Southeastern Naturalist
C.B. Mowry and J.L. Edge
2014 Vol. 13, No. 2
280
2014 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 13(2):280–287
Melanistic Coyotes in Northwest Georgia
Christopher B. Mowry1,* and Justin L. Edge1
Abstract - Melanism is rare in Canis latrans (Coyote), but we detected the phenotypic trait
several times in northwest Georgia. We observed up to 9 melanistic Coyotes during a 9-year
period, 2003–2012: 5 from trail-camera photographs, 2 from live-captures during a radiotelemetry
study, and 2 from hunter-kills. The ancestry of southeastern Coyotes is unclear, and
we suggest that a genetic study including melanistic individuals could increase understanding
of the potential influence of C. lupus (Gray Wolf), C. rufus (Red Wolf) and/or C. lupus familiaris
(Domestic Dog) on the Coyote’s genetic makeup and evolutionary history.
Introduction
The benefit conferred by camouflage is the most common explanation for melanism
in mammals, although physiological functions have also been hypothesized
(Caro 2005). Dark-colored Canis spp. (wolves) are more prevalent in forested than
in open habitats in western North America, suggesting selection for a phenotype
(melanism) that allows for greater crypsis during predatory behavior (Anderson et
al. 2009). A similar selective advantage has been hypothesized for Panthera onca
L. (Jaguar) and P. pardus L. (Leopard) living in forested habitats (Majerus 1998).
Melanism can also act to conceal prey species. Kiltie (1989, 1992) found a higher
percentage of black hair on Sciurus niger L. (Fox Squirrel) living on the dark substrate
caused by periodic burning in pine savannas than on non-blackened ground,
which led to reduced predation of Fox Squirrels by Buteo jamaicensis Gmelin (Redtailed
Hawk). The potential physiological advantages of mammalian melanism are
less clear, but thermoregulation via the absorption or reflection of sunlight is most
often cited (Caro 2005).
Canis latrans Say (Coyote) exhibits variation in coat color, but melanism (i.e.,
black pelage), particularly within their historic western range, is quite rare (Beckhoff
and Gese 2003). For example, Young and Jackson (1951) cited only one known
instance of a melanistic individual in an intensive survey of western Coyote populations,
and no black Coyotes have been seen during the past 24 years of studies in
Yellowstone National Park (R. Crabtree, Yellowstone Ecological Research Center,
Bozeman, MT, pers. comm.). Melanism was more common in C. rufus Audubon &
Bachman (Red Wolf) populations, and the trait was once used to distinguish Red
Wolves from Coyotes where the two species overlapped (Gipson 1976, Halloran
1958). A study of Red Wolves in Arkansas in the 1930s found a 25% incidence of
melanism (Black 1936). Gipson (1976) identified 12 melanistic individuals of a
total 548 (2.2%) Coyote-like wild canids in Arkansas in the 1970s.
1Berry College, Department of Biology, Box 430, Mt. Berry, GA 30149. *Corresponding
author - cmowry@berry.edu.
Manuscript Editor: John Cox
Southeastern Naturalist
281
C.B. Mowry and J.L. Edge
2014 Vol. 13, No. 2
Melanism in canids has been traced to the KB allele, which is characterized by
a 3-bp deletion mutation in the melanocortin pathway (Anderson et al. 2009). The
dominant KB allele was found in 111 of 113 black-colored Canis lupus L. (Gray
Wolf) from Yellowstone and the Canadian Arctic, and in all 6 black-colored Coyotes
sampled from Minnesota and West Virginia (Anderson et al. 2009). Anderson
et al. (2009) concluded that the mutation first appeared in C. lupus familiaris L.
(Domestic Dog, hereafter Dog) nearly 50,000 years ago. Hybridization and the resulting
introgression among Dogs, wolves, and Coyotes spread the trait throughout
the Canis genus. Rutledge et al. (2009) alternatively suggested that the KB allele
originated in black C. lycaon Schreber (Eastern Wolf) of eastern North America
rather than in Dogs. Barsh et al. (2009) cited shorter extended haplotypes and more
point mutations associated with the KB allele in Dogs, as well as its broader worldwide
distribution as evidence of its origins.
The Coyote was historically restricted to regions west of the Mississippi River,
but it has expanded its geographic range during the past several decades to include
most of North America, and it is now found throughout the United States. The extirpation
of the congeneric Red Wolf eliminated the Coyote’s primary non-human
competitor and facilitated its southeastern range expansion (Thurber and Peterson
1991). European settlement of the eastern US led to land-use changes that resulted
in deforestation and increased the amount of edge and open lands, which also facilitated
Coyote range-expansion (Gompper 2002, Parker 1995). Immigration into the
southeast likely began in the 1950s with human-released Coyotes, but it was not until
the mid-1970s that Coyotes started to appear in Georgia (Hill et al. 1987, Parker
1995) as they followed a natural colonization pattern from west to east. A decade
later, Coyotes were prevalent only in the southern portion of the state, although
Hill et al. (1987) documented occasional Coyote sightings in several northwestern
Georgia locations, including near the current study site. In this paper, we report on
several sightings of melanistic Coyotes in northwest Georgia.
Field-site Description
Our observations were the result of a broader Coyote-ecology study conducted
at the11,340-ha Berry College campus in Rome, GA within the ridge and valley
ecoregion (Fig. 1, Hodler and Schretter 1986). The campus is comprised of a combination
of buildings, agricultural fields, managed Pinus sp. (pine) stands, natural
mixed hardwood-pine forests, wetlands, creeks, and a 21.5-ha reservoir. Forested
areas are dominated by Quercus spp. (oak), Carya spp. (hickory), and pine trees.
A remnant population of montane Pinus palustris Miller (Longleaf Pine) is being
restored and maintained with periodic prescribed burning. Roughly 230 ha of the
Berry College land are undeveloped, with 85% of that area classified as timbered
upland. Lowland, bottomland, slopes, and old fields make up the remaining undeveloped
land, and 1596 ha are devoted to campus buildings, water, roads, and
utilities (D’Angelo et al. 2006; F and W Forestry 2007; William Yoemans, Berry
College Land Resources, Mt. Berry, GA, pers. comm.). Approximately 300 ha are
used for livestock operations (cattle, sheep, horses). Suburban development borders
Southeastern Naturalist
C.B. Mowry and J.L. Edge
2014 Vol. 13, No. 2
282
the study site to the south and east, and large, protected forest areas (Rocky Mountain
Recreational Area and Chattahoochee National Forest) lie to the north.
Methods
To learn more about the presence of Coyotes within the study site, we deployed a
TrailMAC remote 35-mm camera (Trail Sense Engineering, Middletown, DE) for a
total of approximately 40–50 nights from March 2003 through April 2005. We placed
the camera in areas where we had observed Coyote scat or footprints. In March 2006,
we began a Coyote radio-telemetry project by setting 20–30 modified off-set Bridger
#2 foothold traps scented with Coyote urine and Steppenwolfe II® (Minnesota Trapline
Products, Pennock, MN) throughout the study site for each of 4 nights. We
repeated the 4-night trapping effort in March 2007and fitted each Coyote captured
with a 280-g VHF radio-collar with mortality sensor (Advanced Telemetry Systems,
Isanti, MN). We collected blood samples and recorded sex, weight, and general body
condition. Each individual was assigned to an age class—pup, yearling, young adult,
older adult—based on body size, time since previous breeding season, and tooth
Figure 1. Map
showing the locat
ion of the
primary Coyote
research study
site, Berry College,
Rome, GA,
and a secondary
location, Ringgold,
GA, where
a melanistic Coyote
was detected.
Southeastern Naturalist
283
C.B. Mowry and J.L. Edge
2014 Vol. 13, No. 2
wear (Bowen 1982; Gier 1968; R. Crabtree, pers. comm.). We conducted additional
camera-trapping in conjunction with our radio-telemetry study for 34 nights in June–
July 2006 using 7 Digital Game Camera 100s (Moultrie Feeders, Alabaster, AL). The
care and use of all animal subjects was approved by the Berry College Institutional
Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC protocol #2005/06-04), covered by Georgia
Department of Natural Resources scientific collecting permits #29-WTN-07-40
and 29-WTN-06-111, and followed guidelines approved by the American Society of
Mammalogists (Gannon et al. 2007).
Results
We obtained multiple images of Coyotes on 5 separate occasions during 2003–
2005; of these, 2 individuals were melanistic. Our camera recorded photographs of
a melanistic Coyote on 10 April 2003 (Fig. 2a) and again on 2 February 2005. We
do not know if the photographs taken in 2003 and 2005 were of the same individual,
but we assume that multiple photographs taken on the same date were of the same
individual. Therefore, we photographed 1 or 2 melanistic Coyotes from 2003 to
2005 during 40–50 camera-trap nights. In January 2005, we observed the bodies of
2 other melanistic Coyotes shot by hunters on separate occasions within 15 km of
the study site after learning about the kills from local media reports and state wildlife
officials. We obtained 10 photographs of Coyotes during our June–July 2006
camera-trapping effort (34 nights), although none were melanistic.
We captured a total of 8 Coyotes during live-trapping efforts for our radio-telemetry
study; 2 were melanistic with a white chest patch. We captured a young adult
male weighing 11.8 kg (Fig. 2b) on 25 March 2006 and monitored it until 3 October
2006; a trapper recaptured him 64 km north of the study site on 17 January 2007. We
captured an adult female weighing 15.0 kg on 5 March 2007 and monitored her until
22 March 2009 (see Supplemental Video File 1, available online at http://www.eaglehill.
us/SENAonline/suppl-files/s13-2-1171-Mowry-s1, and, for BioOne subscribers,
at http://dx.doi.org/10.1656/S1171.s1); her fate was undetermined.
We were given a photograph of a melanistic Coyote taken on 4 March 2012 approximately
95 km from the study site (near Ringgold, GA) using a Moultrie Game
Spy Trail Camera (Ebsco Industries, Birmingham, AL) (Fig. 2c). The number of
camera-trap nights associated with this photograph is unknown.
Discussion
We detected as many as 9 melanistic Coyotes within or near our study site in
northwest Georgia over the past 9 years, and heard accounts of other melanistic
individuals from hunters and trappers. Melanistic Coyotes are also known to exist
in other southeastern states, but data on the frequency of occurrence is scarce. None
of the state wildlife agencies in the Southeast (Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama,
Mississippi, Tennessee, Florida, Arkansas) record such numbers in their annual
trapping reports, although there is anecdotal information. For example, the Georgia
Trappers Association estimates that out of every 75–100 Coyotes trapped in the
Southeastern Naturalist
C.B. Mowry and J.L. Edge
2014 Vol. 13, No. 2
284
Figure 2. (a) Melanistic
Coyote remotely photographed
at Berry College,
GA; (b) Melanistic
male Coyote captured
and radio-collared at
Berry College, GA on 25
March 2006; (c) Melanistic
Coyote remotely photographed
near Ringgold,
GA on 4 March 2012.
Southeastern Naturalist
285
C.B. Mowry and J.L. Edge
2014 Vol. 13, No. 2
southern part of the state, 2–3 are black (R. Johnson, Georgia Trappers Association,
Tifton, GA, pers. comm.). At a fur auction in Russellville, AR in February 2010, 75
Coyote pelts were sold and 1 was melanistic (B. Sasse, Arkansas Game and Fish
Division, Little Rock, AR, pers. comm.). Estimates on the frequency of occurrence
of Coyote melanism in Mississippi are 0.5% (B. Leopold, Mississippi State University,
Mississippi State, MS, pers. comm.). We recommend that trappers and state
furbearer coordinators officially note the number of melanistic Coyotes harvested
each year to better document and potentially understand this phenomenon.
Way et al. (2010) concluded that eastern Coyotes, which are larger than their
western counterparts, represent past hybridization between western Coyotes and
Eastern Wolves. Genetic and morphometric data from Texas canid populations also
provide evidence of hybridization and introgression between Coyotes, Red Wolves,
Canis lupus baileyi Nelson and Goldman (Mexican Wolf), and Gray Wolves (Hailer
and Leonard 2008; Mech and Nowak 2010). Recently, vonHoldt et al. (2011) found
both Gray Wolf and Dog ancestry in tissue samples taken from Coyotes from the
Midwest and Southeast (Illinois, Ohio, Virginia, Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi),
but none of the sampled individuals were from Georgia and, to our knowledge,
none were melanistic. A previous study by Adams et al. (2003) found widespread
occurrence of Dog mitochondrial DNA in southeastern Coyotes, suggesting
a past hybridization event between these 2 canids and subsequent introgression,
although none of the 112 samples were from Georgia Coyotes (the majority were
from West Virginia, Virginia, and northern North Carolina; the closest was from the
Florida panhandle, over 300 km away), and to our knowledge none were melanistic.
Physiological and behavioral reproductive barriers (e.g., different estrous cycles,
lack of parental care by male Dogs) have traditionally been thought to minimize
hybridization between Coyotes and Dogs (Mengel 1971), but ecological conditions
such as mild winters and increased food availability in the Southeast might allow
for more instances of its success.
An apparently higher regional presence of melanistic Coyotes in our study area
hints at the possibility of hybridization with Dogs. The close proximity of suburban
areas to our study site means that Dogs are plentiful and interbreeding is theoretically
possible, although all of the melanistic canids we observed were Coyote-like
with the exception of their darker pelage. Alternatively, the melanistic trait could
suggest past hybridization between a dwindling population of Red Wolves, some of
which were black, and eastward-expanding Coyotes.
The presence in this area of what is otherwise a very rare or nonexistent phenotype
(i.e., melanism) in other Coyote populations suggests that further genetic study
could contribute to a better understanding of Coyote ancestry and melanism in this
species. An important first step should be to determine the geographic distribution
and frequency of occurrence of melanism in Coyotes. Tissue samples from melanistic
Coyotes could then be screened for the presence of the KB allele. The use of
high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping arrays and other
high-throughput genotyping technologies could potentially provide a more detailed
look at the regional and local ancestry of Coyotes in the southeastern US (vonHoldt
et al. 2011).
Southeastern Naturalist
C.B. Mowry and J.L. Edge
2014 Vol. 13, No. 2
286
Acknowledgments
Funding was provided by Berry College Faculty Development and Undergraduate Research
grants, and a National Science Foundation-REU grant (# DEB0354017). The assistance
of the following people is greatly appreciated: Robert Crabtree, Jennie Sheldon, Mike
Conner, Greg Blalock, Marcus Blalock, Don Murdoch, Eddie Elsberry, Steve Benzel, Dean
Wilson, Martin Goldberg, George Gallagher, Billy Yoemans, Lisa Duncan, Phil Broome,
Katie Eady Owens, Maura Davenport, Katie Holzer, Scott Warsen, Ryan Oosthuysen, David
Saunders, Shawn Regan, Jamie Bishop, Carly Turner, Paula Carlisle, Eric Griffin, John
Lawrence, Nicole Acuff, Hannah Anderson, and Kathy Clements. We also thank the editor
and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.
Literature Cited
Adams, J.R., J.A. Leonard, and L.P. Waits. 2003. Widespread occurrence of a domestic
Dog mitochondrial DNA haplotype I in southeastern US Coyotes. Molecular Ecology
12:541–546.
Anderson, T.M., B.M. vonHoldt, S.I. Candille, M. Musiani, C. Greco, D.R. Stahler, D.W.
Smith, B. Padhukasahasram, E. Randi, J.A. Leonard, C.D. Bustamante, E.A. Ostrander,
H. Tang, R.K. Wayne, and G.S. Barsh. 2009. Molecular and evolutionary history of
melanism in North American Gray Wolves. Science 323:1339–1343.
Barsh, G.S., T.M. Anderson, B.M. vonHoldt, S.I. Candille, M. Musiani, D.R. Stahler, J.A.
Leonard, B. Padhukasahasram, E. Randi, C.D. Bustamante, E.A. Ostrander, H. Tang,
and R.K. Wayne. 2009. A response to Rutledge et al. (2009). Science 324:34.
Beckoff, M., and E.M. Gese. 2003. Coyote (Canis latrans). USDA National Wildlife Research
Center – staff publications. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE. Available online
at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm usdanwrc/224. Accessed 16 August 2012.
Black, J.D. 1936. Mammals of northwestern Arkansas. Journal of Mammalogy 17:29–35.
Bowen, W.D. 1982. Determining age of Coyotes, Canis latrans, by tooth sections and
tooth-wear patterns. Canadian Field-Naturalist 96:339–341.
Caro, T. 2005. The adaptive significance of coloration in mammals. Bioscience 55:125–136.
D’Angelo, G.J., J.G. D’Angelo, G.R. Gallagher, D.A. Osborn, K.V. Miller, and R.J. Warren.
2006. Evaluation of wildlife warning-reflectors for altering White-tailed Deer behavior
along roadways. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34:1175–1183.
F and W Forestry. 2007. Executive Summary to Berry College. Albany, GA.
Gannon, W.L., R.S. Sikes, and the Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society
of Mammalogists. 2007. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for
the use of wild mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy 88:809–823.
Gier, H.T. 1968. Coyotes in Kansas. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin
393:1–98.
Gipson, P.S. 1976. Melanistic Canis in Arkansas. The Southwestern Naturalist 21:124–126.
Gompper, M.E. 2002. Top carnivores in the suburbs? Ecological and conservation issues
raised by colonization of northeastern North American by Coyotes. Bioscience
52:185–190.
Hailer, F., and J.A. Leonard. 2008. Hybridization among three native North American Canis
species in a region of natural sympatry. PLoS ONE 3:e3333.
Halloran, A.F. 1959. Black Red Wolves. Oklahoma Wildlife 14:6–8.
Hill, E.P., P.W. Sumner, and J.B. Wooding. 1987. Human influences of range expansion of
Coyotes in the Southeast. Wildlife Society Bulletin 15:521–524.
Southeastern Naturalist
287
C.B. Mowry and J.L. Edge
2014 Vol. 13, No. 2
Hodler, T.W., and H.A. Schretter. 1986. The Atlas of Georgia. University of Georgia Press,
Athens, GA. 273 pp.
Kiltie, R.A. 1989. Wildfire and the evolution of dorsal melanism in Fox Squirrels, Sciurus
niger. Journal of Mammalogy 70:726–739.
Kiltie, R.A. 1992. Tests of hypotheses on predation as a factor maintaining polymorphic
melanism in coastal-plain Fox Squirrels (Sciurus niger L.). Biological Journal of the
Linnean Society 45:17–37.
Majerus, M.E.N. 1998. Melanism: Evolution in Action. Oxford University Press, New
York, NY. 338 pp.
Mech, L.D., and R.M. Nowak. 2010. Systematic status of wild Canis in north-central Texas.
Southeastern Naturalist 9:587–594.
Mengel, R.M. 1971. A study of Dog-Coyote hybrids and implications concerning hybridization
in Canis. Journal of Mammology 52:316–336.
Parker, G.R. 1995. Eastern Coyote: The Story of its Success. Nimbus Publishing, Halifax,
NS, Canada. 254 pp.
Rutledge, L.Y., P.J. Wilson, C.J. Kyle, T.J. Wheeldon, B.R. Patterson, and B.N. White.
2009. How the Gray Wolf got its color. Science 324:33–34.
Thurber, J.M., and R.O. Peterson. 1991. Changes in body size associated with range expansion
in the Coyote (Canis latrans). Journal of Mammalogy 72:750–755.
vonHoldt, B.M., J.P. Pollinger, D.A. Earl, J.C. Knowles, A.R. Boyko, H. Parker, E. Geffen,
M. Pilot, W. Jedrzejewski, B. Jedrzejewska, V. Sidorovich, C. Greco, E. Randi, M. Musiani,
R. Kays, C.D. Bustamante, E.A. Ostrander, J. Novembre, and R.K. Wayne. 2011.
A genome-wide perspective on the evolutionary history of enigmatic wolf-like canids.
Genome Research 21:1294–1305.
Way, J.G., L. Rutledge, T. Wheeldon, and B. White. 2010. Genetic characterization of eastern
“Coyotes” in eastern Massachusetts. Northeastern Naturalist 17:189–204.
Young, S.P., and H.H.T. Jackson. 1978. The Clever Coyote. University of Nebraska Press,
Lincoln, NE. 411 pp.