Seasonal Density Estimates of Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose
Dolphin) in the Mississippi Sound from 2011 to 2013
Jonathan L. Pitchford, Eric E. Pulis, Kristine Evans, Jamie K. Shelley, Billie J.S. Serafin, and Moby Solangi
Southeastern Naturalist, Volume 15, Issue 2 (2016): 188–206
Full-text pdf (Accessible only to subscribers.To subscribe click here.)
Southeastern Naturalist
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
188
2016 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 15(2):188–206
Seasonal Density Estimates of Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose
Dolphin) in the Mississippi Sound from 2011 to 2013
Jonathan L. Pitchford1,*, Eric E. Pulis1, Kristine Evans2, Jamie K. Shelley1,
Billie J.S. Serafin1, and Moby Solangi1
Abstract - We conducted vessel-based line-transect sampling from December 2011 to
November 2013 to quantify Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose Dolphin) density over 8 consecutive
seasons in the Mississippi Sound. Density estimates showed temporal variation ranging
from 0.27 Dolphins/km2 (CV% = 31.3) in spring 2013 to 1.12 Dolphins/km2 (CV% = 21.6)
in spring 2012. Density in winter and summer was stable compared to fall and spring, which
fluctuated across years. We also noted spatial variation—density was commonly highest in the
central and eastern portions of the Mississippi Sound. Spatial and temporal variation in temperature
and salinity were potentially driving shifts in Bottlenose Dolphin density. Additional
regularly collected density estimates using standardized protocols are needed in order to draw
more definitive conclusions regarding the status and trend of this population.
Introduction
Bays, sounds, and estuaries (BSEs) within the northern Gulf of Mexico (nGOM)
have shown a variety of Tursiops truncatus (Montagu) (Bottlenose Dolphin, hereafter
Dolphin) abundance and distribution patterns including no change between
seasons (McClellan et al. 2000), peaks in spring (Shane 2004), summer (Hubard et
al. 2004), and winter (Bassos-Hull and Wells 2007, Shane 1980), or bimodal peaks
in spring and fall (Balmer et al. 2008). Recent National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) reports estimate that the Bay Boudreau, Mississippi Sound
(BB-MSS) BSE Dolphin stock is among the most densely populated within the
nGOM (Waring et al. 2014). The geographic extent of the stock area spans 3711 km2
(Scott et al. 1989) from the western edge of Mobile Bay, AL to Lake Borgne, LA
in the west. The southern border includes the mouth of Bay Boudreau in the west
and a chain of barrier islands (Cat, Ship, Horn, Petit Bois, and Dauphin islands) in
central and eastern portions of the stock area (NOAA 2015). Previous research has
shown that Dolphins in this area exhibit seasonal variation in abundance (Hubard
et al. 2004, Loheofener et al. 1990, Miller et al. 2013), but differences in survey
methods, study areas, and timing of surveys make interpretation of long-term trends
difficult. More study is needed to increase understanding of the biology and spatial
and temporal distribution of Dolphins in the MSS to better understand stock structure
in this region.
Previous research designed to quantify Dolphin abundance has included variable
methodologies and density estimates for the MSS. Density estimates derived
1Institute for Marine Mammal Studies, 10801 Dolphin Lane, Gulfport, MS 39503. 2Geosystems
Research Institute, Mississippi State University Box 9627, Mississippi State, MS
39762. *Corresponding author - jpitchford@imms.org.
Manuscript Editor: Graham Worthy
Southeastern Naturalist
189
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
from aerial surveys for the fall of 1985 and 1992 were 0.07 Dolphins/km2 and 0.2
Dolphins/km2, respectively, for the MSS and Lake Borgne (Blaylock and Hoggard
1994). Mullin et al. (1990) conducted aerial surveys in 1987 and estimated 0.37 Dolphins/
km2 in May and 0.16 Dolphins/km2 in September within inshore waters from
the mouth of the Mississippi River to the Alabama–Florida border. Boat-based surveys
have resulted in higher estimates for the region; surveys conducted from 1995
to 1996 in an area directly north of Horn and Petit Bois islands resulted in density
estimates that ranged from 0.6 Dolphins/km2 in winter to 1.3 Dolphins/km2 in the
summer (Hubard et al. 2004). Boat-based density estimates within the MSS ranged
from 0.67 Dolphins/km2 in winter (from November 2007 to February 2008) to 1.07
Dolphins/km2 in summer (May–August 2007) for an area that extends from the Mississippi–
Louisiana border to the eastern end of Horn Island, including an area up to
15 km south of the barrier islands. Density was highest inshore in summer months
(1.69 Dolphins/km2), but was reduced in these areas during winter (0.89 Dolphins/
km2), suggesting higher use of deeper, offshore areas in winter (Miller et al. 2013).
Pitchford et al. (2015) predicted occurrence of Dolphins with spatial distribution
models (SDMs) for the MSS that showed seasonal shifts. In winter (December–
February), occurrence was highest south of East Ship and Horn Islands. In spring
(March–May), predicted occurrence was highest north of Horn and Petit Bois islands
and in an area south of Bay St. Louis, MS. During summer, predicted occurrence was
high throughout the MSS extending into Lake Borgne, LA. In fall (September–November),
a westward shift was noted, including high levels of predicted occurrence
in Lake Borgne, LA. The results of the Pitchford et al. (2015) study did not include
abundance estimates, but did suggest that shifting environmental conditions and prey
distributions drive seasonal shifts in Dolphin occurrence. Aerial surveys were conducted
from 2011–2012 in the MSS from Alabama in the east to the mouth of Lake
Borgne in the west (Lake Borgne was not surveyed) and extending south into the
Bay Boudreau region, but did not include areas south of the barrier islands. Density
estimates extrapolated to the BB-MSS geographic region were 0.65 Dolphins/km2
in spring (March–April 2011), 0.46 Dolphins/km2 in summer (July–August 2011),
0.31 Dolphins/km2 in fall (October–November 2011), and 0.24 Dolphins/km2 in
winter (January–February 2012) (NOAA 2015). These estimates are lower than those
reported by Miller et al. (2013), but the differences in sampling method (i.e., aerial
vs. boat) and survey area likely contributed to these disparities. Large coefficients
of variation associated with both sets of estimates further confound comparisons between
the Miller et al. (2013) and Pitchford et al. (2015) studies.
Regular abundance estimates can be used for several purposes including trend
analysis and calculations of potential biological removal (PBR), which require
abundance estimates that are ≤8 years old (Waring et al. 2014). This consideration is
important for the MSS because several anthropogenic and natural disturbances have
occurred in the nGOM in recent years, including the Deepwater Horizon (DWH)
oil spill (Schwacke et al. 2013), freshwater floods (Carmichael et al. 2012), and
several hurricanes (Miller et al. 2010, Smith et al. 2013) that have been implicated
as sources of stress to Dolphins in this region. Coinciding with these disturbances
Southeastern Naturalist
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
190
is the longest-running unusual mortality event (UME) on record within the nGOM
that began in 2010 and continues to date (Litz et al. 2014, Venn-Watson et al.
2015a). Currently, the UME has included 1259 Bottlenose Dolphin strandings over
a ~2712-km2 region extending from the western border of Louisiana to the Florida
Panhandle (data available at http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/health/mmume/). Although
the actual cause is unclear, several factors have been cited as contributors
to this UME including the combination of prolonged cold weather and unusually
large freshwater floods (Carmichael et al. 2012) and petroleum exposure associated
with the DWH oil spill (Litz et al. 2014, Schwacke et al. 2013). The DWH
oil spill released 4.9 million barrels of oil into the nGOM, and response efforts
resulted in the application of 1 million gallons of Corexit® dispersant into the
nGOM (National Commission 2010) that have since been implicated as a source of
stress for many marine species (White et al. 2012, Whitehead et al. 2011) including
Dolphins (Lane et al. 2015, Schwacke et al. 2013, Venn-Watson et al. 2015b).
Large numbers of stranded Dolphins were recovered in Mississippi following the
oil spill, including an usually large number of perinate Dolphins (Venn-Watson et
al. 2015a). Considering the importance of the MSS for Dolphins and the existence
of numerous threats, regular population assessments are needed to gauge trends in
Dolphin density in this region (Balmer et al. 2013, Speakman et al. 2010). Such
assessments provide important information for the management of this protected
species and can be used to indicate the health of the regional ecosystem (Balmer et
al. 2015, Kucklick et al. 2011, Wells et al. 2004).
The purpose of this paper is to present density estimates derived from boatbased,
line-transect distance-sampling conducted within the MSS from 2011 to
2013. The results include seasonal estimates for multiple strata arranged from west
to east to provide a high level of spatial resolution. Although our results do not
present any direct evidence of the effects of recent disturbances in the MSS, they
provide much-needed density estimates for a protected species within a region
that has experienced a variety of natural and anthropogenic disturbances. In addition,
we collected data across all seasons for 2 y and from areas that have not been
included in some previous abundance estimates (e.g., areas south of the barrier
islands, Lake Borgne). Our results contribute to greater understanding of spatial
and temporal shifts in the distribution of estuarine Dolphins in this region.
Materials and Methods
Study area
The MSS is a ~2000-km2 microtidal embayment that is heavily influenced by
wind forcing (Kjerfve 1986) and is separated from the Gulf of Mexico by a series
of barrier islands (Cat, Ship, Horn, Petit Bois, and Dauphin islands) (Eleuterius
1978; Fig. 1). Average annual water-temperature range = 9–32 °C, salinity range =
0–33 ppt, and water-depth range = 1–7 m (Christmas and Eleuterius 1973). Structured
habitats within the region are limited to seagrass beds along the barrier-island
shorelines and marsh-edge habitats, which have been altered from their historic
extent (Rakocinski et al. 2003).
Southeastern Naturalist
191
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
Data collection
From December 2011 through November 2013, we recorded Dolphin sightings
using line-transect, distance-sampling methods as outlined in Buckland et
al. (2001). We employed a stratified sampling design to achieve fine-scale spatial
resolution. We divided the study area into 7 strata, ~20 km × 20 km in size
arranged and numbered from west to east. Each stratum contained four ~20-km
quasi-parallel transects that we surveyed twice within each season including winter
(December–February), spring (March–May), summer (June–August), and fall
(September–November) (Fig. 1). The transects were separated by a minimum perpendicular
distance of 2.2 km. We considered the orientation of the transects (i.e.,
parallel to the shoreline) appropriate due to the highly uniform depth and substrate
within the MSS. We surveyed alternating transects (i.e., A and C or B and
D) from either stratum 1–4 or 5–7 each survey day to maintain high probability of
independence among sightings. Typically, we conducted surveys during the period
0700–1500 h, only when winds were ≤16 km per hour, and wave heights were
≤0.6 m. We surveyed all transects before initiation of a second seasonal survey. It
took an average of 4.25 d (SE = 0.14) to cover all transects once and 8.5 d (SE =
0.27) to cover all transects twice. The survey platform was a 9.5-m Stamas Tarpon
Figure 1. Study area used to develop seasonal spatial distribution models for Bottlenose
Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) within the Mississippi Sound. Survey strata are numbered
1–7 and transects are labeled A–D.
Southeastern Naturalist
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
192
(Stamas Yacht, Inc., Tarpon Springs, FL) powered by twin 250-hp, 4-stroke engines
carrying a boat captain and 4 observers at 25 km per hour. At the beginning
of each transect within each stratum, we recorded Beaufort sea state (BSS), glare,
sightability, and sea-surface environmental conditions (i.e., dissolved oxygen,
salinity, pH, temperature, and depth). Sightability was a composite measure of
BSS and glare and contained 4 levels (i.e., poor, moderate, good, and excellent)
to quantify the ability of observers to detect Dolphins. During the survey, 2 observers
scanned the area between the transect and 90° to port, and 2 observers
scanned the area between the transect and 90° to starboard (Melancon et al. 2011,
Miller et al. 2013). We classified a Dolphin sighting as an observation of at least
1 Dolphin by more than 1 observer. When only 1 observer sighted a Dolphin, the
boat stopped briefly on the transect to allow all observers to search for the animal
before continuing on the survey. When Dolphins were observed, the boat traveled
directly to the original sighting location to estimate the total number of Dolphins
in the group (i.e., cluster size) using the 10-m chain rule (Smolker et al. 1992)
and to determine geographic coordinates using a Garmin GPSmap76 global positioning
system (GPS) with differential accuracy of 3–5 m. Travel to the original
sighting location provided the best estimate of actual distance, which reduced the
likelihood of bias and improved the accuracy of our density estimates (Buckland
et al. 2001). After recording coordinates of the sighting and estimating group size,
the boat traveled back to the transect at the location where it departed and the
survey resumed. We imported sighting-location coordinates for each season into
ESRI® ArcMapTM 10.2 (Redlands, CA) and used the measuring tool to determine
the distance from each sighting to the transect line.
Data analysis
We used Program Distance 6.0 (Thomas et al. 2010) to estimate density (D),
population size (N), and cluster size among seasons of the year (i.e., winter, spring,
summer, and fall) from 2011 to 2013. We employed both the conventional-distance
sampling (CDS) and the multiple covariates distance sampling (MCDS) engines to
generate a model set for each season (Thomas et al. 2010). Initial analyses revealed
that several sightings associated with unusually large distances from the survey
platform were skewing detection functions; thus, we discarded from densityestimation
analyses the sightings associated with the largest 5% of perpendicular
distances from the survey vessel (Buckland et al. 2001). Detection functions for
selected models did not indicate violation of the assumption that all Dolphins on the
transect line were seen during surveys, so we did not need to truncate the smallest
observed distance values. We used a global detection function to estimate stratumspecific
densities, global densities, and post-stratified sightings by survey stratum
to account for variation in the spatial distribution of Dolphins among seasons. We
did not employ stratum-specific detection functions because small sample sizes
among survey strata prevented reliable assessment of differences in detectability
among strata. We estimated cluster size for each season and stratum by regressing
log cluster size against detection-probability estimates. We estimated total
Southeastern Naturalist
193
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
abundance ( N ˆ ) with the equation
n
N ˆ = Σ(si / Pˆ i),
i = 1
where Pˆ i represents the inclusion probability and si represents cluster size (Thomas
et al. 2010).
We developed a set of candidate models for each season over the study period
(2011/12–2013) using a variety of combinations of covariates that could influence
detectability of Dolphins. Each set contained models with no covariates and models
with sightability, glare, BSS, glare and BSS, and cluster size as covariates with
all possible combinations of uniform (no covariates), half-normal, and hazard-rate
detection-functions and cosine, simple polynomial, and hermite polynomial-series
expansions. We employed Kolmogorov-Smirnov and chi-square goodness-offit
tests to assess model fit. We calculated Akaike’s information criterion (AIC)
(Akaike 1973) and Akaike weights (Burnham and Anderson 2002) for each model
and used them to select a final model for each season. We determined global density
and cluster size-estimates across the entire study area from the mean of strata
estimates weighted by stratum area. Where possible, we also made stratum-specific
estimates to examine the spatial variation in density across the MSS. Following
density estimation, we used least-squares regression, including calculation of R2
values, in Microsoft Excel® to conduct trend analyses. Finally, we ran a multiple
linear regression to examine the relation between Dolphin density (Dolphins/km2)
within each stratum for each season (n = 56), and dissolved oxygen, salinity, temperature,
and depth using the R 2.12.1 (R Core Team, 2015). We set a priori significance
at α = 0.05.
Results
We spent a total of 456 hours surveying during 66 days over the course of this
study. During this time, we documented 539 Dolphin sightings—165, 128, 106,
and 140 during winter, spring, summer, and fall, respectively (Fig. 2). Seasonal
encounter rates across the study period ranged from 0.07 sightings/km (CV% =
47) in spring 2013 to 0.15 sightings/km (CV% = 38) in spring 2012. Average cluster
size ranged from 3.0 Dolphins per group in winter 2012/13 to 5.7 Dolphins per
group in summer of 2013 (Fig. 3). Average depth recorded during surveys ranged
from 3.7 m (SE = 0.2) during winter of 2011/12 to 4.6 m (SE = 0.4) in summer of
2012 (Table 1). Average water temperature ranged from 14.2 °C (SE = 0.3) in winter
2011/12 to 29.5 °C (SE = 0.2) during summer 2012. Average salinity ranged
from 11.3 ppt (SE = 0.9) in spring 2013 to 26.2 ppt (SE = 4.3) in winter 2011/12.
Average dissolved oxygen ranged from 4.6 mg/L (SE = 0.1) during summer 2012
to 8.1 mg/L (SE = 0.3) during fall 2013. We noted spatial variation when examining
environmental conditions by stratum. Specifically, we observed a west–east
salinity gradient that ranged from 2.4 (spring 2013) to 9.4 ppt (winter 2011/12)
in stratum 1 and from 17.7 (spring 2013) to 28.3 (fall 2013) ppt in stratum 7.
Spring salinity levels also varied notably across years from 4.7 (stratum 1) to
Southeastern Naturalist
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
194
Figure 2. Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) sightings in winter (a), spring (b), summer
(c), and fall (d) in the Mississippi Sound from 2011 to 2013.
Figure 3. Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) cluster size in the Mississippi Sound
among seasons of the year from 2011/12 to 2013. The error bars on each estimate are 95%
confidence intervals around the mean.
Southeastern Naturalist
195
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
23.5 ppt (stratum 7) in spring 2012 and from 2.4 ppt (stratum 1) to 17.7 ppt (stratum
7) in spring 2013. (for full data on environmental conditions by stratum, see
Supplemental Table 1, available online at https://www.eaglehill.us/SENAonline/
suppl-files/s15-2-S2264-Pitchford-s1, and, for BioOne subscribers, at http://
dx.doi.org/10.1656/S2264.s1).
AIC values indicated that the best models for all seasons had no covariates, with
the exception of the spring 2012 model, which included sightability as a covariate
(for summary information on all analyzed models, see Supplemental Table 2,
available online at https://www.eaglehill.us/SENAonline/suppl-files/s15-2-S2264-
Pitchford-s1, and, for BioOne subscribers, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1656/S2264.s1).
There was considerable model-competition for each season as indicated by AIC
values; thus, we calculated AIC weights. Of models generated for fall 2012, a model
that included sightability as a covariate (AIC weights = 0.22) was very competitive
with the model with no covariates (AIC weights = 0.24). Kolmogorov-Smirnov
goodness-of-fit test statistics and P-values for the highest-ranking seasonal models
are provided in Table 2.
Dolphin density estimates ranged from 0.27 Dolphins/km2 (CV% = 31.3) in
spring 2013 to 1.12 Dolphins/km2 (CV% = 21.6) in spring 2012 (Table 2, Fig. 4).
Table 2. Estimates of Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) density (D; Dolphins/km2) and population
size (N) among seasons of the year in the Mississippi Sound from winter 2011/12 to fall 2013. CI
= confidence interval, CL = confidence limit, CV = coefficient of variation, K-S GoF = Kolmogorov-
Smirnoff goodness-of-fit statistic (and associated P value).
Lower Upper Lower Upper Cluster
Season D CI CI N CL CL CV% size K-S GoF
Winter 2011/12 0.66 0.40 1.10 1793 1076 2988 25.1 3.3 0.09 (0.6)
Spring 2012 1.12 0.71 1.71 3236 1927 4627 21.6 4.0 0.08 (0.5)
Summer 2012 0.86 0.51 1.43 2322 1394 3868 25.9 4.7 0.07 (1.0)
Fall 2012 0.46 0.29 0.73 1248 790 1973 23.3 4.2 0.08 (0.7)
Winter 2012/13 0.75 0.42 1.32 2023 1144 3578 28.3 3.0 0.05 (0.9)
Spring 2013 0.27 0.15 0.50 738 397 1369 31.3 3.3 0.08 (0.9)
Summer 2013 0.71 0.45 1.11 1923 1231 3003 22.8 5.7 0.08 (0.9)
Fall 2013 0.83 0.50 1.36 2239 1362 3680 24.9 4.6 0.04 (1.0)
Table 1. Average depth, temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, and associated standard error of the
mean (SE) among seasons of the year in the Mississippi Sound from winter 2011/12 to fall 2013.
Dissolved
Season Depth (m) Temp (°C) Salinity (ppt) oxygen (mg/L)
Winter 2011/12 3.7 (0.2) 14.2 (0.3) 26.2 (4.3) 7.0 (0.2)
Spring 2012 4.2 (0.3) 23.5 (0.4) 14.3 (0.8) 5.4 (0.1)
Summer 2012 4.6 (0.4) 29.5 (0.2) 19.7 (1.1) 4.6 (0.1)
Fall 2012 4.1 (0.2) 23.6 (0.5) 17.6 (1.0) 4.9 (0.1)
Winter 2012/13 4.1 (0.3) 14.8 (0.3) 16.1 (1.1) 6.3 (0.1)
Spring 2013 4.4 (0.3) 21.1 (0.5) 11.3 (0.9) 5.8 (0.1)
Summer 2013 4.4 (0.3) 28.9 (0.1) 16.3 (0.9) 6.3 (0.2)
Fall 2013 4.2 (0.3) 20.8 (0.8) 19.9 (1.0) 8.1 (0.3)
Southeastern Naturalist
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
196
Population estimates for the study area ranged from 738 (95% CI = 397–1369) in
spring 2013 to 3236 (95% CI = 1927–4627) in spring 2012. Densities in winter and
summer seasons were fairly constant relative to those in spring and fall seasons,
which fluctuated during the 2-y study period. Overall, we detected a slight decreasing
trend in Dolphin density (R2 = 0.08; ԏ = 0.03). We also detected a slight
increasing trend in cluster size (R2 = 0.15). Model coefficients of variation for each
season within each year ranged from 21.6% in spring 2012 to 31.3% in winter 2013
(Table 2). Full data on variance attributed to detection probability, encounter rate,
and cluster size are provided in Supplemental Table 3 (available online at http://
www.eaglehill.us/SENAonline/suppl-files/s15-2-S2264-Pitchford-s1, and, for
BioOne subscribers, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1656/S2264.s1).
Dolphin density varied among strata and strata within season ranging from
0 Dolphins/km2 in strata 1 and 2 in spring 2012 and in stratum 2 in spring 2013 to 2.1
Dolphins/km2 (CV% = 56.1) in stratum 4 in spring 2012 (Fig. 5; see Supplemental
Table 2, available online at https://www.eaglehill.us/SENAonline/suppl-files/s15-
2-S2264-Pitchford-s1, and, for BioOne subscribers, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1656/
S2264.s1). Differences in density estimates among strata 3–7 compared to strata
1–2 in the westernmost portion of the Mississippi Sound were also notable. While
Dolphin density in stratum 1 was similar to levels in the other strata during the summer
and fall seasons of 2012 and 2013, it remained relatively low in the winter and
spring seasons during both survey years. Variation in encounter rates ranged from
0 sightings/km in strata 1 and 2 in spring 2012 and in stratum 2 in spring 2013, to
0.33 sightings/km in strata 5 in winter 2012/13. Encounter rate was the main source
of variance for all models across all seasons as encounter rate variance ranged from
28.7% in stratum 6 in spring 2012 to 98.3% in stratum 1 in winter 2011/12 (see
Supplemental Table 2, available online at https://www.eaglehill.us/SENAonline/
suppl-files/s15-2-S2264-Pitchford-s1, and, for BioOne subscribers, at http://dx.doi.
Figure 4. Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) density (Dolphins/km2) in the Mississippi
Sound among seasons of the year from 2011/12 to 2013. The error bars on each estimate
are 95% confidence intervals around the mean.
Southeastern Naturalist
197
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
org/10.1656/S2264.s1). Results of a multiple linear regression showed that only
salinity was a significant predictor of Dolphin density ( P = 0.003; R2 = 0.23).
Discussion
Spatiotemporal variation in density
Overall, these results suggest that there is spatial variation in Dolphin density in
the MSS over seasonal and annual timescales. Differences in density among survey
strata across both season and year suggests that the region is dynamic with regard
to environmental variants (e.g., temperature, salinity) that influence Dolphin occurrence
and distribution (Pitchford et al. 2015). The largest difference among seasons
included a 4-fold decrease in density from the spring of 2012 to the spring of 2013
and an almost 2-fold increase from the fall 2012 to the fall of 2013. Conversely,
summer and winter densities were similar throughout the study period. Differences
in density estimates among the 2 spring seasons potentially reflect differences in environmental
conditions. The spring of 2012, which contained the greatest estimated
density over the 2 years sampled (1.12 Dolphins/km2), coincided with lower-flow
rates on the Pascagoula and Pearl rivers (484 m3/s and 305 m3/s average minimum
daily flow rates, respectively, for 1 February 2012–11 May 2012) (US Geological
Survey 2015) and was characterized by higher average sea-surface temperature
(SST) (23.5 °C; SE = 0.4) and higher average salinity (14.3 ppt; SE = 0.1). Spring
2013 coincided with higher-flow rates on the Pascagoula and Pearl Rivers (721
m3/s and 557 m3/s average minimum daily flow rate, respectively, for 1 February
Figure 5. Dolphin density (Dolphins/km2) among survey strata for each survey season from
2011/12 to 2013. Survey strata are numbered 1–7 from the western portion of the Mississippi
Sound in Lake Borgne, LA to the Mississippi–Alabama state border in the east. The
error bars on each estimate are 95% confidence intervals around the mean.
Southeastern Naturalist
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
198
2013–11 May 2013) (US Geological Survey 2015), lower average SST (21.1 °C;
SE = 0.5), and lower average salinity (11.3 ppt; SE = 0.9) within the MSS, and the
lowest estimated density during the study period (0.27 Dolphins/km2). Salinity was
also higher in all strata during the spring of 2012 relative to spring 2013, excepting
stratum 4. Similarly, low estimates in fall 2012 (0.46 Dolphins/km2) coincided
with the occurrence of Hurricane Isaac, which produced over 10 inches of rain in
South Mississippi from 25 August to 3 September 2012 (Berg 2013). During the
late summer and fall of 2013, the MSS was unaffected by tropical systems and our
estimated density estimate for that period was 0.83 Dolphins/km2. Changes in average
temperature, salinity, and flow rates among both spring and fall seasons of the
study period reflect overall differences in climate that may have played a role in
the abundance of Dolphins within the MSS. Further, the significance of salinity as
a predictor of density also suggests that increased precipitation and river flow into
the MSS is linked with periods of reduced Dolphin population density.
Density was commonly highest within the central and eastern MSS (i.e., strata
4–7) regardless of season, and density in the extreme western MSS (i.e., strata 1–2)
was consistently low in the winter and spring relative to the other strata. However,
during the summer and fall, density in strata 1–2 was typically higher than it was
during winter and spring, suggesting that use of this area was somewhat restricted
to the warm season. During the winter and spring, low temperature and salinity are
common in this area, as is low predicted occurrence of Dolphins (Pitchford et al.
2015). Specifically, salinity is consistently lower in the western MSS, especially
in the winter and spring. Possible reasons for low densities in the cooler months
include discomfort associated with inhabiting cold water (Loheofener et al. 1990),
suppressed immune response (Carmichael et al. 2012), development of skin lesions
(Hart et al. 2012), and seasonal changes in the distribution of prey (Hastie et al.
2004, Hubard et al. 2004, Loheofener et al. 1990, Miller et al. 2013, Pitchford et
al. 2015). While the potential direct effects of temperature and salinity on Dolphins
has been noted in other studies (Carmichael et al. 2012, Hart et al. 2012), there is
less information available regarding the indirect effects of changing environmental
conditions on Dolphin distribution. An exception includes hydrographic fronts,
which readily form in estuarine systems near the mouths of rivers and have the
propensity to concentrate fish (Franks 1992) and increase foraging efficiency for
Dolphins (Mendes et al. 2002). Although there are a variety of prey species that
inhabit the MSS (Barros and Odell 1990, Barros and Wells 1998, Hoese and Moore
1998) and have seasonal-movement regimes that could influence the distribution of
Dolphins (Hubard et al. 2004, Loheofener et al. 1990, Miller et al. 2013, Pitchford
et al. 2015), it is difficult to relate Dolphin density to occurrence of these species
without more-specific information regarding both Dolphin diet and seasonal shifts
in the distribution of prey species within the MSS. Researchers noted a seasonal
shift in diet in their study of stomach contents of stranded oceanic Dolphins in
North Carolina—the majority of prey items across all seasons were from the family
Scianidae, the relative proportions of Sciaenids (e.g., Micropogonias undulatus
vs. Cynoscion regalis) differed significantly across seasons (Gannon and Waples
Southeastern Naturalist
199
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
2004). The lack of substantial information on Dolphin prey- and forage-species
distribution in the nGOM, should be addressed in the future to better understand
Dolphin distribution, activity, and movement in this region. Work similar to Gannon
and Waples (2004) or McCabe et al. (2010), which examined prey selection of
Dolphins by incorporating prey-availability sampling, should help to illuminate the
relation between shifting environmental conditions and seasonal spatial distributions
of Dolphins in the MSS.
Variation in cluster size of sighted groups was evident during the course of
our study; the number of Dolphins within each group was lowest in winter (3.3
and 3.0 Dolphins/group in winter 2011/12 and winter 2012/13, respectively) and
highest in summer (4.7 and 5.7 Dolphins per group in summer 2012 and 2013,
respectively). These numbers are consistent with group sizes reported by Mullin
et al. (1990), but are lower than the average cluster size reported by Miller
et al. (2013), which ranged from 7.7 Dolphins per cluster during winter to 11.7
Dolphins per cluster during summer. A possible explanation for lower estimated
cluster sizes in this study is the location of our sampling area. Miller et al. (2013)
surveyed up to 15 km south of the barrier islands, potentially observing larger
groups from the Northern Coastal Stock (NCS).
Sources of error
Boat-based surveys may positively bias density estimates because Dolphins may
actively seek boats in order to bowride, although this phenomenon is more common
with large, slow moving vessels that produce a bow wave (Würsig et al. 1998).
Conversely, aerial surveys often result in negatively biased density estimates,
particularly in turbid waters or for small BSE stocks in which aerial-survey speed
and geography of the region may reduce sightings (Hubard et al. 2004, Marsh and
Sinclair 1989). The first published density estimates for the MSS were derived from
aerial surveys (0.07–0.2 Dolphins/km2; Blaylock and Hoggard 1994) and seem low
when compared with boat-based estimates (0.16–0.37 Dolphins/km2, Mullin et al.
1990). Other factors that could negatively bias estimates include responsive movement
away from the survey vessel, sighting conditions, and observer variation and
fatigue (Buckland et al. 2001). We did not control for responsive movement in this
study, but histograms of detection probability produced by the Program Distance
6.0 (Thomas et al. 2010) did not suggest that Dolphins were either attracted to or
repelled from the survey vessel. To control for effects of survey conditions, we
measured variables such as BSS, glare, and sightability—which accounts for BSS,
glare and other factors (e.g., weather) that could affect detection—during each survey
and included them in the analysis as a covariate. However, only during spring
2012 was a model that included sightablity selected as the best model. We did not
control for observer variation and fatigue, but designed the study to avoid long
surveys, and we used inter-transect travel time as an observer rest-period to minimize
fatigue. Also, to avoid potential bias arising from interobserver variability, we
counted only sightings observed by 2 or more observers.
Southeastern Naturalist
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
200
Trend detection
We detected a decreasing trend in density from 2011 to 2013 (R2 = 0.08; ԏ=
0.03), but this result may not reflect actual population trends. Although our study
included the high frequency of sampling needed for trend detection, seasonal estimates
had low precision (i.e., large confidence intervals). When compared with
previous estimates, winter densities from 2011 to 2013 were higher and summer
densities were lower than those published by Loheofener et al. (1990) and Hubard
et al. (2004); however, these estimates may not be directly comparable because
they were made within the MSS embayment only. Estimates from Miller et al.
(2013), when including only their values for coastal and island waters, correspond
closely to those for strata 3–6 in this study. Miller et al. (2013) reported a density
in the same area of 0.88 Dolphins/km2 in winter 2007/08, very similar to estimates
presented here for the 2011/12 and 2012/13 winters (0.86 and 0.95 Dolphins/
km2, respectively). This finding suggests that the number of Dolphins using this
region during winter has not decreased during the intervening years. Conversely,
2007 summer estimates of 1.54 Dolphins/km2 (Miller et al. 2013) were higher
than 2012 and 2013 summer estimates in our study (0.94 and 0.63 Dolphins/km2,
respectively), suggesting that the summer population in strata 3–6 may have decreased.
Again, the magnitude of variation in estimates and seasonal and annual
variation in physical conditions in the MSS suggests that to accurately quantify
population trends, longer study periods to record both Dolphin density and physical
oceanographic data are needed. The survey area employed in the current study
encompasses the majority of the geographic region delineated as the BB-MSS
stock; however, coverage of this area required a minimum of 4 days, which may
have inflated the variance around seasonal estimates. Future studies could employ
the use of multiple boats to reduce the amount of time required to complete all
transects, thus reducing the variance around estimates. Another strategy to increase
the precision of estimates and facilitate trend detection would be to select
a smaller trend-site for repeated (e.g., annual, biannual) surveys in a location and
during a time of year when density has historically been stable and, thus distributional
shifts would be less likely to confound trend detection (Taylor et al. 2007).
In this study, density in strata 4–7 was relatively constant during summer, suggesting
that this area would be a reasonable location for trend detection during the
summer (June–August). However, it is unknown how well this area represents the
BB-MSS stock, which encompasses a large geographic area and has the potential
to house multiple independent populations.
Aerial stock-assessment surveys conducted in the MSS in 2011 were completed
just as this study was beginning (both studies were underway during winter 2012).
The resulting best estimate of 900 Dolphins (CV = 0.63) based on winter aerial
surveys (NOAA 2015) was lower than the estimate for the same time period presented
in this study (N = 1793; CV = 0.25). This result is not surprising because
the stock assessment was based on aerial surveys, which are often biased low (Hubard
et al. 2004, Marsh and Sinclair 1989) and did not include areas south of the
barrier islands. The results of our study and others (Miller et al. 2013, Pitchford
Southeastern Naturalist
201
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
et al. 2015) have shown that occurrence of Dolphins south of the barrier islands
is high during the winter when occurrence is lower in near-shore areas, suggesting
that the southern boundary for this stock has little biological significance. The
proximity of the NCS to the BB-MSS stock and the potential for movement of
NCS Dolphins into shallow waters of the MSS (NOAA 2015), further confounds
stock delineation. These factors must be considered when designing future studies,
and we recommend establishment of trend sites to improve delineations. While
inclusion of areas south of the barrier islands in winter increases the potential for
inclusion of Dolphins from the NCS, winter surveys excluding this area are likely
underestimating abundance of the BB-MSS stock. Future surveys should include
these areas, specifically in winter, to more accurately quantify regional population
size. Implementation of a broad-scale photo-identification project that includes Pollock’s
(1982) robust design could help to determine where biologically significant
boundaries lie through estimation of home ranges (Defran et al. 1999; Gubbins
2002) and the use of mark–recapture analyses that include estimates of emigration,
immigration, survival rate, and population size (Rosel et al. 2011).
Conclusions
Although Dolphins are a protected species (Marine Mammal Protection Act of
1972) and are often cited as sentinels of marine ecosystems (Kucklick et al. 2011,
Wells et al. 2004), there has been little effort to quantify long-term trends in density
and to use this information to improve management of the species. Also, there has
been no investigation of a carrying capacity of Dolphins in the MSS and no effort
to examine changes in demographic rates in response to changes in density. This
lack of information is a barrier to understanding how population changes resulting
from large-scale mortality, including changes to population demographics, affect
recovery of the species. Our results showed that the density of Dolphins varied over
spatial and temporal scales, suggesting that seasonal abundance and distribution of
Dolphins in the MSS is complex and is likely related, either directly or indirectly,
to changes in environmental conditions (e.g., salinity). Due to the infrequency of
Dolphin density estimations within this region, differences in study areas and methodologies,
and a lack of precision in estimates, only large changes in the population
are likely detectable. This inability to accurately detect change is unfortunate given
the occurrence of several large disturbances including the DWH oil spill and the
ongoing UME. Undoubtedly, more work needs to be done to more accurately quantify
abundance and distribution of Dolphins within the MSS and to better delineate
stock boundaries to improve our understanding of this population.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the IMMS staff including many interns and volunteers that assisted
with this project. We also extend special thanks to Victoria Howard, Megan Broadway, and
Andrew Heaton for assistance with data collection and management, Mark Praznovsky for
being an excellent boat operator, and to Dr. Andrew Coleman and Trevor Jensen for technical
support and for reviewing this manuscript. This project was partially funded with qualified
Southeastern Naturalist
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
202
outer continental shelf oil and gas revenues by the Coastal Impact Assistance Program, US
Fish and Wildlife Service, and US Department of the Interior through a subgrant from the
Mississippi Department of Marine Resources. Partial funding for this project was also provided
through the Emergency Disaster Relief Program I project number 607 issued through
the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National
Marine Fisheries Service through the Gulf States Fisheries Commission Administered by
Mississippi Department of Marine Resources. Additionally, partial funding was provided
through the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act (GOMESA) of 2006 project 985, which is
administered by the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources as well as through direct
funding to IMMS from the Department of Commerce to National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration/National Marine Fisheries Service (Award #NA10NMF4690193). All field
research was conducted under National Marine Fisheries Service permit GA LOC 13549.
Literature Cited
Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle.
Pp. 267–281, In B.N. Petrov and F. Caski (Eds.). Proceedings of the Second International
Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.
287 pp.
Balmer, B.C., R.S. Wells, S.M. Nowacek, D.P. Nowacek, L.H. Schwacke, W.A. McLellan,
and F.S. Scharf. 2008. Seasonal abundance and distribution patterns of Common
Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) near St. Joseph Bay, Florida, USA. Journal of
Cetacean Research and Management 10:157–167.
Balmer, B.C., L.H. Schwacke, R.S. Wells, J.D. Adams, R.C. George, S.M. Lane, W.A.
Mclellan, P.E. Rosel, K. Sparks, T. Speakman, E.S. Zolman, and D.A. Pabst. 2013. Comparison
of abundance and habitat usage for Common Bottlenose Dolphins between sites
exposed to differential anthropogenic stressors within the estuaries of southern Georgia,
USA. Marine Mammal Science 29:E114–E135.
Balmer, B.C., G.M. Yitalo, L.E. McGeorge, K.A. Baugh, D. Boyd, K.D. Mullin, P.E. Rosel,
C. Sinclair, R.S. Wells, E.S. Zolman, and L.H. Schwacke. 2015. Persistent organic
pollutants in blubber of Common Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) along the
northern Gulf of Mexico coast, USA. Science of the Total Environment 527:306–312.
Barros, N.B., and D.K. Odell. 1990. Food habits of Bottlenose Dolphins in the southeastern
United States. Pp. 309–328, In S. Leatherwood and R.R. Reeves (Eds.). The Bottlenose
Dolphin. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 653 pp.
Barros, N.B., and R.S. Wells. 1998. Prey and feeding patterns of resident Bottlenose
Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Journal of Mammalogy
79:1045–1059.
Bassos-Hull, K.M., and R.S. Wells. 2007. Investigating potential hurricane and red-tiderelated
impacts on Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) abundance, reproductive
rates, distribution, and site fidelity in Charlotte Harbor and Pine Island Sound, Florida.
Technical Report 1231. Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, FL. 43 pp.
Berg, R. 2013. Tropical cyclone report, Hurricane Isaac (AL092012): 21 August–1 September
2012. National Hurricane Center. Available online at http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/
tcr/AL092012_Isaac.pdf. Accessed 8 March 2015.
Blaylock R.A., and W. Hoggard. 1994. Preliminary estimates of Bottlenose Dolphin abundance
in southern US Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico continental shelf waters. NOAA
Technical Memo NMFS-SEFSC 356. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast
Fisheries Science Center, 75 Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL. 10 pp.
Southeastern Naturalist
203
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
Buckland, S.T., D.R. Anderson, K.P. Burnham, J.L. Laake, D.L. Borchers, and L. Thomas.
2001. Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations,
Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 448 pp.
Burnham, K.P., and D.R. Anderson. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A
Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer Science and Business Media New
York, NY. 488 pp.
Carmichael, R.H., W.M. Graham, A. Aven, G. Worthy, and S. Howden. 2012. Were multiple
stressors a “perfect storm” for northern Gulf of Mexico Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops
truncatus) in 2011? PLoS ONE 7:e41155.
Christmas, J.Y., and C.K. Eleuterius 1973. Hydrology. Pp. 74-121, In J.Y. Christmas (Ed.).
Cooperative Gulf of Mexico Estuarine Inventory and Study, Mississippi. Gulf Coast
Research Laboratory Press, Ocean Spring, MS. 434 pp.
Defran, R.H., D.W. Weller, D.L. Kelly, and M.A. Espinosa. 1999. Range characteristics of
Pacific coast Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Southern California Bight.
Marine Mammal Science 15:381–393.
Eleuterius, C.K. 1978. Geographical definition of Mississippi Sound. Gulf Research Reports
6:179–181.
Franks, P.J.S. 1992. Sink or swim: Accumulation of biomass at fronts. Marine Ecology
Progress Series 82:1–12.
Gannon, D.P., and D.M. Waples. 2004. Diets of coastal Bottlenose Dolphins from the US
mid-Atlantic coast differ by habitat. Marine Mammal Science 20:527–545.
Gubbins, C. 2002. Use of home ranges by resident Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)
in a South Carolina estuary. Journal of Mammology 83:178–202.
Hart, L.B., D.S. Rotstein, R.S. Wells, J. Allen, A. Barleycorn, B.C. Balmer, S.M. Lane, T.
Speakman, E.S. Zolman, M. Stolen, W. McFee, T. Goldstein, T.K. Rowles, and L.H.
Schwacke. 2012. Skin lesions on Common Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)
from three sites in the northwest Atlantic, USA. PLoS ONE 7:e33081.
Hastie, G.D., B. Wilson, L.J. Wilson, K.M. Parsons, and P.M. Thompson. 2004. Functional
mechanisms underlying cetacean distribution patterns: Hotspots for Bottlenose Dolphins
are linked to foraging. Marine Biology 144:397–403.
Hoese, H.D., and R.H. Moore. 1998. Fishes of the Gulf of Mexico. Texas A&M Press, College
Station, TX. 422 pp.
Hubard, C.W., K. Maze-Foley, S.D. Mullin, and W.W. Schroeder. 2004. Seasonal abundance
and site fidelity of Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Mississippi
Sound. Aquatic Mammals 30:299–310.
Kjerfve, B. 1986. Comparative oceanography of coastal lagoons. Pp 63–81, In D.A. Wolfe
(Ed.). Estuarine Variability. Academic Press, Orlando, FL. 509 pp.
Kucklick, J., L. Schwacke, R. Wells, A. Hohn, A. Guichard, J. Yordy, L. Hansen, E. Zolman,
R. Wilson, L. Litz, D. Nowacek, T. Rowles, R. Pugh, B. Balmer, C. Sinclair, and
P. Rosel. 2011. Bottlenose Dolphins as indicators of persistent organic pollutants in the
western North Atlantic Ocean and northern Gulf of Mexico. Environmental Science and
Technology 45:4270–4277.
Lane, S.M., C.R. Smith, J. Mitchell, B.C. Balmer, K.P. Barry, T. McDonald, C.S. Mori,
P.E. Rosel, T.K. Rowles, T.R. Speakman, F.I. Townsend, M.C. Tumlin, R.S. Wells, E.S.
Zolman, and L.H. Schwacke. 2015. Reproductive outcome and survival of Common
Bottlenose Dolphins sampled in Barataria Bay, Louisiana, USA, following the Deepwater
Horizon oil spill. Proceedings of the Royal Society DOI:10.1098/rspb.2015.1944.
Southeastern Naturalist
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
204
Litz, J.A., M.A. Baran, S.R. Bowen-Stevens, R.H. Carmichael, K.M. Colegrove, L.P. Garrison,
S.E. Fire, E.M. Fougeres, R. Hardy, S. Holmes, W. Jones, B.E. Mase-Guthrie, D.K.
Odell, P.E. Rosel, J.T. Saliki, D.K. Shannon, S.F. Shippee, S.M. Smith, E.M. Stratton,
M.C. Tumlin, H.R. Whitehead, G.A.J. Worthy, and T.K. Rowles. 2014. Review of historical
unusual mortality events (UMEs) in the Gulf of Mexico (1990–2009): Providing
context for the multi-year northern Gulf of Mexico cetacean UME declared in 2010.
Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 112:161–175.
Loheofener, R., W. Hoggard, K. Mullin, R. Ford, and J. Benigno. 1990. Studies of Mississippi
Sound Bottlenose Dolphins: Estimates of Bottlenose Dolphin density in Mississippi
Sound from small-boat surveys. Technical Report. National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Pascagoula, MS. 60 pp.
Marsh, H., and D.F. Sinclair. 1989. Correcting for visibility bias in strip-transect aerial
surveys of aquatic fauna. Journal of Wildlife Management 53:1017–1024.
McCabe, E.J.B., D.P. Gannon, N.B. Barros, and R.S. Wells. 2010. Prey selection by resident
Common Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Marine
Biology 157:931–942.
McClellan, D.B., J.A. Browder, J.L. Tobias, G.J. Konoval, M.D. Hearon, O. Bass, and
J. Osborne. 2000. Opportunistic sightings of Bottlenose Dolphin, Tursiops truncatus,
along the southeast Florida coast and Florida Bay, 1992-1997. National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-435. Miami, FL. 18 pp.
Melancon, R., S.M. Lane, T. Speakman, L.B. Hart, C. Sinclair, J. Adams, P.E. Rosel, and L.
Schwacke. 2011 Photo-identification field and laboratory protocols utilizing FinBase v.
2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD. 46 pp.
Mendes, S., W. Turrell, T. Lutkebohle, and P. Thompson. 2002. Influence of the tidal cycle
and a tidal-intrusion front on the spatio-temporal distribution of coastal Bottlenose Dolphins.
Marine Ecology Progress Series 239:221–229.
Miller, L.J., M. Solangi, and S.A. Kuczaj. 2010. Seasonal and diurnal patterns of behavior
exhibited by Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Mississippi
Sound. Ethology 116:1–11.
Miller, L.J., A.D. Mackey, M. Solangi, and S.A. Kuczaj. 2013. Population abundance and
habitat utilization of Bottlenose Dolphins in the Mississippi Sound. Aquatic Conservation:
Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 23:145–151.
Mullin, K.D., R.R. Loheofener, W. Hoggard, C.L. Roden, and C.M. Rogers. 1990. Abundance
of Bottlenose Dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in the coastal Gulf of Mexico. Northeast
Gulf Science 11:113–122.
National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling (National
Commission). 2010. The use of surface and subsea dispersants during the BP
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. Staff Working Paper 4. Available online at http://oscaction.
org/resource-center/staff-papers/. Accessed 3 January 2015.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2015. Common Bottlenose
Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus truncatus) Mississippi Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay Boudreau
Stock. Available online at http://nefsc.noaa.gov/publications/tm/tm231/254_gmexbodomssound_
F2014July.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2016.
Pitchford, J.L., V.A. Howard, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, A.T. Coleman, and M. Solangi.
2015. Predictive spatial modelling of seasonal Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)
distributions in the Mississippi Sound. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater
Ecosystems. DOI:10.1002/aqc.2547.
Southeastern Naturalist
205
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
Pollock, K.H. 1982. A capture–recapture design robust to unequal probability of capture.
The Journal of Wildlife Management 46:752–757.
R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation
for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online at http://www.R-project.
org/. Accessed 8 March 2015.
Rakocinski, C.F., H.M. Perry, M.A. Abney, and K.M. Larsen. 2003. Soft-sediment recruitment
dynamics of early Blue Crab stages in Mississippi Sound. Bulletin of Marine Science
72:393–408.
Rosel, P.E., K.D. Mullin, L. Garrison, L. Schwacke, J. Adams, B. Balmer, P. Conn, M.J.
Conroy, T. Eguchi, A. Gorgone, A. Hohn, M. Mazzoil, C. Schwarz, C. Sinclair, T. Speakman,
K. Urian, N. Vollmer, P. Wade, R. Wells, and E. Zolman. 2011. Photo-identification
capture–mark–recapture techniques for estimating abundance of bay, sound, and estuary
populations of Bottlenose Dolphins along the US east coast and Gulf of Mexico: A
workshop report. NOAA Technical Memo NMFS-SEFSC-621. Lafayette, LA. 30 pp.
Schwacke, L.H., C.R. Smith, F.I. Townsend, R.S. Wells, L.B. Hart, B.C. Balmer, T.K. Collier,
S. De Guise, M.M. Fry, L.J. Guillette, S.V. Lamb, S.M. Lane, W.E. McFee, N.J.
Place, M.C. Tumlin, G.M. Ylitalo, E.S. Zolman, and T.K. Rowles. 2013. Health of Common
Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Barataria Bay, Louisiana, following
the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Environmental Science and Technology 48:93–103.
Scott, G.P., D.M. Burn, L.J. Hansen, and R.E. Owen. 1989. Estimates of Bottlenose Dolphin
abundance in the Gulf of Mexico from regional aerial surveys. CRD 88/89-07. Available
from NMFS, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, FL.
Shane, S.H. 1980. Occurrence, movements, and distribution of Bottlenose Dolphin, Tursiops
truncatus, in southern Texas. Fisheries Bulletin 78:593–601.
Shane, S.H. 2004. Residence patterns, group characteristics, and association patterns of
Bottlenose Dolphins near Sanibel Island, Florida. Gulf of Mexico Science 22:1–12.
Smith, C.E., B.J. Hurley, C.N. Toms, A.D. Mackey, M. Solangi, and S.A. Kuczaj. 2013.
Hurricane impacts on the foraging patterns of Bottlenose Dolphins Tursiops truncatus
in Mississippi Sound. Marine Ecology Progress Series 487:231–244.
Smolker, R.A., A.F. Richards, R.C. Connor, and J.W. Pepper. 1992. Sex differences in patterns
of association among Indian Ocean Bottlenose Dolphins. Behaviour 123:38–69.
Speakman, T.R., S.M. Lane, L.H. Schwacke, P.A. Fair, and E.S. Zolman. 2010. Mark–recapture
estimates of seasonal abundance and survivorship for Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops
truncatus) near Charleston, South Carolina, USA. Journal of Cetacean Research
and Management 11:153–162.
Taylor, B.L., M.M. Martinez, T. Gerrodette, and J. Barlow. 2007. Lessons from monitoring
trends in abundance of marine mammals. Marine Mammal Science 23:157–175.
Thomas, L., S.T. Buckland, E.A. Rexstad, J.L. Laake, S. Strindberg, S.L. Hedley, J.R.B.
Bishop, T.A. Marques, and K.P. Burnham. 2010. Distance software: Design and analysis
of distance-sampling surveys for estimating population size. Journal of Applied Ecology
47:5–14.
US Geological Survey (USGS). 2015. National water information system: USGS Water
Data for the nation. Available online at http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/. Accessed 15
January 2015.
Venn-Watson, S., L. Garrison, J. Litz, E. Fougeres, B. Mase, G. Rappucci, E. Stratton,
R. Carmichael, D. Odell, D. Shannon, S. Shippee, S. Smith, L. Staggs, M. Tumlin, H.
Whitehead, and T. Rowles. 2015a. Demographic clusters identified within the northern
Gulf of Mexico Common Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) unusual mortality
event: January 2010–June 2013. PLoS ONE 10(2): e0117248. doi:10.1371/journal.
pone.0117248.
Southeastern Naturalist
J.L. Pitchford, E.E. Pulis, K. Evans, J.K. Shelley, B.J.S. Serafin, and M. Solangi
2016 Vol. 15, No. 2
206
Venn-Watson, S., K.M. Colegrove, J. Litz, M. Kinsel, K. Terio, J. Saliki, S. Fire, R. Carmichael,
C. Chevis, W. Hatchett, J. Pitchford, M. Tumlin, C. Field, S. Smith, R. Ewing,
D. Fauquier, G. Lovewell, H. Whitehead, D. Rotstein, W. McFee, E. Fougeres, and T.
Rowles. 2015b. Adrenal gland and lung lesions in Gulf of Mexico Common Bottlenose
Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) found dead following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
PLoS ONE10(5):e126538. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0126538.
Waring, G.T., E. Josephson, K. Maze-Foley, and P.E. Rosel. 2014. US Atlantic and Gulf
of Mexico Marine mammal stock assessments. NOAA Technical Memo NMFS-NE
228:02543-1026. NOAA, Washington, DC. 16 pp.
Wells, R.S., H.L. Rhinehart, L.J. Hansen, J.C. Sweeney, F.I. Townsend, R. Stone, D.R.
Casper, M.D. Scott, A.A. Hohn, and T.K. Rowles. 2004. Bottlenose Dolphins as marine
ecosystem sentinels: Developing a health-monitoring system. EcoHealth 1:246–54.
White, H.K., P. Hsing, W. Cho, T.M. Shank, E.E. Cordes, A.M. Quattrini, R.K. Nelson, R.
Camilli, A.W.J. Demopoulos, C.R. German, J.M. Brooks, H.H. Roberts, W. Shedd, C.M.
Reddy, and C.R. Fisher. 2012. Impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on a deep-water
coral community in the Gulf of Mexico. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
109:20,303–20,308.
Whitehead, A., B. Dubansky, C. Bodinier, T.I. Garcia, S. Miles, C. Pilley, V. Raghunathan,
J.L. Roach, N. Walker, R.B. Walter, C.D. Rice, and F. Galvez. 2011. Genomic and physiological
footprint of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on resident marsh fishes. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences 2109:20,298–20,302.
Würsig, B., S.K. Lynn, T.A. Jefferson, and K.D. Mullin. 1998. Behaviour of cetaceans in
the northern Gulf of Mexico relative to survey ships and aircraft. Aquatic Mammals
24:41–50.