Ultrasound Diagnosis of Bat Pregnancy in Field Settings
Lydia H. Moore1,*, Heidi Holland2, Jason B. Robinson3, Windy Williford2, and Samuel J. Holst4
1Wormsloe Institute For Environmental History, 7601 Skidaway Road, Savannah, GA, 31406. 2Lowcountry Vets, 168 Bluffton Road, Bluffton, SC 29910. 3Lotus Enterprises LLC, PO Box 23765, Lexington, KY 40523. 4Georgia Department of Natural Resources, 2065 US 278, Social Circle, GA, 30025. *Corresponding author.
Southeastern Naturalist, Volume 24, Issue 2 (2025): 116–123
First published early online: 18 May 2025
Abstract
Accurately documenting reproductive status is prerequisite for effectively monitoring wildlife population trends, population stability, and species-specific conservation objectives. Unfortunately, the accepted methods for determining reproductive status of North American bats can be subjective, and accuracy is influenced by experience of the handler. For small mammals other than bats, ultrasound can provide a reliable method for determining pregnancy. Our goal was to determine the efficacy of using ultrasound relative to abdominal palpation typically used by biologists to determine pregnancy in bats in the field. Although there are some advantages of using ultrasound in the field, this method did not outperform abdominal palpation substantively to warrant its expense.
Download Full-text pdf (Accessible only to subscribers. To subscribe click here.)
Access Journal Content
Open access browsing of table of contents and abstract pages. Full text pdfs available for download for subscribers.
Issue-in-Progress: Vol. 24( 2) ... early view
Check out SENA's latest Monograph and current Special Issue in progress: