Introduction to a Special Issue
BOSTON HARBOR ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK AREA:
NATURAL RESOURCES OVERVIEW
CHARLES T. ROMAN1, BRUCE JACOBSON2, AND JACK WIGGIN3
The Islands and the Park
Boston Harbor Islands national park area includes 34 discrete islands
and peninsulas, ranging in size from small rock outcrops (e.g., The
Graves, Little Calf Island) to Worlds End, a complex of woodland,
grassland, freshwater and coastal wetlands, and intertidal habitats
(Fig. 1). Given a large mean tidal range of 2.9 m (9.5 ft) within Boston
Harbor, many of the islands have extensive intertidal areas of sandflats
and mudflats, cobble and coarse sand beaches, salt marshes, and rocky
shores. Intertidal areas are almost equal to the terrestrial area of the
islands (Table 1). A geographic grouping of the islands would include
the outer islands or Brewster Islands, the inner islands or Dorchester
Bay Islands, the Quincy Bay Islands, and the Hingham Bay Islands.
Aside from the few outcrops of exposed bedrock, most of the islands are
geologically classified as drumlins, elongate landforms of unconsolidated
glacial tills (Rosen and Leach 1987). As these drumlin islands
erode, the sediment is reworked to form sand and gravel spits, beaches,
and tombolos (beaches or bars connecting islands to each other or the
mainland). The park includes approximately 55 km (34 mi) of shoreline,
most of which is relatively undeveloped.
All of the islands have a rich history of human use; many islands
have structures, and some islands (e.g., Deer, Little Brewster, and
Thompson) are still occupied with institutional uses. These various
landforms, the interface of marine and terrestrial environments, and
past land use within an urban region all contribute to a diversity of
habitats found throughout the islands. Visitors to the national park
area are likely to be drawn to the different habitats that are represented,
the historical and cultural attractions, and the beaches and
recreational facilities.
1National Park Service, North Atlantic Coast Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit,
University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI 02882-1197;
charles_roman@nps.gov. 2National Park Service, Boston Harbor Islands National
Park Area, 408 Atlantic Avenue—Suite 228, Boston, MA 02110;
bruce_jacobson@nps.gov. 3Urban Harbors Institute, University of Massachusetts
Boston, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, MA 02125; jack.wiggin@umb.edu.
Boston Harbor Islands National Park Area: Natural Resources Overview
2005 Northeastern Naturalist 12(Special Issue 3):3–12
4 Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 12, Special Issue 3
Administratively, the Boston Harbor Islands were designated by the
United States Congress as a national park in 1996. The federal enabling
legislation created a 13-member Boston Harbor Islands Partnership,
charged with coordinating activities of the island landowners and
managers. Unlike other national park units, land ownership is not with the
National Park Service, but the National Park Service serves an important
role in public education and working with the Partnership to protect natural
and cultural resources, consistent with National Park Service standards.
Due to the Partnership management structure, a number of federal, state,
municipal, and not-for-profit entities have continuing responsibilities to
protect park resources and provide visitor services.
In 2002, the Partnership endorsed a general management plan, defining
the mission and future direction of the park. The plan includes
objectives for managing natural resources, such as restoration of natural
systems, maintenance of native biota, conservation of rare biota, protection
of water and air resources, and promotion of natural geologic
processes (National Park Service 2002). It is imperative that a comprehensive
natural resource information base be assembled to refine these
management objectives, and to develop resource protection and restoration
management strategies, enhance our understanding of how the
island ecosystems function, appreciate the role of human impacts on the
islands’ natural resources and processes, and enhance our ability to
predict changes in ecosystem structure and function.
While the islands have been used for many purposes over a period
measured in millennia, until recently there have been few attempts to
quantify the resources scientifically. A resource inventory and monitoring
Photo: Great Brewster Island from Middle Brewster. (Morss photo)
2005 C.T. Roman, B. Jacobson, and J. Wiggin 5
Figure 1. Boston Harbor Islands national park area consists of 34 islands and
peninsulas within 50 square miles of Massachusetts Bay, a part of the Gulf of
Maine.
Photo: View from Great Brewster Island of Boston Harbor Light on Little
Brewster Island. (Morss photo)
6 Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 12, Special Issue 3
initiative by the Boston Harbor Islands Partnership has yielded an
emerging baseline of natural resource and social science information.
Baseline information is essential for several reasons. It provides an
enhanced scientific basis for resource protection and restoration initiatives,
and for visitor management. It allows park managers to identify
Table 1. Area of terrestrial (e.g., forests, shrublands, grasslands, freshwater wetlands,
rock outcrops, development, others) and intertidal (e.g., rocky shores, mud and sand flats,
salt marsh, gravel and sand beaches, others) habitats associated with Boston Harbor
Islands. Data Source: Bell et al. 2002.
Area (ha)
Island Terrestrial Intertidal Total
Outer Islands
Calf 7.5 6.5 14.0
Great Brewster 7.5 19.8 27.3
Green 1.0 6.0 7.0
Little Brewster 1.3 1.7 3.0
Little Calf 0.4 1.6 2.0
Middle Brewster 5.0 3.8 8.8
Outer Brewster 7.7 4.1 11.8
Shag Rocks 0.2 2.4 2.6
The Graves 0.1 1.8 1.9
Quincy Bay Islands
Gallops 9.2 11.2 20.4
Georges 15.8 5.6 21.4
Hangman 0.2 2.2 2.4
Lovells 19.6 28.8 48.4
Nixes Mate < 0.1 8.1 8.1
Nut 6.8 16.5 23.3
Rainsford 6.6 9.3 15.9
Hingham Bay Islands
Bumpkin 12.2 12.7 24.9
Button 0.2 46.9 47.1
Grape 21.9 18.8 40.7
Langlee 1.8 1.4 3.2
Peddocks 74.6 42.1 116.7
Raccoon 1.3 3.2 4.5
Ragged 1.1 27.3 28.4
Sarah 1.4 18.4 19.8
Sheep 0.4 8.4 8.8
Slate 4.8 15.2 20.0
Webb State Park 13.9 22.3 36.2
Worlds End 104.5 46.6 151.1
Inner Islands
Deer 74.9 32.5 107.4
Long 85.1 34.9 120.0
Moon 21.9 87.1 109.0
Snake 2.9 29.4 32.3
Spectacle 34.6 11.5 46.1
Thompson 54.2 53.0 107.2
Total Area, ha (acres) 600 (1483) 641 (1584) 1241 (3067)
2005 C.T. Roman, B. Jacobson, and J. Wiggin 7
resource components that are of particular value and consider this information
when making management decisions. These components may
include rare habitats, endangered species, vulnerable geological features,
sites of significant cultural or historical interest, and sites of
recreational or educational value. Baseline information is also essential
for monitoring trends, especially changes that might be the result of
activities and management actions within or adjacent to the park, as well
as regional and even global activities.
About This Special Issue
This collection of manuscripts provides detail on several studies
highlighted at the October 2003 Boston Harbor Islands Science Symposium.
We are fortunate to have Dr. Edward O. Wilson, keynote
speaker at the Symposium, lead this Special Issue of Northeastern
Naturalist with some insightful comments on opportunities the islands
offer for investigating the related concepts of biodiversity and
island biogeography.
The contributed papers begin with descriptions of historic vegetation
and landscape processes as understood through analysis of historical
accounts from the 1600s to the present (Richburg and
Patterson), and by detailed paleoecological interpretation of a deep
sediment core (Patterson et al.). Human influence has been obvious
in shaping island landscapes within a region with over three centuries
of urban development. Several contributed papers provide inventories
of specific taxonomic groups including vascular plants (Elliman),
lichens and bryophytes (LaGreca et al.), macrolepidoptera (Mello),
and birds, including waterbirds, landbirds, and shorebirds (Paton et
al.). Detailed descriptions and maps of the extensive intertidal marine
habitats associated with the islands are presented by Bell et al. The
final manuscript addresses the topic of visitor carrying capacity
(Manning et al.), a topic that is perhaps unique for a natural history
journal like Northeastern Naturalist, but highly relevant to planners
and resource managers as protection of island natural resources is
pursued. In fact, authors of all the papers in this issue discuss the
specific relevance of their findings to the protection and restoration
of natural resources.
This Special Issue is far from comprehensive, but represents a good
beginning. As additional inventories are completed, research projects
pursued, and long-term monitoring programs initiated, the natural resource
database will grow. Presentations at a 2002 seminar hosted by
the MIT Sea Grant College Program (Jacobson and Pederson 2002) and
the follow-up Boston Harbor Islands Science Symposium point to the
varied topics being addressed throughout the park. For instance, studies
8 Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 12, Special Issue 3
Photo: Snowy Egret (Egretta thula), Sarah Island rookery. (Morss photo)
Photo: Captain Russ Bowles, University of Massachusetts–Boston, Marine
Division, off Lovells Island. (Morss photo)
2005 C.T. Roman, B. Jacobson, and J. Wiggin 9
Photographer's Note - As a member of the park's Advisory Council, I
wanted to become more familiar with the Harbor Islands. As fate would
have it, the Partnership was embarking on the studies described in the
Special Issue. Over several years, I accompanied scientsts to all 34
Islands and photographed the incredible diversity I found.
On a typical trip, researchers investigated many resources: plants, birds,
intertidal zone, and lichens, among others. We landed in varied weather
conditions and in all seasons—thanks to the able captains at UMass–
Boston. I accompanied the researchers and also spent time on my own
absorbing the unique environments. Often we circumnavigated an island
in opposite directions and compared notes on the back side. Many of the
researchers are now my friends, and the knowledge they shared adds
immensely to my appreciation of the park.
My hope is that the photo essay spread throughout this Special Issue will
awaken interest in the Boston Harbor Islands, a natural and cultural
treasure in our own front yard. I, for one, was unprepared for what I found.
Sherman Morss, Jr., Vice-Chair
Boston Harbor Islands Advisory Council
Photo: Botanist Ted Elliman surveys a Spartina alterniflora fringe marsh,
Button Island. (Morss photo)
10 Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 12, Special Issue 3
are underway to evaluate the role of sea level rise, storms, and boat
wakes on island geomorphology. Monitoring of water and sediment
quality and response of the system to improved wastewater treatment
are fundamentally important to interpreting changes to the natural resources
of the islands and evaluating water-based recreational opportunities
at area beaches (Rex et al. 2002). The National Park Service is
developing a long-term environmental monitoring program for all
coastal park units throughout the northeastern US, including the Boston
Harbor Islands. A suite of physical, chemical, and biological indicators
are currently being identified and tested with the aim of providing
managers with early warning of emerging issues and problems that may
require intervention. These and many other studies, projects, and longterm
activities will hopefully be the focus of future volumes about the
Boston Harbor Islands national park area.
The Islands as Laboratories and Classrooms
The Boston Harbor Islands are situated at the doorstep of numerous
nationally and internationally renowned academic and research
communities, and we expect that this Special Issue will generate
interest in the study of the Boston Harbor Islands complex. There is a
wonderful opportunity to design research, inventory, and monitoring
projects that take full advantage of the diverse gradient of conditions
that the islands offer, as many of the studies presented in this Special
Issue have done. For instance, biotic species composition and abundance,
in both terrestrial and marine environments, can be assessed
along gradients of island size, proximity to the mainland, substrate
type, wind, wave, and salt spray exposure, visitor use patterns, development
history and intensity, air quality, and others. Studies conducted
throughout the Boston Harbor Islands will not only assist
natural resource managers in making scientifically informed decisions
related to resource protection, but valuable contributions can be
made with regard to topics of urban ecology, biodiversity, restoration
ecology, and climate change, among others.
Of further importance, the islands are accessible to metropolitan
Boston. Annually, more than 5000 schoolchildren visit the park as part
of their curriculum. The islands serve as an outdoor classroom for
science exploration and, most significantly, provide students with an
opportunity to understand the fundamental role of natural resource
stewardship initiatives.
Acknowledgments
As is customary for Northeastern Naturalist, each manuscript in this Special
Issue was assigned a Guest Editor with the responsibility of coordinating peer
2005 C.T. Roman, B. Jacobson, and J. Wiggin 11
review. Thanks are extended to the following Guest Editors and numerous
anonymous peer reviewers for contributing their time and expertise toward
making this an informative volume: Bets Brown, Ronald Davis, Steven Hamburg,
Mary Foley, Jeff Marion, Scott Melvin, John Rawlins, David Richardson,
and Paul Somers. Thanks also go to Jane Crosen, Mary-Jane James-Pirri, and
Keith Goldfarb for providing editorial assistance, and to Pat Morss for photography.
Special thanks are extended to Joerg-Henner Lotze and Glen Mittelhauser
of Northeastern Naturalist for working closely with us throughout a long but
rewarding process. Finally, each individual manuscript gratefully acknowledges
financial support, and we want to further recognize the following for their
contributions to enhancing scientific understanding of the Boston Harbor Islands:
National Park Service, Island Alliance, Massachusetts Natural Heritage
and Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Environmental Trust, and The
Harold Whitworth Pierce Charitable Trust. The latter two generously support
the production of this Special Issue.
Literature Cited
Bell, R., M. Chandler, R. Buchsbaum, and C. Roman. 2002. Inventory of
intertidal habitats: Boston Harbor Islands, a national park area. Technical
Report NPS/NERBOST/NRTR-2004/1. National Park Service, Northeast
Region, Boston, MA. 138 pp.
Jacobson, B., and J. Pederson. 2002. Boston Harbor Islands national park area:
2002 islands’ biodiversity—Seminar. MIT Sea Grant College Program Publication
Number 03-22. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
MA. 50 pp.
National Park Service. 2002. Boston Harbor Islands: A national park area.
General management plan. National Park Service, Northeast Region, Boston,
MA. 192 pp.
Rex, A.C., D. Wu, K. Coughlin, M. Hall, K.E. Keay, and D.I. Taylor. 2002.
The State of Boston Harbor, mapping the harbor’s recovery. Technical
Report No. 2002-09. Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Boston,
MA. 42 pp.
Rosen, P.S., and K. Leach. 1987. Sediment accumulation forms, Thompson
Island, Boston Harbor, Massachusetts. Pp. 233–250, In D.M. FitzGerald and
P.S. Rosen (Eds.). Glaciated Coasts. Academic Press, Inc., New York, NY.
12 Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 12, Special Issue 3
Photo: Boston Light, Little Brewster Island. (Morss photo)