2009). This concept is often called “animism”, one
of Descola’s (2013a) four ontologies, or Amerindian
perspectivism (Viveiros de Castro 2004), but Hill
(2013:120) has recently labeled it simply as relational
ontology. In this paper, we consider that the
actions to participate in and maintain these relational
ontologies are historical practices (sensu Holly
2013, Sassaman and Holly 2011), which are simultaneously
reifying and transformative. One valuable
result of this perspective is that it situates the quotidian
actions of ordinary people as simultaneously
routine and agential. Like hunter-gatherer economic
practices, households and the dwellings that contain
them are bounded referents where we can visualize
the daily routines that are the loci of history (see
Betts 2009). It is within dwellings that much of the
social/ontological lives of hunter-gatherers were
enacted—where families and friends socialized and
strategized; where stories were told and histories
recounted; where religious rituals and rights were
observed. In the home, as elsewhere, these practices
were entangled in the material aspects of everyday
life—the production and use of material culture and
the preparation and consumption of food. It is in this
intersection of practices that dwellings become essential
spaces of inquiry. A relational and historical
approach to dwellings provides a means to examine
the social and cosmological aspects inherent in their
design, construction, and use.
The Wabanaki of the Maritime Peninsula
(Maine, the Maritime Provinces, and the Gaspé
Peninsula) were hunter-gatherers until well after
European colonialism. As we discuss below, ethnographic
and archaeological evidence indicates that,
like other Algonquin groups, Wabanaki cosmology
centered on social relationships between people
and particular animals who could sometimes share
the same perceptions, cognizance, and volition.
Hornborg (2008) has termed this non-dichotomous
view of human/non-human relationships a “sacred
ecology”, a term which refers specifically to the
Wabanaki sacred ontology and its relationships
to Algonquian cosmology. Ethnographically and
archaeologically, practices apparently similar to
the ones we describe below exist among other Algonquian
hunter-gatherers, suggesting a shared
cosmological framework and shared ontological
principles (Brightman 1993, Ingraham et al. 2016,
Martin 1978, Speck 1935). At present, the geographic
extent of these commonalities, especially
archaeologically, is not fully defined, and there were
clearly local ethnic differences that likely included
local relationships to specific animals (Ingraham et
al. 2016). Indeed, locally specific variations on this
basic framework may have themselves driven ethnic
distinctions. One way in which these local variations
were expressed was in “animal friendships” in
which a hunter or hunting group had an affinity for
a particular animal and for hunting that animal successfully
(Martin 1978:121−122, Tanner 1979:139);
these differences may account for some variability
in religious practice within a basic Algonquian cosmology
(see Hoffman 1955:489).
A Relational Approach to Hunter-Gatherer Architecture and Gendered
Use of Space at Port Joli Harbour, Nova Scotia
M. Gabriel Hrynick1,* and Matthew W. Betts2
Abstract - Dwellings are unique arenas in which hunter-gatherers meet socially on a daily basis. Increasingly, archaeologists
recognize that the relationships between people, entities, places, and objects form the basis of hunter-gatherer
ontology. The spatial patterning of dwellings and the activities within them are among the ways that relational ontologies
are expressed and maintained. We consider the gendered patterning of Maritime Woodland period architecture and space
at Port Joli Harbour as a way in which ancient Wabanaki, and in particular ancestral Mi’kmaq, may have expressed their
cosmologies. Consistency and variability in such patterning offers insight into how people maintained a sacred ecology.
Dwellings provide scales at which to consider these relationshi ps when tracking the role of history and tradition.
North American East Coast Shell Midden Research
Journal of the North Atlantic
1Department of Anthropology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, 13 MacAulay Lane, Annex C, Fredericton, NB
E3B 5A3, Canada. 2Canadian Museum of History, 100, rue Laurier Street, Gatineau, QC K1A 0M8, Canada. *Corresponding
author - gabriel.hrynick@unb.ca.
2017 Special Volume 10:1–17
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
2
Although ontological relationships were maintained
in part through a variety of specific ritual
practices and proscriptions, such as hunter–prey
rituals, offerings, prohibitions, and cleansing rites,
regional ethnographic accounts suggest that among
the most ubiquitous ways these relationships were
maintained was through daily adherence to a series
of gendered rules and proscriptions relating to actions
carried out within and around dwellings (e.g.,
Denys 1908, Hoffman 1955:211, Le Clercq 1910,
Speck 1997). On the Maritime Peninsula, these
dwelling floors are most visible at shell-bearing
sites (Sanger 2010), and represent an important and
understudied feature class for understanding the
social and spiritual lives of the people who made
shell-bearing sites on the Maritime Peninsula.
In this paper, we consider the organization
of Middle and Late Maritime Woodland period
(2400−400 B.P.) architectural forms and domestic
space at Port Joli Harbour. We present data that support
gendered dwelling-scale negotiations with the
broad Wabanaki cosmology outlined earlier. These
are evident as (1) the incorporation of ritual architecture
into domestic architecture; (2) the repeated
placement and orientation of dwellings within sites,
sometimes incorporating earlier architectural elements;
and (3) identifiable divisions of space within
dwellings, sometimes with a physical architectural
manifestation. We recognize that considering gender
in archaeology may be challenging, but is of tremendous
anthropological importance (e.g., Brumfield
2006). Although we have previously considered
Wabanaki gendered divisions of space within dwellings
based on ethnohistoric analogy (Hrynick et al.
2012), we herein move our discussion of gender to
include, in addition to divisions of space and correlated
activities, the construction of various structures,
and a range of intra-dwelling activities.
Our interpretations are informed by historical
process (sensu Pauketat 2001), which considers the
ethnohistorical record as part of an historical trajectory
that includes the Middle and Late Maritime
Woodland periods at Port Joli Harbour. In this paradigm,
historical accounts are not perceived as records
of static and unchanging prehistoric cultures,
but rather as part of a long-term and dynamic cultural
context that is part of a people’s history (e.g.,
Betts et al. 2012, Birch and Williamson 2015:5–10,
Ingraham et al. 2016, Sassaman and Holly 2011). As
such, ethnohistoric and historic accounts, critically
considered, may reveal important information to
inform the archaeological record (e.g., Betts 2009).
We interpret gendered actions within the dwelling as
local agential manipulations of Wabanaki cosmology
(defined here as a peoples’ conceptualization of
their place in the universe and their relationship to its
beings, informed by their broader ontology), which
served to maintain and modify relationships with the
natural world. The archaeology of hunter-gatherer
dwellings and domestic space offers avenues for
studies of hunter-gatherer historical processes and
relational ontologies. Therefore, we argue that consideration
of hunter-gatherer cosmologies is critical
for understanding domestic architecture and the use
of space. Of course, we recognize that other frameworks
of analysis and interpretation are useful; here,
we consider relational ontology as a novel means to
more fully explore the nature of domestic architecture,
especially in relation to cosmology.
Dwellings and Relational Ontology
As discussed by Descola (2013a:123–129), the
ways in which ontologies are constructed, lived,
and viewed are not universal among hunter-gatherer
groups. Nonetheless, as we (Betts et al. 2012) and
others (e.g., Descola 2013b; Hill 2011, 2013) have
recognized, relational ontology offers a potent
analytical framework for situating and analyzing the
cosmologies of many hunter-gatherer societies in
North and South America. In this paper, we use ethnographic
and archaeological evidence to support our
assertion that the Wabanaki cosmological system was
relational, and as such, it may be possible to identify
more narrowly some of the ways, places, and interactions
in which Wabanaki relational ontologies were
maintained. In many North American Aboriginal
ontologies, relationships between people and other
entities (e.g., organisms, landscapes, or objects) are
mutually defining (Watts 2013). These relationships
structure the perspectives from which people viewed
their world (Viveiros de Castro 1998).
As we discussed above, in many relational ontologies,
relationships between animals and humans
are viewed as social; animals are perceived as “nonhuman
persons” with the same spiritual and volitional
capacities as humans. These social relationships
must be continually maintained through ritual action
(Hill 2013), but humans have agency in how they
negotiate them and, in turn, can change how they
define and relate to animals and the world (Descola
2013b). Among hunter-gatherers, actions to maintain
proper relationships with animals include hunting
ritual, cleansing, and other overt ceremonies, but
may be most commonly perpetuated within actions of
peoples’ daily lives, often manifest as proscriptions
on certain actions, or “taboos” (Hill 2011). In many
hunter-gatherer societies, violation of such prohibitions
could result in unsuccessful hunts, illness, bad
weather, or other dangers, due to their deleterious
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
3
affect on important relationships. These are especially
well documented in Amazonia (e.g., Halbmayer
2012), the Arctic (e.g., Boas 1901:120–128, 142;
Sabo and Sabo 1985; Willerslev 2007), and the Subarctic
(e.g., Scott 1989, Tanner 1979), but also exist
among other hunting groups, such as Melanesian
hunter–horticulturalists (McNiven 2010). Many prohibitions
pertain to gender and interactions between
men and women. For instance, for the Rock Cree,
Brightman (1993:124–132) outlines gender prohibitions
and rules surrounding relationships between
men and women. An illustrative example is that the
Rock Cree avoid placing fur, meat, or bones on the
ground where women might inadvertently step over
them, an action which may adversely affect the success
of hunters, while other transgressions may cause
illness (Brightman 1993:125–126). Similarly, among
Baffin Island Inuit, interactions between hunters and
menstruating women can result in illnesses and hunting
failures (Boas 1901:120, 126–128), and for the
Mi’kmaq, maintaining successful hunting relationships
with bears requires adherence to gendered taboos
around the house when a bear carcass was present,
including bringing the bear into the side of the
tent, rather than through a door also used by women
(Le Clercq 1910:227).
Agency, manifest as people’s strategic negotiations
of and practices within ontological relationships,
is the mechanism by which history is made
(Pauketat 2012). Engagements with relational ontologies
are precisely the kinds of interactions between
people and structure that are historically generative;
as Sassaman and Holly (2011:3) suggest, “when the
cultural logic for motivating action makes reference
to the past, humans actively manipulate the ontological
structures that inflect history”. The processes
that define cosmologies are themselves historical,
and these processes create a long historical trajectory
in which elements persist and are agentially
modified. In cases of direct cultural descent, the ethnohistoric
record can be critically employed not as
an unchanged relic of previous times, but as a recent
expression of long and dynamic historical processes,
contextualized by the past (Betts 2009). Archaeologists
can therefore cautiously apply the ethnographic
record to the deep past to consider the ways in which
people acted to make their histories in context.
Among their myriad attributes, dwellings are
places where gender and age are reinforced and
displayed, often including actions involving specific
tasks, materials, objects, and spaces. In many
hunter-gatherer societies, the house may feature
women’s activities prominently alongside male ones
(e.g., Ackerman 1990, Giffen 1930), providing a
counterpoint to male-dominated economic activity
and tool production (cf. Endicott 1999), and thus offering
an opportunity to consider women’s roles explicitly.
Ethnographic accounts suggest that among
hunter-gatherers these considerations may include
architectural principles such as who assembles the
dwelling, the presence or absence of sub-features,
or symbolic orientations of the doorway and interior
spaces (e.g., Dawson 1995, Paulson 1952, Whitelaw
1994:231–232).
Dwellings are bounded areas in which people
converge to conduct daily activities, often in cosmologically
mediated ways. These actions may reflect
negotiations that occur in other social contexts, but
as these convergences occur, people engage with the
myriad functions and social implications of dwellings
and domestic space. As well as being social
arenas, hunter-gatherer dwellings are technological
articulations between people and their environments
(Ryan 2012). In this capacity, they have intertwined
economic (e.g., Binford 1990, Hayden 1997) and
social implications (e.g., LeMoine 2003, Rapoport
1969). Dwellings may also indicate identity or be
reminders of socially appropriate action at multiple
scales, thus mediating, enacting, or exemplifying
social relationships (Blanton 1994). If huntergatherers
engage with the environment and animals
relationally (e.g., Betts 2009; Betts et al. 2012; Tanner
1979), and they do this through proscriptions
on behavior and rituals that often take place in and
through dwellings, then the technological, social,
and ontological aspects of dwellings are inseparable
and can be best understood through a form of relational
ecology (Betts et al. 2015). Archaeological
patterning associated with built spaces can elucidate
both ritual and social practice, but changes in such
patterning over time may reveal historical processes
related to changing cosmology and/or social roles.
Wabanaki Sacred Ecology
Many indigenous societies constructed relational
ontologies between people, animals, landscapes,
objects, and or other entities via a non-dichotomous
system that did not exist as distinctly functional
or ritual (Descola 2013b). Although relational approaches
offer a broadly applicable framework,
their use in specific cases requires attention to cultural
context. We consider Wabanaki ethnography
within the context of a broad Algonquian cosmology,
rather than focusing on only the Mi’kmaq
record, because of apparent meaningful cosmological
similarities among Wabanaki groups and
with other Algonquian hunter-gatherers (Hoffman
1955:420–423, Ingraham et al. 2016, Martin 1978,
Prins 1996:36–37). Drawing on this broadly held
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
4
Algonquian hunter-gatherer cosmology further permits
us to consider the dynamic interactions of cosmology
and daily practices beyond those described
in the Mi’kmaq literature. However, throughout, we
make reference to Mi’kmaw oral history, and ethnohistoric
literature when possible.
Despite a colonial context in which Wabanaki
beliefs underwent sustained and pervasive European
influence, there is a clear persistence in Wabanaki
identity and elements of cosmology (see Hornborg
2008, Prins 1996). Hornborg has labeled aspects of
Wabanaki, and in particular Mi’kmaw, relational
ontology as a “sacred ecology” whereby humans
maintained relationships with animals and other natural
entities through careful action. Wabanaki sacred
ecology is unique, but shares many general concepts
and attributes with a broader Algonquian cosmology.
Algonquian hunter-gatherers maintained social relationships
between people and particular animals (Feit
1973, Tanner 1979), which were considered, essentially,
“other-than-human persons” (Hallowell 1960).
Also within this system, objects often possessed volition
and agency, although this spiritual power was not
equally distributed (Hoffman 1955:356–357). In this
cosmology, a variety of ritual actions had to be conducted
for animals to continue to allow themselves to
be taken, prevent bad weather, and prevent illnesses
or injury among hunters and their families (Feit 1973,
Tanner 1979). These actions permeated domestic
life, but also were maintained via more ostensible
ritual actions, such as sweat ceremonies (sweats)
associated with divination or healing (see Hrynick
and Betts 2014). Gender permeated relationships
between human and animals, and among individuals
as they enacted relational ontologies. This gendering
can be seen both in specific ritual activities, such as
sweats or menstrual seclusion, and in the gendering
of daily activities, such as spatial division, food taboos,
or gendered object associations. For instance,
men manufactured and used weapons, while women
dressed game (e.g., Denys 1908). Tanner (1979) has
described this Algonquian cosmology as an inextricable
melding of “motivated religious” and “common
sense” thought. As Tanner (1979:204) suggests, this
relational ontology is a means for Algonquians to
engage with the world, and in doing so they may precipitate
culture change.
Relational ontology and gender in Wabanaki
cosmology
Ethnohistorical evidence provides information
about Wabanaki cosmological beliefs and practices
and their gendered associations. Ethnohistoric
sources support the presence of a relational ontology
perpetuated in terms of human–animal relationships,
maintained via adherence to daily norms and
prohibitions (Betts et al. 2012:626–627, Hoffman
1955:420–421). Le Clercq (1910:277), Nicolar
(2007:152–153), and Rand (1894:70–71) described
the belief in human-like social organizations among
specific animals. Leland (1884:31) and Hagar (1896)
related legends in which animals had human psyches
and expressions. Several accounts (Leland 1884:69,
Mallery 1890:65) support the presence of “game
keepers” or “animal masters” among other Algonquian
groups (Martin 1978), but the accounts are
less clear about this system for the Wabanaki (Hoffman
1955:423).
This relational system also involved the overlapping
spheres of gender and animal ritual. Animal
ritual included gendered behavior around the
dwelling and gendered hunting and animal-disposal
rituals, similar to Central Algonquians (Le Clercq
1910:227). Additionally, although there may have
occasionally been female religious practitioners
such as buion (shamans) or medicine women
(Hoffman 1955:475, Mechling 1959:175, Nicolar
2007:156), shamanistic practices such as sweating
and divination were mostly performed by men (Denys
1908:416, Lescarbot 1914:184–185, Mechling
1959:172–173, Wallis and Wallis 1955:124). Even
though wigwam construction was a female activity
(Prins and McBride 2007:35–36), men may have
constructed sweathouses (Hoffman 1955:306).
Seemingly functional tasks were strictly gendered,
with the expectation that maintaining this gender
division was important for maintaining a sacred
ecology. For example, among Algonquian groups,
the breaking of gendered taboos could result in illnesses
or failed hunts (Le Clercq 1910:227, Tanner
1979:161–162). Martin (1978:114 footnote) has
suggested the symbolism surrounding gendered
Algonquian roles involving animals may be understood
as a way by which “sexual and social relations
within the group are reaffirmed and sustained by
the act of ‘bringing home animals’”. The evidence
provided above, in addition to our previous review
of a general hunter-gatherer world-views, indicates
that gendering exists as an organizational principle
which was inexorably linked to sacred ecology. It
also indicates that gendering was especially prominent
in daily domestic activity, many of which took
place in and around dwellings. We argue that this
gendering of ritual (and the actions that entailed) is
visible in the archaeological record at Port Joli Harbour,
and changes and continuity in these practices
at the dwelling-scale offers insight into gendered
negotiations as historical practices.
Indeed, notions of dwellings and ritual space as
gendered pervade ethnographic accounts. Gender
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
5
was not the only relational principle of Wabanaki
society, and existed in proximity to other important
organizational rules, such as those surrounding age
or the disposal of animal remains. Our interpretation
reflects the strongly gendered nature of architecture
and domestic space in the local ethnohistoric record,
and the archaeologically visible correlates of those
activities. This analysis does not deny or preclude
other interpretations; in a sacred ecology constructed
of numerous overlapping realms, a variety may be
considered. Further, this focus serves the important
purpose of including women’s activities and agency
within particular cultural phenomenon (Brumfield
2006).
Maritime Woodland Period Architecture on the
Maritime Peninsula
Port Joli Harbour is located on Nova Scotia’s
South Shore (Fig. 1), within traditional Mi’kmaw
territory in the Wabanaki homeland (Bock 1978).
The Wabanaki were different from more southerly
Algonquian groups; while horticulture was practiced
at European contact among these southerly
peoples, the Wabanaki on the Maritime Peninsula
remained hunter-gatherers, and their social organization,
cosmology, and technology differed from
adjacent peoples in some respects (Hoffman 1955).
The wigwam and the sweathouse were the major
architectural forms employed by the Wabanaki. Historically,
Wabanaki wigwams were conical, slightly
offset vertically, and covered with birch bark or
hides supported by wooden posts, with a smoke hole
at the top and a trapezoidal door (e.g., Bock 1978,
Le Clercq 1910:100–101, Speck 1997:27–34). They
typically housed a nuclear family and sometimes
1 or 2 grandparents or guests (Sanger 1987:115).
However, wigwams were comparatively small and
highly portable, making them ideal for the high
degree of Wabanaki residential mobility (Butler and
Hadlock 1957:11). Ethnographically, wigwams were
almost exclusively constructed by women (cf. Prins
and McBride 2007:35–36).
Archaeological studies have indicated continuity
in this architectural form throughout the Maritime
Woodland period (Sanger 2010). At present, the
vast majority of architectural evidence is from the
coast, where features are more clearly defined and
Figure 1. Map of the Maritime Peninsula (shaded gray) showing the location of Port Joli Harbour on Nova Scotia’s South Shore.
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
6
excavated 4 using a high-resolution methodology
that permits the identification of artifact patterning
and the horizontal exposure of living surfaces. We
located dwelling features initially by testing the site
with a small-bore soil probe to identify highly organic
deposits, stratigraphic incongruities, or dense
artifact deposits. Subsequently, we explored potential
features with 50 cm × 50 cm hand-excavated test
pits. Following the identification of a likely dwelling
feature, we excavated horizontally by stratigraphic
layer to expose entire living features. We maintained
cross-shaped baulks across features to permit clear
visibility and to document stratigraphic relationships
on 2 axes. We screened all excavated deposits
through 3-mm mesh and took column samples from
the baulks to permit the recovery of micro-fractions
to enhance spatial patterning (Hrynick et al. 2012).
We have encountered some dwelling features in the
course of excavating other features or deposits using
transect excavations, and these are represented
as partially excavated features. These deposits were
also screened through 3-mm mesh, bulk sampled,
and fully documented stratigraphically.
Previously excavated features
For the purposes of this paper, we focus primarily
on the 4 features excavated fully in the course
of the E’se’get Project. However, J.S. Erskine also
excavated features that in general indicate similarity
between the Port Joli structure assemblage and
features from throughout the Maritime Peninsula
(Erskine 1959:347–350, 1962:5). Erskine identified
dwelling features based on a confluence of subfeatures
in conjunction with “ashy”, artifact-rich soil
(Erskine 1986:90). His accounts, based on coarserresolution
excavations, do not permit precise interpretations
about intra-dwelling spatial organization.
However, it is worth noting that he interpreted
dwelling features as exhibiting a bilateral division of
space in which ceramic artifacts were concentrated
on one side of the dwelling and lithic artifacts were
concentrated on the other, which he interpreted as
a gendered division of domestic space (Erskine
1986:90). This interpretation may have drawn on
his knowledge of Historic period accounts from the
region, and is in accordance with the gendered division
of space reported in the ethnohistoric literature.
Although Erskine did not excavate using standard
archaeological techniques and his recording of
spatial patterning is not quantifiable, his interpretation
supports Late Maritime Woodland gendered
divisions of domestic space, similar to the kind we
identified at AlDf-24 Area C (Hrynick et al. 2012),
which we discuss below.
identifiable in contrast to surrounding shell-bearing
deposits (Sanger 2010). To date, the most apparent
intra-regional structural difference among domestic
features on the Maritime Peninsula is the presence
or absence of a floor paving (Hrynick and Robinson
2012). In areas such as northeast Maine, where
beaches tend to be comprised of water-rolled gravel,
Maritime Woodland period peoples appear to have
lined their dwelling floors with it (Hrynick and Robinson
2012, Sanger 2010). No paving is apparent in
areas such as Port Joli Harbour, where the adjacent
beaches are comprised of sand (Hrynick et al. 2012).
Sweathouses, the other form of architecture
that is near ubiquitous in historic period accounts
from the region (Denys 1908:416; Dièreville 1933,
175−176; Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents
1611–1616:115−117; Le Clercq 1910:296−297;
Lescarbot 1914: 184−185; Speck 1997:48; see Prins
and McBride 2007:18), have not been recognized in
the archaeological record for the Maritime Peninsula
except at Port Joli Harbour (Hrynick and Betts
2014). In historical times, they ranged from minimally
modified wigwams with the entrances sealed,
to special purpose structures erected over specially
constructed stone architecture. According to the
ethnographic documents, these structures were used
exclusively by men and for a wide variety of purposes
including healing, preventative medicine, and
hunting ritual, including divination.
Architecture at Port Joli Harbour
Since 2008, the Canadian Museum of History’s
E’se’get Archaeology Project has focused on the
relationships among the economic and social systems
of the Maritime Woodland Period occupants
of Port Joli Harbour and its environs (Betts et al.
2012, Hrynick and Betts 2014, Hrynick et al. 2012,
Neil et al. 2014). Its approach has included a focus
on Wabanaki history within the realm of regionally
defined cosmologies (Hrynick and Betts 2014) and
human–animal relationships (Betts et al. 2012). The
bulk of this work has been at shell-bearing sites
dating from the Middle (2200–1350 B.P.) to Late
Maritime Woodland (1350–550 B.P.) periods.
The E’se’get Project has prioritized the identification
and high-resolution excavation of architectural
features (Hrynick et al. 2012). In addition to features
identified in the 1950s and 1960s by John S. Erskine
(1959, 1962, 1986), an avocational archaeologist,
the E’se’get Project has identified 10 architectural
features, placing it among the largest architectural
datasets for the prehistoric Maritime Peninsula, and
the largest Maritime Peninsula dataset outside of
the Gulf of Maine. Of these features, we have fully
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
7
lack of intrusive features into the deposits; in effect,
each subsequent occupation was deposited onto the
footprint of the other, with no discernable disturbance
of the underlying substrate (Hrynick et al. 2012:6,
9–13). Such high artifact counts are necessary for
identifying artifact patterning, but are not always
available. We interpreted this spatial pattern as indicative
of a gendered division of space (Hrynick et
al. 2012), consistent with the Historic period accounts
from throughout the Wabanaki homeland (e.g., Le
Clercq 1910:102; Speck 1997:29). This patterning is
also present in accounts of domestic space for other
hunter-gatherer Algonquians (Tanner 1979). Following
the interpretation of this feature, E’se’get Project
excavations of domestic architecture focused on evaluating
this continuity in domestic patterning deeper
in time.
We devoted a subsequent season to Jack’s Brook
(AlDf-30), located ~300 m inland to the west of
Port Joli Harbour on a small, treeless, knoll within a
dense, mixed forest. The knoll is surrounded on the
north by a small creek, Jack’s Brook, and on the east,
west, and south by a fen, which has been established
for at least 3000 years (Neil et al. 2014). The architectural
deposits at the site are undisturbed (Hrynick
and Betts 2014:97). The site does not conform to
regional settlement models for domestic sites in the
region, but instead was identified fortuitously in the
early 1900s (Raddall n.d.). There were 3 domestic
features at the site, each stratigraphically distinct
but superimposed on top of one another, with each
feature essentially in the same footprint as the one
below it (Fig. 2), consistent in many respects with
the persistent location of dwelling placement at
AlDf-24 Area C.
Jack’s Brook (AlDf-30) Feature 1 (Fig. 3) contained
a compact black sandy loam with comminuted
charcoal. The feature was oval, approximately
3 m × 2.5 m, shallow, and basin-shaped. We attribute
its mild depression to clearing and trampling, based
on similarity to other hunter-gatherer dwelling floors
(Marshall 1996:352) and the absence of archaeological
evidence for excavation of the surface, such as
a backfill berm (see Hrynick et al. 2012). It is common
for Middle Maritime Woodland period dwelling
features to be less artifact-dense than Late Maritime
Woodland ones (cf. Black 2004); true to form, Feature
1 was less artifact-dense than Feature 4 at AlDf-
24 Area C, with 649 pieces of lithic debitage and 831
ceramic sherds in total, compared to 7413 pieces of
debitage and 120 ceramic sherds at AlDf-24 Area C
Feature 4. Large rocks and cobbles protruded into
Feature 1 from levels that were stratigraphically
deeper to form what we interpret as an intentional
Features excavated during the E’se’get Project
Three of the architectural features identified by
the E’se’get Project were partially excavated using
a vertically oriented excavation strategy, rather than
exposed in full horizontal extent. AlDf-8 produced
evidence for a Late Maritime Woodland period
dwelling, visible as a lens of dark, highly organic,
artifact-rich soil (Betts and Hrynick 2013). At AlDf-
24 Area A, we identified and excavated nearly 50%
of a dwelling feature appearing as highly organic,
charcoal-rich soil, in contrast to the shell midden
that dominated Area A. This feature yielded cordwrapped
stick pottery, suggesting a Late Maritime
Woodland Period occupation (Petersen and Sanger
1993). In Area C of AlDf-24, we partially excavated
a dwelling feature that was directly beneath the fully
excavated Later Late Maritime Woodland Period
dwelling feature we describe fully below. At AlDf-
31, the margin of a probable architectural feature
was identified; the function of this feature is unclear
pending further excavation (Betts 2010).
Because these features were partially excavated,
they offer limited data about the division of domestic
space. However, alongside Erskine’s data, they do
support overall similarity with dwellings throughout
the Maritime Peninsula, emphasizing temporal and
spatial continuity for the basic technological form of
the conical wigwam across the Maritime Peninsula
(Sanger 2010), as well as a tendency to place some
dwellings in repeated northward orientation.
Four fully excavated features serve to place people
and gendered practices within an historical trajectory.
All of these features exhibited structural similarity.
AlDf-24 Area C Feature 4 is a Later Late Maritime
Woodland dwelling feature, with a radiocarbon
date on terrestrial mammal bone of 660 ± 40 B.P.
(Beta-286106, 1σ cal AD 1270–1400), located to the
landward side of a large shell midden and articulated
with a smaller “kitchen” midden, or midden adjacent
to a dwelling. Hrynick et al. (2012) argued, based on
artifact patterning and ethnographic analogy, that the
artifact distribution within the feature conforms to a
binary division of space in which debitage tends to
be concentrated to the northwest of the feature, while
scrapers, pottery, and organic tools were primarily on
the southeastern half of the dwelling. The robustness
of the spatial patterning was enhanced by the artifact
richness of the feature, probably attributable in part
to numerous re-occupations of the area in which a
wigwam was repeatedly placed in almost precisely
the same location and with a similar orientation,
generating a complex palimpsest. Aside from these
re-occupations, the architectural deposits at the site
are undisturbed, as evidenced by the stratigraphy and
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
8
axial feature dividing the floor roughly into western
and eastern halves. The feature yielded a radiocarbon
date on terrestrial mammal bone of 1380 ± 30
B.P. (Beta-341498, 1σ cal A.D. 607–680).
Figure 2. Stratigraphic profile of the Jack’s Brook site (AlDf-30) Area A. This profile shows the relationships between
Feature 1, 2, and 3.
Figure 3. Planview of Jack’s
Brook (AlDf-30) Feature 1
with the axial feature consisting
of a row of stones,
labeled.
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
9
concentrations of comminuted charcoal than were
present in Feature 1. The change to a darker black
soil was evident during excavation and in profile,
with the horizontal and stratigraphic margins of the
feature clearly visible. In the bottommost levels of
the feature, the soil became mottled with orange subsoil
and pebbles, emphasizing the trampled nature of
the feature. The same large boulders and cobbles intruded
into this unit from deeper stratigraphic levels,
continuing to, as with Feature 1, physically force a
bilateral division of space. In Feature 2, a total of 85
pieces of debitage were recovered from west of the
axial feature and 38 pieces from east of the axial feature,
a statistically significant pattern (χ² = 17.959,
df = 1, P < 0.05). A total of 64 Ceramic sherds were
recovered from west of the axial feature and 76 from
the east, yielding a statistically insignificant pattern
(χ² = 1.029, df = 1, P < 0.05). As with Feature 2, the
lithic patterning in the feature does suggest a bilateral
division of space, while the presence of the axial
feature suggests a further structural division. We
interpret this as likely representing a structure spatially
divided along gendered lines, especially considering
that the incorporation of the axial feature
We consider the primary architectural division
in this structure to have been the rocks incorporated
to divide the structure into 2 halves. A total of 509
pieces of lithic debitage were recovered from east
of the axial feature, with only 140 pieces from the
west. Ceramic sherds in Feature 1 are also higher by
piece count on the east, with 291 pieces on the west
and 540 pieces on the east (a situation similar to the
ceramic patterning at AlDf-24 Area C Feature 4).
Chi square tests show that this patterning is statistically
significant (χ² = 291.8, df = 1 for debitage, χ²
= 37.3, df = 1 for ceramics; P < 0.05). Furthermore,
both scrapers from the dwelling feature were recovered
on the western side of the axial feature. Three
of the 4 total bifaces from within the feature were
recovered from east of the axial feature. The distribution
of lithics might appear to suggest a maleoriented
occupation on the eastern side of the dwelling,
though the ceramic patterning does not support
this. Despite this ambiguous patterning, we believe
that the bilaterally distributed artifacts and the axial
feature also supports a general bilateral division of
space, with the most parsimonious division being according
to gender, based on the ethnographic record
and the strong patterning
identified in AlDf-24
Area C. Although this is
the most parsimonious
explanation for the axial
feature, we note that the
act of re-incorporating
the axial feature further
suggests a gendered activity,
as the construction
of wigwams was women’s
work ethnographically.
Feature 2 (Fig. 4)
at Jack’s Brook (AlDf-
30) was stratigraphically
contiguous with and beneath
Feature 1, and in a
nearly identical orientation.
This feature yielded
2 overlapping radiocarbon
dates on terrestrial
mammal bone, 1410 ±
30 B.P. (Beta -341499,
1σ cal A.D. 591−665)
and 1470 ± 40 B.P. (Beta
-273516, 1σ cal A.D.
540–650). The feature
was characterized by a
compact, dark black,
sandy loam with higher
Figure 4. Planview map of Jack’s Brook (AlDf-30) Feature 2 with the axial feature, consisting
of a row of stone, labeled.
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
10
1σ cal A.D. 660–600). The large central stones in
Feature 3 are the same stones that protruded into the
2 domestic features, Feature 1 and Feature 2, above
it, the tops of the stones aligning to form an axial
feature in the stratigraphically higher structures.
While Feature 1 and 2 are consistent with dwelling
features from the Maritime Peninsula, Feature
3 is not. It is almost a meter smaller than a typical
dwelling feature from the region (Sanger 2010),
and the deep bowl shape and the substantial central
stone architecture would preclude a domestic occupation.
As we have argued elsewhere (Hrynick and
Betts 2014), it is consistent with the archaeological
signature that might be produced by a sweathouse
reported in the ethnographic record in which a small
wigwam-like structure was placed over a large central
stone (approximately 45 cm × 50 cm), held in
place by smaller stones (approximately 20 cm × 20
cm and smaller) (Wallis and Wallis 1955:124). Such
structures were made airtight with skins or blankets,
and hot stones were brought into the structure where
they were used to vaporize plant-based sudorifics
and to make the inside of the structure hot (Wallis
and Wallis 1955:124; see
also Hrynick and Betts
2014). Because stones
were brought into the
structure, charcoal deposition
would have been
minimal, consistent with
Feature 3.
One reason for the
unique placement of Feature
3 away from the shore
may have been seclusion,
emphasizing the ritual
distinctiveness of the site
when the sweathouse was
occupied. Such seclusion
may be a characteristic
of ritual activity, and
may further emphasize
the strongly gendered nature
of Wabanaki sweathouse
rituals (Hrynick
and Betts 2014). In contrast
to wigwams, which
housed both genders and
were assembled by women
(Prins and McBride
2007:35−36), sweathouses
appear to have
been used exclusively by
men (Denys 1908:416,
as likely consciously made by women, who based
on ethnographic analogy, probably constructed the
dwelling.
Feature 3 (Fig. 5) was stratigraphically below
Feature 2, essentially forming a footprint for the
feature above it. We have presented this feature and
our interpretations of it in detail elsewhere (Hrynick
and Betts 2014), but review it and our interpretation
for its unique placement here, as that may have
important implications for expressions of ritual and
gender in Port Joli. The feature was basin-shaped,
and had been excavated into the subsoil as deeply as
40 cm. The feature was small, approximately 2.5 m
× 2 m in area. A stone feature consisting of a central
boulder, flanked on all sides by several large stones
and cobbles, had been added to the depression, as
had a cobble paving partially lining a small pit in
the southwest. Northwest of the central stone, a low
bench or step was shaped into the subsoil to form the
northern margin of the pit feature. The only materials
recovered from this feature were 2 pieces of firecracked
rock, which refit, and a single piece of wood
charcoal, dating to 1420 ± 30 B.P. (Beta-341499,
Figure 5. Planview map of Jack’s Brook (AlDf-30) Feature 3. Note that the central stones,
the tops of which formed the axial feature in subsequent domestic occupations, form a central
stone sweathouse apparatus in Feature 3 (see Hrynick and B etts 2014).
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
11
Le Clercq 1910:296–297). Cross-culturally, this is
common, likely in part due to the frequent association
of sweathouse ceremonies and shamanism
(MacDonald 1988, Paper 1990). For Algonquian
hunter-gatherers, sweathouses featured elements of
hunting-ritual, including divination (Speck 1935:99,
221), contextualizing the gendered nature of the
practice as an activity closely linked to hunter–prey
interactions. In addition to these considerations, the
sweathouse was located close to a freshwater source
that could provide water for use in sweats or for
subsequent submersion (Denys 1908:416, Le Clercq
1910:296–297). Thus, the site was characterized by
a mixed forest–fen environment at least from the
Middle Maritime Woodland through the present
(Neil et al. 2014) and may have provided access to
medicinal plants (Hrynick and Betts 2014).
Discussion: Gendered Spaces, Sacred Ecology,
and Wabanaki History
Port Joli architecture suggests a general regional
consistency in architectural form, both diachronically
at Port Joli and throughout the Maritime
Peninsula. Beyond this fundamental technological
articulation, one which was ideally suited to huntergatherer
mobility and subsistence on the Maritime
Peninsula (Butler and Hadlock 1957:11), the Port
Joli dataset illuminates chronological changes in
patterning which require interpretation. The reincorporation
of a male sweathouse into subsequent
domestic architecture, which ethnographic analogy
suggests was built by women, indicates a variety of
changes in the way people, quite literally, constructed
their relational ontologies. At Port Joli, tracking
these transitions historically emphasizes the role of
gender in these relationships.
The perspective we outlined earlier is that adherence
to ritual actions at the domestic scale are historically
situated negotiations with the world, making
the household a nexus at which culture changes and
is renewed. The dwellings and their configurations,
and the actions carried out within them, were negotiations
with a cohort of animal-persons that had the
agency to directly impact human lives. While we
do not deal directly with the perceived agency of
animals here, it is assumed, and human negotiations
with these animal persons is critical to understanding
Wabanaki architecture in Port Joli. Although relational
ontologies are expressed at a variety of scales,
many of which may be reflected in the organization
of the house, daily activities offer regular and repetitive
opportunities to negotiate those relationships.
These reflections and these manipulations make the
dwelling-scale archaeologically valuable, and may
highlight the roles of ordinary women and men in
maintaining and modifying cosmology. In the above
study, we utilize ethnographic and archaeological
data to propose that the manipulation of gendered
spaces and things may have been a key way in which
Port Joli inhabitants expressed a sacred ecology. In
Figure 6, we provide a schematic of the interplay of
domestic life and cosmology at Port Joli in the reification
and modification of broad cosmology locally.
Figure 6. Diagram of relationships among architecture, cosmology, and history at Port Joli Harbour. Following Tanner
(1979) we suggest that these relationships are negotiated via sacred ecology, driving directed social action. Accordingly,
the relationships between what people do is related to cosmology, and both may change or persist through time, dependent
upon individual agency.
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
12
This model may be conceptualized as mediated via
Wabanaki sacred ecology.
Employing the ethnographic record as part of the
dynamic Wabanaki historical trajectory, it is possible
to interpret the Middle and Late Maritime Woodland
period architectural history of Port Joli Harbour as
an historical and gendered process that articulated
directly with Wabanaki cosmology. In the present
case, this history begins with the construction of
the Jack’s Brook (AlDf-30) sweathouse, the oldest
known architectural feature from Port Joli Harbour,
and coeval with some of the earliest archaeological
materials from Port Joli. As we suggested above, the
location of Jack’s Brook (AlDf-30), while incongruous
with prevailing habitation-site models, makes
good sense when considering the need for (1) exclusion
and privacy, (2) fresh water, and (3) medicinal
plants used in sweat ceremonies. The placement of
the sweathouse is part of a social context at Port Joli
Harbour, and must be related to adjacent habitation
sites.
With these considerations in mind, ethnographic
accounts offer several compelling explanations
for sweathouses in relationship to cosmology. As
Hill (2011) has pointed out, directed ritual such as
sweats may serve to address spiritual problems that
require attention beyond that which is embedded in
quotidian action. The sweathouse at Jack’s Brook
(AlDf-30) may represent an attempt, especially by
men, to maintain human–animal relationships or
address particular problems. These actions probably
occurred in conjunction with actions to maintain
relationships at regular habitations, which were
elsewhere on the landscape (potentially at AlDf-24).
Later re-occupations of the Jack’s Brook site (AlDf-
30) were characterized by a marked modification
to the use and gendering of the site, namely in the
transition away from a male-oriented ritual space
of the sweathouse to a family-oriented habitation.
The placement of this re-occupation was apparently
guided by historical and cultural, rather than
environmental, factors (Hrynick and Betts 2014),
as the overlapping radiocarbon dates and paleoenvironmental
reconstruction indicates significant
climatic/economic changes were unlikely (Neil et
al. 2014). The decision to modify the site’s purpose
and to re-incorporate the sweathouse into domestic
architecture is a profound modification to how gendered
cosmological relationships were conducted at
Jack’s Brook (AlDf-30). Most abruptly, there was a
dramatic transition away from spaces used and directed
exclusively by adult men, to one that included
the actions of men, women, and children. If the ethnohistoric
record is applicable, this transition was
marked by the construction of a dwelling by women
for use by their families, in contrast to that of structures
constructed by men for their own purposes.
Although the stone axial feature incorporated
into the later dwellings might have a variety of social
meanings, Late Maritime Woodland and Historic
Period accounts suggest that, in historical context,
this binary division of space likely represents a
form of gendered spatial division, and this is at least
partially supported by the lithic patterning discussed
above. For Algonquian hunter-gatherers generally
(e.g., Skinner 1912:245, Tanner 1979) and the Wabanaki
specifically (e.g., Denys 1908:408, Le Clercq
1910:102:227, Orchard 1909, Speck 1997:29),
gendered spatial divisions appear to have been a
strong component of relational practice and to have
been microcosms of broader social organization.
The strong association between Wabanaki women
and the construction and use of dwelling features
suggests that women played important roles in the
re-incorporation of the axial feature. In addition to
a division of space, one ritual explanation of this
re-incorporation concept is the “axis mundi”, which
Hornborg (2006, 2008) describes in the context of
Wabanaki sacred ecology. The Wabanaki, like many
Indigenous societies, conceived of the world as comprised
of a series of cosmological zones, and moving
between them as an opportunity to change perspective.
This belief system allowed individuals to temporarily
adopt the perspectives of other-than-human
persons, gaining insight into critical spiritual, economic,
and other relationships between humans and
other beings (see Viveiros de Castro 1998).
Travel between these worlds was often facilitated
by an axis mundi, or “world pillar” (Hornborg
2006:316), a concept common in hunter-gatherer
cosmology (e.g., Cummings 2013:81). Hornborg
suggests that “for many [I]ndigenous North Americans,
this pillar was represented by the doorpost of
the wigwam” and that this was true for the Wabanaki,
as supported by Rand’s (1894) account of a woman
travelling between worlds via a passage beneath her
doorpost (Hornborg 2008:30). Speck’s (1935) interpretation
of Algonquian divination suggests that
shamanism, dreaming, and sweats were employed to
interpret the location of game, supporting an interpretation
of the sweathouses that includes travelling
between worlds to access the perspective of particular
animals (Hornborg 2006). If so, the incorporation
of a ritual structure/stone alignment used previously
in sweats, and extending beneath the surface of the
current dwelling, incorporated a powerful axis mundi
into the wigwam. Further utilizing that feature
to ensure that gendered activities and spaces were
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
13
a physical reminder of appropriate social action to
its inhabitants.
This perspective can elucidate the use of architectural
elements as mnemonics (e.g., Betts et
al. 2012). At Jack’s Brook (AlDf-30), the central
stone structure may have been a mnemonic for the
division of space and participation in appropriate
social relationships, and a tangible reminder of history.
Moreover, it may have served as a reminder of
the importance of spiritual preparation, especially
for men. The overlapping radiocarbon dates from
Jack’s Brook (AlDf-30) Features 1, 2, and 3 suggest
occupation of all these features in rapid succession,
suggesting that the dwellings may have been constructed
by people who remembered the use of, or
even constructed, the sweathouse. This interpretation
supports the notion of a conscious appropriation
of the male sweathouse into domestic space, not just
inadvertent incorporation of an ancient architectural
component without a tangible, ritual link.
This history did not end at Jack’s Brook (AlDf-
30). By the Late Maritime Woodland Period, the
archaeological record of Port Joli indicates that
central stone architecture may no longer have been
necessary to enforce a gendered division of domestic
space. The occupants of AlDf-24 Area C, Feature 4
appear to have no longer required the physicality of
such a mnemonic to maintain a strict gendered division
(Hrynick et al. 2012). This form of patterning
was repeated into the historic period, as is documented
in the ethnohistoric literature (Hrynick et al.
2012). It is possible that this shift was due to an intensification
of gendered activity or a reinforcement
of metaphorical space, marked by an emphasis on
gendered behavior without clear canonical signaling
in architectural form. Alternatively, less-durable architectural
elements might have been used to physically
separate the spaces inside wigwams, though we
note that the ethnohistoric record does not mention
any such architecture.
That historical factors influenced the construction
and use of dwelling features at Port Joli is further
attested by the clear reuse of specific places for
wigwams. Among ethnographically known Algonquians,
the placement and orientation of dwellings
is environmental and cosmological. Mistassini Cree
camps were placed on western shores with doorways
facing east of lakes to avoid harsh winds (Rogers
1967:9−11). This arrangement provides the warmest
possible camp and best viewscape. However, Mistassini
Cree explanations for this placement are linked
to Algonquian cosmology with an eastward doorway
orientation allowing inhabitants to “avoid the spiritual
entity, Ciiwetinsuu, who is associated with the
maintained was a powerful means to reinforce the
importance of quotidian actions in the maintenance
of spiritual relationships. It also might be seen as an
appropriation of male spiritual spaces/features by
women to be incorporated into their own spaces and
that of their families.
This interpretation highlights the need to consider
relational ontologies in contexts beyond immediate
hunter–prey interaction. Whether or not the
axial feature indicates gendered divisions of domestic
space, it almost certainly suggests some form of
domestic architectural ritual activity, and if so, activity
initiated by women in their construction of the
dwelling, and then maintained by men and women
in their use of the dwelling. This interpretation is
supported both by Rand’s account and the consensus
in ethnohistoric accounts of women’s prominence in
the house, and around the construction of dwellings.
The ethnographic relationship among architecture,
shamanism, and relational perspectives offers one
explanation for how domestic and ritual architecture
could be linked within Wabanaki cosmology.
The excavated nature of the sweathouse and stone
alignment, below the domestic dwelling where
spiritual travel and transformation were known to
occur (Hornborg 2008:30), reinforced its potential
as a figurative and literal axis mundi. Used in this
way and in this context, the axial feature may be
both a conscious memorialization of history and a
metaphysical connection to facilitate access to other
perspectives within a relational ontology.
That the central portion of the sweathouse may
have later been incorporated as a gender divider
suggests a conscious decision that was both agential
and historical in its relationship with cosmology.
Minimally, it suggests re-incorporation of male architectural
elements into largely female dominated
ones. If the axial feature is a gendered division, this
represents transition of a male space into a divided
male and female space, displaying conscious change
within Wabanaki cosmological principles. In this
case, the ritually imbued stone alignment of the
sweathouse was appropriated and transformed into
a potent reminder to the occupants of the gendered
actions necessary inside the dwelling. That women
probably assembled the structure further highlights
their important roles in cosmological activities. If
the Middle Maritime Woodland Period divisions of
space at Jack’s Brook (AlDf-30) drew on the sweathouse
architecture to create gendered spaces, which
is the most likely explanation, this may have served
as what Blanton (1994) has described as “canonical”
signaling, by which architecture serves as an
indicator not just of identity to outsiders, but also as
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
14
shown how seemingly mundane activities, such as
the everyday construction, use, and maintenance of
dwellings, can expose historical process on a grand
scale and its linkages to such critical issues as cosmology
and identity. In short, the archaeology of
hunter-gatherer domestic architecture may provide
insight into the agency of ordinary men and women
as they negotiate their cosmologies and identities.
At Port Joli, bilateral artifactual spatial patterning
in dwellings combined with the presence of
unique architectural structures such as sweathouses
can be explained as an adherence to gender rules
regarding architectural construction and use. We
have proposed an ontological context for these rules,
providing a potent link between everyday actions
within these structures and the maintenance of “sacred
ecology”. For the Wabanaki who lived in Port
Joli, the construction and use of architecture, from
sweathouses to domestic wigwams, participated in a
relational ontology focused on maintaining connections
with other “animal persons”. These connections
were maintained through strict adherence to
gendered norms, thus mediating the social lives of
those who lived at Port Joli. And yet the archaeology
also exposes historical process, as people appropriated
and transformed architectural components and
spaces to physically and symbolically reinforce the
practices necessary to maintain proper relationships.
Eventually, these physical mnemonics were
abandoned, and the inhabitants appear to have relied
on tradition and routine to perpetuate and intensify
these gendered practices.
Acknowledgments
As always, we thank Acadia First Nation for their collaboration,
support, and frequent insight. Funding for this
research was provided by the Canadian Museum of History
and the University of New Brunswick. Other support
was provided by the Thomas Raddall Provincial Park, the
Harrison Lewis Centre, and the University of Connecticut.
Kevin McBride, Brian Robinson, Karen Ryan, Zareen
Thomas, and Jesse Webb provided thoughtful comments
on various portions of this paper. An early portion of this
research was presented at the 2013 Eastern States Archaeological
Federation meeting; we are grateful for comments
we received there. Two anonymous reviewers and Karine
Taché offered further helpful suggestions.
Literature Cited
Ackerman, L.A. 1990. Gender studies in Yu’pik society.
Etudes/Inuit/Studies 14(1):209–221.
Betts, M.W. 2009. Chronicling Siglit identities: Economy,
practice, and ethnicity in the Western Canadian Arctic.
Alaska Journal of Anthropology 7(2):1–28.
north and northwest, and is in charge of cold weather,
snow, and ‘winter’ animals” (Tanner 1979:103). Relational
studies may further help to illuminate the role
of men and women in these ritual actions.
Sanger (2010:38) has suggested that the doorways
of houses at Maine’s Maritime Woodland
period sites tend to face away from the beach, typically
to the east. He offers both environmental and
historical explanations for this phenomenon, which,
as among the Cree, need not be mutually exclusive.
It may be preferable to have a house face the sunrise,
and an entrance facing away from the water
might offer protection from winds off the ocean.
For the Wabanaki, in a region that is today inhabited
by people whose confederacy is named for the
dawn, interpretations for doorway orientation such
as Sanger’s are particularly appealing, as they exist
at the intersection of ecological and religious variables,
in harmony with local ideals. However, Port
Joli Harbour doorways sometimes face the water,
toward the beach and not east, hinting at local variability
toward specific cosmological relationships
and practices.
Conclusions
Changes in the gendered organization and structure
of Port Joli Harbour architecture through time
may serve as an index to cosmological change for archaeologists,
highlighting the development of local
variability in Algonquian religion and ritual. These
changes, rather than reflecting the practices of ritual
specialists, seem to privilege women, domestic action,
and routine maintenance of human–animal
relationships. Such everyday negotiations exist in
an intimate discursive relationship with cosmology,
exposing that spirituality is embedded in daily practice,
and more importantly that daily practice is impossible
to disentangle from its ontological context
among hunter-gatherers.
Archaeologies of hunter-gatherers increasingly
recognize these daily actions (Hill 201l, Sassaman
and Randall 2012) as historical processes (sensu
Sassaman and Holly 2011). The relationships between
people and other entities, and the perspectives
from which such relationships proceed not
only define the hunter-gatherers who are engaged
in them, but are defined by the quotidian actions
ordinary hunter-gatherers take toward maintaining
them. As we have discussed here, gender may be one
of the most critical ways by which some relational
ontologies were maintained and expressed, and considering
gender from this perspective may provide
a fuller picture of hunter-gatherer cosmologies (and
gender roles themselves). We believe we have also
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
15
Endicott, K.L. 1999. Gender relations in hunter-gatherer
societies. Pp. 411–419, In R.B. Lee and R. Daly
(Eds.). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and
Gatherers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
UK. 534 pp.
Erskine, J.S. 1959. Micmac Notes 1959. Manuscript on
file. Nova Scotia Museum, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Erskine, J.S. 1962. Micmac Notes 1962. Nova Scotia Museum,
Halifax, NS, Canada.
Erskine, J.S. 1986. Unpublished Papers on the Archaeology
of the Maritime Provinces. M. Deal (Ed.). St.
Mary’s University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Feit, H.A. 1973. The ethno-ecology of the Waswanipi
Cree, or how hunters can manage their resources. Pp.
115–125, In B. Cox (Ed.). Cultural Ecology: Readings
on the Canadian Indians and Eskimos. McLelland and
Stewart, Toronto, ON, Canada. 331 pp.
Giffen, N.M. 1930. The Roles of Men and Women in Eskimo
Culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago,
IL, USA. 126 pp.
Hagar, S. 1896. Micmac magic and medicine. Journal of
American Folklore 9(34):170–77.
Halbmayer, E. 2012. Amerindian mereology: Animism,
analogy, and the multiverse. Indiana 29:103–125.
Hallowell, A.I. 1960. Ojibwa ontology, behavior, and
worldview. Pp. 19–52, In S. Diamond (Ed.). Culture
in History: Essays in Honor of Paul Radin. Columbia
University Press, New York, NY, USA. 1014 pp.
Hayden, B. 1997. The Pithouses of Keatley Creek. Harcourt
Brace, Fort Worth, TX, USA. 140 pp.
Hill, E. 2011. Animals as agents: Hunting ritual and relational
ontologies in prehistoric Alaska and Chukotka.
Cambridge Archaeological Journal 21(3):407–426.
Hill, E. 2013. Archaeology and animal persons: Toward
a Prehistory of human–animal relations. Environment
and Society: Advances in Research 4:117–136.
Hoffman, B.G. 1955. The historical ethnography of the
Micmac of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California Berkeley,
CA, USA. 839 pp.
Holly, Jr., D.H. 2013. History in the Making: The Archaeology
of the Eastern Subarctic. AltaMira, Lanham,
MD, USA. 208 pp.
Hornborg, A.-C. 2006. Visiting the six worlds: Shamanistic
journeys in Canadian Mi’kmaw cosmology. Journal
of American Folklore 119(473):312–336.
Hornborg, A.-C. 2008. Mi’kmaq Landscapes: From
Animism to Sacred Ecology. Ashgate, Burlington, VT,
USA. 214 pp.
Hrynick, M.G., and M.W. Betts. 2014. Identifying
sweathouses in the archaeological record: A Maritime
Woodland Period case study from Nova Scotia,
Canada. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
35:92–105.
Hrynick, M.G., and B.S. Robinson. 2012. Quantifying
gravel from a Ceramic Period living surface in
Downeast Maine. Maine Archaeological Society Bulletin
52(2):27–43.
Hrynick, M.G., M.W. Betts, and D.W. Black. 2012. A
Late Maritime Woodland Period dwelling feature from
Nova Scotia’s South Shore: Evidence for patterned
use of domestic space. Archaeology of Eastern North
America 40:1–25.
Betts, M.W. 2010. Permit report: E’se’get archaeology
project 2009 field season. Manuscript on file, Nova
Scotia Museum, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Betts, M.W., and M.G. Hrynick. 2013. Permit report:
E’se’get archaeology project 2012 field season.
Manuscript on file, Nova Scotia Museum, Halifax,
NS, Canada.
Betts, M.W., S.E. Blair, and D.W. Black. 2012. Perspectivism,
mortuary symbolism, and human–shark
relationships on the Maritime Peninsula. American
Antiquity 77(4):621–45.
Betts, M.W., M. Hardenberg, and I. Sterling. 2015. How
animals create human history: Relational ecology and
the Dorset–Polar bear connection. American Antiquity
80(1):89–112.
Binford, L.R.1990. Mobility, housing, and environment:
A comparative study. Journal of Anthropological Research
46(2):119–52.
Birch, J., and R.F. Williamson. 2015. The Mantle Site:
An Archaeological History of An Ancestral Wendat
Community. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD,
USA. 195 pp.
Black, D.W. 2004. Living Close to the Ledge: Prehistoric
Human Ecology of the Bliss Islands, Quoddy Region,
New Brunswick, Canada. 2nd Edition. Copetown Press,
St. John’s, NL, Canada. 266 pp.
Blanton, R. 1994. Houses and Households: a Comparative
Study. Plenum, New York, NY, USA. 272 pp.
Boas, F. 1901. The Eskimo of Baffinland and Hudson Bay.
Bulletin No. 15. American Museum of Natural History,
New York, NY, USA. 378 pp.
Bock, P.K. 1978. Micmac. Pp. 109–122, In B.G. Trigger
(Ed.). Handbook of North American Indians Volume
15: Northeast. Smithsonian, Washington, DC, USA.
924 pp.
Brightman, R.A. 1993. Grateful Prey: Rock Cree Animal–
Human Relationships. University of California Press,
Berkeley, CA, USA. 396 pp.
Brumfield, E.M. 2006. Methods in feminist and gender
archaeology: A feeling for difference and likeness. Pp.
31–58, In S.M. Nelson (Ed.). Handbook of Gender in
Archaeology. AltaMira, Oxford, UK.
Butler, E.L., and W.S. Hadlock. 1957. Uses of birch bark
in the Northeast. Robert Abbe Museum, Bar Harbor,
ME, USA. 66 pp.
Cummings, V. 2013. The Anthropology of Hunter-gatherers:
Key Themes for Archaeologists. Bloomsbury,
New York, NY, USA. 176 pp.
Dawson, P.C. 1995. “Unsympathetic users: An ethnoarchaeological
examination of Inuit responses to
the changing nature of the built environment. Arctic
48(1):71–80.
Denys, N. 1908. The Description and Natural History of
the Coasts of North America (Acadia). Champlain
Society, Toronto, ON, Canada. 678 pp.
Descola, P. 2013a. Beyond Nature and Culture. University
of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA. 488 pp.
Descola, P. 2013b. The Ecology of Others. Prickly Paradigm
Press, Chicago, IL, USA. 90 pp.
Dièreville, S. de. 1933. Relation of the Voyage to Port
Royal in Acadia or New France. Champlain Society,
Toronto, ON, Canada. 324 pp.
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
16
Ingold, T. 2006. Rethinking the animate, re-animating
thought. Ethnos 71(1):9−20.
Ingraham, R.C., B.S. Robinson, K.D. Sobolik, and A.S.
Heller. 2016. “Left for the tide to take back”: Specialized
processing of seals on Machias Bay, Maine.
The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology
11(1):89–106.
Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents. 1611–1616. Acadia.
The Burrow Brothers Company, Cleveland, OH,
USA. 319 pp.
Le Clercq, C. 1910. New Relations of Gaspesia: With the
Customs and Religions of the Gaspesian Indians. The
Champlain Society, Toronto, ON, Canada. 500 pp.
Leland, C.G. 1884. The Algonquin Legends of New England,
or Myths and Folklore of the Micmac, Passamaquoddy,
and Penobscot Tribes. 3rd Edition. Houghton,
Mifflin, and Company, Boston, MA, USA. 114 pp.
Lemoine, G. 2003. Women of the house: Gender, architecture,
and ideology in Dorset prehistory. Arctic Anthropology
40(1):121–38.
Lescarbot, M. 1914. History of New France, Volume III.
Champlain Society, Toronto, ON, Canada. 521 pp.
MacDonald, R. 1988. Ontario Iroquoian sweat lodges.
Ontario Archaeology 47:17–26.
Mallery, G. 1890. The fight with the giant witch. American
Anthropologist 3(1):65–70.
Marshall, I. 1996. A History and Ethnography of the Beothuk.
McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal, QC,
Canada. 640 pp.
Martin, C. 1978. Keepers of the Game: Indian–Animal
Relationships and the Fur Trade. University of California
Press, Berkeley, CA, USA. 226 pp.
McNiven, I.J. 2010. Navigating the human–animal divide:
Marine mammal hunters and rituals of sensory allurement.
World Archaeology 42(2):215–230.
McNiven, I.J. 2013. Between the living and the dead:
Relational ontologies and the ritual dimensions of dugong
hunting across the Torres Strait. Pp. 97–116. In
C. Watts (Ed.). Relational Archaeologies.Routledge,
New York, NY, USA. 254 pp.
Mechling, W.H. 1959. The Malecite Indians, with notes
on the Micmacs, Part 2. Anthropologica 8:161–274.
Neil, K., K. Gajewski, and M. Betts. 2014. Human–ecosystem
interactions in relation to holocene environmental
change in Port Joli Harbour, Southwestern Nova Scotia,
Canada. Quaternary Research 81(2):203–212.
Nicolar, J. 2007. The Life and Traditions of the Red Man: A
Rediscovered Treasure of Native American Literature.
Duke University Press, Durham, NC, USA. 240 pp.
Orchard, W.C. 1909. Notes on Penobscot houses. American
Anthropologist 11:601–606.
Paper, J. 1990. “Sweat lodge”: A northern Native American
ritual for shamanic trance. Temenos 26:85–94.
Pauketat, T.R. 2001. Practice and history in archaeology:
An emerging paradigm. Anthropological Theory
1(1):73–98.
Pauketat, T.R. 2012. An Archaeology of the Cosmos: Rethinking
Agency in and Religion in Ancient America.
Routledge, New York, NY, USA. 256 pp.
Paulson, I. 1952. The “seat of honour” in Aboriginal dwellings
of the circumpolar zone, with special regard to the
Indians of northern North America. Pp. 63–65, In S.
Tax (Ed.). Indian Tribes of Aboriginal America. University
of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA. 410 pp.
Petersen, J.B., and D. Sanger. 1993. An Aboriginal ceramic
sequence for Maine and the Maritime provinces. Pp.
113–170, In M. Deal and S. Blair (Eds.). Prehistoric
Archaeology in the Maritime Provinces: Past and Present
Research. Maritime Committee on Archaeological
Cooperation, Fredericton, NB, Canada. 330 pp.
Prins, H.E.L. 1996. The Mi’kmaq: Resistance, Accommodation,
and Cultural Survival. Harcourt Brace, Fort
Worth, TX, USA. 250 pp.
Prins, H.E.L., and B. McBride. 2007. Asticou’s Island
Domain: Wabanaki People at Mount Desert Island
1500–2000. 2 Vols. Acadia National Park and the Abbe
Museum, Bar Harbour, ME, USA. 618 pp.
Raddall, T.H. n.d. Indian Kitchen-Middens in Queens
County. Manuscript on file. Dalhousie University Archives,
Halifax, NS, Canada.
Rand, S.T. 1894. Legends of the Micmacs. Longmans,
Green, and Co., New York, NY, USA. 317 pp.
Rapoport, A. 1969. House Form and Culture. Prentice
Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA. 150 pp.
Rogers, E.S. 1967. The Material Culture of the Mistassini.
National Museum of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
156 pp.
Ryan, K. 2012. The Significance of Choice in Late Dorset:
The Technology of Domestic Architecture in the
Eastern North American Arctic c. 1500 B.P.–500 B.P.
British Archaeological Reports, Oxford, UK. 295 pp.
Sabo, G., and D.R. Sabo. 1985. Belief systems and the
ecology of sea mammal hunting among the Baffinland
Eskimo. Arctic Anthropology 22:2–86.
Sanger, D. 1987. The Carson Site and the late Ceramic
Period in Passamaquoddy Bay, New Brunswick. Archaeological
Survey of Canada Paper No. 135. National
Museum of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 157 pp.
Sanger, D. 2010. Semi-subterranean houses in the Ceramic
period along the coast of Maine. Maine Archaeological
Society Bulletin 50(2):23–46.
Sassaman, K.E., and D.H. Holly Jr. 2011. Hunter-gatherer
Archaeology as Historical Process. University of Arizona
Press, Tucson, AZ, USA. 352 pp.
Sassaman, K.E., and A.R. Randall. 2012. Hunter-gatherer
theory in North American archaeology. Pp. 18–27,
In T. Pauketat (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of North
American Archaeology. Oxford University Press, Oxford,
UK. 704 pp.
Scott, C. 1989. Knowledge construction among the Cree
hunters: Metaphors and literal understanding. Journal
de la Société des Américanistes 75:193–208.
Skinner, A. 1912. Notes on the Eastern Cree and Northern
Salteaux. Anthropological Papers of the American
Museum of Natural History, Vol. IX. New York, NY,
USA. 253 pp.
Speck, F.G. 1935. Naskapi: The Savage Hunters of the
Labrador Peninsula. University of Oklahoma Press,
Norman, OK, USA. 248 pp.
Speck, F.G. 1997. Penobscot Man: The Life History of
a Forest Tribe in Maine. University of Maine Press,
Orono, ME, USA. 404 pp.
Journal of the North Atlantic
M.G. Hrynick and M.W. Betts
2017 Special Volume 10
17
Tanner, A. 1979. Bringing Home Animals: Religious
Ideology and the Mode of Production of Production
of the Mistassini Cree Hunters. Memorial University
of Newfoundland Institute of Social and Economic
Research, St. John’s, NL, Canada. 233 pp.
Viveiros de Castro, E. 1998. Cosmological deixis and
Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological
Institute 4:469–88.
Wallis, W.D., and R.S. Wallis. 1955. The Micmac Indians
of Eastern Canada. University of Minnesota Press, St.
Paul, MN, USA. 236 pp.
Watts, C. 2013. Relational archaeologies: Roots and
routes. Pp. 1–17, In C. Watts (Ed.). Relational Archaeologies.
Routledge, New York, NY, USA. 272 pp.
Whitelaw, T.M. 1994. Order without architecture: Functional,
social, and symbolic dimensions in huntergatherer
settlement organization. Pp. 217–243, In
M.P. Pearson and C. Richards (Eds). Architecture and
Order: Approaches to Social Space. Routledge, London,
UK. 260 pp.
Willerslev, R. 2007. Soul Hunters: Hunting, Animism, and
Personhood Among the Siberian Yukaghirs. University
of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA. 229 pp.
Zedeño, M.N. 2009. Animating by association: Index objects
and relational taxonomies. Cambridge Archaeological
Journal 19(3):407–17.