Southeastern Naturalist
A. Prince, C.S. DePerno, B. Gardner,, and C.E. Moorman
2014 Vol. 13, No. 3
456
2014 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 13(3):456–462
Survival and Home-Range Size of Southeastern Fox
Squirrels in North Carolina
Annemarie Prince1,2,*, Christopher S. DePerno1, Beth Gardner1, and
Christopher E. Moorman1
Abstract - Studies of Sciurus niger (Fox Squirrel) in the Southeast have focused on habitat
relationships with limited emphasis on other life-history characteristics. We estimated survival
rates for 51 radio-collared Sciurus n. niger (Southeastern Fox Squirrel) on Fort Bragg,
NC, during March 2011–June 2012 using the Kaplan-Meier staggered-entry design. Also,
we calculated composite and seasonal 99% kernel-density home-range estimates for male
and female Fox Squirrels. During our study, 22 radio-collared Fox Squirrels died: 8 were
depredated, 2 were hunter harvested, and 12 died of unknown causes. Survival rates differed
among the seasons when the sexes were combined; survival was greatest in the winter and
lowest in the fall. Male annual survival (0.35) was lower than female annual survival (0.66)
at the α = 0.10 level. Male home ranges were larger than female home ranges, potentially
exposing them to greater predation risk. High mortality of male Fox Squirrels may warrant
reevaluation of harvest regulations for declining, hunted Fox Squirrel populations. Additionally,
large space requirements for Fox Squirrels may be indicative of low availability of
forage on the landscape, a condition that should prompt land managers to adjust management
actions to improve habitat conditions for Fox Squirrels.
Introduction
In the Southeast, most studies of Sciurus niger L. (Fox Squirrel) have focused
on habitat relationships, and few have focused on demographic processes, including
survival (Conner 2001, Lee et al. 2008, McCleery et al. 2008, Weigl et al. 1989).
Yet, survival estimates are critical for setting appropriate hunting seasons and harvest
limits where Fox Squirrels are hunted (Bailey 1984, Dasmann 1981).
In some southeastern states, Fox Squirrel and Sciurus carolinensis Gmelin
(Eastern Gray Squirrel) harvest regulations and bag limits are combined to form
a general squirrel season (Loeb and Moncrief 1993, Tappe and Guynn 1998). Recently,
researchers have questioned managing these species together because Fox
and Gray Squirrels have different survival strategies (Conner 2001, Edwards et
al. 2003, Lee et al. 2008, Tappe and Guynn 1998). In the Southeast, Fox Squirrels
tend to be long-lived, have smaller and fewer litters, and exhibit high adult survival
rates. Therefore, Tappe and Guynn (1998), and others (see Conner 2001, Lee et al.
2008) suggested Fox Squirrels are closer to a K-selected species (Pianka 1970) than
Eastern Gray Squirrels and should be managed separately with respect to hunting
seasons and harvest regulations.
1Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation
Biology Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607. 2Current
address - Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Colville, WA 99114. *Corresponding
author - annemarie.prince@dfw.wa.gov.
Manuscript Editor: Andrew Edelman
Southeastern Naturalist
457
A. Prince, C.S. DePerno, B. Gardner,, and C.E. Moorman
2014 Vol. 13, No. 3
Although mid-western Fox Squirrels have been more thoroughly studied, extrapolation
of survival rates from these studies is not appropriate because of ecological
differences between regional populations (e.g., diet, home-range size, morphology,
habitat use; Conner 2001, Edwards et al. 1989, Nixon et al. 1968, Weigl et al. 1989).
Therefore, we estimated survival rates for a population of Sciurus n. niger (Southeastern
Fox Squirrel, hereafter Fox Squirrel). Also, to relate space use to survival, we
determined seasonal home-range size of male and female Fox Squirrels.
Study Area
We conducted the study on Fort Bragg Military Installation, a 64,280-ha active
army base in the Sandhills physiographic region of North Carolina. Dominated by
an overstory of Pinus palustris Mill. (Longleaf Pine) and an understory of Aristida
stricta Michx. (Wiregrass), Fort Bragg and adjacent areas make up the largest contiguous
tract of Longleaf Pine-Wiregrass ecosystem remaining in North Carolina
(Sorrie et al. 2006). Large hardwood trees, including Quercus laevis Walter (Turkey
Oak), Q. stellata Ashe (Sand Post Oak), Q. marilandica Münchh. (Blackjack Oak),
Q. falcata Michx. (Southern Red Oak), and Carya spp. (hickories), were scattered
across the base and located in small patches in the uplands, along drainages, and
bordering the military drop zones. Fort Bragg has relied heavily on the use of prescribed
fire to maintain an open midstory for the federally endangered Picoides
borealis Vieillot (Red-cockaded Woodpecker). Beginning in the late 1980s, prescribed
fires were conducted primarily in the growing-season (April–June) every 3
years to prevent hardwood encroachment in the uplands; however, dormant-season
burns were conducted yearly on the parachute-drop zones and throughout the base
on forest acreage not burned due to weather or lack of personnel the previous year
(J. Jones, Fort Bragg Wildlife Branch, Fort Bragg, NC, pers. comm.). On Fort
Bragg, hunters were allowed to harvest 1 Fox Squirrel per day, with a season limit
of 10 during October–December. The Eastern Gray Squirrel hunting season extended
October–February and had a daily limit of 8 with no season limit. Hunting
Eastern Gray Squirrels and Fox Squirrels with dogs was permitted on Fort Bragg.
Since 1982, squirrel hunter effort has declined on Fort Bragg, and Fox Squirrel
harvest has remained relatively constant over this period (J. Jones, pers. comm.).
Methods
Animal capture and monitoring
We trapped Fox Squirrels using wooden-box traps (Baumgartner 1940) and
wire-cage traps (Tomahawk Live Trap Company, Tomahawk, WI) baited with dried
whole-kernel corn. After capture, Fox Squirrels were transferred into a modified
capture cone (Koprowski 2002) and weighed, sexed, aged (juvenile or adult; Weigl
et al. 1989), assessed for reproductive condition, and individually ear-tagged (Monel
1005-1/1005-3, National Band and Tag Company, Newport, KY). We radio collared
adult Fox Squirrels weighing ≥750 g (collar weight = 19 g, less than 3% body weight;
Model SI-2C, Holohil Sys. Ltd., Carp, ON, Canada) and released them at the capture
Southeastern Naturalist
A. Prince, C.S. DePerno, B. Gardner,, and C.E. Moorman
2014 Vol. 13, No. 3
458
location. During the study, we had 33 radio collars available for deployment, and we
trapped periodically during February 2011–May 2012 to maintain 33 radio-collared
Fox Squirrels throughout the study. All capture and processing methods met the
specifications set forth by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at North
Carolina State University (IAUCUC # 10-153-O) and followed guidelines of the
American Society of Mammalogists (Gannon et al. 2007).
We located radio-collared Fox Squirrels once per day and ≥3 times per week
using the homing technique (White and Garrott 1990) at random times between 0.5
hours after sunrise and 0.5 hours before sunset during February 2011–June 2012.
We continually monitored radio-collared Fox Squirrels until death, radio failure, or
they became inaccessible to tracking (i.e., moved into artillery impact area).
We confirmed mortalities by the presence of Fox Squirrel remains near the
radio collar or by signs of a struggle (i.e., ground disturbance, blood and/or bite
marks on the radio collar). If Fox Squirrel remains were absent or we could not
distinguish predation from scavenging, we classified mortalities as unknown. We
determined cause of death by examining squirrel remains, looking for signs of a
struggle, and swabbing the radio collar for potential predator DNA. We obtained
DNA swabs by vigorously rubbing a double-sided Q-tip on the radio transmitter
and the collar casing. We individually labeled the swabs, placed them in envelopes,
and sent them to Wildlife Genetics International (Nelson, BC, Canada) for genetic
analysis. The species-identification test was a sequence-style analysis of the 16S
rRNA mitochondrial gene (Johnson and O’Brien 1997). Using evidence from the
field and from the laboratory DNA results, we categorized mortalities as predation
(mammalian carnivores and raptors), hunting, and unknown.
Data analysis
We excluded radio-collared Fox Squirrels that died within 7 days of capture to
avoid using capture-related mortalities in our analysis (Conner 2001). Also, we
censored Fox Squirrels when the radio collar stopped transmitting, an individual
moved into the artillery impact area (inaccessible to tracking), or when we found
the collar with no clear sign of mortality.
We calculated annual and seasonal survival rates using the staggered-entry modification
(Pollock et al. 1989) of the Kaplan-Meier product-limit survival estimator
(Kaplan and Meier 1958). We estimated annual survival using 52 weeks of data collection.
We defined seasons based on plant phenology and according to Weigl et al.
(1989) (winter: 16 January to 15 March, spring: 16 March to 1 June, summer: 2 June
to 30 September, and fall: 1 October to 15 January). We used a chi-square test within
Program CONTRAST (Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, United State Geological
Survey, Laurel, MD) to compare among seasonal survival rates for males, females,
and the sexes combined, and annual survival rates between males and females (Sauer
and Hines 1989); alpha was set at 0.05.
We calculated seasonal home ranges for Fox Squirrels (mean ± SE = 36.7 ±
1.3 locations, n = 152) within a season using the same seasons defined above.
We calculated composite (i.e., entire study period, all seasons combined) home
Southeastern Naturalist
459
A. Prince, C.S. DePerno, B. Gardner,, and C.E. Moorman
2014 Vol. 13, No. 3
ranges for Fox Squirrels with ≥30 locations during the study period. We imported
coordinates of squirrel locations into a geographic information system (ArcView10;
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA) and calculated 99%
kernel-density home ranges using the kde function (bandwidth = PLUGIN, cell size
= 30) within the Geospatial Modeling Environment (Version 0.7.1.0; Hawthorne
L. Beyer 2009–2012). We used 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s
HSD post hoc comparison tests to compare home-range sizes between the sexes and
among the seasons.
Results
We radio collared 52 Fox Squirrels (27 male, 24 female, 1 unknown). The mean
body weight at capture was 922 ± SE 22 g for males and 963 ± SE 24 g for females.
One male Fox Squirrel was removed from the survival analysis because it died
within 7 days of capture. We detected 22 mortalities (15 male, 7 female): 2 squirrels
were harvested by hunters, 8 were killed by predators, and 12 squirrels lacked
sufficient remains and/or signs of a struggle to determine cause of death and were
classified as unknown. Of the 8 predator mortalities, Lynx rufus Schreber (Bobcat)
and Urocyon cinereoargenteus Schreber (Gray Fox) DNA were extracted from 1
collar each, we suspected a Buteo jamaicensis Gmelin (Red-tailed Hawk) killed
1 squirrel, and the remaining 4 deaths were not attributable to a specific predator.
However, because of the presence of the tail and fur at the recovered collar location,
we suspect predation in 6 of the 12 deaths classified as unknown .
Survival rates differed among the seasons when the sexes were combined (χ2 =
11.61, P = 0.03, df = 4); survival was greatest in the winter and lowest in the fall
(Table 1). Male annual survival was about half of female annual survival, but the
statistical difference was weak (χ2 = 2.64, P = 0.10, df = 1).
Composite home ranges were calculated for 47 (25 male, 22 female) Fox Squirrels.
Male composite home range size (mean ± SE = 81.26 ± 14.12 ha [range = 6.85–
312.67 ha]) was about 4 times larger on average (F1, 143 = 42.70, P < 0.001) than that
Table 1. Kaplan-Meier seasonal survival rates (Ŝ) and 95% confidence intervals for male, female,
and combined sexes of radio-collared Southeastern Fox Squirrels on Fort Bragg, NC, 1 May 2011–2
June 2012.
Males Females Sexes combined
95% CI 95% CI 95% CI
Time periodA Ŝ Lower Upper Ŝ Lower Upper Ŝ Lower Upper
Spring 2011 0.87 0.71 1.00 0.93 0.81 1.00 0.88 0.77 0.88
Summer 2011 0.87 0.71 1.00 0.82 0.64 1.00 0.85 0.72 0.85
Fall 2011 0.66 0.45 0.87 0.80 0.61 0.99 0.72 0.57 0.72
Winter 2011 0.94 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.90 0.97
Spring 2012 0.65 0.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.66 0.84
AnnualB 0.35 0.07 0.63 0.66 0.41 0.91 0.49 0.30 0.68
ASpring: 16 March to 1 June, summer: 2 June to 30 September, fall: 1 October to 15 January, and
winter: 16 January to 15 March.
B2 June 2011–2 June 2012.
Southeastern Naturalist
A. Prince, C.S. DePerno, B. Gardner,, and C.E. Moorman
2014 Vol. 13, No. 3
460
of females (mean ± SE = 19.83 ± 3.01 ha [range = 5.40–72.07 ha]) (Table 2). We observed
an effect of season on home-range size (F3, 143 = 5.78, P = 0.001); on average,
home ranges were about 3 times larger in spring than in winter.
Discussion
Our estimate of male annual survival was low compared to other studies in the
Southeast and may be explained by the large home ranges of male Fox Squirrels on
Fort Bragg and the resulting increase in predation risk. The Kaplan-Meier estimate
of male annual survival on Fort Bragg was 0.35 (95% CI = 0.07–0.63) compared
with 0.73 (95% CI = 0.59–0.87) and 0.62 (95% CI = 0.46–0.78) calculated for
Fox Squirrel populations in Georgia (Conner 2001) and South Carolina (Lee et al.
2008), respectively. Discrepancies in predation rates among studies of Fox Squirrel
survival could be due to differing forest structure on study sites or varying predator
densities across the Southeast. Weigl et al. (1989) suggested that Fox Squirrel predation
would only reach appreciable levels when Fox Squirrel habitat was in close
proximity to large closed-canopy hardwood stands that support high populations of
alternate prey, like Eastern Gray Squirrels. Because Fox Squirrels on Fort Bragg selected
areas in close proximity to drainages with high hardwood densities, Weigl’s
hypothesis could explain our relatively high predation rates and low male survival
rates (Prince 2013). Regardless of the mechanism, low male survival estimates on
Fort Bragg suggest the need for close monitoring of the potential additive effects
of hunter harvest in the future.
Seasonal changes in activity level and home-range size likely caused the
variation in seasonal survival estimates for Fox Squirrels on Fort Bragg. In North
Carolina, the spring and fall are typically seasons of plentiful food, and corresponding
increases in foraging and caching behavior could make males and females more
susceptible to predation (Edwards et al. 2003, Weigl et al. 1989). During our study,
the majority of the Fox Squirrel mortalities occurred in the fall, but home-range
sizes for males and females were greatest in the spring. Perhaps squirrels are more
active during the fall, but their movements are more localized as they forage in
areas with a greater hardwood (and acorn) component. Conversely, survival rates
Table 2. Mean home-range size (ha) based on 99% kernel-density estimates and standard error (SE) by
sex and season for radio-collared Southeastern Fox Squirrels on Fort Bragg, NC, 2011–2012.
Males Females Sexes combined
SeasonA n Home range SE n Home range SE n Home rangeC SE
Spring 22 108.52 20.54 20 28.18 4.32 42 71.39 A 12.43
Summer 20 76.14 13.31 18 19.24 5.65 39B 50.31 AB 8.70
Fall 18 68.67 13.17 16 18.12 5.32 33B 45.64 AB 8.75
Winter 18 34.42 9.38 16 6.62 1.33 35B 21.57 B 5.34
All (composite) 25 81.26 14.12 22 19.83 3.01 47 53.30 8.78
ASpring: 16 March to 1 June, summer: 2 June to 30 September, fall: 1 October to 15 January, and
winter: 16 January to 15 March.
BIncludes Fox Squirrel of unknown sex.
CTukey’s HSD post hoc comparison test; seasons with the same letter are similar at α = 0.05.
Southeastern Naturalist
461
A. Prince, C.S. DePerno, B. Gardner,, and C.E. Moorman
2014 Vol. 13, No. 3
were greatest in the winter and may correlate with reduced activity during this time
period; decreased winter activity similarly was observed for Eastern Gray Squirrels
in Maryland (Thompson 1977).
In all studies of Fox Squirrel space use in the Southeast, males consistently
had larger home ranges; however, techniques used to determine home-range size
have varied (Edwards 1986, Powers 1993, Weigl et al. 1989, Wooding 1997). For
example, previous studies in the Southeast used the minimum convex polygon
method for determining home-range sizes and report estimates of the mean size
ranging from 79.5 ha for male Fox Squirrels in Florida (Wooding 1997) to 11.6
ha for females in Alabama (Powers 1993). Home-range estimates derived from
kernel-density estimators are considered more robust than minimum convex polygon
methods (Borger et al. 2006), and our comparatively large estimates may more
accurately represent the true space requirements of Fox Squirrels.
Management implications
For declining or isolated, hunted Fox Squirrel populations, high mortality rates
for male Fox Squirrels may warrant reevaluation of harvest regulations (e.g., shorter
seasons, smaller bag limits). Additionally, if large space requirements of Fox
Squirrels are indicative of low availability of forage on the landscape, land managers
may need to adjust management actions (e.g., hardwood retention) to improve
habitat conditions for Fox Squirrels.
Acknowledgments
This project was funded by the Department of Defense, Fort Bragg Military Installation,
and the North Carolina State University Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Program.
We thank J. Jones and A. Shultz (Fort Bragg Wildlife Branch) for providing background
information about Fox Squirrel management on Fort Bragg and technical and logistical support
throughout the project. Also, we thank C. Farr, M. Frisicano, R. Davis, B. Sherrill, and M.
Broadway for their countless hours in the field gathering data for this project.
Literature Cited
Bailey, J.A. 1984. Principles of Wildlife Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York,
NY. 373 pp.
Baumgartner, L.L. 1940. Trapping, handling, and marking Fox Squirrels. Journal of Wildlife
Management 4:444–450.
Borger L., N. Franconi, G. De Michele, A. Gantz, F. Meschi, A. Manica, S. Lovari, and T.
Coulson. 2006. Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home-range size
estimates. Journal of Animal Ecology 75:1493–1405.
Conner, L.M. 2001. Survival and cause-specific mortality of adult Fox Squirrels in southwestern
Georgia. Journal of Wildlife Management 65:200–204.
Dasmann, R.F. 1981. Wildlife Biology, Second Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York,
NY. 212 pp.
Edwards, J.W. 1986. Habitat utilization by Southern Fox Squirrel in coastal South Carolina.
M.Sc. Thesis. Clemson University, Clemson, SC. 52pp.
Edwards, J.W., D.C. Guynn, Jr., and M.R. Lennartz. 1989. Habitat use by Southern Fox
Squirrel in coastal South Carolina. Proceedings of the Annual Conference Southeastern
Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 43:337–345.
Southeastern Naturalist
A. Prince, C.S. DePerno, B. Gardner,, and C.E. Moorman
2014 Vol. 13, No. 3
462
Edwards, J.W., M. Ford, and D. Guynn. 2003. Fox and Gray Squirrels: Sciurus niger and
S. carolinensis. Pp. 248–267, In G.A. Feldhamer, B.C. Thompson and J.A. Chapman
(Eds.). Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Conservation.
John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. 1216 pp.
Gannon, W.L., R.S. Sikes, and the Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society
of Mammalogists. 2007. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for
the use of wild mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy 88:809–823.
Johnson, W.E., and S.J. O’Brien. 1997. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the Felidae using
16S rRNA and NADH-5 mitochondrial genes. Journal of Molecular Evolution 44 (Suppl
1):S98–116.
Kaplan, E.L., and P. Meier. 1958. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations.
Journal of the American Statistical Association 53:457–481.
Koprowski, J.L. 2002. Handling tree squirrels with a safe and efficient restraint. Wildlife
Society Bulletin 30:101–103.
Lee, J.C., D.A. Osborn, and K.V. Miller. 2008. Characteristics of a high-density population
of Southern Fox Squirrels. American Midland Naturalist 159:385–393.
Loeb, S.C., and N.D. Moncrief. 1993. The biology of Fox Squirrels (Sciurus niger) in the
Southeast: A review. Pp. 1–19, In J.W. Edwards and P.A. Tappe (Eds.). Proceedings of
the Second Symposium on Southeastern Fox Squirrels, Sciurus niger. Virginia Museum
of Natural History, Special Publication 1, Martinsville, VA. 84 pp.
McCleery, R.A., R.R. Lopez, N.J. Silvy, and D.L. Gallant. 2008. Fox Squirrel survival in
urban and rural environments. Journal of Wildlife Management 72:133–137.
Nixon, C.M., D.M. Worley, and M.W. McClain. 1968. Food habits of squirrels in southeast
Ohio. Journal of Wildlife Management 32:294–305.
Pianka, E. 1970. On r and K selection. American Naturalist 104:592–597.
Pollock, K.H., S.R. Winterstein, C.M. Bunck, and P.D. Curtis. 1989. Survival analysis in telemetry
studies: The staggered-entry design. Journal of Wildlife Management 53:7–15.
Powers, J.S. 1993. Fox Squirrel home range and habitat use in the southeastern coastal
plain. M.Sc. Thesis. Auburn University, Auburn, AL. 93 pp.
Prince, A. 2013. Habitat selection, survival, and home-range size of the Southeastern Fox
Squirrel. M.Sc. Thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 44 pp.
Sauer, J.R., and J.E. Hines. 1989. Testing for differences among survival or recovery rates
using program CONTRAST. Wildlife Society Bulletin 17:549–550.
Sorrie, B.A., J.B. Gray, and P.J. Crutchfield. 2006. The vascular flora of the Longleaf Pine
ecosystem of Fort Bragg and Weymouth Woods, North Carolina. Southern Appalachian
Botanical Society 71:129–161.
Tappe, P.A., and D.C. Guynn, Jr. 1998. Southeastern Fox Squirrels: r- or K-selected? Implications
for management. Pp. 239–249, In M.A. Steele, J.F. Merritt, and D.A. Zegers
(Eds.). Ecology and Evolutionary Biology of Tree Squirrels. Virginia Museum of Natural
History Special Publication 6. Martinsville, VA. 84 pp.
Thompson, D.C. 1977. Diurnal and seasonal activity of the Grey Squirrel. Canadian Journal
of Zoology 55:1176–84.
Weigl, P.D., M.A. Steele, L.J. Sherman, J.C. Ha, and T.L. Sharpe. 1989. The ecology of the
Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger) in North Carolina: Implications for survival in the Southeast.
Bulletin of Tall Timbers Research Station Number 24:1–93.
White, G.C., and R.A. Garrott. 1990. Analysis of Wildlife Radio-tracking Data. Academic
Press, San Diego, CA. 383 pp.
Wooding, J.B. 1997. Distribution and population ecology of the Fox Squirrel in Florida.
Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 139 pp.