1
2017 NORTHEASTERN NATURALIST 24(Monograph 15):1–48
Bees of Maine, with a State Species Checklist
Alison C. Dibble1,*, Francis A. Drummond1,2, Constance Stubbs1,3, Michael Veit4,
and John S. Ascher5
Abstract - We present a new county checklist developed from bee research in Maine
since the 1800s. The list contains 278 bee species in 37 genera and 6 families, of which all
but 8 are native, with ≥50 taxa each in Andrena and Lasioglossum. Data for 16 counties
from publications, museum collections, and recent surveys varied in number of species
from 8 (Androscoggin) to 197 (Hancock). Research since 1930 on Vaccinium angustifolium
(Lowbush Blueberry) led to many records. Twenty-one species are considered unusual,
including 3 first recorded in 2016: Epeoloides pilosulus, Melitta melittoides, and Holcopasites
calliopsidis. Maine records provide evidence of declines in Bombus affinis, decline in
B. terricola followed by partial recovery, and increase in B. impatiens. Crops that should
be studied regarding associated bees are Malus pumila (Apple), Vaccinium corymbosum
(Highbush Blueberry), Vaccinium macrocarpon (American Cranberry), and Curcurbitaceae
(cucurbits). Montane, sandy, and island habitats were identified as priorities for future
sampling. We discuss records of bee species from New England relevant to understanding
the Maine fauna, bee diversity, changes in abundance, cleptoparasitism, pesticide impacts,
habitat requirements, and climate change.
Introduction
In Maine, native bees have received attention due to their role as pollinators,
in particular of native, insect-dependent Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton (Lowbush
Blueberry). This crop is designated in the industry as “wild blueberry” and also
known as Low Sweet Blueberry. It is unusual in that large monocultural stands
of a wild shrub are managed commercially (Hall et al. 1979). Extensive studies of
Lowbush Blueberry since the 1960s (Boulanger et al. 1967; Bushmann and Drummond
2015; Drummond and Stubbs 1997a, 1997b, 2003; Stubbs et al. 1992) have
identified that the most important pollinators for this crop are native bees including
Bombus (bumble bees), Andrena (mining bees), Halictus and Lasioglossum (sweat
bees), Megachile (leaf-cutter bees), and Osmia (mason or orchard bees). Of particular
interest to researchers and growers are the alternate forage plants visited by
bees for pollen and nectar before and after the bloom period for the Lowbush Blueberry
crop (Bushmann and Drummond 2015, Stubbs et al. 1992). Other research
foci within the Lowbush Blueberry pollination system are the effects of pesticides,
pests, and diseases on native bees (Bushmann et al. 2012, Drummond 2012a).
1University of Maine, School of Biology and Ecology, 5722 Deering Hall, Orono, ME
04469. 2University of Maine, Cooperative Extension, 305 Deering Hall, Orono, ME 04469.
3Current address - PO Box 799, Winterport, ME 04496. 493 Chestnut Street, Pepperell, MA
01463. 5Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science
Drive 4, Singapore 117543. *Corresponding author - adibble2@gmail.com.
Manuscript Editor: David Halliwell
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
2
Collecting for purposes other than to understand pollination of Lowbush Blueberry
has been less intensive despite the longstanding importance of orchard crops
and research on invasive plant pollination since the early 1990s (Stubbs et al.
2007). Procter (1938, 1946) included bees in a general survey of the Mount Desert
Region, and in recent decades several bee surveys have been conducted that were
not related to Lowbush Blueberry (Dibble et al. 1997; Droege 2010; Stubbs et al.
1996, 2007). Diverse bees also visit other native blueberry species including Vaccinium
corymbosum L.(Highbush Blueberry), common in Maine wetlands, and also
V. myrtilloides Michx. (Common Blueberry), which often grows intermixed with
Lowbush Blueberry.
In Maine, the study of native bees and their collection has been uneven across
time and geographic locale (Table 1). The earliest scientific studies of Maine bees
include reports of an entomological collecting trip to northern parts of Penobscot
and Piscataquis Counties by Alpheus S. Packard Jr. (1861). There is also a description
by Cresson (1863) of 2 currently valid Nomada species from unknown
localities in Maine: N. depressa and the poorly known N. proxima; both are from the
collection of Edward Norton, and their type specimens are deposited in the Academy
of Natural Sciences Philadelphia. Another collector, Frederick Allen Eddy,
collected bees in the early 1880s from the vicinity of Orono, Penobscot County,
many of which are deposited in the University of Maine Collection.
John H. Lovell made the most important historical contribution to the study of
Maine bees by documenting the bee fauna of Waldoboro in Lincoln County where
he lived and by making broader studies of regional bees and their floral associations
(Covell 1972; Lovell 1900, 1905a, 1905b, 1907, 1908, 1910, 1911, 1913, 1922a,
1922b, 1924, 1925a, 1925b, 1925c; Lovell and Cockerell 1905, 1906, 1907a,
1907b; Lovell and Lovell 1932; Pellett 1939). His collections, which consist of
about 16,000 specimens of bees and other flower-visiting insects, were brought to
the University of Louisville insect collection (renamed as the Lovell Insect Museum).
Most of Lovell’s type specimens of New England bees, including those from
Maine, are in the National Museum of Natural History, with lectotype designations
provided by Covell (1972), and have been databased and imaged. However, the
types of 4 additional species described from New England by Lovell (1909) and
originally deposited in the Museum of the Boston Society of Natural History, were
overlooked by Covell (1972). These types are now in the Museum of Comparative
Zoology at Harvard University (Moure and Hurd 1987). In all, Lovell described
from New England 15 currently valid bee species (2 of questionable validity; 8
with coauthor T.D.A. Cockerell) and 18 additional names now placed in synonymy,
with Waldoboro the type locality of 10 valid species and an additional 14 taxa now
considered to be junior synonyms. Lovell made important contributions to what
is known about pollination ecology, flower morphology, and the honey plants of
North America (see the biography of John Lovell at https://www.encyclopedia.
com/doc/1G2-2830902685.html). His work was of particular importance as a
foundation for regional investigations of floral specialization (oligolecty), complementing
investigations of bees in the Midwestern United States by the pioneering
Northeastern Naturalist
3
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Table 1. Chronological list of selected collectors of bees in Maine, including those having more than 10 records in available sources, with approximate
years of activity, collecting localities, comments and citation if known, and repository if known. det. = determined by. County abbreviations are in Figure 1.
Other abbreviations: American Museum of Natural History (AMNH), Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry, Augusta (ME DACF),
University of Connecticut Entomological Collection (UCMS). [Table continued on following 2 pages.]
Collection localities
Collectors Collection years and/or study focus Comments and citation if known Repository, if known
Packard, A.S., Jr. 1861 Northern PE and PI Report to Maine Board of Agriculture Unknown
Zabriskie, J.L. 1898–1900 Little Deer Isle (HA), AMNH
Casco Bay (CU)
Lovell, J.H. 1904–1907 Waldoboro (LI) Types catalogued by Covell (1972) Lovell Insect Museum at the
University of Louisville; type
specimens in the National Museum
of Natural History and the Museum
of Comparative Zoology at
Harvard; some specimens in
AMNH
Eddy, F.A. 1881–1884 Assumed PE Locale info patchy; “Orono Hill”, ME DACF
“Carre Woods”, “Odlin Road” ; red ink
Franklin, H.J. 1911–1913 Orono (PE) Bombus Unknown
Woodruff, L.B. 1915 Camden (KN) Bombus AMNH
Viereck, H.L. 1922 Mount Desert Island (HA) Viereck 1922 Unknown
Schwarz, H.F. 1925 Rangeley (FR) Schwarz (1926) AMNH
Procter, W. 1938–1946 Mount Desert Island (HA) Part of a general natural history survey; Sawtell Museum Archives, Acadia
Procter (1938, 1946) National Park at McFarland Hill,
Bar Harbor, ME
Borror, D.J. 1940 LI Academic insect collection Ohio State University
Brower, A.E. 1933–1960 Bar Harbor (HA), Maine Forest Service, specialized in ME DACF, in part
Augusta (KE), Katahdin (PI) Lepidoptera
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
4
Table 1, continued.
Collection localities
Collectors Collection years and/or study focus Comments and citation if known Repository, if known
Unknown 1927–1929, 1937 N. Gray (CU) “Maine Agric Exp Sta” ME DACF
“Entomological Museum”
Phipps, C.R. Late 1920s CU, HA,WN With O. Dirks, studied insects ME DACF
associated with blueberry crop
Plath, O.E. 1935 Caribou (AR) University of Connecticut
Klots, W.B. 1954 Oxford (OX) AMNH
Wygodzinsky, P. 1964 Skowhegan (KE) AMNH
Osgood, E.A. 1960s–1980s Alternate forage for Lowbush Specimens det. by TB. Mitchell, W.E. ME DACF
Blueberry, including Rubus, LaBerge, and, for Bombus, H.E. Milliron
Viburnum (PE, WN,YO)
Boulanger, L. W. 1961–1965 Lowbush Blueberry With E.A. Osgood; also sampled ME DACF
pollinators (WD, WN, YO) New Brunswick, Canada
Favreau, M. 1974 WD AMNH
Heinrich, B. 1970s–1980s Farmington area (FR) Bombus biology and foraging behavior Unknown
Miliczky, E.R. (student 1970s Blueberry pollinators Some Dialictus det. by S.W. Batra; ME DACF
of E.A. Osgood) Masters thesis 1978
Hansen, R. (student 1982 HA, WN Bees on spruce, T34 (HA) and ME DACF
of E.A. Osgood) Washington County, T4 ND, (n. HA) and
WN, sent specimens to M. Arduser;
Dialictus and Evylaeus det. by G.C. Eickwort
Dibble, A.C. Early 1990s– Conservation of bee diversity Dibble and Drummond 1997, Dibble et al. School of Biology and Ecology,
present on Amelanchier (HA, PE); 1997; Andrena det. by W.E. LaBerge, , University of Maine, Orono, ME
bee/host plant relationships Halictidae by G.C. Eickwort and J. Gibbs,
(AR, HA, PE, PI, WN) Nomada by S. Droege, Bombus by L.
Richardson, various by J.S. Ascher and
M. Veit
Northeastern Naturalist
5
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Table 1, continued.
Collection localities
Collectors Collection years and/or study focus Comments and citation if known Repository, if known
Stubbs, C.S., F.A. 1990s–2010 Pollinators on Lowbush Nomada det. by S. Droege Acadia National Park Collection
Drummond, and Blueberry, invasive plants
H. Ginsberg (HA, PE, WD, WN)
Droege, Sam 2010 Schoodic Peninsula, Winter Hymenoptera Bioblitz, Acadia National US Geological Survey
Harbor (HA); Bradley (PE) Park; bee diversity study, Penobscot
Experimental Forest, Bradley
Loose, J., F.A. Late 1990s WN Lowbush Blueberry research (Deblois and ME DACF, in part
Drummond, and Cherryfield), det. by S.W. Batra, updates
C.S. Stubbs by M. Veit
Ascher, J.S. 2001 Monhegan Island, Port Clyde American Museum of Natural History and AMNH
(KN) University of Singapore
Maier, C.T. 2001–2004 Steuben (WN) Connecticut Agricultural Experiment
Station, New Haven, CT
Bushmann, S. 2010–present HA, WD, WN Blueberry pollinators confirmed or det. School of Biology and Ecology,
by S. Droege, J. Gibbs, R. Jean University of Maine, Orono, ME
Veit, M. 2006–2016 HA, KE, PE, SO, WD, YO General bee surveying Personal collection, Pepperell, MA
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
6
mellitologists Sigmund Graenicher (1905, 1911, 1914, 1927, 1935) and Charles
Robertson (1929).
Other earlier scientists who contributed to what is known of Maine bees include
Franklin (1911, 1912), who made the first extensive studies of Maine bumble
bees (Bombus sensu lato, including Psithyrus), and cited Orono, ME, among the
syntype localities in his description of Psithyrus fernaldae Franklin, 1911. This
taxon is now cited as Bombus (Psithyrus) fernaldae or treated as a synonym of the
Palearctic B. (P.) flavidus Eversmann (see Cameron et al. 2007). Viereck (1922)
described from Mount Desert Island 2 Andrena species now in synonymy. Herbert
F. Schwarz (1926) reported bees collected at Rangeley in Franklin County and
deposited voucher specimens in the American Museum of Natural History. William
Procter (1938, 1946) included bees in his general biological survey of Mount
Desert Island in Hancock County. In Washington, Hancock, Cumberland, Knox,
and Lincoln counties and perhaps elsewhere in the late 1920s, Clarence R. Phipps
(1930) inventoried insects associated with blueberry species and Gaylussacia baccata
(Wangenh.) K. Koch (Black Huckleberry). Auburn E. Brower, a well-known
microlepidopteran specialist, collected Maine bees among other insects from the
early 1930s for almost 50 years, in the Augusta area of Kennebec County and many
other Maine locales (Davis and Hevel 1995).
Interest in Lowbush Blueberry prompted many research projects since the work
of Phipps (1930). From early times, a high priority was given to documenting bee
fauna and obtaining expert identification of specimens, as correct determination
to the level of species is a crucial aspect in understanding ecological patterns (see
discussion in Cane 2001). In 1961–1965, bees and other insect visitors to Lowbush
Blueberry were documented in 3 Maine counties and 4 Canadian provinces (Boulanger
et al. 1967). Eben A. Osgood (1972, 1989) examined the nesting biology of
Andrena and contributed to the identification of 2 Osmia species (Rust and Osgood
1993). His students and others extended this research by investigating native plants
as floral resources and the response of the bee communities to pesticides applied to
control Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens) (Spruce Budworm) outbreaks (Hansen
and Osgood 1983; Miliczky and Osgood 1979a, b; Stubbs et al . 1992, 1996).
Bernd Heinrich has been internationally recognized for his research on the
ecological physiology of bee and moth thermoregulation, and for his numerous
writings in natural history (Heinrich 1971, 1976b, 1979, 1993, 1994, 1995, 2004;
Heinrich and Chavarría 2001; Heinrich and Heinrich 1983a, 1983b; Heinrich et al.
1977). Heinrich conducted important research on the behavior and biology of Bombus
in the Farmington, ME, area. Starting in the 1970s, he elucidated the ecological
physiology of bumble bee energy budgets for optimal foraging and thermoregulation
(Heinrich 1972a, 1972b, 1972c, 1972d, 1973, 1974a, 1974b, 1975, 1976a,
1976c, 1979, 1995, 2004).
These and additional researchers, natural historians, and collectors who have
provided baseline information on Maine’s bee fauna and bee biology are listed
chronologically and annotated in Table 1. Identification of some Maine bee specimens
to species was conducted by resident scientists, especially S. Bushmann and
Northeastern Naturalist
7
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
C.S. Stubbs, and most identifications were by taxonomic specialists on Northeastern
bees, including T.B. Mitchell (1960, 1962), G.C. Eickwort, and W.E. LaBerge.
More recently the specialists who determined Maine bees have included J. Gibbs,
S. Droege, T. Griswold, J.S. Ascher, L. Richardson, and M. Veit.
This report on bee diversity in Maine includes a state checklist of species
occurrence by county (Table 2, Fig. 1) based on all available data, including
specimens examined by the authors, taxonomic catalogs, revisions, other literature,
and digitized specimen records. The latter include specimens from multiple
collections in the northeastern United States, including the American Museum
of Natural History (AMNH), Cornell University, the University of Connecticut,
and other collaborating institutions, compiled using open-source Arthropod Easy
Capture (AEC; Seltmann 2013) (see http://biodiversity-informatics-training.org/
wp-content/uploads/2014/03/D2_P6_CW_AEC2.pdf) and made publicly accessible
through the biodiversity portals Discover Life (http://www.discoverlife.org)
Figure 1. State of Maine,
showing approximate
boundaries of the 16 counties,
and number of bee
species known. County
names are abbreviated as:
AN = Androscoggin, AR =
Aroostook, CU = Cumberland,
FR = Franklin, HA =
Hancock, KE = Kennebec,
KN = Knox, LI = Lincoln,
OX = Oxford, PE = Penobscot,
PI = Piscataquis, SA
= Sagadahoc, SO = Somerset,
WD = Waldo, WN =
Washington, YO = York.
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
8
and iDigbio (https://www.idigbio.org/portal/recordsets/8919571f-205a-4aed-b9f2-
96ccd0108e4c). The citizen-science website Bugguide (www.bugguide.net) was
also consulted as a source for recent records for the subset of species identifiable
from digital images. The checklist, while preliminary, provides insight into the
state of knowledge of bee species for each of Maine’s 16 counties (Fig. 1) and
provides a baseline for future assessment of native bee community health and diversity
in Maine. For example, a 5-year bumble bee survey initiated in 2015 (http://
mainebumblebeeatlas.umf.maine.edu/) will likely expand upon the baseline for
bumble bees reported here (Bickerman-Martens et al. 2017).
Methods
Checklist
We compiled records for Maine bees from collections we examined (University
of Maine Entomological Museum, American Museum of Natural History,
Cornell University, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Maine Forest Service Entomological
Collection, Acadia National Park, The Peabody Museum of Natural
History at Yale University, and several private collections), published bee research
conducted in Maine (Boulanger et al. 1967; Bushmann and Drummond
2015; Dibble and Drummond 1997; Dibble et al. 1997; Miliczky 1978; Procter
1938, 1946; Stubbs et al. 1992, 2007), and additional graduate theses and widely
disseminated reports (e.g., Dearborn et al. 1983, Droege 2012). We consulted historical
literature for Maine records and ranges of bee taxa, including taxonomic
revisions by Bouseman and LaBerge (1978), LaBerge (1956, 1961, 1967, 1971,
1973, 1977, 1980, 1985, 1987, 1989), LaBerge and Bouseman (1970), LaBerge
and Ribble (1972, 1975), McGinley (1986), Michener (1947), and Ribble (1968).
Species distribution information was also derived from recent taxonomic publications
such as Gibbs (2010, 2011), Gibbs et al. (2013), Rightmyer et al. (2010),
and Sheffield et al. (2011). Published and unpublished databases were consulted
including iDigbio; records from specimens integrated by Discover Life from the
United States Geological Survey through efforts of S. Droege and displayed using
its global mapper tool; the Maine Forest Service Entomological Museum (see
Dearborn et al. 1983) with updates (C. Donohue, Maine Forest Service, Augusta,
ME, pers. comm.); and the Maine Bumble Bee Atlas (hosted by the Maine Department
of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife with the University of Maine). State records
for Maine were also obtained from critical review of Mitchell (1960, 1962), and
from taxonomic revisions that also served as a basis for updating all scientific
names to current usage, following Ascher and Pickering (2017) and a pending update
of the World Bee Checklist in the Integrated Taxonomic Information System
(http://www.itis.gov). New records based on specimens collected since 1992 by
A.C. Dibble and from 2009 to 2015 by S. Bushmann, F.A. Drummond, B. DuClos,
and M. Veit are also reflected in the checklist.
Many vouchers, especially in older collections, have labels with minimal data
regarding localities and collecting events. By contrast, collections made for various
research projects in Maine may have voucher specimens with detailed ecological
Northeastern Naturalist
9
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
and collecting-effort information recorded. Most of these vouchers were obtained
in one of the following ways: (1) as an individual bee captured directly on flowers,
(2) using sweep nets on flowers of known plants in a repeatable manner, (3) using
malaise traps set up at a known plant, (4) using small tent-like nets set up over bee
burrows, or (5) using bowl traps with a liquid solution in which insects drown when
they arrive to investigate a visual trap mimicking a highly attractive floral resource
(Droege 2010). Catch rates for bee groups differ between capture methods (Bushmann
and Drummond 2015, Drummond and Stubbs 1997b), but important and
complementary data were obtained in Maine by each of the sampling methods. For
instance, bowl traps captured large numbers of sweat bees but were ineffective at
reliably capturing bumble bees. Hand capture and netting were, by contrast, highly
effective for some large and noticeable bees (Bushmann 2013).
The compilation of the checklist by county (Table 2) includes only taxa where
historical reports are consistent with species ranges as currently understood and are
otherwise considered to be reliable (for some of these, county-level information
was unavailable) or for which a specimen is known to us. Additional bee taxa that
could be in Maine based on reports that we regard as yet unconfirmed but potentially
valid are excluded from the checklist table but are discussed below.
Table 2. Checklist of the bees of Maine by county including selected sources. “Unknown county”
means that a locality label or literature source does not include county or town but is from Maine.
County abbreviations are explained in Figure 1. Superscripts following county records are representative
sources, and are not comprehensive. Numbers refer to sources that are records in the literature or
specimens in collections, lower case letters refer mostly to museum specimens (see Source Legend at
end of checklist). * = introduced species. [Table continued on the following 10 pages.]
Scientific name Counties (selected sources)
Andrena (Andrena) carolina Viereck, 1909 ARn, CU13, HA1,8PE1,4,14,53, PI12,
WN8,9,12,26, 61,n, YOk
Andrena (Andrena) clarkella (Kirby, 1802) HA1,25, PE1,10,12,19,n, WN1, YO±
Andrena (Andrena) frigida Smith, 1853 ANa, HA1,8,25, PE1,12,14,18,n, WD8,
WN1,8,10,12,61
Andrena (Andrena) mandibularis Robertson, 1892 HA1,8,18, PE14, WNc
Andrena (Andrena) milwaukeensis Graenicher, 1903 HA25, KE12, PE1,12,n, PI, WN9
Andrena (Andrena) rufosignata Cockerell, 1902 ARn, HA8, KE12, LIm, PE1,14,n, SO2,
WN8,10,12,26,54,61,c,n, YOk
Andrena (Andrena) thaspii Graenicher, 1903 ARa, FRa, HA8,25, PE1,18, WN9,24,n,
YO61,c
Andrena (Callandrena s.l.) asteris Robertson, 1891 HA25,a,o, KNp, LIm, WNc, YOc
Andrena (Callandrena s.l.) braccata Viereck, 1907 YO29, PE1
Andrena (Callandrena s.l.) placata Mitchell, 1960 CUa,g, HAg, KNg, OXn, PE1,n, SOa
Andrena (Cnemidandrena) canadensis Dalla Torre, 1896 CUg, FRa, HA1,g, LI1, PE1, SOa,i
Andrena (Cnemidandrena) hirticincta Provancher, 1888 FRa, HA1,25,a,c,g, LIc, OXq, PEk,n, PIa,
SOc, YOa,k
Andrena (Cnemidandrena) nubecula Smith, 1853 CUa,g,FRa, HA1,25,a,g, KE, KNc, LIm,
PE1,n, SOc, WD2
Andrena (Conandrena) bradleyi Viereck, 1907 ARn, HA8, PE1,14, WD8, WN8,10,12,61
Andrena (Euandrena) algida Smith, 1853 HA1, PE1,14,n, WN8,12
Andrena (Euandrena) nigrihirta (Ashmead, 1890) FRa, HA25, KN7, PE1,2,14,n, WN9,12, YOk
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
10
Scientific name Counties (selected sources)
Andrena (Gonandrena) integra Smith, 1853 HA8, PE1,12
Andrena (Gonandrena) persimulata Viereck, 1917 WD2
Andrena (Holandrena) cressonii Robertson, 1891 CU18, HA1,8, PE1,14,26,n, WDa, WN1,9,10
Andrena (Larandrena) miserabilis Cresson, 1872 HA1,25, PE1,2,12,14,n, WD8, WN10, YO2
Andrena (Leucandrena) barbilabris (Kirby, 1802) HA25, PE12,n
Andrena (Leucandrena) erythronii Robertson, 1891 PE19, Unknown county29
Andrena (Melandrena) carlini Cockerell, 1901 CU12,13, HA1,8,25, KN12, PE1,4,10,12,14,19,k,n,
WDa, WN4,10,12,45,61,n, YOo
Andrena (Melandrena) commoda Smith, 1879 HA1,25
Andrena (Melandrena) dunningi Cockerell, 1898 HA1, PE1,12,14,19,k,n, WN8,9,61
Andrena (Melandrena) nivalis Smith, 1853 ARn, HA8, KEc, OXa,k, PE1,2,14, PIk,
WN1,2,9,10,61, YO12
Andrena (Melandrena) pruni Robertson, 1891 WNn
Andrena (Melandrena) regularis Malloch, 1917 HA8, KN12, PE1,12,14,16,n, WN4,9,10,12,61
Andrena (Melandrena) vicina Smith, 1853 CUi, HA1,8,20,25, KE12, KN12, LI56,a,p,
OXk,p, PE1,8,14,19,n, WN1,8,9,10,12,61, YO12
Andrena (Micrandrena) melanochroa Cockerell, 1898 HA1, KNn, OXc, PE1,12,14,45,n, WD2,
WN10,12,61, YOk
Andrena (Micrandrena) salictaria Robertson, 1905 HA1,25, LI45, PE45, WN12
Andrena (Plastandrena) crataegi Robertson, 1893 HA1,25,a,o, KN12, LIm, OXa, PE1,4,10,12,14,n,
PIh, WN10,12,61,c,h , YO2,12,o
Andrena (Rhacandrena) brevipalpis Cockerell, 1930 HA8, PE2
Andrena (Rhacandrena) robertsonii Dalla Torre, 1896 KNm, LIm, PE12, WN12
Andrena (Scrapteropsis) alleghaniensis Viereck, 1907 HA1, PE14,n, WN8,10,12,61, YO2
Andrena (Scrapteropsis) imitatrix Cresson, 1872 HA1, KE12, PE12,n, WN8,10,61
Andrena (Scrapteropsis) kalmiae Atwood, 1934 ARn, CU13, HA8, WN8,c, YO2
Andrena (Simandrena) nasonii Robertson, 1895 HA1, KN12, PE1,12,14,n, WN8,9,10,12
Andrena (Simandrena) wheeleri Graenicher, 1904 ARn, HA1,25, KN12, PE1,12,13,14, PIh,
WD12,a,d, WN9,10, 12,61, YO12,o
*Andrena (Taeniandrena) wilkella (Kirby, 1802) ARn, CUg, FRa, HA1,25,a,o, LIm, OXa,
PE1,12,18,n, PIh,k, SAi, SOc, WD8,
WN1,5,8,12,61, YOa,c
Andrena (Thysandrena) bisalicis Viereck, 1908 CU12, HA8, PE1,12, YO13
Andrena (Thysandrena) w-scripta Viereck, 1904 HA25,a as A. lata, KE12, PE1,12,14, PIh,
WN9 as A. lata,10,12
Andrena (Trachandrena) ceanothi Viereck, 1917 HA1, PE1,12, WN8, YO12
Andrena (Trachandrena) forbesii Robertson, 1891 HA8, PE1,12,14,k,n, PI, WDa, WN12
Andrena (Trachandrena) hippotes Robertson, 1895 PE1,12,16,19,n, PIh, WDa
Andrena (Trachandrena) miranda Smith, 1879 ARn, FRa,n, HA1,25, LIn, PE1,2,14,n, PIh,
WN9,12,61, YOc
Andrena (Trachandrena) nuda Robertson, 1891 PE66, YO66
Andrena (Trachandrena) rugosa Robertson, 1891 HA1,8, LIm, PE1,2, WN8,10, YOk
Andrena (Trachandrena) sigmundi Cockerell, 1902 HA1,20,25, KN12,n, LIa, PE1,12,14,n,
WN1,4,10,12,61,n, YO12
Andrena (Trachandrena) spiraeana Robertson, 1895 PE12,46
Andrena (Trachandrena) virginiana Mitchell, 1960 CUc,g, HA1,8,g, OXn, PE1, WD
Andrena (Tylandrena) erythrogaster (Ashmead, 1890) CUk, PEf,n
Andrena (Tylandrena) perplexa Smith, 1853 PE10
Calliopsis (Calliopsis) andreniformis Smith, 1853 HA8,25, KE56,k, YO2
Perdita (Perdita) octomaculata (Say, 1824) CUc,g, HA2,g, KNg, LI56,a,p, WN5
Pseudopanurgus aestivalis (Provancher, 1882) (= P. WN1, Unknown county43
nebraskensis)
Northeastern Naturalist
11
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Scientific name Counties (selected sources)
Pseudopanurgus andrenoides (Smith, 1853) FR57,a, HA1,2,c, KNc, LI56, PE1, SOa
Anthophora (Clisodon) terminalis Cresson, 1869 HA25, OXq, PE1, SO2, YOk
Anthophora (Melea) bomboides Kirby, 1837 Unknown county28
*Apis (Apis) mellifera L., 1758 AR4, AN4, CU13, HA1,4,25,63, KE4,
KN4,70, LI4,70, OX4,n, PE1,4,12,69,63,70,k,
WD4,8,63,70,q, WN1,4,5,9,10,61,63,70
Bombus (Bombus) affinis Cresson, 1863 CUg,i, FR27, HA25, KEk, LIh,m, PE12,n,p,
PIa, WD4,12, WN12, YOa
Bombus (Bombus) terricola Kirby, 1837 AR1,4,8,p, CU4,a,g,o, FR1,4,27,57,63,a,o,
HA1,4,18,25,63,70,a,f,g,q, KE4,k, KN4,70,a,g, LIo,
OXa, PE1,4,12,13,14,18,63,69,70,k, PIa,h,k, SA4,
SO4,i, WD4,63,70,p,q, WN1,4,5,9,12,61,63,70,
YO4,73,a,k,r
Bombus (Cullumanobombus) griseocollis (DeGeer, 1773) HA1,63, PE1,63, PIa, WNb
Bombus (Cullumanobombus) rufocinctus Cresson, 1863 ARj,n, HA1, PE1,63,b , WN5
Bombus (Thoracobombus) fervidus (Fabricius, 1798) HA1,25,m, KEk,n, LIp, PE1,12, OXq, PIa,
SO2, WN4,61, YOa,r
Bombus (Thoracobombus) pensylvanicus (DeGeer, 1773) YO29,32,66
Bombus (Psithyrus) ashtoni (Cresson, 1864) CUa,n, FR57,a, HA1,25,k,o,q, KEk,n, LIo,
OXa, PE1,2,n, YOa,r
Bombus (Psithyrus) citrinus (Smith, 1854) AR8, CUr, HA25,63,k,p, KEk, KNa, LIp,
OXk, PEp, WDp, WNc, YO73
Bombus (Psithyrus) fernaldae (Franklin, 1911) FR57,a, HA2,25,p, PE1, PI12, WD63,
WN1,4,5,63
Bombus (Psithyrus) insularis (Smith 1861) FRa, HAn, PE1
Bombus (Pyrobombus) bimaculatus Cresson, 1863 AR8, HA1,25,63, KE2, KN63, LI6,j,
PE1,2,63,b, WD5,63, WN1,4,61,63, YO2
Bombus (Pyrobombus) impatiens Cresson, 1863 AR8, CU1,13, FR4,8, HA1,4,8,63,m, KE4,k,n,
KN4,63,g, LI4, OXn, PE1,2,4,12,63,b, PIa,m,
SAi, WD4,63, WN1,4,61,63, YO1,73,a
Bombus (Pyrobombus) perplexus Cresson, 1863 AR2,8, HA1,2,25,63,a,j,q, KEk, LIm, KN63,a,
PE1,2,12,14,63,m, PIh,k, WD63,q, WN1,5,12,63,b,
YOr
Bombus (Pyrobombus) sandersoni Franklin, 1913 ANb, AR, FRa, HA63,a, KEb, KNa, PE1,63,
PIk,m, WN1,4,5,63,b, YOq
Bombus (Pyrobombus) ternarius Say, 1837 AR1,2,8, CUa,g,r, FR4,57,a,o,
HA1,4,25,63,a,g,k,m,n,p,q, KE4,m,n, KN4,63a,
LIj,o,p,q, OXn, PE1,4,12,18,63,k, PIa,h,k, SA4,
SOa,j, WD4,63,k,p,q, WN1,4,5,9,61,63,a,b, YOa,r
Bombus (Pyrobombus) vagans vagans Smith, 1854 AR1,4, CU13,g,p,r, FR4,57,a, HA1,19,25,63,a,k,q,
KN63,a, LIm, PE1,2,10,63,m,n, PIa,h, SO2,
WD63,k,q, WN1,4,5,9,10,61,63, YOa
Bombus (Subterraneobombus) borealis Kirby, 1837 AR1,2,4,8, FR4,57,a, HA1,2,25, KN63,e, LIp,
OXq, PE1,63,b, WD5,8,63,qWN1,4
Habropoda laboriosa (Fabricius, 1804) LIm
Melissodes (Apomelissodes) apicatus Lovell & Cockerell, LI48,m,p, WD48
1906
Melissodes (Eumelissodes) agilis Cresson, 1878 LI47,a
Melissodes (Heliomelissodes) desponsus Smith, 1854 LIa, PE1
Melissodes (Eumelissodes) druriellus (Kirby, 1802) AN47,o, AR47, CU47,c, HA1,25,a, LI47,
PE1,47
Melissodes (Eumelissodes) illatus Lovell & Cockerell, 1906 FRa,o, HA1,2,8,25,47,a, KE47, KNa, LI47,
PE1,n, SOa, WN1,4,5,7,12,b,c, YO47,o
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
12
Scientific name Counties (selected sources)
Melissodes (Eumelissodes) subillatus LaBerge, 1961 CU47, HA47, LI47,m
Melissodes (Eumelissodes) trinodis Robertson, 1901 LI62,a
Melissodes (Melissodes) b. bimaculatus (Lepeletier, 1825) Unknown county66
Peponapis (Peponapis) pruinosa (Say, 1837) CU1, HA1, PE4
Holcopasites calliopsidis (Linsley, 1943) WA1
Holcopasites illinoiensis (Robertson, 1891) PE41
Epeolus americanus Cresson, 1878 [= lanhami Mitchell, WN40,c
1962]
Epeolus autumnalis Robertson, 1902 HA1
Epeolus pusillus Cresson, 1864 Unknown county66
Epeolus scutellaris Say, 1824 CU6,a, HA1,25,a,g, KNa,g, WN1
Epeoloides pilosulus (Cresson, 1878) LIm
,YO2
Triepeolus donatus (Smith, 1854) HA25, LI56,a,m
Triepeolus pectoralis (Robertson, 1897) CUg, HAc, KNa
Nomada armatella Cockerell, 1903 WN66
Nomada articulata Smith, 1854 CUn, HA8, LIm, PE14, PIk
Nomada bella Cresson, 1863 PE14,16, WD2
Nomada bethunei Cockerell, 1903 HA8, WN8
Nomada composita Mitchell, 1962 HAa, PE14, WN10,45
Nomada cressonii Robertson, 1893 ANm, HA1,25, PE1,14,16, WD2, WN9,10,45,
YO2
Nomada cuneata (Robertson, 1903) HA25
Nomada denticulata Robertson, 1902 PE18, YO2
Nomada depressa Cresson, 1863 OXq, PE14, WN8,9
Nomada dreisbachi Mitchell, 1962 Unknown county29
Nomada florilega Lovell and Cockerell, 1905 ANm, LI29,Lovell and Cockerell, 1905,p
Nomada gracilis Cresson, 1863 HAas N. inepta, PE1, WN8,10
Nomada illinoensis Robertson, 1900 Unknown county58
Nomada imbricata Smith, 1854 HA8, PE1,14, WN8,10
Nomada lepida Cresson, 1863 PE14, WD2
Nomada louisianae Cockerell, 1903 Unknown county71
Nomada luteoloides Robertson, 1895 HA1, PE14, WD8, WN1,10,45
Nomada maculata Cresson, 1863 HA8, PE14, WN8, YO2
Nomada ovata (Robertson, 1903) PE14,17,29
Nomada perplexa Cresson, 1863 HA25, LIm, PE14
Nomada proxima Cresson, 1863 Unknown county28,Cresson 1863
Nomada pygmaea Cresson, 1863 HA5, PE1,2,14, WN9,10
Nomada sayi Robertson, 1893 HA1, PE14, WN9,10
Nomada subrutila Lovell & Cockerell, 1905 LILovell and Cockerell, 1905,p
Nomada valida Smith, 1854 HA8, WN10
Nomada vicina Cresson, 1863 HAg
Nomada vincta Say, 1837 PEn
Nomada xanthura Cockerell, 1908 Unknown county29
Ceratina (Zadontomerus) calcarata Robertson, 1900 HA1,2,25,o, LIm, PE1,2,12,14, SAi, WD2,
WN1,8,61, YO2
Ceratina (Zadontomerus) dupla Say, 1837 HA1,25,o, KN12, LIm, PE1,10,12,14,n, SAi,
WN9
Ceratina (Zadontomerus) mikmaqi Rehan & Sheffield, 2011 HA1,8, SOa, WDa, WN8
Xylocopa (Xylocopoides) virginica (L., 1771) HA1
Colletes americanus Cresson, 1868 WN1
Colletes compactus Cresson, 1868 HA1, PE18, YOa
Colletes consors Cresson, 1868 [ssp. mescocopus Swenk] HA8,25,a, LIa, WN12,17
Northeastern Naturalist
13
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Scientific name Counties (selected sources)
Colletes hyalinus Provancher, 1888 FRa
Colletes impunctatus Nylander, 1852 [ssp. lacustris Swenk] PI29,39
Colletes inaequalis Say, 1837 HA1,8, KEk, PE1,12,16,18,19, WN8,10,12,61,n
Colletes kincaidii Cockerell, 1898 SOi, WN1
Colletes latitarsis Robertson, 1891 Unknown county72
Colletes simulans Cresson, 1868 HA2,25, KNc, LI1,a, PE1,n, SOa, WN1,5,12
Colletes validus Cresson, 1868 YO12, Unknown county29
Hylaeus (Hylaeus) annulatus (L., 1758) AR4, FRa,s, HA2,4,25,s, KNa, PE1,4,12, P14,
WD4, WN1,4,5,9
Hylaeus (Cephalylaeus) basalis (Smith, 1853) FRa, LI38, WN9
Hylaeus (Hylaeus) mesillae (Cockerell, 1896) [ssp. cressoni CUa, HA1,25,a, LI38,m, PE1, SOa, WN1,8,
(Cockerell, 1907)] YO2
Hylaeus (Hylaeus) saniculae (Robertson, 1896) LIa
Hylaeus (Hylaeus) verticalis (Cresson, 1869) HA8, LIm, PE1, PI, WN9
Hylaeus (Metziella) sparsus (Cresson, 1869) HA25
Hylaeus (Paraprosopis) floridanus (Robertson, 1893) Unknown county33
Hylaeus (Prosopis) affinis (Smith, 1853) CUa, FRa, HA1,2,8,25,a, KN, LIa, PE1,2,12,o,
WN8
Hylaeus (Prosopis) illinoisensis (Robertson, 1896) Unknown county29
Hylaeus (Prosopis) modestus modestus Say, 1837 FR57, HA1,25, PE1,2,12,14, PI, WN1,9
Dufourea novaeangliae (Robertson, 1897) HA25, LI, WN42
Augochlora (Augochlora) pura (Say, 1837) FRc, HA1,8,25, KNm, PE1, WDk, WN9,61
Augochlorella aurata (Smith, 1853) CUa, HA1,25,a, KEn, LIa,m, OXq, PE1,12,14,n,
SOa, WD8,12,a, WN1,4,5,9,10,12,61, YO2,f,k
Augochloropsis (Paraugochloropsis) metallica (Fabricius, WD8
1793)
Agapostemon (Agapostemon) sericeus (Förster, 1771) OXq
Agapostemon (Agapostemon) splendens (Lepeletier de Saint PEn, SAi
Fargeau, 1841)
Agapostemon (Agapostemon) texanus Cresson, 1872 HA1,8, OXq, PE12, WN58, YO12
Agapostemon (Agapostemon) virescens (Fabricius, 1775) HA1,8,25, LIm, PE1,12,19, WN8, YOc
Halictus (Odontalictus) ligatus Say, 1837 HA1,8, LIm, PE1,12,14,16,n, WD8, WN1,5,8,12,
YO2
Halictus (Seladonia) confusus confusus Smith, 1853 ARi, FRa,s, HA1,8,25,a,s, KE12, KNa,
PE1,14,s,n, WD2,a, WN1,8,9, YO2
Halictus (Protohalictus) rubicundus (Christ, 1791) CUa,±, FRa,s, HA1,2,8,25,a,s, LIa,m,
PE1,12,14,19,s, WD2,a, WN1,5,8,10,12,61,
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) admirandum (Sandhouse, 1924) HA1,8
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) albipenne (Robertson, 1890) HA1,8,a, KE8, WN1,8, YO12
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) anomalum (Robertson, 1892) HA8, WD8, WN8
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) atwoodi Gibbs, 2010 PE1,14
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) coeruleum (Robertson, 1893) WN61
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) cressonii (Robertson, 1890) FRo, HA1,8,25, LIa,m, PE1,12,14,n, PIa,
WN1,5,8,9,10,12, YO12,k
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) ellisiae (Sandhouse, 1924) HA1, PE1, WN5
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) ephialtum Gibbs, 2010 HA8, SOa, WN8
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) heterognathum (Mitchell, 1960) HA8, PE12,14, SOa, WD8, WN1,8
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) hitchensi Gibbs, 2012 HA1,8, PE1,n (as L. atlanticum), WN1
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) imitatum (Smith, 1853) HA1, LIa, SOa, PE1,n, WD8, WN1,8,10
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) katherineae (Gibbs, 2011) HA8, WN66, YO66
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) laevissimum (Smith, 1853) FRa, HA1,2,8,25, KE12, PE1,12, WN9
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) leucocomum (Lovell, 1908) HA1,8, LIa, PE1,15, WD8, WN8,45, YO12
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
14
Scientific name Counties (selected sources)
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) lineatulum (Crawford, 1906) PEn, WD, WN8, YOq
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) nigroviride (Graenicher, 1911) FRa, HA1,8, KNa, LIm, PE1,12,n
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) novascotiae (Mitchell, 1960) KNa
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) oblongum (Lovell, 1905) HA1,25,o, LIm,o, PE1,14, WN1
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) oceanicum (Cockerell, 1916) HA25, WN8
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) obscurum (Robertson, 1892) LIm, PEm
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) paradmirandum (Knerer & HA8, WN8
Atwood, 1966)
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) perpunctatum (Ellis, 1913) HA1,8, PE1, WN1,8, YO12
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) pilosum (Smith, 1853) HA1,2, YO12
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) planatum (Lovell, 1905)
FRa, HA1,2,8, LIa, PE1, WD8, YO2
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) smilacinae (Roberson, 1899) HA1,8, SOc, PE12,19, WD8, WN8, YO12
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) subversans (Mitchell, 1960) FRa, HA2,8, WD8
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) subviridatum (Cockerell, 1938) HA8, WN8
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) taylorae (Gibbs, 2010) HA8, PE1
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) tenax (Sandhouse, 1924) FRa, HA2, WN9
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) timothyi (Gibbs, 2010) HA8, WN8,10, YO24
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) versans (Lovell, 1905) HA1,2,8,a, LIa, PE1,n, WDa, WN8,9
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) versatum (Robertson, 1902) HA1,2,8,25, PE1,n, SOa, WN8
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) viridatum (Lovell, 1905) FRa, HA1,25,a, KE, LIm, PE1,m, WD8,
WN1,9
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) weemsi (Mitchell, 1960) HA8, WD8, WN8
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) zephyrum (Smith, 1853) HA25
Lasioglossum (Evylaeus) cinctipes (Provancher, 1888) HA8,25,c, KE2,c, LIa,m, PE1,n, WD2,
WN1,8,a, YO2
Lasioglossum (Hemihalictus) birkmanni (Crawford, 1906) HA8,25, WN1
(former L. macoupinense sensu auct.)
Lasioglossum (Hemihalictus) foxii (Robertson, 1895) HA1,25,a,n, PE1,n, WN1,9
Lasioglossum (Hemihalictus) inconditum (Cockerell, 1916) FRa, HAa,1, PE1, WD8, WN1,9
Lasioglossum (Hemihalictus) macoupinense (Robertson, HA8,25, PE14, WN9
1895) [non auct.; = divergens (Lovell, 1905)]
Lasioglossum (Hemihalictus) nelumbonis (Robertson, 1890) HA8
Lasioglossum (Hemihalictus) pectorale (Smith, 1853) HA1,8, PE1,14, WN1, YO
Lasioglossum (Lasioglossum) acuminatum McGinley, 1986 HA1,8, LIa,m, PE1, WN1,8,61, YO10
Lasioglossum (Lasioglossum) athabascense (Sandhouse, HA8,25, PE1, WN8,9
1933)
Lasioglossum (Lasioglossum) coriaceum (Smith, 1853) FRo, HA1,2,8,25, LIm, PE1,n, WD2,8,
WN1,8,61
*Lasioglossum (Lasioglossum) zonulum (Smith, 1848) FRa, HAa, KNa, LIa,c, PE15,n, WN8
*Lasioglossum (Leuchalictus) leucozonium (Schrank, 1781) FRs, HA1,2,8,25,a,s, SOa, WD8, WN8
Lasioglossum (Sphecodogastra) comagenense (Knerer & SO2, WN1,2(Veit det., with “?")
Atwood, 1964)
Lasioglossum (Sphecodogastra) quebecense (Crawford, HA1,8, KEc, PE14, PIc, WD8,
1907) WN26,45,c, YOa,o
Lasioglossum (Sphecodogastra) truncatum (Robertson, HA1,2,25, WD8,a
1901)
Sphecodes atlantis Mitchell, 1956 FRa
Sphecodes clematidis Robertson, 1897 CUa, HA9,25,a, PE1
Sphecodes confertus Say, 1837 PIc, WN61
Sphecodes coronus Mitchell, 1956 HA2, PIc, YO61
Northeastern Naturalist
15
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Scientific name Counties (selected sources)
Sphecodes cressonii (Robertson, 1903) HA25, LIa
Sphecodes davisii Robertson, 1897 HA1, PE1,14 (as S. persimilis),k, SOa, WN1,9,61,
YO2
Sphecodes dichrous Smith, 1853 HA1,25, KNc, WN1
Sphecodes johnsonii Lovell, 1909 HA25, WN1
Sphecodes levis Lovell and Cockerell, 1907 FRa, LIp, PE1,14, YOk
Sphecodes mandibularis Cresson, 1872 PE14,a, WN61
Sphecodes minor Robertson, 1898 KE12
Sphecodes prosphorus Lovell and Cockerell, 1907 HA10, KNa, LIa,p, SO2
Sphecodes ranunculi Robertson, 1897 FRa, HA1,25, PE14,16, WDa, WN12,61, Y O67
Sphecodes solonis Graenicher, 1911 FRa, PE14, SO2
*Anthidium (Anthidium) m. manicatum (L., 1758) HA1, LI1, PE1
Dianthidium (Dianthidium) simile (Cresson, 1864) YOa
Stelis (Dolichostelis) louisae Cockerell, 1911 Unknown county30
Stelis (Stelis) foederalis Smith, 1854 LIm, WN9,61
Stelis (Stelis) lateralis Cresson, 1864 HA25, LI29,51,m, PE1
Stelis (Stelis) nitida Cresson, 1878 WN61
Coelioxys (Boreocoelioxys) funeraria Smith, 1854 Unknown county31
Coelioxys (Boreocoelioxys) moesta Cresson, 1864 HA8, KNa, PI4, WN9,61
Coelioxys (Boreocoelioxys) octodentata Say, 1824 PE1, YOc
Coelioxys (Boreocoelioxys) porterae Cockerell, 1900 HA1,2, OXq, PE1,4, PI4, WN61
Coelioxys (Boreocoelioxys) rufitarsis Smith, 1854 HAa, KNa, PE1, YO2
Coelioxys (Coelioxys) sodalis Cresson, 1878 HA1,25, PI1
*Megachile (Callomegachile) sculpturalis Smith, 1853 AR1, HA1, PE1
*Megachile (Eutricharaea) rotundata (Fabricius, 1793) PE1, WD4, WN4,9,61
Megachile (Litomegachile) brevis Say, 1837 CUc, HA25, LI59
Megachile (Litomegachile) mendica Cresson, 1878 HA25, WN9, YOb,c
(*?)Megachile (Megachile) centuncularis (L., 1758) HA1,25,a, PE1, WNc
Megachile (Megachile) inermis Provancher, 1888 FRa, HA4,25, LI59, PE1,2,4, SO, WD4,
WN9,61
Megachile (Megachile) montivaga Cresson, 1878 PE17
Megachile (Megachile) lapponica Thomson, 1872 Unknown county35
[= nivalis Friese, 1903]
Megachile (Megachile) relativa Cresson, 1878 AR4, CUc, FRa, HA1,2,4,25,a,o, LI59,
PE1,2,4, PI4, SO2, WD4, WN1,4,9,61, YOc
Megachile (Xanthosarus) f. frigida Smith, 1853 HA25,a, LIa, OXf, PE1, PIa, WN9
Megachile (Xanthosarus) gemula Cresson, 1878 CUc, FRa, HA1,2,8,a,o, LI59, PE1,14,n,
WN1,8, YOa,c
Megachile (Xanthosarus) latimanus Say, 1823 HA1,25, KE2,n, LI59, OXq, PE1, WN1,
YOc
Megachile (Xanthosarus) m. melanophaea Smith, 1853 FRa,57, HA1,25, LIa, PE1,2,12, SO, WN1,9,
YOc
Megachile (Xanthosarus) mucida Cresson, 1878 WA61, det. Terry Griswold
Heriades (Neotrypetes) carinata Cresson, 1864 HA1,25, PE1,2
Heriades (Neotrypetes) leavitti Crawford, 1913 SO2, 29
Heriades (Neotrypetes) v. variolosa (Cresson, 1872) HA1, Unknown county29
Hoplitis (Alcidamea) albifrons albifrons (Kirby, 1837) HA9, WN9
Hoplitis (Alcidamea) pilosifrons (Cresson, 1864) HA8, WN8
Hoplitis (Alcidamea) producta producta (Cresson, 1864) HA1,8,25, PE1,12,14, WN1,8,9,10, YOc,n
Hoplitis (Alcidamea) spoliata (Provancher, 1888) CUo, HA25, LIm, PE1,12, PI, WN9,10,12,61,
[= H. cylindrica] YOa,c
Hoplitis (Alcidamea) truncata truncata (Cresson, 1878) HA25, PE1, YO2
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
16
Scientific name Counties (selected sources)
*Osmia (Helicosmia) caerulescens (L., 1758) HA1, PE4,16,19
Osmia (Melanosmia) albiventris Cresson, 1864 HA25, LI60, PE2,14,n, WN9
Osmia (Melanosmia) atriventris Cresson, 1864 HA1,25, LI60, PE1,2,12,14, WD2,4,
WN4,5,8,9,10,12,61, YOk
Osmia (Melanosmia) bucephala Cresson, 1864 HA8,25,a, KE4, LI60, PE1,10,n, WD2,
WN4,9,12,61, YO2
Osmia (Melanosmia) collinsiae Robertson, 1905 PE1,29
Osmia (Melanosmia) distincta Cresson, 1864 HA1,25, PE1,14, YOo
Osmia (Melanosmia) inspergens Lovell & Cockerell, 1907 HA1,8,25, LI60,p, WN9
Osmia (Melanosmia) laticeps Thomson, 1872 KN36
Osmia (Melanosmia) nigriventris (Zetterstedt, 1838) WN61
Osmia (Melanosmia) proxima Cresson, 1864 HA25,o, LI60,o, PE1,4,14, WN9,12,61, YO
Osmia (Melanosmia) pumila Cresson, 1864 HA8,25, PE1,n, WD2, WN8,61, YOk
Osmia (Melanosmia) simillima Smith, 1853 CUg, HA8,25, YOc
Osmia (Melanosmia) tarsata Provancher, 1888 WN10,61,66, Unknown county43
[= O. kenoyeri]
Osmia (Melanosmia) tersula Cockerell, 1912 HA1,8,9, PE1,14, WN9,10,o
Osmia (Melanosmia) virga Sandhouse, 1939 HA8, PE12, WN8, YO2
Osmia (Osmia) lignaria lignaria Say, 1837 HA8,25, KE4, PE1,2,4,12,16,n, WN8,61, YO
Macropis (Macropis) ciliata Patton, 1880 LI29,55
Macropis (Macropis) nuda (Provancher, 1882) CU13, HA25,a, LIa, PE1,n, WN8, YO2
Melitta (Cilissa) americana (Smith, 1853) LI55, WN37
Melitta (Cilissa) melittoides (Viereck, 1909) YO2
Source Legend
Code Item
1 Dibble specimens, or for Colletes compactus, photo determined by J.S. Ascher. See Dibble
et al. 1997, Dibble and Drummond 1997; Roque Island 2014; Dibble and Drummond field
course at Eagle Hill (2012–2016); Bee Module experiment 2012–2015, unpubl. data.
2 Veit specimens.
3 Stubbs specimens, or see Stubbs et al., 1992; Stubbs et al. 2007.
4 Drummond specimens.
5 Droege bioblitz at Acadia National Park, see Droege 2010.
6 AMNH database, includes J.S. Ascher specimens.
7 Ascher specimens and Maine Bee Type Compilation.
8 Bushmann specimens, 2010–2012 data from her Ph.D. Dissertation, and collections into 2016.
9 R. Hansen 1981, T30 MD, 1982, T4 ND, both in Washington County, and from Hancock
County, see Hansen and Osgood 1983.
10 L. Guimond 1989, T32 MD, Hancock County; T31, Washington County; Deblois, Washington
County; and Orono, Penobscot County.
11 Droege determinations, Nomada.
12 E.A. Osgood, including Orono, Penobscot County; Deblois, Washington County, 1961–1984;
Vienna, Kennebec County, 1961–1990; Kennebunk, York County, 1961–66 (Boulanger et al.
1967), Katahdin, Piscatquis County.
13 “Me. Agr. Exp. Sta” N. Gray, Cumberland County. 1929 and 1930 (possibly C.R. Phipps).
14 Miliczky and Osgood 1979a, 1979b, Passadumkeag, Penobscot Count y.
15 Frederick Allen Eddy, ca. 1882 (red ink).
16 s.n., Orono, Penobscot Co., 1929 (C.R. Phipps?), 1941, 1961–1963.
17 Specimens housed in MCZ Harvard University collections .
Northeastern Naturalist
17
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
18 Includes specimens collected by A.E. Brower, some mention “Me. Agr. Exp. Sta.”, various
sites, including Orono (1930, 1936, 1938); Bar Harbor, Hancock County (1937); T19, Washington
County (1962); Patten, Penobscot County (1974).
19 s.n. Orono 1936-1938 (C.O. Dirk?).
20 s.n. 17 May 1929, S. Sedgwick, Hancock County.
21 s.n. 1930, Orono, Penobscot County, Maine Agricultural Experiment Station.
22 s.n. 7 June 1961, Twp 19, Washington Co., determined as Andrena durangoensis, J.S. Ascher
annotated as A. carolina.
23 s.n. Machias, Washington County 1929.
24 s.n. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station, 1961.
25 Procter 1938 (amplified and revised in 1946).
26 s.n. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station, 1930.
27 Bernd Heinrich, Wilton, Franklin County, n.d., assumed by Leif Richardson from Bumblebee
Economics.
28 “Coll. E. Norton”, presumably as “Maine” and no date, locale or county given.
29 Mitchell 1960, 1962, no county given; a few further details by taxon where available:
29a For Agapostemon sericeus, mapped as occurring in Maine as A. radiatus by Roberts (1972)
[revision]
29b For Anthophora bomboides, cited by Mitchell 1960, 1962 but not by Brooks 1983.
29c For Osmia collinsiae, in Mitchell, but no record information indicated.
30 For Stelis lousiae, Parker and Bohart; recorded as extending … north to Maine on p. 147 of
Parker and Bohart, JKES 52(1) 1979, but not shown on their map.
31 For Coelioxys funeraria, Baker, mapped in Figure 20 of Baker 1975 with no details but shown
about half way up Maine coast.
32 For Bombus pensylvanicus, cited in Milliron 1973 Vol. II of Monograph. Worker from Saco,
York Coounty, 13 Jun 1951, collected by T.B. Mitchell.
33 For Hylaeus floridanus, cited by Mitchell but as H. packardi. One of the 2 specimens in type
series was from Maine (described by Mitchell, 1951). Snelling (1970) proposed the synonymy
and cited the Maine occurrence.
34a Gibbs 2011, and Jason Gibbs’ determinations of Maine specimens.
34b Gibbs 2010, and Jason Gibbs’ determinations of Maine specimens.
34c Gibbs et al. 2013 Evylaeus revision.
35 Sheffield et al. 2011, Megachile nivalis, now known as Megachile (Megachile) lapponica
Thomson, 1872. Synonymy of N. American M. nivalis with European M. lapponica at http://
cjai.biologicalsurvey.ca/srpg_18/srpg_18.pdf.
36 For Osmia laticeps, cited in Rightmyer et al. 2010, i.e., the ZooKeys paper on non-metallic
Osmia. Record is from “USA: MAINE, 15 June 1982 (1♀, St. Charles)” (http://www.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3088345/).
37 For Melitta americana, collected by Brianne DuClos, 9 July 2013, powerline corridor, Deblois,
Washington County, ME, determined by Sam Droege, GPS 44.702139, -67.989309.
38 Lovell, 1910.
39 Stephen (1954), revision of Colletes.
40 For Epeolus americanus, cited by Brumley 1965 [as E. americanus]; Mitchell, 1962:450;
paratype of E. lanhami from “Oreno, Me.”[sic]. Table 2 refers to a specimen collected by
R.A. Morse and C. Zmarlicki, July 19, 1961, “Washington County”, no town given.
41 For Holcopasites illiniosensis, cited in Hurd and Linsley 1972.
42 For Dufourea novaeangliae, collected in Machias (Washington County) by Samantha Gallagher
July 2015.
43a For Pseudopanurgus aestivalis, listed by Mitchell (1960) as P. nebrascensis, see Sheffield and
Perron 2014.
43b For Osmia tarsata, see discussion on synonymy with O. kenoyeri Cockerell, 1915, see Sheffield
and Perron 2014.
44 Roque Island 2014, Dibble and Drummond Native Bees field course at Eagle Hill, Steuben, ME.
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
18
45 Ribble, D.W. 1967. Revisions of 2 subgenera of Andrena: Micrandrena Ashmead and Derandrena,
new subgenus (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Ph.D. Thesis, published in 1968 as Bulletin
of the University of Nebraska State Museum 8(5):237–394 .
46 For Andrena spiraeana, recorded from Orono (Penobscot County) by LaBerge 1973:342
47 LaBerge 1961 (Melissodes druriellus is former M. rustica)
48 LaBerge 1956
49 For Nomada armatella, see Mitchell (1960, 1962); J.S. Ascher notes the only record with
details at http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20l?id=BBSL521175; specimen collected 20 May
1967, Deblois (Washington County), sin nom.
50 Mitchell, 1956, descriptions of Sphecodes, as “carolinus”; collected on Katahdin as “carolinus”.
51 For Stelis lateralis, collected by D.J. Borror on 6 July 1939, no town given, Lincoln County,
Ohio State U. record at http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20l?id=GBIF311451792.
52 Bug Guide photo.
55 Lovell 1922b (Bees of Maine, Part II).
56 Lovell 1925a (Bees of Maine, Part III).
57 Schwarz 1926.
58 Stubbs et al. 1992.
59 Lovell 1925b (Bees of Maine, Part IV).
60 Lovell 1925c (Bees of Maine, PartV).
61 Jennifer (Loose) Ryan, blueberry barrens collections, 1998.
62 Dearborn et al. 1983.
63 Kalyn Bickerman-Martens, Maine collections 2015.
64 Megan Leach, Maine collections 2014.
65 University of Maine Entomological Museum collection, housed in Augusta, ME.
66 Discover Life: within a species, click on global map to see details of voucher specimens.
67 s.n. Kennebunk, York County, 1960s (Boulanger et al. 1967?).
68 For Andrena cornelli, cited by LaBerge (1980) as A. longifacies LaBerge.
69 University of Maine, Orono collections 1905, 1915, collectors unknown.
70 Brianne DuClos, Maine collections 2014 –2015.
71 Discover Life, http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20l?id=AMNH_BEES24420
72 Discover Life, http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20l?id=AMNH_BEES668
Symbol Abbreviation Institution or Collector
a AMNH American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY
b CAES Connecticut Agriculture Experiment Station, Storrs, CT
c CUIC Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
d JML Unknown (cited for Andrena wheeleri from Waldo County)
e JSA John Ascher
f NYSM New York State Museum, Albany, NY
g RUAC Rutgers University, Rutgers, NJ
h UCD University of California, R.M. Bohart Museum of Entomology, Davis, CA
i UCMS University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
j UMA University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
k UNHP University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH
l - (left blank, could be confused with “l” [one])
m OSUC Ohio State University Insect Collection, columbus, OH
n INHS Illinois Natural History Survey Insect Collection, Champaign, IL
o KU University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
p USNM Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC
q YPM Yale Peabody Museum, New Haven, CT
r FMNH Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL
s BISON USGS Biodiversity Information Serving Our Nation (https://bison.usgs.gov)
Northeastern Naturalist
19
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Figure 2. Non-native bee, Anthidium manicatum (European Wool-carder Bee); the males
are territorial at flowers of Merostachys lanata Send (Lamb’s Ears), shown here, and other
plants in Old Town, Penobscot County. The male chases other bees away while he awaits a
visit from a conspecific female. Photograph © A.C. Dibble.
Results
Sampling effort was highly uneven, and of Maine’s 16 counties, only 8 have more
than 50 available county records (see Fig. 1). Of these, only 5 have more than 100 bee
species: Hancock County (197 confirmed species), Penobscot County (181), Washington
County (162), York County (104), and Lincoln County (102). Androscoggin
and Sagadahoc counties have only 11 and 8 species documented, respectively.
Despite these gaps, we list 278 described species of bees in 37 genera and 6 families
for Maine (Table 2). For most of these, at least 1 voucher specimen was found
or records in the literature are considered reliable. For some species (Table 2),
information derived from Mitchell (1960, 1962; for 7 species) or other literature
did not specify any county. A few species in Table 2 (i.e., Colletes latitarsis, Epeolus
pusillus, Melissodes bimaculatus, Nomada louisianae) are mapped for Maine
in Discover Life, but details about the record, including county, are pending (J.S.
Ascher, unpubl. data).
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
20
The largest genus is Andrena (53 spp.), followed by Lasioglossum (50), Nomada
(28), Bombus (includes Psythirus) (17), and Osmia (16). The total count includes
at least 8 non-native species of Old World origin: Apis mellifera, Lasioglossum
leucozonium, L. zonulum, Andrena wilkella, Anthidium manicatum (Fig. 2), Osmia
caerulescens, Megachile rotundata, and M. sculpturalis. Megachile centuncularis
could be non-native (questionable status due in part to lack of confirmed records
for Alaska; see Giles and Ascher 2006).
Discussion
We consider the Maine bee checklist (Table 2) to be preliminary because none
of the state’s 16 counties have been exhaustively sampled, despite much effort in
recent studies or by some collectors. Counties with few available records may be
considered to have less relative documentation, in terms of numbers of bee species
(indicated by shading of counties in Fig. 1), so it is not yet possible to say
with any confidence that bee diversity in one county is higher than in another.
Counties in southern Maine with the warmest climate and expanses of sandy habitat
are expected to have the most species, but this is not yet borne out. Penobscot
County is particularly well represented because the University of Maine in Orono
has been an agricultural research center since the 1860s, with entomologists
active on or near campus. Early and continuing research in major Lowbush Blueberry
crop areas such as Hancock and Washington counties (Yarborough 2009)
have led to better exploration of the bee fauna in those regions (Bushmann and
Drummond 2015).
Species richness
Bee species richness in Maine is relatively low (less than 300 species), but not unusually
so given its latitude and climate (Sheffield et al. 2003, Stubbs et al. 1996). Greater
species richness was reported for bees of Wisconsin (Wolf and Ascher 2009), perhaps
reflecting in part higher summer temperatures across most of that state, and
much greater richness was recorded for western states such as Colorado (Scott et al.
2011). Gibbs et al. (in press) developed a checklist of 465 species in Michigan, with
38 new records. Low species richness in Maine could be due in part to the extent
of forest. Maine is the most forested state in the continental US when measured as
the proportion of total landscape comprised of forest vegetation landscapes (93% of
land area; Wilson and Sader 2002). Much of the Maine landscape is categorized as
mixed northern hardwood, coniferous forests, and boreal spruce–fir forests (Davis
1993). Dense, shady forests are not optimal habitats for generalist bees in the region
(Dibble et al., in press; Romey et al. 2007) because of insufficient floral resources
and lack of open sky for insolation and navigation. Powerline rights-of-way may
provide suitable open habitat for many species including regional rarities (Wagner
et al. 2014). In Maine, the extent of coniferous forest with a permanently shaded
understory may limit the spatial distribution and abundances of native bee communities
(Groff et al. 2016), whereas in hardwood forests of southern Maine many
specialist bees visit spring ephemerals in the forest understory prior to leafout.
Northeastern Naturalist
21
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Timber harvest throughout much of Maine creates a changing light environment to
which bees are likely to respond.
Native bee species richness in Maine is greatest for genera that are common
across the Holarctic region and well adapted to the boreal forest and other habitats
characteristic of northern latitudes (Michener 2007). Genera richest in species
(Andrena, Lasioglossum, Nomada, Bombus, and Osmia) all include early emerging
species that overwinter as adults. Their ecology has been a subject of the past
45 years in Maine bee research (Bushmann and Drummond 2015; Bushmann et al.
2012; Dibble and Drummond 1997; Dibble et al. 1997; Drummond et al. 2017b;
Jones et al. 2014; Osgood 1972, 1989; Stubbs et al. 1992). Of the 30–35 species
of Andrena that occur regularly in Maine blueberry fields (Bushmann 2013, Bushmann
and Drummond 2015), the 5 most common are Andrena (Andrena) carolina
and Andrena (A.) rufosignata, both of which have long malar spaces that facilitate
their collection of nectar from blueberry flowers, and the generalists A. (Melandrena)
regularis, A. (M.) carlini, and A. (M.) nivalis. These Andrena tend to be found
in sandy loam soils (Osgood 1972), typified by the vast glacial plains of Washington
County (Davis 1993).
Some species in the list (Table 2) are of particular interest because they are
seldom collected, have a narrow distribution, were not expected to occur in the
area, have been in decline, or have specific habitat requirements. There is a possibility
that a taxon is under-recorded due to identification difficulties, so scarcity
of records might not reflect rarity in nature. Nonetheless, one might assume that a
species represented by a single recent record and 1 historic citation (Lovell 1922b)
such as Melitta (Cilissa) americana, found in 2013 by Brianne DuClos, is genuinely
less abundant than the many Andrena and Osmia species each represented by
multiple specimens recorded from several counties.
We identified 21 species that could be considered unusual. Among recent state
records, Epeoloides pilosulus (Macropis Cuckoo Bee) was found in the Kennebunk
Plains in York County, June 2016 on Apocynum sp., by M. Veit along with
its host Macropis nuda (known from 6 counties). Epeoloides pilosulus is the only
member of its tribe in America North of Mexico, was recently rediscovered in
New England (Wagner and Ascher 2008), and is now classified as endangered in
Canada (COSEWIC 2011). M. Veit also found at this same site a new state record
for Melitta melittoides, a rarely collected species associated with Lyonia ligustrina
(L.) DC. (Maleberry; Wagner et al. 2014). In another recent example, Fenja Brodo,
entomologist from Ottawa, ON, Canada, collected Holcopasites calliopsidis on
Rhus typhina L. (Staghorn Sumac) on 14 July 2016 along a roadside in Steuben
(Washington County).
In addition to the 4 species mentioned above, we consider others notable due
to their limited representation in regional bee collections. These include Colletes
consors (subspecies mesocopus), Colletes hyalinus, Colletes impunctatus,
Macropis (Macropis) ciliata, Hylaeus (Hylaeus) saniculae, Hylaeus (Paraprosopis)
floridanus, Hylaeus (Metziella) sparsus, Andrena (Scrapteropsis) kalmiae
(newly documented for York County by M.Veit in June 2016), Melitta (Cilissa)
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
22
americana, Heriades (Neotrypetes) leavitti, Hoplitis (Alcidamea) albifrons, Osmia
(Melanosmia) inermis, Osmia (Melanosmia) laticeps, Osmia (Melanosmia)
tarsata, Coelioxys (Boreocoelioxys) funeraria, Megachile (Megachile) lapponica,
Bombus (Psithyrus) ashtoni (collections since 2000 are few and noteworthy),
and Bombus (Bombus) affinis, which was listed as Federally Endangered in
2017 and requires careful identification.
No well-known bee species is unique to Maine, but 2 species of Nomada of
uncertain status are known reliably only from holotypes from the state. Nomada
proxima has uncertain taxonomic placement and status (Mitchell 1962). Nomada
subrutila, described from Waldoboro in Lincoln County, has been recorded from 3
other states (Mitchell 1962), but some or all of these records may result from confusion
with the widely distributed species Nomada imbricata and/or N. luteoloides.
The taxonomic status of these species was only recently clarified by Schwarz and
Gusenleitner (2004). Maine shares most (95%+) of its known bee fauna with New
York, Michigan, Massachusetts, and Connecticut. New Brunswick, Canada, has
similar climate, soils, and vegetational communities to Maine (Griffin et al. 2009,
Smit et al. 2007), and studies of Lowbush Blueberry there (Javorek et al. 2002) record
a bee fauna similar to that of comparable sites in Maine (Boulanger et al. 1967,
Javorek et al. 2002, Stubbs et al. 1992). Certain species differ, notably Triepeolus
brittaini Cockerell, which is now well known from all 3 Maritime Provinces of
Canada, with numerous recent records (J.S. Ascher, S.K. Javorek [Agriculture and
Agri-Food Canada, Kentville, NS, Canada], and J. Klymko, [Nature Serve, Atlantic
Canada Conservation Data Centre, Sackville, NB, Canada], unpubl. data), but has
not yet been recorded elsewhere. The bee fauna of Nova Scotia is also similar to
that of Maine (Sheffield et al. 2003), but includes remarkable disjunct occurrences
of “southern” species such as Colletes willistoni Robertson, that have not been recorded
from Maine (though M. Veit has collected C. willistoni in Massachusetts and
New Hampshire, and it could be in Maine). The influence of warming by the Gulf
Stream and other ocean currents may be more extensive on Nova Scotia (Boughner
1937) than on Maine, and may explain these remarkable distributions.
Bee species other than those included in our checklist have been proposed by
various sources to occur in Maine. We excluded the following because of insufficient
documentation or problematic identification: Andrena (Andrena) cornelli
Viereck, A. (Gonandrena) fragilis Smith, A. (Trachandrena) heraclei Robertson,
A. (Tylandrena) perplexa Smith, A. (Gonandrena) platyparia Robertson, A. (Micandrena)
ziziae Robertson, Lasioglossum (Dialictus) tegulare Robertson (most if
not all records pertain to L. ellisiae), Nomada lehighensis Cockerell (see Droege
2010), and N. subnigrocincta Swenk. All of these species could plausibly occur in
the state, but we have not been able to definitively confirm their presence. The taxonomic
status of several additional cleptoparasitic Nomada “cuckoo bee” species
and morphospecies remains uncertain pending completion of ongoing taxonomic
revision of the genus (Droege et al. 2010). We have excluded a number of other
records of species that cannot plausibly occur as far northeast as Maine, such as Augochloropsis
sumptuosa (Smith), a species reported for Maine by Mitchell (1960)
Northeastern Naturalist
23
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
but recorded reliably no nearer than New Jersey, and Ceratina metallica H.S. Smith
(syn. C. strenua), reported by Procter (1946) but likely to have been misidentified.
Life history and ecology
Life histories for most of the bees found in Maine are derived from studies
conducted elsewhere and assumed to apply in Maine, but some bee species have
been studied using Maine populations: Osmia atriventris (Drummond and Stubbs
1997a), Andrena crataegi (Osgood 1989), and Bombus impatiens (Drummond
2012a, Stubbs and Drummond 2001).
Regarding sociality and cleptoparasitism (one bee species lays its eggs in the
nest of another bee species), 135 species in the Maine checklist (Table 2) are
solitary bees, 39 are eusocial, 55 species are cleptoparasitic (e.g., Nomada and
other Nomadinae, and Coelioxys) or socially parasitic in the case of some halictines
(e.g., Sphecodes). Four species of Bombus (Psithyrus) are social parasites of other
bumble bees.
Our checklist suggests that 22.7% of the total known bee species in Maine
are cleptoparasites or social parasites of pollen-collecting bees. Bushmann and
Drummond (2015) reported a similar percentage in a more recent survey of the
bee community associated with Lowbush Blueberry in Maine. Their 4-year study
involved 44 sites in Hancock, Waldo, and Washington counties. They found that
17.7% of bee species richness and 4.8% of the total bee abundance associated
with Lowbush Blueberry in Maine are cleptoparasites. The number of bee cleptoparasites
found in Maine is similar in species richness but is about one-fourth the
relative abundance compared to that found by Sheffield et al. (2013) in Canada
(varied from 1 to 10% cleptoparasite species relative to bee species richness and up
to 22% in terms of individual cleptoparasite bee numbers relative to total bee abundance).
Actual parasitism rates are not known for the Maine bee fauna. Over North
American bee fauna, with respect to species richness, rate of cleptoparasitism might
vary between 0 and 91% in individual bee species, and could be as high as 29% at
the community level, based on a review of the literature (Wcislo 1996).
About half of the 278 bee species (Table 2) are known or suspected to be
soil-nesting bees, including all species of Andrena and Colletes and most
Lasioglossum. One Andrena species found in Maine, A. crataegi, is known to interconnect
tunnels between individuals and may form a large communal ground
nest in which each solitary sister bee is a queen (Osgood 1989). Of bees listed in
Table 2, forty-three species nest in cavities and or stems, including several species
of Lasioglossum in subgenus Dialictus that excavate nests in soft wood (Michener
2007), as do Auglochlora pura and Anthophora terminalis. Tiny bees in the genus
Ceratina (small carpenter bee) may exploit an existing hole in a stem to access
the hollow or pithy interior in which they lay their eggs. Examples of Maine plant
species associated with stem-nesting bees are Rubus spp. (blackberry and raspberry),
Sambucus spp. (elderberry), and Rhus typhina L. (Staghorn Sumac). Bees
that nest in wood include Xylocopa virginiana (Eastern Carpenter Bee), which can
excavate galleries in wooden structures and may cause some damage. Megachile
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
24
and Osmia can nest in holes in stumps, logs, or standing dead trees, and might use
holes made by boring beetles.
Bee species differ in their overwintering condition and time of emergence,
with important consequences for pollination of Maine crops (Bushmann 2013).
Queen bumble bees overwinter as adults that emerged and mated during the previous
autumn, while most other native bees emerge as fully developed adults for
their maiden flight in spring or summer, from nests established and provisioned by
their mothers during the previous season (or earlier that same season). In most native
Maine bee species other than Bombus, males typically emerge first, a condition
called protandry, and they are ready to mate when the females appear. Emergence is
staggered depending on the bee species, with early bees appearing with first flowers
of Salix spp. (willow) and Acer rubrum L. (Red Maple) in spring (Bushmann 2013).
The importance of willow to bees active in early spring was studied by Ostaff et al.
(2015) and was documented in a common garden study in Maine by A.C. Dibble,
F.A. Drummond, and L. Berg Stack (unpubl. data).
Some Bombus, especially the currently common species B. ternarius (Tricolored
Bumble Bee; Fig. 3) and B. vagans (Half-black Bumble Bee), are in evidence
from early spring (the beginning of April or, recently, in warm years, as early as
late March) until late October. The large queens can be seen foraging on flowers
Figure 3. Queen Bombus ternarius (Tricolored Bumble Bee) on flowers of Erica tetralix L.
(Crossleaf Heath) in a garden, on 24 April 2014, Brooklin, Hancock County. Photograph ©
A.C. Dibble.
Northeastern Naturalist
25
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
into June; new queens are observed as early as late July (Bushmann 2013). Bumble
bee workers of various sizes can be found starting in June and then throughout
the growing season, with average size of individuals increasing gradually over the
summer and fall (Bushmann et al. 2012).
An especially early bee is Colletes inaequalis, which often emerges before the
snow has fully melted from its nest aggregations. Other bees active early in spring
include many species in the genera Andrena, Lasioglossum, Nomada, and Osmia
(Fig. 4). Adult emergence can begin as early as late March, i.e., in southern Maine
in a particularly early spring, but more typically in April (A.C. Dibble, pers. observ.;
Bushmann and Drummond 2015; Stubbs et al. 1992).
Bees with long flight seasons (both univoltine and multivoltine) extending
from spring until fall include primitively eusocial halictine species, e.g., in the
genera Halictus, Lasioglossum (Fig. 5), and Augochlorella, and the subsocial
carpenter bees, e.g., genera Ceratina and Xylocopa. Most Colletes (Fig. 6) and
their Epeolus cleptoparasites, and Melissodes and their Triepeolus cleptoparasites,
fly from summer to fall in association with peak bloom of plants in the family
Asteraceae such as asters and goldenrods. Early emerging and late-flying species
and most specialists have restricted flight seasons. Data for Maine on flight activity
of most species is in the process of being summarized (E. Venturini and F.A.
Figure 4. Female Osmia (mason bee) rests briefly on a leaf while foraging on Vaccinium
vitis-idaea L. (Northern Mountain Cranberry), in Brooklin, Hancock County, 13 June 2015.
Photograph © A.C. Dibble.
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
26
Figure 6. Colletes compactus compactus (Cellophane Bee) female, late-flying solitary bee
species seldom collected in Maine, at her nest entrance, 16 September 2011, Brooklin, Hancock
County. Photograph © A.C. Dibble.
Figure 5. Lasioglossum (Dialictus) sp. (a metallic sweat bee) female on flowers of Penstemon
digitalis “Mystica” (Foxglove Beardtongue), 8 July 2014, Blue Hill, Hancock County.
Photograph © A.C. Dibble.
Northeastern Naturalist
27
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Drummond, University of Maine, Orono, ME, unpubl. data). Many species were
included in phenological diagrams for offshore islands of New York State (Ascher
et al. 2014) and Massachusetts (Goldstein and Ascher 2016). Flight activity varies
across sites and years. Likewise, flight activity of most Osmia species peaks
in May–June, but collections of O. atriventris and O. simillima have been made
in Maine as late as August in Hancock and Washington counties (Droege 2012).
Some bee species, including several Megachile and their Coelioxys cleptoparasites,
are aestival, i.e., most active in summer (A.C. Dibble and F.A. Drummond, pers.
observ.; Droege 2012). Colletes and its Epeolus cleptoparasites can be active in
mid-September in Hancock and Washington counties (A.C. Dibble, unpubl. data).
Information on host-plant usage includes Stubbs et al.’s (1992) reports of pollen
and nectar records for native bee species associated with Lowbush Blueberry.
Osmia atriventris is considered polylectic, but in a study in Winterport, ME, where
54 species of flowering plants came into bloom during its nesting period, individuals
collected pollen from only a few species—90% was ericaceous pollen, most
likely of Lowbush Blueberry (Drummond and Stubbs 1997b). Subsequently Bushmann
and Drummond (2015) studied flower use and pollen collection by native bees
during Lowbush Blueberry bloom, and found that in addition to ericaceous plants,
the 3 most common native forage plant species or genera were Cornus canadensis
L. (Bunchberry), Rubus spp. (raspberry and blackberry), and Houstonia caerulea L.
(Azure Bluet). Fowler (2016) reviewed regional patterns of bee specialization on
plants of the northeastern US.
Lowbush Blueberry is one of the native plants on which floral visitors have been
studied intensively (Bushmann and Drummond 2015, Drummond et al. 2017b,
Stubbs et al. 1992, and numerous other papers). Others include Amelanchier (shadbush;
Dibble and Drummond 1997, Dibble et al. 1997), Viburnum nudum spp.
cassinoides (L.) Torr. & A. Gray (Withe-rod; Miliczky and Osgood 1979b, Stubbs
et al. 2007), and Spiraea alba var. latifolia (Aiton) H.E. Ahles (White Meadowsweet;
Stubbs et al. 2007).
Other than in such pollinator studies, forage-plant information from museum
collections of bees is often lacking or may be unreliable. Emphasis on data regarding
flowering-plant associations will enhance our ability to protect or manipulate
habitat for native bees and can lead to Maine-specific recommendations with
potential usefulness in other parts of northeastern North America. The most up-todate
information on Maine forage plants and larger-scale vegetational landscapes
can be found in Bushmann and Drummond (2015); Dibble and Drummond (1997);
Dibble et al., in press; Droege (2012); Drummond et al. (2017a); Groff et al. (2016);
Stubbs et al. (1992); and Venturini et al. (2015). More Maine studies are in the
pipeline (A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, and L. Berg Stack, unpubl.data). These
kinds of data, when considered with reference to regional reviews of specialist bees
(Fowler 2016), will increase the effectiveness of pollinator plant lists (e.g., A.C.
Dibble, unpubl. data; Ley et al. 2011; Venturini et al. 2015) so that bee gardens and
pollinator strips are more likely to accomplish their intended goals in Maine.
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
28
Changes in abundance
Long-term population dynamics of bee communities have not been well
studied in Maine, other than climate-change data reported by Drummond et al.
(2017b). In that study, continuous sampling over a 29-year period in a Lowbush
Blueberry field in Winterport, Waldo County, resulted in total bee abundance
varying 2–3 fold from one year to the next. Bee categories (Bombus, Andrena, Osmia,
and “Halictids and Other”) were not highly correlated with one another and
showed independence. Osmia declined since 2007, but the total bee community
abundance was stable during the 29-year time period. Predictability from models
developed by Drummond et al. (2017b) was low to moderate and suggested that
abundance fluctuations depend on both density-dependent factors and stochastic
density-independent factors such as weather.
The relative abundance of wild native Bombus species in Maine has changed dramatically
since the early 1960s (Bushmann et al. 2012). Whereas the most common
native bees in Maine continue to include bumble bee species such as Bombus ternarius
(Fig. 3) and B. vagans, both in the subgenus Pyrobombus, another once-common
species, B. terricola (Yellow-banded Bumblebee) in subgenus Bombus, and its social
parasite B. ashtoni (treated by Williams et al. 2014, as conspecific with the Old
World Bombus bohemicus) have declined in Maine (Bushmann et al. 2012; Heinrich
and Heinrich 1983a, b) and across the region (Bartomeus et al. 2013, Cameron et al.
2011, Kerr et al. 2015). Bombus affinis (Rusty-patched Bumble Bee), also parasitized
by B. ashtoni, appears to have been relatively common at one time in Maine and is
recorded for 10 counties, but today it is seldom found. It was noted by Procter (1946)
as scarce for Mount Desert Island. Boulanger et al. (1967) listed B. affinis from New
Brunswick but did not specify any Maine counties. On the other hand, several species
of subgenus Pyrobombus such as B. ternarius and especially B. impatiens (Eastern
Bumble Bee) have increased (Bushmann and Drummond 2015). Surveys of B. terricola
distribution in Maine in 2014–2015 indicate a resurgence of that species at many
sites (Drummond 2015), but not of its social parasite B. ashtoni.
Habitat and landscapes
Using literature and specimen-label data to assess relative sampling effort by
habitat, we found studies in blueberry fields to be well represented, and edge habitats
associated with mixed conifers were also relatively well studied. Many habitats
in Maine require more attention, including coastal islands, well-drained sandy
soils on islands and elsewhere, hardwood forests, swamps, bogs, open mountain
summits, roadsides, and urban and suburban plantings. Bees on coastal islands in
New England are of particular interest because they potentially include relictual
or disjunct species (see Goldstein and Ascher 2016) or those that have potentially
declined on the mainland due to infection by a microsporidian pathogen, Nosema
bombii Fantham and Porter (Bushmann et al. 2012). On a 1-day visit in late July
2014 to Roque Island, ME, 6 Bombus species were documented including B. fervidus
(Yellow Bubmblee), which is relatively scarce in Washington County, but not
B. impatiens (A.C. Dibble, unpubl. data). In visits to Monhegan Island, ME, and
when studying samples in the Cornell University Insect Collections from Appledore
Northeastern Naturalist
29
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Island, ME, we found no strikingly unusual species. Counties in southern Maine
with sandy soils, such as York and Cumberland, could be under-represented in
the checklist, and harbor bees such as Nomada tiftonensis that have a restricted
distribution in the state. Additional bee species characteristic of northern climates
have been found on Mount Washington in New Hampshire and may also extend
their ranges southward into mountainous habitats in Maine, but surveys of the
most promising high-elevation sites in Maine, such as Katahdin, are lacking. Bees
may be genuinely scarce there. No bees other than a single Bombus terricola were
seen on a 4-day hiking trip to a lowland forest area near Katahdin in August 2014
(A.C. Dibble, pers. observ.). In a scenario of upward-shifting treeline with climate
change, open habitats that support unusual montane bee faunas in the state could
change greatly in coming decades due to upslope advance of coniferous trees
(Dibble et al. 2009), putting some as yet unstudied cold-adapted bee species at risk
(Kerr et al. 2015) before they have been inventoried.
Conservation concerns
Native bees of Maine could encounter competition with non-native bees for floral
resources or nest sites. They could be impacted by pesticides, natural enemies,
diseases, habitat degradation (through invasive plant encroachment), habitat fragmentation,
and climate change (Brown and Paxton 2009, Goulson et al. 2015, Kerr
et al. 2015).
Non-native bee species can be adventive, or they could arrive in Maine as purposeful
introductions. Non-native bees can alter ecosystems in subtle but significant
ways (Goulson 2003, Goulson et al. 2015). They may compete for floral resources
and nest sites, spread pests and pathogens to native bee populations, and effect
diminishing plant repoduction in native plant species that depend on native bee
pollinators but are not visited much by introduced bees.
The best-known and most economically important managed non-native bee in
Maine is Apis mellifera (European Honey Bee), which has been in North America
since 1622 (Kingsbury 1906). Since 1630, when Maine was a part of Massachusetts,
Apis mellifera has been established in the state (Martin et al. 1980). It has been
used in Lowbush Blueberry pollination since the 1950s (Lee 1958), with managed
colonies supplemented by feral honey bees, but since the 1990s persistent overwintering
feral hives are seldom found in Maine (F.A. Drummond, unpubl. data). The
disappearance of feral colonies is a phenomenon that has been observed across the
entire US and is attributed to the accidental introduction of the parasitic mite Varroa
destructor (Delaplane 2001). Colony Collapse Disorder in managed Apis mellifera
demonstrates the collective impact of multiple simultaneous threats (Drummond
2012c, Ellis et al. 2010, Neumann and Carreck 2010, Ratnieks and Carreck 2010).
This syndrome, which became evident in 2006, prompted new research on pollinator
habitat quality as a means of enhancing existing native bee populations in
Maine, with the idea that native bees might be required to play an increasing role
as pollinators of Lowbush Blueberry and other Maine crops (Asare 2013, Venturini
et al. 2015). High rates of honey bee colony losses (averaging greater than 30%;
Lee et al. 2015, vanEngelsdorp and Meixner 2010) across the US since 2006 have
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
30
resulted in severe economic hardship for commercial beekeepers. Honey bee colonies
continue to be reared in Maine and brought from out of state (more than 75,000
commercial colonies per year; Drummond 2012c). Many of these colonies swarm
and produce initial feral colonies that last only 2–3 years in the absence of management
(Drummond et al. 2012). Apis mellifera is present in all Maine counties,
though voucher specimens could not be found for some counties. A recent survey
among Maine beekeepers (most are assumed to be hobbyists) to obtain pollen for
analysis of pesticide residue from honey bee colonies will be reported separately.
Any counties not vouchered were filled into Table 2 based on beekeeper responses
to that survey (E. Ballmann, University of Maine, Orono, ME, unpubl.data).
Bombus impatiens is both a native bumble bee (categorized as such in Table 2)
and the species that is purchased from commercial suppliers and brought into Maine
in colonies (quads) annually for blueberry, Malus pumila Miller (Apple), Solanum
lycopersicum L. (Tomato), and Curcurbitaceae (curcurbits) pollination in both the
greenhouse and in the field (Drummond 2012a). Several thousand colonies are set
out each year in Maine Lowbush Blueberry fields (Drummond 2012a, Stubbs et al.
2001). Bombus impatiens abundance and collecting frequency was lower in Maine
prior to the 1990s compared to more recent times (Bushmann et al. 2012). Current
populations of B. impatiens found in Maine could have multiple sources including
both managed commercial colonies brought from Michigan (Drummond 2012a,
Stubbs and Drummond 2001, Stubbs et al. 2001), and wild native genotypes with
populations that appear to be expanding their range northward in possible association
with climate change (Bushmann et al. 2012). Recent collections in more than
200 locations from 2011–2015 have shown that B. impatiens individuals make up
~10–20% of bumble bee individuals in Maine (F.A. Drummond, unpubl. data).
Bushmann et al. (2012) showed that relative abundance of B. impatiens in the 1960s
was much lower than current estimates in Maine (1961–1963: not detected, 1997–
1998: 1–4%, 2010–2015: 10–20%). Procter (1946) did not record B. impatiens in
coastal Hancock County.
Megachile rotundata (Alfalfa Leaf-cutter Bee) was used commercially as a managed
pollinator for Lowbush Blueberry in Maine for more than a decade in the 1990s
through to the early 2000s (Stubbs et al. 1997b) but not subsequently (F.A. Drummond,
pers. observ.). Many hundreds of thousands of prepupae in individual leaf
cells were imported from the western US and Canada and released by Maine growers
for pollination of the Lowbush Blueberry crop (Stubbs and Drummond 1997a,
b, c; Stubbs et al. 1997a, b). The bee was commonly trap nested and observed in
blueberry fields in the 1990s when releases were made in Maine. Intensive bee surveys
conducted from 2010 to 2012 using diverse sampling methods (Bushmann and
Drummond 2015) in the same regions as these earlier releases have not recorded a
single individual of M. rotundata, suggesting that it may be poorly adapted to longterm
establishment at these sites (Stubbs and Drummond 1997a, b, c).
Several other non-native megachilids are adventive in the New World and may
be a detriment to native species (Roulston and Malfi 2012, Strange et al. 2011).
Megachile sculpturalis (Giant Asian Resin Bee) was detected in the southeastern
Northeastern Naturalist
31
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
US in 1994 and has been dispersing rapidly across the US (Hinojosa-Díaz 2008,
Mazurkiewicz 2010). It was collected in Portland, ME, by M. Mazurkiewicz in
2008, and by A.C. Dibble and S. Bushmann in Aroostook County in 2013, with additional
documentation since. Anthidium manicatum (European Wool-carder Bee)
males defend flowers of Merostachys lanata Send (Lamb’s Ears; Fig. 2), Agastache
foeniculum (Anise Hyssop), and horticultural bedding plants in the genus Salvia
(Mealy Sage) against other floral visitors in Maine, and they attack bumble bees
that attempt to visit such flowers (Gibbs and Sheffield 2009). Anthidium manicatum
appears to be increasing in numbers and locales in Maine (A.C. Dibble, pers.
observ.). Osmia caerulescens (Blue Mason Bee) may be associated with urban
habitats, and has been found in Maine as early as the 1930s (see sources cited in
Table 2). Osmia lignaria (Blue Orchard Bee), indicated in Table 2 as non-native,
has been recommended as a managed bee for orchards (Torchio 1976); in Maine it
is relatively scarce. Osmia (Osmia) cornifrons (Radoszkowski) (The Horned faced
Bee) was deliberately introduced from East Asia by USDA scientists (Yamada et
al. 1971) and is abundant farther south in eastern North America, but has not yet
been documented in Maine. Changes in abundance over time for some species of
Megachilids were studied by Drummond et al. (2017b).
Additional small-bodied non-native bees could have negligible influence on
native bees, but this relationship has not been measured. A mining bee, Andrena
wilkella, and 2 sweat bees, Lasioglossum leucozonium and L. zonulum, are examples
of ground-nesting bees native to Europe that are found in the Northeast
and are documented for Maine. In general, with the exception of Apis mellifera,
non-native bees appear to be increasing in richness and abundance in Maine, but
they still comprise a far lower proportion than in states to the south, such as New
York (see Matteson et al. 2008). Some possible explanations for this difference
include Maine’s colder climate, more limited international trade, and limited extent
of cities and suburbs (Simberloff 2013).
Pesticide exposure may not be as important a threat to native bee health in
Maine as in other states where crops are routinely treated, e.g., with imidacloprid,
a widely used, systemic neonicotinoid (one class of persistent insecticides
thought to harm beneficial insects even at sublethal doses; Blacquiere et al. 2012).
Coating of crop seed with neonicotinoids is not much in use in the state compared
to levels applied to Brassica napus L. (Oilseed Rape) crops in the United
Kingdom, Hungary, and Germany (Woodcock et al. 2017) and Zea mays subsp.
mays L. (Corn) in Ontario and Quebec, Canada (Tsvetkov et al. 2017). Even so,
exposure in Maine crops can be at levels that impact local bee populations as
demonstrated in a study on honey bees by Drummond (2012c). Exposure of native
bees to pesticides and the resulting effects are complicated and not well
studied. As an example, a recent study by Ciarlo et al. (2012) showed that the
“inert ingredients” in pesticide formulations have negative effects on honey bee
learning. Studies of managed pollinators such as Apis mellifera, Bombus, Osmia,
and Megachile suggest either significant negative effects (Drummond 2012b,
Ladurner et al. 2008, Laycock et al. 2012) or no measurable impact (Drummond
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
32
2012b, c). No true consensus has emerged with all of the conflicting data that currently
exist, especially for the neonicotinoids, though recent studies suggest that
site differences affect exposure rates to bees and subsequent impacts (Tsvetkov et
al. 2017, Woodcock et al. 2017). In Maine, the effects of pesticides on native bees
have not been extensively researched. Drummond and Stubbs (1997a) showed
a negative relationship between the amount of insecticide active ingredient applied
during the Lowbush Blueberry growing season and the relative abundance
of Osmia spp. in blueberry fields. Ten percent of the variation in Osmia density
was attributed to pesticide exposure. Bushmann (2013) in a 3-year study of native
bee communities in more than 40 blueberry fields did not find evidence to suggest
increased pesticide use affected native bee abundance or richness. Natural
population fluctuations of bee communities between years and locations make it
difficult to assess the impacts of pesticide exposure, and pesticides continue to be
a serious potential concern.
Natural enemies of native bee pollinators in Maine include cleptoparasitic bees
such as Nomada cuckoos of Andrena species (Bushmann and Drummond 2015),
parasitoid wasps in the genus Monodontomerus (Torymidae), and the bee flies
(Bombyliidae). Myopa spp. (white-faced flies) (Conopidae) attack Bombus in flight
and lay their eggs in the abdomen of the living host. Velvet ants (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae)
are found in Maine blueberry fields (Jones et al. 2014) where they parasitize
soil-nesting bees and wasps. Crab spiders in the genus Thomisus (Thomisidae)
camouflage on flowers and attack bees when they arrive to forage. Although such
pests can thwart efforts to enhance populatons of native species as pollinators (Cane
et al. 1996), these species and their interactions might also be considered indicators
of a healthy or naturally functioning ecosystem and bee community (Sheffield et
al. 2013). Perspective might shift according to management goals. Drummond and
Stubbs (1997a) found that Osmia spp. (mostly O. atriventris) populations nesting
in artificial nest blocks had ~20% parasitization by aculeate wasps after 4 years
of nest block utilization in a blueberry field in Winterport. Presence of these pest
wasps might not be considered an index of a commercially healthy bee community,
at least from a blueberry farmer’s perspective. On the other hand, lack of Stelis bee
cleptoparasites may indicate a disturbed system or unhealthy host-bee populations
(see Sheffield et al. 2013).
A question remains regarding whether some exotic or cosmopolitan pathogens
might be contracted by native bees from managed bees brought in to pollinate
Lowbush Blueberry or other crops. Bushmann et al. (2012) found that Nosema
bombi, a microsporidian pathogen of Bombus associated with blueberry fields,
varied in its infection rate according to the bumble bee species, with a much higher
rate in B. terricola—a species that had been in documented decline throughout
its range—than in other common bumble bees. There was no correlation between
farms employing the use of commercial bumble bees (B. impatiens) for pollination
of Lowbush Blueberry and localized infection rates. Nonetheless, this is an
example in which a threat can be more lethal to some species of native bees than
to their congeners.
Northeastern Naturalist
33
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Another potential threat to native bees is encroachment into native habitats
by non-native invasive plants (Pimentel et al. 2005, Stubbs et al. 2007,
Weber 2017). Although many invasive plants in Maine do attract native bees
(A.C. Dibble, unpubl. data; Stubbs et al. 2007), their presence can be considered
a detriment because they displace native plants with which native bees
evolved. We think it is possible that habitats dominated by invasive plants
have lower diversity of pollen and nectar resources and subsequently a narrower
range of overlapping flowering phenologies that support native bees.
Stubbs et al. (2007) tested the supposition that invasive plants can become sinks for
pollinators that would otherwise pollinate flowers of native plant species, leading
to lower fruit set in the native flora. They found that pollination and bee abundance
were not much affected by presence of 2 invasive plants, Lythrum salicaria L.
(Purple Loosestrife) and Rhamnus frangula L. (Glossy Buckthorn), in Acadia National
Park, but flowering period for Berberis thunbergii DC. (Japanese Barberry)
overlapped that of Lowbush Blueberry and attracted floral visitors, mostly native
bees, to such an extent that significantly lower floral visitation rates were observed
on Lowbush Blueberry in the vicinity of barberry patches. In another example,
Purple Loosestrife, a perennial of wet soils, attracts generalist bees (in Eurasia,
where native, it also attracts specialists) but displaces native vegetation (Stubbs et
al. 2007). Among the numerous bee-visited native plants that could be affected by
Purple Loosestrife is Lysimachia, the oil and pollen source for Macropis (in turn,
the only host of the associated cleptoparasitic genus Epeoloides). When meadows
and roadsides become dominated by invasive Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl. (Bigleaf
Lupine), then Asclepias syriaca L. (Common Milkweed) has less habitat. The latter
is much more attractive to diverse native bees, including numerous Bombus species,
and other insects such as Danaus plexippus (L.) (Monarch Butterfly), for which
milkweed is a host for the larval stage. Bigleaf Lupine emerges earlier in spring
than does Common Milkweed, and quickly shades and outcompetes any Common
Milkweed that is already present.
Other examples of invasive plants that could impact Maine bees by reducing
floral resources are: (1) herbs such as Impatiens glandulifera Royle (Ornamental
Jewelweed or Himalayan Balsam), Hypericum perforatum L. (St. John’s-wort),
and Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) Ronse Decr. (Japanese Knotweed); (2) grasses
such as Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. (Common Reed) and Phalaris
arundinacea L. (Reed Canary Grass) (but pollen of nonnative Phleum pratense
L. [Common Timothy] is gathered by bees; Rivernider et al., in press); (3) tender
and woody vines such as Solanum dulcamara L. (Bittersweet Nightshade) and
Celastrus orbiculatus Thunb. (Oriental Bittersweet); (4) shrubs including Japanese
Barberry, Elaeagnus umbellata Thunb. (Autumn Olive), and Lonicera morrowii A.
Gray (Morrow’s Honeysuckle); and (5) trees including Acer platanoides L. (Norway
Maple) and Robinia pseudoacacia L. (Black Locust). Most of these examples,
but not all, are on the Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry
Invasive Plant List (http://www.maine.gov/dacf/mnap/features/invasive_plants/
invsheets.htm).
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
34
Habitat changes apart from invasive plant encroachment, that could impact bee
populations, include agricultural practices, urbanization, and forest succession.
Bee responses to most of these are not fully quantified in Maine. Venturini et al.
(2017) found that pollinator plantings for native bees in association with Lowbush
Blueberry agroecosystems increased abundance of native bees. This finding suggests
that diverse gardens in cities and towns are also beneficial to bee diversity and
abundance in Maine (Dibble et al., in press), but data are lacking. Regarding forest
succession, Miliczky (1978) found 65 bee species at edges and small openings in a
Picea (spruce)–Abies (fir) forest, suggesting that areas adjacent to or gaps within
closed-canopy conifer stands are not necessarily devoid of bee communities. It appears
likely that in additon to anthropogenic alterations to the landscape, fire, floods,
and catastrophic wind-throw can be associated with early successional openings in
which bees find suitable habitats. Native Americans in Maine burned small openings
for centuries (Cronon 1983); presumably they altered habitats near waterways and
maintained blueberry-dominated openings in conifer and mixed hardwood stands.
Beginning ca. 1605, European colonists conducted what we might consider a vast
deforestation (Cronon 1983), and brought in Apis mellifera and nonnative plants,
some of which became important bee forage (e.g., Taraxacum officinale F.H. Wigg.
[Common Dandelion]). Populations of many native bee species had potential to
expand in response to increased open sky and additional forage and ground-nesting
opportunities. Beginning in the the mid-1800s, large areas of agricultural fields were
abandoned in Maine and many other parts of New England, and overall the trend
in vegetation composition in uplands continues today toward forest-dominated
ecosystems (Dibble et al. 2008, Wessels 1997). The Penobscot Experimental Forest
of the University of Maine in Bradley, Penobscot County, is an example of such
a forested landscape. It is dominated by Picea rubens Sarg. (Red Spruce) and other
conifers, and some stands within this forest are periodically harvested in patches under
various cutting regimes. The landscape features 343 plant species (Dibble 2013)
of which about 59% offer pollen and nectar resources that might be taken by bees.
Timber harvest in Maine continues, leading to large openings that favor bees in the
short term; this is a landscape shift that, along with habitat fragmentation and urbanization,
alters bee habitat resources, and not necessarily for the worse (Romey et al.
2007). In patches, ongoing transition through succession of edge habitats to closedcanopy
forest may reduce bee diversity and abundance temporarily. Would bee
communities then resemble those that were present prior to intense anthropogenic
habitat alteration? This cannot be measured, and we do not know precisely what bee
diversity may have been lost, but we can compare to historic collections and reasonably
interpret Maine’s current bee fauna as an artifact of human disturbance and its
current diversity as indicative of the capacity of these animals to adapt and exploit
opportunity, demonstrating resilience in a changing landscape.
Climate change and in particular hotter summer temperatures may already be
resulting in changes to Bombus ranges in Maine and elsewhere (Kerr et al. 2015).
Campbell et al. (2009) speculated that climate change will result in wetter conditions
in Northeastern North America. Rainy springs, as documented by Drummond
Northeastern Naturalist
35
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
et al. (2017b), and summers could detrimentally affect bees of Maine and other
regions of northern New England in several ways: (1) upset a synchrony between
bloom period for host plants and active period for native bees (but see Bartomeus et
al. 2011), (2) limit good weather conditions for foraging with the result that insects
are unable to provision sufficient brood for subsequent generations, and (3) lead to
prolonged conditions that enhance fungal infections in soil-nesting bees (Batra et
al. 1973).
Data from Drummond et al. (2017b) indicate that climate change that might affect
bee activity and foraging during the spring bloom period of Lowbush Blueberry is
already in effect in Maine. Their estimate of pollination days for Blue Hill in Hancock
County between 1960 and 2015 showed a significant increase in the average
number of pollination days as of 1990 but then a decline through to 2015. They ascribed
this trend to an increase in rainy weather during bloom since 1990. There are
potential impacts on crop pollination and on long-term bee population dynamics.
Lack of synchrony between bees and their host plants could lead to an inadequacy of
pollen and nectar sources (Miller-Rushing and Primack 2008) that might impact bee
populations. A recent study (Bartomeus et al. 2011) showed that bee responses were
comparable to and less extreme than the response of relevant plant species.
Conclusions
Maine has a diversity of native bees typical for northeastern North America but
with fewer species than states with warmer climates such as those to the south and
west. Native bee species richness is rather high for typically Holarctic genera that
overwinter as adults and are otherwise well adapted to a cold temperate climate
(Michener 2007). While Apis mellifera feral colonies are in decline, other nonnative
bees could be increasing in species richness and abundance.
The preliminary county checklist focuses attention on gaps in available data,
with the goal of informing future inventories. Additional sampling is needed in
western, northern, and southern Maine, with particular attention to Androscoggin,
Somerset, and Sagadahoc counties, along with other counties from which few species
have been recorded.
Many vouchers we examined are from studies of pollinators for Lowbush
Blueberry. Similarly intensive surveys of other crops (Apple, Vaccinium macrocarpon
Aiton [American Cranberry], Highbush Blueberry, curcurbits) are needed
in Maine. Crops that are pollinator-independent might also be surveyed for associated
bees, as for Solanum tuberosum L. (Potato) in Michigan (Buchanan et
al. 2017). Natural habitats that could be targeted for more intensive sampling
include well-drained sandy openings, coastal islands, and higher elevations
with features such as tablelands and balds, among other Maine plant communities
(Gawler and Cutko 2010). Our assumption that York and Cumberland
County sandy areas could have high diversity compared to other counties may
be confounded by the extent to which habitats are being developed in that part
of the state, where changed land use, intensive lawn management, or forest succession
occupy areas that were formerly openings with abundant flowers. Bee
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
36
associations with vegetation dominated by heaths (Ericaceae, e.g., Vaccinium)
such as bogs, and other types of wetlands (Anderson and Davis 1998, Davis
1993) need further survey.
New collections should be subjected to identification by expert taxonomists. We
urge that if regional bee faunas are to be fully useful assessments then they must
be based on careful consideration of taxonomy and behavior (e.g., host plants and
habitat associations), with attention to known biogeographic patterns (Goldstein
and Scott 2015). Cane (2001) cautioned that ecological studies require correct
bee identifications for their validity. Bee label data should include floral records
so that host-plant associations and phenology can be summarized, and specimens
should ideally include preservation of associated pollen loads for morphological
and metagenomic studies. We hope that this first checklist of the bees of Maine
can serve as a baseline for measuring the effects of anticipated climate and habitat
changes on native and exotic bee populations in coming decades.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate funding from the US Department of Agriculture National Institute of
Food and Agriculture (Specialty Crops Research Initiative Contract/Grant/Agreement No.
2011-51181-30673), the University of Maine, the American Museum of Natural History,
and Stewards LLC. This project was supported by USDA National Institute of Agriculture,
Hatch Project number ME0-21505 through the Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment
Station. We thank people who, in addition to J.S. Ascher. and M. Veit, examined bees for this
report: (1) Jason Gibbs, Cornell University and Michigan State University, identified Lasioglossum
(Dialictus) specimens from the Maine Entomological Museum; (2) Terry Griswold
and Wallace E. LaBerge identified Osmia captured in Lowbush Blueberry fields in 1990 and
1997–1998, and Jason Gibbs determined Osmia captured in 2010–2012; (3) Sam Droege,
USGS Pawtuxent National Wildlife Refuge, identified Nomada and many other Maine bees;
and (4) Leif Richardson, University of Vermont, identified hundreds of Maine Bombus specimens.
Charlene Donahue of the Maine Forest Service provided records from the Maine Forest
Service Insect Collection, Augusta, ME. We appreciate data, insights, and numerous county
and some state records from Sara Bushmann regarding particularly Bombus and Lasioglossum
in Maine. We are grateful to recent and current researchers who shared data with us, with
special thanks to Jennifer (Loose) Ryan, Eric Venturini, Kalyn Bickerman-Martin, and Brianne
Du Clos. Judith Collins assisted in many ways. We appreciate help from Anne Favolise,
Hadel Go, and Keith Goldfarb in preparing Figure 1. Comments received from Dave Halliwell,
Keith Goldfarb, and 2 anonymous reviewers on earlier drafts significantly improved
this monograph. Thank you to John Pickering for maintaining the biodiversity portal www.
discoverlife.org. We recognize the many contributions of bee experts from past decades who
have collected, determined, or annotated Maine bee specimens; their observations, skill, and
dedication made this report possible. This is Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station
Publication number 3566. Comments from 4 anonymous reviewers improved an earlier
version of the manuscript.
Literature Cited
Anderson, D.S., and R.B. Davis. 1998. The flora and plant communities of Maine peatlands.
Technical Bulletin 170. University of Maine Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station,
Orono, ME. 98 pp.
Northeastern Naturalist
37
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Asare, E. 2013. The economic impacts of bee pollination on the profitability of the Lowbush
Blueberry industry in Maine. M.Sc. Thesis, School of Economics, The University of
Maine, Orono, ME. 167 pp.
Ascher, J.S., and J. Pickering. 2017. Discover Life bee species guide and world checklist
(Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila). Draft-47. Available online at http://www.discoverlife.
org/mp/20q?guide=Apoidea_species. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Ascher, J.S., S. Kornbluth, and R.G. Goelet. 2014. Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila)
of Gardiners Island, Suffolk County, New York. Northeastern Naturalist 21:47–71.
Baker, J.R. 1975. Taxonomy of five nearctic subgenera of Coelioxys (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).
University of Kansas Science Bulletin 50:649–730.
Bartomeus, I., J.S. Ascher, D.L. Wagner, B.N. Danforth, S.R. Colla, S. Kornbluth, and R.
Winfree. 2011. Climate-associated phenological advances in bee pollinators and beepollinated
plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States
of America 108(51):20645–20649.
Bartomeus, I., J.S. Ascher, J. Gibbs, B.N. Danforth, D.L. Wagner, S.M. Hedtke, and R. Winfree.
2013. Historical changes in northeastern United States bee pollinators related to
shared ecological traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
State of America 110:4656–4660.
Batra, L.R., S.W.T. Batra, and G.E. Bohart. 1973. The mycoflora of domesticated and wild
bees. Mycopathologia et Mycolagia Applicata 49(1):13–44.
Bickerman-Martens, K., B. Swartz, R. Butler, and F. A. Drummond. 2017. Documenting
the diversity, distribution, and status of Maine bumble bees: The Maine Bumble Bee
Atlas and citizen scientists. Maine Policy Review 26(2):43–49.
Blacquiere, T., G. Smagghe, C.A. van Gestel, and V. Mommaerts. 2012. Neonicotinoids
in bees: A review on concentrations, side-effects, and risk assessment. Ecotoxicology
21(4):973–92.
Boughner, C.C. 1937. The climate of Canada. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological
Society 63(271):419–432.
Boulanger, I.W., G.W. Wood, E.A. Osgood, and C.O. Dirks. 1967. Native bees associated
with Low-bush Blueberry in Maine and eastern Canada. Maine Agricultural Experiment
Station Bulletin T 26, Technical Series. Orono, ME. 22 pp.
Bouseman, J.K., and W.E. LaBerge. 1978. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the
Western Hemisphere. Part IX. Subgenus Melandrena. American Entomological Society,
Transactions 104(3/4):275–389.
Brooks, R.W. 1983 Systematics and bionomics of Anthophora: The bomboides group and
species groups of the New World. The University of California Publications in Entomology
98:1–84.
Brown, M.J.F., and R.J. Paxton. 2009. The conservation of bees: A global perspective.
Apidologie 40(3):410–416.
Brumley, R.L. 1965. A revision of the bee genus Epeolus Latreille of western American
north of Mexico. M.Sc. Thesis. Utah State University, Logan, UT. 92 pp.
Buchanan, A. L., J. Gibbs, L. Komondy, and Z. Svendrei. 2017. Bee community of commercial
Potato fields in Michigan and Bombus impatiens visitation to neonicotinoid-treated
Potato plants. Insects 8(1):30. Available online at doi:10.3390/insects8010030.
Bushmann, S.L. 2013. Wild bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) communities associated with the
Lowbush Blueberry agroecosystem of Maine. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Maine,
Orono, ME. 137 pp.
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
38
Bushmann, S.L., and F.A. Drummond. 2015. Abundance and diversity of wild bees (Hymenoptera:
Apoidea) found in Lowbush Blueberry growing regions of Downeast Maine.
Environmental Entomology 44:1–15.
Bushmann, S.L., F.A. Drummond, L.A. Beers, and E. Groden. 2012. Wild bumblebee
(Bombus) diversity and Nosema (Microsporidia: Nosematidae) infection levels associated
with Lowbush Blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) production and commercial
bumblebee pollinators. Psyche 2012:1–11.
Cameron, S.A., Hines H.M., and P.H. Williams. 2007. A comprehensive phylogeny of the
bumble bees (Bombus). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 91:161–188.
Cameron, S.A., J.D. Lozier, J.P. Strange, J.B. Koch, N. Cordes, L.F. Solter, and T.L. Griswold.
2011. Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108:662–667.
Campbell, J.L., L.E. Rustad, E.W. Boyer, S.F. Christopher, C.T. Driscoll, I. J. Fernandez,
P. M. Groffman, D. Houle, J. Kiekbusch, A.H. Magill, M.J. Mitchell, and S.V. Ollinger.
2009. Consequences of climate change for biogeochemical cycling in forests of northeastern
North America. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39(2):264–284.
Cane, J.H. 2001. Habitat fragmentation and native bees: A premature verdict? Conservation
Ecology 5(1):3. Available online at http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss1/art3/. Accessed
27 June 2017.
Cane, J.H., D. Schiffhauer and L.J. Kervin. 1996. Pollination, foraging, and nesting ecology
of the leaf-cutting bee, Megachile (Delomegachile) addenda (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
on cranberry beds (Vaccinium macrocarpon). Annals of the Entomological Society
of America 89:361–367.
Ciarlo T.J., C.A. Mullin, J.L. Frazier, and D.R. Schmehl. 2012. Learning impairment in
honeybees caused by agricultural spray adjuvants. PLoS ONE 7(7):e40848. Available
online at doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040848.
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). 2011. COSEWIC
assessment and status report on the Macropis Cuckoo Bee Epeoloides pilosulus in Canada.
Ottawa, ON, Canada. ix + 25 pp. Available online at http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.
gc.ca/document/default_e.cfm?documentID=2297. Accessed 17 November 2017.
Covell, C.V., Jr. 1972. A catalog of the J.H. Lovell types of Apoidea (Hymenoptera),
with lectotype designations. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington
74:10–18.
Cresson, E.T. 1863. List of the North American species of Bombus and Apathus. Proceedings
of the Entomological Society of Philadelphia 2:83–116.
Cronon, W. 1983. Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England.
Hill and Wang, New York, NY. 241 pp.
Davis, D.R., and F.G. Hevel. 1995. Donation of the Auburn E. Brower collection to the
Smithsonian Institution. Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 49(3):253–254.
Davis, R.B. 1993. The Natural History of Maine. Jokers are Wild Publishing House, Orono,
ME. 157 pp.
Dearborn, R. G., R. Bradbury, and G. Russell, 1983. The forest insect survey of Maine:
Order Hymenoptera. Maine Forest Service, Augusta, ME. 101 pp.
Delaplane, K.S. 2001. Varroa destructor: Revolution in the making. Bee World
82(4):157–159.
Dibble, A.C. 2013. Vascular flora of the Penobscot Experimental Forest, with provisional
lists of lichens and bryophytes. Pp 103–137 In L.S. Kenefic and J.C. Brissette (Comps.).
Penobscot Experimental Forest: 60 years of research and demonstration in Maine,
1950–2010. General Technical Report NRS-P-123. US Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA. Available online at http://
www.fs.fed.us/nrs/pubs/gtr/gtr_nrs-p-123.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Northeastern Naturalist
39
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Dibble, A.C., and F.A. Drummond. 1997. Floral syndrome in Amelanchier nantucketensis
(Rosaceae) II. Bee preference and diversity associated with andropetaly. Canadian Journal
of Botany 75:1860–1867.
Dibble, A.C., F.A. Drummond, and W.E. LaBerge. 1997. Floral syndrome in Amelanchier
nantucketensis (Rosaceae). I. Floral density, bee activity, and characterization of andropetaly.
Canadian Journal of Botany 75:1851–1859.
Dibble, A.C., K. Zouhar, and J. Kapler-Smith. 2008. Chapter 5. Northeastern bioregion,
Pp. 61–90, In K. Zouhar, J. Kapler-Smith, M.L. Brooks, and S. Sutherland (Eds.). Wildland
fire in ecosystems: Fire and nonnative invasive plants. General Technical Report
RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 6. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain
Research Station, Ogden, UT. Available online at http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/
rmrs_gtr042_6.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Dibble, A.C., N.G. Miller, J.W. Hinds, and A.M. Fryday. 2009. Lichens and bryophytes of
the alpine and subalpine zones on Katahdin, Maine, I: Overview, ecology, climate, and
conservation aspects. The Bryologist 112(4):651–672.
Dibble, A.C., A.L. Averill, K. Bickerman-Martens, S.C. Bosworth, S. Bushmann, F.A.
Drummond, A.K. Hoshide, M.E. Leach, K. Skyrm, E. Venturini, and A. White. In press.
Bees and their habitats in four New England states. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment
Station Publication, University of Maine, Orono, ME.
Droege, S. 2010. The very handy bee manual. 2015 revision. Available online at http://bio2.
elmira.edu/fieldbio/beemanual.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Droege, S. 2012. Report on bees collected during the Schoodic Peninsula Hymenoptera
blitz, Acadia National Park, 30 July–1 Aug 2010. Pp. 35–36, In D. Chandler, D. Manski,
C. Donahue, and A. Alyokhin (Eds.). Biodiversity of the Schoodic Peninsula: Results
of the insect and arachnid bioblitzes at the Schoodic District of Acadia National Park,
Maine. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station, Technical Bulletin 206.
Orono, ME. 210 pp.
Droege, S., M.G. Rightmyer, C.S. Sheffield, and S.G. Brady. 2010. New synonymies in the
bee genus Nomada from North America (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Zootaxa 2661:1–32.
Drummond, F.A. 2012a. Commercial bumble bee pollination of Lowbush Blueberry. International
Journal of Fruit Science 12(1–3):54–64.
Drummond, F.A. 2012b. Effect of Imidacloprid on bumble bees: Cage trial, 2009. Arthropod
Management Tests 37(1):C8. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.4182/
amt.2012.C8.
Drummond, F.A. 2012c. Effect of Assail on honeybees, 2008. Arthropod Management Tests
37(1):C7. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.4182/amt.2012.C7.
Drummond, F.A. 2015. Rebound of a once common bumble bee. Presentation at the Northeast
Natural History Conference. Springfield, MA. Available from the author.
Drummond, F.A., and C.S. Stubbs. 1997a. Potential for management of the Blueberry Bee,
Osmia atriventris Cresson. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Vaccinium
Culture. Acta Hort 446:77–86.
Drummond, F.A., and C.S. Stubbs. 1997b. Sampling bee populations in Lowbush Blueberry
in Maine. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Vaccinium Culture. Acta
Hort 446:101–108.
Drummond, F.A., and C.S. Stubbs. 2003.Wild bee conservation for wild blueberry fields.
University of Maine Cooperative Extension Fact Sheet 630. Orono, ME. 12 pp.
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
40
Drummond, F.A., K. Aronstein, J. Chen, J. Ellis, J. Evans, N. Ostiguy, W. Sheppard, M.
Spivak, and K. Visscher. 2012. The first two years of the stationary hive project: Abiotic
site effects. American Bee Journal 152:369–374. Available online at http://articles.
extension.org/pages/63773/the-first-two-years-of-the-stationary-hive-project:-abioticsite-
effects.
Drummond, F., E. Ballman, and J. Collins. 2017a. Are they weeds or a life force? Or sustainability
on the edge. Spire, The Maine Journal of Conservation and Sustainability 2017
issue. Available online at https://umaine.edu/spire/2017/05/04/drummond-et-al/.
Drummond, F.A., A.C. Dibble, C. Stubbs, S. Bushmann, J.S. Ascher and J. Ryan. 2017b. A
Natural History of Change in Native Bees Associated with Lowbush Blueberry in Maine.
Northeastern Naturalist 24 (Monograph 15):49–68.
Ellis, J.D., J.D. Evans, and J. Pettis. 2010. Colony losses, managed colony population
decline, and Colony Collapse Disorder in the United States. Journal of Apicultural Research
49(1):134–136.
Fowler, J. 2016. Specialist bees of the Northeast: Host plants and habitat conservation.
Northeastern Naturalist 23(2):305–320.
Franklin, H.J. 1911. New North American Bombidae. Transactions of the American Entomological
Society 37:157–168.
Franklin, H.J. 1912. The Bombidae of the New World. Transactions of the American Entomological
Society 38:177–486.
Gawler, S., and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural Landscapes of Maine: A Guide to Natural Communities
and Ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Augusta, ME. 293 pp.
Gibbs, J. 2010. Revision of the metallic species of Lasioglossum (Dialictus) in Canada
(Hymenoptera, Halictidae, Halictini). Zootaxa 2591:1–382.
Gibbs, J. 2011. Revision of the metallic Lasioglossum (Dialictus) of eastern North America
(Hymenoptera, Halictidae, Halictini). Zootaxa 3073:1–216.
Gibbs, J., and C.S. Sheffield. 2009. Rapid range expansion of the Wool-carder Bee, Anthidium
manicatum (Linnaeus) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), in North America. Journal of
the Kansas Entomological Society 82(1):21–29.
Gibbs, J., L. Packer, S. Dumesh, and B.N. Danforth. 2013. Revision and reclassification of
Lasioglossum (Evylaeus), L. (Hemihalictus), and L. (Sphecodogastra) in eastern North
America (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae). Zootaxa 3672:1–117.
Gibbs, J., J.S. Ascher, M.G. Rightmyer, and R. Isaacs. In press. The bees of Michigan (Hymenoptera:
Apoidea: Anthophila), with notes on distribution, taxonomy, pollination, and
natural history. Zootaxa.
Giles, V., and J. S. Ascher. 2006. A survey of the bees of the Black Rock Forest Preserve,
New York (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 15:208-231.
Goldstein, P.Z., and J.S. Ascher. 2016. Taxonomic and behavioural composition of an island
fauna: A survey of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) on Martha’s Vineyard
(Dukes County, Massachusetts, USA). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of
Washington 118(1):37–92.
Goldstein, P.Z., and V.L. Scott. 2015. Taxonomic and behavioral components of faunal
comparisons over time: The bees of Boulder County past and present (Colorado, USA)
(Hymenoptera: Anthophila). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington.
117(3):290–346.
Goulson, D. 2003. Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology,
Evolution, and Systematics 34:1–26.
Northeastern Naturalist
41
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Goulson D., E. Nicholls, C. Botias, and E. Rotheray. 2015. Bee declines driven by combined
stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science 347(6229):1255957.
DOI 10.1126/science.1255957. Available online at http://www.moraybeedinosaurs.
co.uk/neonicotinoid/Bee%20declines%20driven%20by%20combined%20stress%20
from%20parasites%20pesticides%20and%20lack%20of%20flowers.pdf. Accessed 27
June 2017.
Graenicher, S. 1905. Some observations on the life history and habits of parasitic bees. Bulletin
of the Wisconsin Natural History Society 3:153–167.
Graenicher, S. 1911. Bees of northwestern Wisconsin. Bulletin of the Public Museum of the
City of Milwaukee 1:221–249.
Graenicher, S. 1914. Wisconsin bees of the genus Perdita. Canadian Entomologist
46:51–57.
Graenicher, S. 1927. On the biology of the parasitic bees of the genus Coelioxys. Entomological
News 38:231–235, 273–276.
Graenicher, S. 1935. Bee fauna and vegetation of Wisconsin. Annals of the Entomological
Society of America 28:285–310.
Griffin, T., G. Anderson, F. Drummond, E. Groden, W. Honeycutt, J. Jemison, L. Stack,
and D. Yarborough. 2009. Agriculture. Pp. 39–42, In G. Jacobson, I.J. Fernandez, P.A.
Mayewski, and C.V. Schmitt (Eds.). Maine’s Climate Future: An Initial Assessment.
University of Maine, Orono, ME. 70 pp.
Groff, S.C., C.S. Loftin, F.A. Drummond, S. Bushmann, and B. McGill. 2016. Parameterization
of the InVEST crop pollination model to spatially predict abundance of wild
blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton) native bee pollinators of Maine, USA. Environmental
Modelling Software 79:1–9.
Hall, I.V., L.E. Aalders, N.L. Nickerson, and S.P. Vander Kloet. 1979. The biological flora
of Canada. 1. Vaccinium angustifolium Ait., Sweet Lowbush Blueberry. Canadian Field-
Naturalist 93:415–430.
Hansen, R.W., and E.A. Osgood. 1983. Insects visiting flowers of wild Red Raspberry in
spruce–fir forested areas of eastern Maine. Entomological News 9 4(4):71–76.
Heinrich, B. 1971. Temperature regulation in the sphinx moth Manduca sexta. Journal of
Experimental Biology 54:141–152.
Heinrich, B. 1972a. Temperature regulation in the bumblebee Bombus vagans: A field
study. Science: 175:183–187.
Heinrich, B. 1972b. Energetics of temperature regulation and foraging in a bumblebee,
Bombus terricola Kirby. Journal of Comparative Physiology 77:49–64.
Heinrich, B. 1972c. Patterns of endothermy in bumblebee queens, drones, and workers.
Journal Comparative Physiology 77:65–79.
Heinrich, B. 1972d. Physiology and brood incubation in the bumblebee queen, Bombus
vosnesenskii. Nature 239:223–225.
Heinrich, B. 1973. The energetics of the bumblebee. Scientific American 228:96–102.
Heinrich, B. 1974a. Thermoregulation in bumblebees. I. Brood incubation by Bombus
vosnesenskii queens. Journal of Comparative Physiology 88:129–140.
Heinrich, B. 1974b. Pheromone-induced brooding behavior in Bombus vosnesenskii and
B. edwardsii (Hymenoptera: Bombidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society
47:396–404.
Heinrich, B. 1975. Thermoregulation in bumblebees. II. Energetics of warm-up and free
flight. Journal of Comparative Physiology 96:155–166.
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
42
Heinrich, B. 1976a. Foraging specializations of individual bumblebees. Ecological Monitoring
46:105–128.
Heinrich, B. 1976b. Heat exchange in relation to blood flow between thorax and abdomen
in bumblebees. Journal of Experimental Biology 64:561–585.
Heinrich, B. 1976c. Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: Bumblebees. Ecology
57:874–889.
Heinrich, B. 1979. “Majoring” and “minoring” by foraging bumblebees, Bombus vagans:
An experimental analysis. Ecology 60:245–255.
Heinrich, B. 1993. The Hot-blooded Insects: Mechanisms and Evolution of Thermoregulation.
Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 601 pp.
Heinrich, B. 1994. A Year in the Maine Woods. Addison and Wesley, Boston, MA. 304 pp.
Heinrich, B. 1995. Bumblebee ecology. Wild Earth Summer 1995:45–47
Heinrich, B., and G. Chavarria. 2001. Bumble bee energetics and conservation, In C.S.
Stubbs and F.A. Drummond (Eds.). Pollination and Bee Conservation: A Cross Roads.
Thomas Say Publications in Entomology, Entomological Society of America, Annapolis,
MD. 156 pp.
Heinrich, B. 2004. Bumblebee Economics. 1979 Edition with New Preface. Harvard University
Press, Cambridge, MA.
Heinrich, B., and M.J.E. Heinrich. 1983a. Size and caste in temperature regulation by
bumblebees. Physiological Zoology 56(4):552–562.
Heinrich, B., and M.J.E. Heinrich. 1983b. Heterothermia in foraging workers and drones of
the bumblebee Bombus terricola. Physiological Zoology 56(4):563–567.
Heinrich, B., P. Mudge, and P. Deringis. 1977. A laboratory analysis of flower constancy
in foraging bumblebees: Bombus ternarius and B. terricola. Behavioral Ecology and
Sociobiology 2:247–266.
Hinojosa-Díaz, I.A. 2008. The Giant Resin Bee making its way west: First record in Kansas
(Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). ZooKeys 1:67–71. Available online at DOI:10.3897/
zookeys.1.17
Hurd, P.D., Jr., and E.G. Linsley. 1972. Parasitic bees of the genus Holcopasites Ashmead
(Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology No. 114. Smithsonian
Institution Press, Washington, DC. 39 pp.
Javorek, S.K., K.E. Mackenzie, and S.P. Vander Kloet.. 2002. Comparative pollination effectiveness
among bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) on Lowbush Blueberry (Ericaceae: Vaccinium
angustifolium). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 95(3):345–351.
Jones, M.S., H. Vanhanen, R. Peltola, and F.A. Drummond. 2014. A global review of
arthropod-mediated ecosystem-services in Vaccinium berry agroecosystems. Terrestrial
Arthopod Reviews 7:41–78.
Kerr J.T., A. Pindar, P. Galpern, L. Packer, S.G. Potts, S.M. Roberts, P. Rasmont, O. Schweiger,
S.R. Colla, L.L. Richardson, D.L. Wagner, L.F. Gall, D.S. Sikes, and A. Pantoja.
2015. Climate change impacts on bumblebees converge across continents. Science
349(6244):177–180. Available online at DOI:10.1126/science.aaa7031.
Kingsbury, S.M. 1906. The records of the Virginia Company of London, Vol. 1–2. The
Court Book, from the manuscript in the Library of Congress 1619–1622. Government
Printing Office, Washington, DC. Available online at https://archive.org/details/recordsofvirgini02virguoft.
Accessed 27 June 2017.
LaBerge, W.E. 1956. Revision of the bees of the genus Melissodes in North and Central
America. Parts I, II. (Hymentoptera, Apidae). University of Kansas Science Bulletin
37-38:911–1194.
Northeastern Naturalist
43
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
LaBerge, W.E. 1961. A revision of the bees of the genus Melissodes in North and Central
America. Part III (Hymenoptera, Apidae). University of Kansas Science Bulletin
42:283–663.
LaBerge, W.E. 1967. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere.
Part I. Callandrena. Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum
7:1–316.
LaBerge, W.E. 1971. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere.
Part IV. Scrapteropsis, Xiphandrena, and Rhaphandrena. Transactions of the
American Entomological Society 97:441–520.
LaBerge, W.E. 1973. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere.
Part VI. Subgenus Trachandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological
Society 99:235–371.
LaBerge, W.E. 1977. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere.
Part VIII. Subgenera Thysandrena, Dasyandrena, Psammandrena, Rhacandrena,
Euandrena, and Oxyandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society
103:1–143.
LaBerge, W.E. 1980. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere.
Part X. Subgenus Andrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society
106:395–525.
LaBerge, W.E. 1985. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere.
Part XI. Minor subgenera and subgeneric key. Transactions of the American
Entomological Society 111:441–567.
LaBerge, W.E. 1987. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere.
Part XII. Subgenera Leucandrena, Ptilandrena, Scoliandrena, and Melandrena.
Transactions of the American Entomological Society 112:191–248.
LaBerge, W.E. 1989. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the western hemisphere.
Part XIII. Subgenera Simandrena and Taeniandrena. Transactions of the American
Entomological Society 115:1–56.
LaBerge, W.E., and J.K. Bouseman. 1970. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of
the Western Hemisphere. Part III. Tylandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological
Society 96:543–605.
LaBerge, W.E., and D.W. Ribble. 1972. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the
Western Hemisphere. Part V. Subgenera Gonandrena, Geissandrena, Parandrena, Pelicandrena.
Transactions of the American Entomological Society 98:271–358.
LaBerge, W.E., and D.W. Ribble. 1975. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of
the Western Hemisphere. Part VII. Subgenus Euandrena. Transactions of the American
Entomological Society 101:371–446.
Ladurner, E., J. Bosch, W.P. Kemp, and S. Maini. 2008. Foraging and nesting behavior of
Osmia lignaria (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in the presence of fungicides: Cage studies.
Journal of Economic Entomology 101(3):647–653.
Laycock, I., K.M. Lenthall, A.T. Barratt, and J.E. Cresswell. 2012. Effects of imidacloprid,
a neonicotinoid pesticide, on reproduction in worker bumble bees (Bombus terrestris).
Ecotoxicology 21(7):1937–1945.
Lee, K.V., N. Steinhauer, K. Rennich, M.E. Wilson, D.R. Tarpy, D.M. Caron, R. Rose, K.S.
Delaplane, K. Baylis, E.J. Lengerich, J. Pettis, J.A. Skinner, J.T. Wilkes, R. Sagili, and
D. vanEngelsdorp. 2015. A national survey of managed Honey Bee 2013–2014 annual
colony losses in the USA. Apidologie 46(3):292–305.
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
44
Lee, W.R. 1958. Pollination studies on Low Bush Blueberries. Journal of Economic Entomology
51:544–545.
Ley, E.L., S. Buchmann, K. McGuire, and L. Stritch. 2011. Selecting plants for pollinators:
A regional guide for farmers, land managers, and gardeners in the ecological region of
the Laurentian Mixed Forest Province. The Pollinator Partnership/North American Pollinator
Project Campaign, San Francisco, CA. Available online at http://www.pollinator.
org/PDFs/Laurentian.rx9.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Lovell, J.H. 1900. The visitors of the Caprifoliaceae. American Naturalist 34:37–51.
Lovell, J.H. 1905a. Four new species of Halictus from Maine. Canadian Entomologist
37:39–40.
Lovell, J.H. 1905b. Some Maine species of Halictus. Canadian Entomologist 37:299–300.
Lovell, J.H. 1907. The Colletidae of southern Maine. Canadian Entomologist 39:363–365.
Lovell, J.H. 1908. The Halictidae of southern Maine. Psyche 15:32–40.
Lovell, J. H. 1909. The bees of Massachusetts: Osmia and Sphecodes. Entomological New
20: 122-126.
Lovell, J.H. 1910. The Prosopididae of southern Maine. Psyche 17(5):177–185.
Lovell, J.H. 1911. New records of bees: Sphecodes and Prosopis (Hym.) Entomological
News 22:211–214.
Lovell, J.H. 1913. The origin of the oligotropic habit among bees (Hymenoptera). Entomological
News 24:104–112.
Lovell, J.H. 1922a. The bees of Maine. The Maine Naturalist 4:71–76.
Lovell, J.H. 1922b. The bees of Maine. Part II. The Maine Naturalist 4:102–105.
Lovell, J.H. 1924. Pollination of Alfalfa. American Bee Journal 66:176–178.
Lovell, J.H. 1925a. The bees of Maine. Part III. The Maine Naturalist 5:7–10.
Lovell, J.H. 1925b. The bees of Maine. Part IV. The Maine Naturalist 5:57–60.
Lovell, J.H. 1925c. The bees of Maine. Part IV. The Maine Naturalist 5:111–115.
Lovell, J.H. and T.D.A. Cockerell. 1905. The nomadine and epeoline bees of southern
Maine. Psyche 12:39–42.
Lovell, J.H. and T.D.A. Cockerell. 1906. Notes on the bees of southern Maine: Anthophoridae,
Halictoididae, Macropidae, and Panurgidae. Psyche 13(5):109–113.
Lovell, J.H. and T.D.A. Cockerell. 1907a. The Megachilidae of southern Maine. Psyche
14:15–21.
Lovell, J.H. and T.D.A. Cockerell. 1907b. The Sphecodidae of southern Maine. Psyche
14(5):101–110.
Lovell, J.H., and H.B. Lovell. 1932. The pollination of Rhodora. Rhodora 36(407):213–214.
Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry. 2017. Invasive plant list.
Available online at http://www.maine.gov/dacf/mnap/features/invasive_plants/invsheets.
htm. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Martin, E.C., E. Oertel, and N.P. Nye. 1980. Beekeeping in the United States. Agricultural
Handbook No. 335. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. 193 pp.
Matteson, K.C., J.S. Ascher, and G.A. Langellotto. 2008. Bee richness and abundance
in New York City urban gardens. Annals of the Entomological Society of America
101(1):140–150.
Mazurkiewicz, M. 2010. The Giant Resin Bee, Megachile sculpturalis, in Maine: A new
state record. The Maine Entomologist 14(4):3.
McGinley, R.J. 1986. Studies of Halictinae (Apoidea: Halictidae), I: Revision of New World
Lasioglossum Curtis. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology No. 429, Smithsonian Institution
Press, Washington, DC.
Northeastern Naturalist
45
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Michener, C.D. 1947. A revision of the American species of Hoplitis (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae),
Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 89:263–317.
Michener, C.D. 2007. Bees of the World. Second Edition. John Hopkins University Press,
Baltimore, MD. 93 pp.
Miliczky, E.R. 1978. Effects of spraying with Sevin-4-oil® on the abundance of insect pollinators
in the spruce–fir forest. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Maine, Orono, ME. 37 pp.
Miliczky, E.R. and E.A. Osgood. 1979a. The effects of spraying with Sevin-4-oil® on insect
pollinators and pollination in a spruce–fir forest. Life Sciences and Agriculture Experiment
Station Technical Bulletin 90. University of Maine, Orono, ME.
Miliczky, E.R., and E.A. Osgood. 1979b. Insects visiting bloom of Withe-rod, Viburnum
cassinoides L., in the Orono, Maine, area. Entomological News 90(3):131–134
Miller-Rushing, A.J., and R.B. Primack. 2008. Global warming and flowering times in Thoreau’s
Concord: A community perspective. Ecology 89(2):332–341.
Mitchell, T.B. 1960. Bees of the Eastern United States. Volume 1: North Carolina Agricultural
Experimental Station Technical Bulletin 141. Raleigh, NC. 538. pp.
Mitchell, T.B. 1962. Bees of the Eastern United States. Volume 2. North Carolina Agricultural
Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 152. Raleigh, NC. 557 pp.
Moure, J.S., and P.D. Hurd Jr. 1987. An Annotated Catalog of the Halictid Bees of the Western
Hemisphere (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington,
DC. 405 pp.
Neumann P., and N.L. Carreck. 2010. Honey Bee colony losses. Journal of Apicultural Research
49(1):1–6. Available online at doi:10.3896/IBRA.1.49.1.01.
Osgood, E.A. 1972. Soil characteristics of nesting sites of solitary bees associated with the
Low-bush Blueberry in Maine. Life Science and Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin
59. Orono, ME. 8 pp.
Osgood, E.A. 1989. Biology of Andrena crataegi Robertson (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae), a
communally nesting Bee. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 97(1):56–64.
Ostaff, D.P., A. Mosseler, R.C. Johns, S. Javorek, J. Klymko, and J.S. Ascher. 2015. Willows
(Salix spp.) as pollen and nectar sources for sustaining fruit- and berry-pollinating
insects. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 95:505–516.
Packard, A.S., Jr. 1861. Report on the insects collected on the Penobscot and Alleguash Rivers,
during August and September. Pp. 375–376, In Sixth Annual Report of the Secretary
of the Maine Board of Agriculture, Augusta, ME.
Pellett, F.C. 1939. John H. Lovell: Notes on the life and writings of the Maine naturalist.
American Bee Journal December 1939:568–570.
Phipps, C.R. 1930. Blueberry and huckleberry insects. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station
Bulletin 356:107–232.
Pimentel, D., R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic
costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological
economics 52(3):273–288.
Procter, W. 1938. Biological Survey of the Mount Desert Region. Part VI. The Insect Fauna.
The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, Philadelphia, PA. 247 pp. Available online
at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/5843840#page/5/mode/1up. Accessed 27
June 2017.
Procter, W. 1946. Biological Survey of the Mount Desert Region. Part VII. The Insect
Fauna. Being a revision of Parts I and VI with the addition of 1100 species. The Wistar
Institute of Anatomy and Biology, Philadelphia, PA. 566 pp. Available online at https://
www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/29157#page/5/mode/1up. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
46
Ratnieks, F.W., and N.L. Carreck. 2010. Clarity on honey bee collapse? Science
327(5962):152–153.
Ribble, D.W. 1968. Revisions of two subgenera of Andrena: Micrandrena Ashmead and
Derandrena, new subgenus (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Bulletin of the University of Nebraska
State Museum 8(5):237–394.
Rightmyer, M.G., T. Griswold, and M.S. Arduser. 2010. A review of the non-metallic Osmia
(Melanosmia) found in North America, with additional notes on palearctic Melanosmia
(Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). ZooKeys 60:37–77.
Rivernider, R., E. Venturini, and F. Drummond. In press. Timothy Grass: A pollen forage
for bumble bees. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society.
Roberts, R.B. 1972. Revision of the bee genus Agapostemon (Hymenoptera: Halictidae).
The University of Kansas Science Bulletin 49(9):437–590.
Robertson, C. 1929. Flowers and insects: Lists of visitors of four hundred and fifty-three
flowers. No publisher. Carlinville, Ill. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.
title.11538. Accessed October 2017.
Romey, W.L., J.S. Ascher, D.A. Powell, and M. Yanek. 2007. Impacts of logging on midsummer
diversity of native bees (Apoidea) in a northern hardwood forest. Journal of the
Kansas Entomological Society 80(4):327–338.
Roulston, T., and R. Malfi. 2012. Aggressive eviction of the Eastern Carpenter Bee (Xylocopa
virginica (Linnaeus)) from its nest by the Giant Resin Bee (Megachile sculpturalis
Smith). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 85(4):387–388.
Rust, R.W., and E.A. Osgood. 1993. Identification of Osmia kenoyeri and O. virga (Hymenoptera:
Megachilidae), two blueberry pollinators. Entomological News 104:113–117.
Seltmann. 2013. Arthropod Easy Capture. Version: 1.34 (Date: 18 February 2013). Available
online at http://sourceforge.net/p/arthropodeasy. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Schwarz, H.F. 1926. Observations on the bees of Rangeley, Maine. The Maine Naturalist
5:136–148.
Schwarz, M., and F. Gusenleitner. 2004. Beitrag zur klärung und kenntnis parasitärer bienen
der gattungen Coelioxys and Nomada (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Linzer Biologische
Beiträge 36(2):1413–1485.
Scott, V.L., J.S. Ascher, T. Griswold, and C.R. Nufio. 2011. Bees of Colorado. Natural History
Inventory of Colorado, No. 23. University of Colorado Museum of Natural History,
Boulder, CO. 112 pp.
Sheffield, C.S., and J.-M. Perron. 2014. Annotated catalogue of the bees described by Léon
Provancher (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). The Canadian Entomologist 146(2):117–169.
Sheffield, C.S., P.G. Kevan, R.F. Smith, S.M. Rignuy, and R.E.L. Rogers. 2003. Bee species
of Nova Scotia, Canada, with new records and notes on bionomics and floral relations
(Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 76(2):357–384.
Sheffield, C.S., C. Ratti, L. Packer, and T. Griswold. 2011. Leafcutter and mason bees of
the genus Megachile Latreille (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in Canada and Alaska.
Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification 18:1–107.
Sheffield, C.S., A. Pindar, L. Packer, and P.G. Kevan. 2013. The potential of cleptoparasitic
bees as indicator taxa for assessing bee communities. Apidologie 44:501–510.
Simberloff, D. 2013. Invasive Species: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University
Press, Oxford, UK. 352 pp.
Smit, B., S.E. Wall, and J. Wandel. 2007. Changing climate: Agricultural adaption in Canada.
University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, BC. 273 pp.
Northeastern Naturalist
47
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
Stephen, W.P. 1954. A revision of the bee genus Colletes in America North of Mexico
(Hymenoptera, Colletidae). The University of Kansas Science Bulletin 36(1):149–527.
Strange, J.P., J.B. Koch, V.H. Gonzalez, L. Nemelka, and T. Griswold. 2011. Global invasion
by Anthidium manicatum (Linnaeus) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae): Assessing potential
distribution in North America and beyond. Biological Invasions 13:2115–2133.
Stubbs, C.S., and F.A. Drummond. 1997a. Blueberry and cranberry (Vaccinium spp.) pollination:
A comparison of managed and native bee foraging behavior. Proceedings of the
International Symposium on Pollination. Acta Hort 437:341–343.
Stubbs, C.S., and F.A. Drummond. 1997b. Pollination of wild Lowbush Blueberry, Vaccinium
angustifolium, by the Alfalfa Leafcutting Bee, Megachile rotundata. Proceedings
of the Sixth International Symposium on Vaccinium Culture. Acta Hort 446:189–196.
Stubbs, C.S., and F.A. Drummond. 1997c. Management of the Alfalfa Leafcutter Bee,
Megachile rotundata (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), for pollination of wild Lowbush
Blueberry. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 70(2):81–93.
Stubbs, C.S., and F.A. Drummond. 2001. Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae): An
alternative to Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) for Lowbush Blueberry pollination.
Journal of Economic Entomology 94(3):609–616.
Stubbs, C.S., H.A. Jacobson, E.A. Osgood, and F.A. Drummond. 1992. Alternate forage
plants for native (wild) bees associated with lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) in
Maine. University of Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 148.
54 pp.
Stubbs, C.S., E.A. Osgood, J.B. Dimond, and F.A. Drummond. 1996. Hymenoptera diversity
in Maine. Pp. 81–86, In S.C. Gawler, J.J. Albright, P.D. Vickery, and F.S. Smith
(Eds.). Biological Diversity in Maine. Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Forest
Biodiversity Project. Augusta, ME. [# OF PP?].
Stubbs, C.S., F.A. Drummond, and S.L. Allard. 1997a. Bee conservation and increasing
Osmia spp. in Maine wild blueberry fields. Northeast Naturalist 4(3): 133–144.
Stubbs, C.S., F.A. Drummond, and D. Yarborough. 1997b. How to manage Alfalfa Leafcutting
Bees for wild blueberry pollination. Wild Blueberry Fact Sheet No. 300. University
of Maine Cooperative Extension Bulletin No. 2413. Orono, ME Available online at
https://extension.umaine.edu/blueberries/factsheets/bees/300-how-to-manage-alfalfaleafcutting-
bees-for-wild-blueberry-production/. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Stubbs, C.S., F.A. Drummond, and D. Yarborough. 2001. Commercial bumble bee, Bombus
impatiens, management for wild blueberry pollination. Wild blueberry fact sheet No.
302. University of Maine Cooperative Extension Bulletin No. 2421. Orono, ME. 4 pp.
Available online at https://extension.umaine.edu/blueberries/factsheets/bees/302-commercial-
bumble-bee-bombus-impatiens-management-for-wild-blueberry-pollination/.
Accessed 27 June 2017.
Stubbs, C.S., F.A. Drummond, and H. Ginsberg. 2007. Effects of invasive plant species on
pollinator service and reproduction in native plants at Acadia National Park. Technical
Report NPS/NER/NRTR – 2007/096. Available online at https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/
5200339. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Torchio, P.F. 1976. Use of Osmia lignaria Say (Hymenoptera: Apoidea, Megachilidae) as a
pollinator in an apple and prune orchard. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society
49(4):475–482.
Tsvetkov, N., O. Samson-Robert, K. Sood, H.S. Patel, D.A. Malena, P.H. Gajiwala, P. Maciukiewicz,
V. Fournier, and A. Zayed. 2017. Chronic exposure to neonicotinoids reduces
honey bee health near Corn crops. Science 356:1395–1397.
Northeastern Naturalist
A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, C. Stubbs, M. Veit, and J.S. Ascher
2017 Vol. 24, Monograph 15
48
vanEngelsdorp, D., and M. Meixner. 2010. A historical review of managed honey bee populations
in Europe and the United States and the factors that may affect them. Journal of
Invertebrate Pathology 103:580–595.
Venturini, E.M, L. Berg Stack, A.C. Dibble, F.A. Drummond, and A.K. Hoshide. 2015.
Enhancing wild bees for crop pollination: Sowing bee pasture for New England’s wild
Lowbush Blueberry. University of Maine Cooperative Extension Fact Sheet, Orono,
ME. 9 pp. Available online at https://extension.umaine.edu/blueberries/wp-content/
uploads/sites/56/2010/05/2015-Bee-Pasture-Fact-Sheet.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Venturini, E.M, F.A. Drummond, A.K. Hoshide, A.C. Dibble, and L. Berg Stack. 2017.
Pollination reservoirs in lowbush blueberry (Ericales: Ericaceae). Journal of Economic
Entomology 110(2):333–346.
Viereck, H.L. 1922. New bees of the genus Andrena. Occasional papers of the Boston Society
of Natural History 5:35–45, pl. 4.
Wagner, D.L., and J.S. Ascher. 2008. Rediscovery of Epeoloides pilosula (Cresson) (Hymenoptera:
Apidae) in New England. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society
81:81–83.
Wagner, D.L., J.S. Ascher, and N.K. Bricker. 2014. A transmission right-of-way as habitat
for wild bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) in Connecticut. Annals of the Entomological
Society of America 107(6):1110–1120.
Wcislo, W.T. 1996. Parasitism rates in relation to nest site in bees and wasps (Hymenoptera:
Apoidea). Journal of Insect Behavior 9(4):643–656.
Weber, E. 2017. Invasive Plant Species of the World: A Reference Guide to Environmental
Weeds. Second Edition. Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International Publications,
Wallingford, UK.
Wessels, T. 1997. Reading the Forested Landscape: A Natural History of New England.
Countryman Press, Woodstock, VT. 200 pp.
Williams, P.H., R.W. Thorp, L.L. Richardson, and S.R. Cola. 2014. Bumble Bees of North
America: An Identification Guide (Princeton Field Guides). Princeton University Press,
Princeton, NJ. 311 pp.
Wilson, E.H., and S.A. Sader. 2002. Detection of forest harvest type using multiple dates of
Landsat TM imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 80(3):385–396.
Wolf, A.T., and J.S. Ascher. 2009. Bees of Wisconsin (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila).
The Great Lakes Entomologist 41(1,2):129–168.
Woodcock, B.A., J.M. Bullock, R.F. Shore, M.S. Heard, M.G. Pereira, J. Redhead, L. Ridding,
H. Dean, D. Sleep, P. Henrys, J. Peyton, S. Hulmes, L Hulmes, M. Sárospataki, C.
Saure, M. Edwards, E. Genersch, S. Knäbe, and R.F. Pywell. 2017. Country-specific effects
of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees. Science 356:1393–1395.
Yamada, M., N. Oyama, N. Sekiga, S. Shirasaki, and C. Tsugawa. 1971. The ecology of
the megachillid bee Osmia cornifrons (Radoszkowski) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and its
utilization for Apple pollination. Bulletin of the Aomori Apple Experiment Station, No.
15. Aomori, Japan.
Yarborough, D. 2009. Wild blueberry culture in Maine. University of Maine Cooperative
Extension Fact Sheet No. 220. UMaine Extension Bulletin No. 2088. Orono, ME. 4 pp.
Available online at http://extension.umaine.edu/blueberries/factsheets/production/wildblueberry-
culture-in-maine/. Accessed 27 June 2017.