Regular issues
Special Issues

Southeastern Naturalist
    SENA Home
    Range and Scope
    Board of Editors
    Editorial Workflow
    Publication Charges

Other EH Journals
    Northeastern Naturalist
    Caribbean Naturalist
    Neotropical Naturalist
    Urban Naturalist
    Eastern Paleontologist
    Journal of the North Atlantic
    Eastern Biologist

EH Natural History Home

Alligator Diet in Relation to Alligator Mortality on Lake Griffin, FL
Amanda N. Rice, J. Perran Ross, Allan R. Woodward, Dwayne A. Carbonneau, and H. Franklin Percival

Southeastern Naturalist, Volume 6, Number 1 (2007): 97–110

Full-text pdf (Accessible only to subscribers.To subscribe click here.)


Site by Bennett Web & Design Co.
2007 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 6(1):97–110 Alligator Diet in Relation to Alligator Mortality on Lake Griffin, FL Amanda N. Rice1,2,*, J. Perran Ross3, Allan R. Woodward4, Dwayne A. Carbonneau5, and H. Franklin Percival6 Abstract - Alligator mississippiensis (American Alligators) demonstrated low hatchrate success and increased adult mortality on Lake Griffin, FL, between 1998 and 2003. Dying Lake Griffin alligators with symptoms of poor motor coordination were reported to show specific neurological impairment and brain lesions. Similar lesions were documented in salmonines that consumed clupeids with high thiaminase levels. Therefore, we investigated the diet of Lake Griffin alligators and compared it with alligator diets from two lakes that exhibited relatively low levels of unexplained alligator mortality to see if consumption of Dorosoma cepedianum (gizzard shad) could be correlated with patterns of mortality. Shad in both lakes Griffin and Apopka had high levels of thiaminase and Lake Apopka alligators were consuming greater amounts of shad relative to Lake Griffin without showing mortality rates similar to Lake Griffin alligators. Therefore, a relationship between shad consumption alone and alligator mortality is not supported. Introduction Alligator mississippiensis Daudin (American Alligators) have been affected by unknown factors on Lake Griffin, FL, causing low hatch-rate success and adult mortality (Ross et al. 2003, Schoeb et al. 2002). Alligator egg hatch-rate success dropped to 10% between 1994 and 1997 (A.R. Woodward, unpubl. data). Between November 1998 and December 2003, researchers recorded 439 dead alligators on Lake Griffin, of which approximately 98% were adults (D.A. Carbonneau, unpubl. data, (Fig. 1). Most alligator deaths occurred in spring, and over 100 individuals died that season in some years; however, alligator deaths were recorded all months of the year during bi-weekly surveys. Between 1998 and 2003, we observed Lake Griffin alligators that were lethargic, unresponsive to human approach, and had uncoordinated behavior. Subsequently, these alligators may have died of drowning. Pathology examinations have shown that these Lake Griffin alligators were 1Florida Museum of Natural History, Box 117800, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. 2Current address - Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 7922 NW 71st Street, Gainesville, FL 32653. 3Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Newins-Ziegler Hall, Box 110430, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. 4Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 4005 South Main Street, Gainesville, FL 32601. 5Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 1239 SW 10th Street, Ocala, FL 34474. 6US Geological Survey, Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Florida, PO Box 110485, Gainesville, FL 32611. *Corresponding author - 98 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 1 affected by severe neurological impairment of unknown causes (Schoeb et al. 2002). These included reduced nerve conduction velocity, degeneration of nerves and characteristic lesions of the torus semicircularis in the midbrain. Organochlorine and organophosphate pesticides, heavy metals, West Nile virus, botulism, and infectious diseases were all investigated and rejected as being associated with this mortality event (Ross et al. 2002). Similar legions and patterns of hatchling mortality and adult impairment as observed in Lake Griffin alligators have been seen in Great Lake salmonines that resulted from thiamin deficiency (Honeyfield et al. 2005). Because of this similarity in pathology, thiamin levels of Lake Griffin alligators were analyzed in 1999 and 2000. Thiamin levels in Lake Woodruff alligators also were analyzed as a reference representing unimpaired alligators. Lake Griffin alligators had lower thiamin levels than Lake Woodruff alligators and seriously impaired Lake Griffin alligators had lower thiamin levels than less seriously impaired specimens (Ross et al. 2002). The cause of neurological impairment in salmonines was the abundance of prey rich in thiaminase, including Alosa psuedoharengus Wilson (Alewife), Osmerus mordax Mitchill (Rainbow Smelt), and Clupea harengus membras Linnaeus (Baltic Herring), which are all filter feeders (Tillitt et al. 2005). American Alligators are known to prey on fish throughout their range in Florida (Delany and Abercrombie 1986; Delany et al. 1988, 1999; Rice 2004). Dorosoma cepedianum Lesueur (Gizzard Shad), an abundant clupeid filter feeder, was available to alligators in many central Florida lakes. Because Lake Griffin alligators showed similar symptoms to salmonines— low tissue thiamin levels, reproductive failure, adult neural impairment, and Figure 1. Annual alligator mortality in Lake Griffin, FL during 1998–2003, based on biweekly surveys. 2007 A.N. Rice, J.P. Ross, A.R. Woodward, D.A. Carbonneau, and H.F. Percival 99 brain lesions (Honeyfield et al. 2005, Schoeb et al. 2002)—and had access to similar prey fish types, we investigated alligator diets in Lake Griffin and nearby Lakes Apopka and Woodruff, where alligators did not demonstrate these characteristics. We hypothesized that elevated alligator mortality on Lake Griffin was due to a diet high in D. cepedianum with high levels of thiaminase causing a depressed level of thiamin in alligators. Body condition analyses investigate an animal’s energy store compared to its body size and are affected by abiotic and biotic components in their habitat (Green 2001). Delany et al. (1999) found differences in alligator condition among lakes in Florida and found that a high condition correlated with a fish-dominated diet. Because condition analyses indicate health of a population (Sutton et al. 2000) and it is unknown if thiamin deficiency affects alligator condition, we examined Lake Griffin alligator condition and compared it to alligator condition from Lakes Apopka and Woodruff. Study Site The study was conducted in Lake Griffin (Lake County—28º50'N, 81º51'W), Lake Apopka (Lake and Orange counties—28º37’N, 81º37'W), and Lake Woodruff National Wildlife Refuge (Volusia County—29º06'N, 81º25'W). Neither Lake Apopka nor Lake Woodruff were having unusual adult alligator mortality events and were chosen as comparative study lakes because of their lake characteristics. Lake Apopka has similar lake characteristics to Lake Griffin, and Lake Woodruff is a cleaner, more pristine lake for comparison. Lakes Griffin and Apopka are hypereutrophic, alkaline, polymictic, shallow water bodies and are a part of the Ocklawaha chain of lakes (Rice 2004). Throughout much of the early 1900s, both lakes were clear, macrophyte-dominated lakes; however, in the mid-1900s, both lakes dramatically changed due to water-level controls, diking and draining associated marshes, urban runoff, sewage, and agricultural effluents, resulting in eutrophication (Canfield et al. 2000, Woodward et al. 1993) as well as pesticide pollution (Heinz et al. 1991). Since the late 1990s, both lakes experienced restoration efforts to improve water quality. These efforts included planting native vegetation, fish removal to reduce phosphorus levels, restoration of marsh on surrounding muck farms, and implementation of a marsh flow-way system to filter the water (Fernald and Purdum 1998). Lake Woodruff National Wildlife Refuge, along the St. Johns River, is a macrophyte- dominated, eutrophic, alkaline lake (Rice 2004). Lake Woodruff has experienced little agriculture and urban development, and its alligator population had consistently high hatching rates (A.R. Woodward, unpubl. data) and low levels of adult mortality. Methods During 2001–2003, we captured adult alligators by capture dart and snare from airboats between 2000 and 0400 hours. Each alligator was 100 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 1 marked with two Monel self-piercing tags (National Band and Tag Co., Newport, KY), sexed by manual palpation, and weighed to the nearest 2 kg using a spring scale. Standard measurements including total length (TL), snout vent length (SVL), tail girth (TG), and head length (HL) were taken with a flexible tape to the nearest 0.1 cm. Stomach contents were obtained predominantly from live adult alligators within 3 hours of capture using the stomach pumping “hose-Heimlich” technique described by Fitzgerald (1989) and modified by Rice et al. (2005). This technique reliably recovered most of the stomach content and allowed subsequent release of the alligator unharmed. Additional stomach samples were obtained during necropsy of alligators by other researchers. Stomach-content samples were washed with water through a 0.5-mm nylon mesh strainer, preserved in 70% ethanol, and stored in the laboratory. Samples were sorted by prey group (fish, reptiles, mammals, birds, amphibians, gastropods, insects, crustaceans, or bivalves) and non-prey items. Prey items were then identified to the lowest possible taxa and minimum numbers of individuals by comparing to reference specimens and skeletons in the collection of the Florida Museum of Natural History (FLMNH). All prey items were categorized as either freshly ingested (fresh) or not freshly ingested (old) to avoid over-representation of indigestible prey. Alligators are unable to digest chitin and keratin (Garnett 1985, Magnusson et al. 1987) and persistent animal parts such as hair, feathers, scutes, and snail opercula may be overrepresented and bias quantitative estimates of prey intake. Guidelines were established based on available literature to categorize each prey item as either fresh or old (Barr 1994, 1997; Delany and Abercrombie 1986; Janes and Gutzke 2002). The time range for prey to be categorized as fresh varied with each prey taxa, but ranged between 24 and 72 hours (Rice 2004). Only freshly ingested material was considered in this analysis. Live mass of fresh prey was estimated by allometric scaling (Brown and West 2000, Casteel 1974, Reitz et al. 1987), field data, and available published weight data for different groups (Burt and Grossenheider 1980, Dunning 1993, Hoyer and Canfield 1994). Fresh invertebrates (except for Gastropods) were weighed to the nearest 0.01 g. Frequency of occurrence (percent of stomach samples containing a given prey type) and percent composition by live mass (percent of the diet each prey group or taxa represents based on estimated live-prey mass) were used to quantitatively analyze the fresh-diet data. The Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance rank test was used to compare mean fish proportion in alligator diets among lakes, and when significant differences were found, the lakes were compared pair-wise using the Mann-Whitney U test. Fulton’s condition factor (K = W/L3 * 10n, where W = mass of the alligator in kg, L = SVL in cm, and n = 5), was used to determine each alligators condition (Zweig 2003). Condition data were analyzed using a general linear model with the least significant difference (LSD) post-hoc 2007 A.N. Rice, J.P. Ross, A.R. Woodward, D.A. Carbonneau, and H.F. Percival 101 test. Values for both diet and condition data were expressed as the mean ± one standard error unless otherwise indicated. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (SPSS 2000). Both diet and condition statistical tests used an alpha of 0.10, with the null hypothesis of no differences. All analyses were performed on samples combined for all three years and then compared among the three lakes. However, Lake Griffin samples were quantitatively analyzed each year to compare the shad consumption year to year. Impaired Lake Griffin alligators were sampled along with normal Lake Griffin alligators during 2001. These samples were analyzed in the same manner as the other samples; however, these analyses were kept separate from normal Lake Griffin samples. No statistical analyses were performed on these samples due to small sample size. Results and discussion pertain to samples from normal (unimpaired) alligators among the lakes, unless indicated by stating that they were samples from impaired alligators. Results Stomach contents from 175 normal American Alligators ranging in size from 182 cm to 304 cm TL were collected from alligators captured at Lakes Griffin (n = 85), Apopka (n = 44), and Woodruff (n = 46) from March to October 2001, from April to October 2002, and from April to August 2003. Stomach contents from an additional 13 alligators were collected from impaired Lake Griffin alligators post-mortem during 2001 (Schoeb et al. 2002). The alligators ate a wide variety of vertebrate and invertebrate prey. Fish were the most important prey group in frequency of occurrence and percent composition by live mass for all lakes. Alligators from Lake Apopka had the highest occurrence of fresh fish (64%), followed by Lake Woodruff (57%) and Lake Griffin (44%) (Table 1). Fish made up an overwhelming percentage of the mass of alligator stomach samples from Lakes Apopka (90% of the diet) and Woodruff (80% of the diet). Total fish biomass for Lake Griffin alligators was 54% of the diet (Appendix 1). While fish were the predominant prey in all lakes, species composition and number of fish Table 1. Percent occurrence of fresh prey in alligator stomachs collected from Lakes Apopka, Griffin, and Woodruff, FL during 2001–2003. Griffin (n = 85) Apopka (n = 44) Woodruff (n = 46) % occurrence % occurrence % occurrence Fish 44 64 57 Reptile 14 7 2 Mammal 2 5 2 Bird 5 2 0 Amphibian 6 0 4 Gastropod 28 9 41 Bivalve 4 0 4 Crustacean 9 11 15 Insect 8 9 13 102 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 1 consumed varied among lakes. Catfish (Ictaluridae) were most commonly consumed in Lake Griffin, shad (Clupeidae) in Lake Apopka, and sunfish and bass (Centrarchidae) in Lake Woodruff (Appendix 1). Proportion of fish (by estimated fresh biomass) in individual alligator stomachs ranged from 0 to 100%. Lake Apopka alligators had the highest mean proportion of fish in their diet (mean = 79.9% ± 6.76), followed by Lake Woodruff (mean = 59.4% ± 7.5) and Lake Griffin (mean = 48.5% ± 6.05) (Fig. 2). Proportion of fish in alligator stomachs differed among lake (P = 0.006), and proportion of fish in alligator stomachs from Lake Apopka was greater than those from Lakes Griffin (P = 0.002) and Woodruff (P = 0.018). Proportions of fish in Lakes Griffin and Woodruff alligator stomachs were not significantly different (P = 0.403). The predominant prey group consumed by Lake Griffin alligators each year was fish, ranging from 43–68% of the diet (Table 2). Fresh shad (D. cepedianum and Dorosoma spp.) represented 38% of the diet of samples from Lake Griffin in 2001, making Clupideidae he predominant family of fish consumed that year. However, no shad were identified in any 2002 samples, and a single old shad was identified in one sample in 2003 (Table 2) (and catfish (Ictaluridae) were the predominant family of fish consumed by Lake Griffin alligators that year (Table 3).) Other vertebrate prey groups (reptiles, mammals, birds, and amphibians) and invertebrates were found less frequently in alligator stomachs in all the lakes (Table 1), and reptiles were the most commonly consumed vertebrate prey after fish. Turtles were the most common reptiles consumed by the alligators, but alligators also consumed aquatic snakes, and we saw evidence (FWC marking tags) of alligator remains in stomachs (Rice 2004). We Figure 2. Mean fish proportion (± SE) in alligator stomach contents among Lakes Griffin, Apopka, and Woodruff during 2001–2003. 2007 A.N. Rice, J.P. Ross, A.R. Woodward, D.A. Carbonneau, and H.F. Percival 103 observed no evidence of fresh alligators in stomachs. Alligator eggshells were found in 2 Lake Griffin alligator samples (one female and one male alligator) and in one sample from a female alligator on Lake Woodruff. Alligator-condition scores (K) for all Lake Griffin alligators ranged from 1.63 to 3.70 (mean = 2.66 ± 0.045), while K for all Lake Apopka alligators ranged from 2.15 to 4.13 (mean = 2.99 ± 0.059), and the K for all Lake Woodruff alligators ranged from 1.86 to 3.08 (mean = 2.48 ± 0.041) (Fig. 3). The condition of alligators differed among lakes (P < 0.001). Impaired alligator samples Thirteen stomach samples from impaired alligators were collected from Lake Griffin during 2001 and they exhibited some similarities and some differences to normal Lake Griffin alligator diets. Eight of the 13 samples contained only old prey, and most (6) were almost completely empty. The proportion of stomach samples containing old prey (62%) was higher than that of normal Lake Griffin samples (26%) (Rice 2004). Fresh prey identified in these samples included fish, reptiles, and invertebrates, similar to samples from normal alligators. Two of the 5 samples containing fresh prey contained multiple specimens of D. cepedianum, and 7 of the 8 samples containing old prey contained prey remains that could not be identified beyond fish. Table 2. Lake Griffin alligator stomach content samples by year showing the proportion of fish consumed and the proportion of shad in alligator diets during 2001–2003. Note that 8 out of 10 shad in 2001 were identified as D. cepedianum, and that the one shad found in all the 2003 samples was not considered fresh, and therefore no biomass estimations were made. Total # Total fish % Fish % Shad Year samples biomass (g) biomass (g) biomass # Shad biomass 2001 24 12,312.4 7875.2 64 10 38 2002 42 18,568.4 7998.1 43 0 0 2003 19 6566.7 4436.2 68 1 0 All years 85 37,447.5 20,309.5 54 11 12 Table 3. Lake Griffin alligator fish consumption by year and family, including minimum number of individuals (MNI) identified and estimated mass in grams of fresh fish consumed during 2001–2003. 2001 2002 2003 MNI Mass (g) MNI Mass (g) MNI Mass (g) Total fish 22 7875 24 7998 9 4436 Ictaluridae 6 2044 13 4620 5 2389 Clupeidae 10 4618 0 0 0 0 Lepisosteidae 2 1003 2 2075 2 1411 Centrarchidae 1 150 4 183.1 1 635 Poeciliidae 2 0.2 1 0.4 0 0 Cyprinodontidae 0 0 2 8.6 1 1.2 Cichlidae 0 0 1 700 0 0 Amiidae 0 0 1 411 0 0 Unidentified fish 1 60 0 0 0 0 104 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 1 Discussion This study confirmed previous studies indicating alligators are opportunistic carnivores that consume a variety of prey (Chabreck 1972, Delany and Abercrombie 1986). Fish were the dominant prey group for alligators in all three lakes in this study; however, the species of fish consumed differed among lakes. This may be due more to habitat differences that support a different composition of fish species rather than dietary preference. Our hypothesis that alligator mortality on Lake Griffin was due solely to a diet high in D. cepedianum with high levels of thiaminase causing depressed levels of thiamin in alligators was not supported by this study. Lake Griffin alligators did have depressed thiamin levels and were consuming a large proportion of shad that had high levels of thiaminase in 2001 (Ross et al. 2003). The drop in morality at Lake Griffin coincidental with the shift in diet away from shad to catfish (Ichtaluridae) does support the hypothesis, but Lake Apooka data does not support it. In addition, Lake Apopka alligators consistently ate large quantities of shad, also containing high levels of thiaminase (Ross et al. 2003), throughout the study, but there was no unusual adult mortality occurring on Lake Apopka. The drop in consumption of shad in Lake Griffin alligator diets after 2001 was most likely due to shad removal by the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). Just prior to Spring 2002 alligator sampling, almost 500,000 kg of D. cepedianum and an estimated 12,000 kg of Lepisosteus spp. (Gar) were removed from Lake Griffin as part of lake restoration and management efforts to reduce phosphorus levels (Walt Godwin, St. Johns River Water Figure 3. Mean condition (± SE) of alligators from Lakes Griffin, Apopka, and Woodruff during 2001–2003. 2007 A.N. Rice, J.P. Ross, A.R. Woodward, D.A. Carbonneau, and H.F. Percival 105 Management District, Palatka, FL. unpubl. data). Shad removal likely altered fish populations and certainly changed size distributions of shad in the lake and thus,their availability to alligators. Shad netting efforts ceased in February 2003 due to absence of large shad in the catch. Alligator mortality on Lake Griffin was unusually high compared to other Florida lakes from 1999 through 2001 (Fig. 1—note that this figure includes only Lake Griffin data); however, by 2003, the number of alligators dying was not very different from typical mortality levels (D.A. Carbonneau, pers. comm.). Several factors in and around Lake Griffin occurred in 2002 that could have affected this decrease in alligator mortality: water levels rose sharply in early 2002 after heavy winter rains in 2001, the marsh flow-way restoration system was reactivated, large quantities of shad and gar were removed, and water quality improved as indicated by reduced chlorophyll levels (Rice 2004). Whether alligator mortality was linked to these events is uncertain. However, a significant change in the species composition in alligator diets coincided with these events. Alligator condition can be affected by diet, prey density, alligator density, habitat, ambient temperatures, or other factors (Delany et al. 1999, Taylor 1979, Zweig 2003). Alligator condition in this study was different among lakes, and Lake Griffin alligator condition ranged between the condition of alligator on Lakes Apopka and Woodruff and appeared to be a healthy size. Insufficient measurements were taken during 2001 to compare the condition of impaired and normal alligators from Lake Griffin. However, impaired Lake Griffin alligators did not appear to be thinner or have a lower condition than normal Lake Griffin alligators. Thiamin deficiency in crocodilian farms has occurred; however, little has been mentioned on how or if this deficiency affects body condition. Huchzermeyer (2003) described thiamin deficiency in crocodilians, but does not mention if body condition was affected. Jubb (1992) reported on thiamine deficiency in hatchling Crocodylus porosus Schneider (Saltwater Crocodile) and mentioned that hatchlings affected by thiamine deficiency were the largest in their clutch group. We did not see evidence of poor body condition in impaired or normal Lake Griffin alligators, and it may be that this deficiency caused a rapid onset of impairments that did not affect their condition. Lake Griffin alligators did have depressed thiamin levels and did consume D. cepedianum with high levels of thiaminase; however the combination of Lake Griffin alligators consuming less shad, the shad removal, and improving water quality all may have contributed to the number of impaired and dead Lake Griffin alligators observed and recorded by researchers decreasing after 2001. In addition, shad in Lake Apopka also had high levels of thiaminase (Ross et al. 2003), and Lake Apopka alligators were consuming greater amounts of D. cepedianum relative to Lake Griffin without showing mortality rates similar to Lake Griffin alligators (Appendix 1). An unknown factor that we did not detect in Lake Griffin may have contributed to the alligator mortality, and this unknown factor was not affecting Lake Apopka and therefore did not affect the alligators there. As of 2004, alligator mortality on Lake Griffin has returned to levels observed prior to the mortality event. 106 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 1 Acknowledgments Arnold Brunnell, John White, Chris Visscher, and Jason Williams, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, provided essential field assistance. Field and lab technicians Chris Tubbs, Tony Reppas, Esther Langan, Jeremy Olson, Chad Rischar, and Patricia Gomez were indispensable. The Florida Museum of Natural History’s (FLMNH) ornithology, mammology, ichthyology, herpetology, and zoo archaeology collection managers and their reference collections were invaluable with species identification. Christina Ugarte and Hardin Waddle provided valuable comments on this manuscript. The St. Johns River Water Management District (Contract SF624AA), Lake County Water Authority, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Museum of Natural History, and the Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit provided funding, facilities, and/or equipment. Access to Lake Woodruff was provided by permit, and this research was approved by the University of Florida IACUC. Literature Cited Barr, B.R. 1994. Dietary studies on the American Alligator, Alligator mississippiensis, in southern Florida. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Miami. Coral Gables, FL. 73 pp. Barr, B.R. 1997. Food habits of the American Alligator, Alligator mississippiensis, in the southern Everglades. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Miami. Coral Gables, FL. 243 pp. Brown, J.H., and G.B. West (Eds.). 2000. Scaling in Biology. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 352 pp. Burt, W.H., and R.P. Grossenheider. 1980. Peterson Field Guide: Mammals, 3rd Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, NY. 289 pp. Canfield, D.E., Jr., R.W. Bachmann, and M.V. Hoyer. 2000. A management alternative for Lake Apopka. Lake and Reservoir Management 16:205–221. Casteel, R.W. 1974. A method for estimation of live weight of fish from the size of skeletal remains. American Antiquity 39:94–97. Chabreck, R.H. 1972. The foods and feeding habits of alligators from fresh and saline environments in Louisiana. Proceedings Annual Conference of Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commission 25:117–124. Delany, M.F., and C.L. Abercrombie. 1986. American Alligator food habits in northcentral Florida. Journal of Wildlife Management 50:348–353. Delany, M.F, A.R. Woodward, and I.H. Kockel. 1988. Nuisance alligator food habits in Florida. Florida Field Naturalist 16:86–90. Delany, M.F, S.B. Linda, and C.T. Moore. 1999. Diet and condition of American Alligators in 4 Florida Lakes. Proceedings Annual Conference of Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 53:375–389. Dunning, J.B., Jr., 1993. CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses. CRC Press, Inc, Boca Raton, FL. 371 pp. Fernald, E.A., and E.D. Purdum. 1998. Water Resources Atlas of Florida. Institute of Science and Public Affairs, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL. 309 pp. Fitzgerald, L.A. 1989. An evaluation of stomach-flushing techniques for crocodilians. Journal of Herpetology 23:170–172. Garnett, S.T. 1985. The consequences of slow chitin digestion on crocodile diet analysis. Journal of Herpetology 19:303–304. Green, A.J. 2001. Mass/length residuals: Measures of body condition or generators of spurious results? Ecology 82:1473–1483. 2007 A.N. Rice, J.P. Ross, A.R. Woodward, D.A. Carbonneau, and H.F. Percival 107 Heinz, G.H., H.F. Percival, and M.L. Jennings. 1991. Contaminants in American Alligator eggs from lakes Apopka, Griffin, and Okeechobee, Florida. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 16:277–285. Honeyfield, D.C., S.B. Brown, J.D. Fitzsimons, and D.E. Tillitt. 2005. Early mortality syndrome in Great Lakes Salmonines. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 17:1–3. Hoyer, M.V., and D.E. Canfield, Jr. 1994. Handbook of Common Freshwater Fish in Florida Lakes. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, FL. 178 pp. Huchzermeyer, F.W. 2003. Crocodiles Biology, Husbandry, and Disease. CAB Publishing, Cambridge, MA. 337 pp. Janes, D., and W.H.N. Gutzke. 2002. Factors affecting retention time of turtle scutes in stomachs of American Alligators, Alligator mississippiensis. American Midland Naturalist 148:115–119. Jubb, T.F. 1992. A thiamine responsive nervous disease in Saltwater Crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus). Veterinary Record 131:347–348. Magnusson, W.E., E.V. da Silva, and A.P. Lima. 1987. Diets of Amazonian crocodilians. Journal of Herpetology 21:85–95. Reitz, E.J., I.R. Quitmyer, H.S. Hale, S.J. Scudder, and E.S. Wing. 1987. Application of allometry to zooarchaeology. American Antiquity 52:304–317. Rice, A.N. 2004. Diet and condition of American Alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) in three central Florida lakes. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 89 pp. Rice, A.N., J.P. Ross, A.G. Finger, and R. Owen. 2005. Application and evaluation of a stomach flushing technique for alligators. Herpetological Review 36:400–401. Ross, J.P., D. Carbonneau, S. Terrell, T. Schoeb, D. Honeyfield, J. Hinterkopf, A. Finger, and R. Owen. 2002. Continuing studies of mortality of alligators on central Florida lakes: Pathology and nutrition. Final Report to St. Johns River Water Management District, Technical report series SJ2002-SP6: 34 pp. and 8 annexes. Available online at techpubs/pdfs/SP/SJ2002-SP6.pdf. Accessed January 2005 Ross, J.P., A.N. Rice, D. Carbonneau, and D. Honeyfield. 2003. Assessment of effects of diet and thiamin on Lake Griffin alligator mortality. Final report to St. Johns River Water Management District, Technical report series SJ2003-SP2: 36 pp. and 6 annexes. Available online at pubs/techpubs/pdfs/SP/SJ2003-SP2.pdf. Accessed January 2005 Schoeb, T.R., T.G. Heaton-Jones, R.M. Clemmons, D.A. Carbonneau, A.R. Woodward, D. Shelton, and R.H. Poppenga. 2002. Clinical and necropsy findings associated with increased mortality among American Alligators of Lake Griffin, Florida. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 38:320–337. SPSS Inc., 2000. SPSS base 11.0 for Windows User’s Guide. SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL. Sutton, S.G., T.P. Bult, and R.L. Haedrich. 2000. Relationships among fat weight, body weight, water weight, and condition factors in wild Atlantic salmon parr. American Fisheries Society 129:527–538. Taylor, J.A. 1979. The foods and feeding habits of subadult Crocodylus porosus Schneider in northern Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 6:347–359. Tillitt, D.E., J.L. Zajicek, S.B. Brown, L.R. Brown, J.D. Fitzsimons, D.C. Honeyfield, M.E. Holey, and G.M. Wright. 2005. Tiamine and thiaminase status in forage fish of salmonines from Lake Michigan. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 17:13–25. Woodward, A.R., H.F. Percival, M.L. Jennings, and C.T. Moore. 1993. Low clutch viability of American Alligators on Lake Apopka. Florida Scientist 56:42–64. Zweig, C.L. 2003. Body condition index analysis for the American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). M.Sc. Thesis. University Florida, Gainesville, FL. 49 pp. 108 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 1 Appendix 1. Fresh prey identified in alligator stomach samples including the numbers identified, estimated mass, and percent composition by live mass for Lakes Griffin, Apopka, and Woodruff, FL during 2001–2003. The only vertebrate species identified to species level, but not considered fresh were Alligator mississippiensis (American Alligator), Kinosternon subrubrum Lacépède (Florida Mud Turtle), and Gallinula chloropus/Fulica americana L. (Common Moorhen/American Coot). Lake Griffin Lake Apopka Lake Woodruff Mass Mass Mass Prey ng % ng% ng% Fish Shad, Dorosoma spp.Rafinesque 2 1322 3.5 42 3854 21.8 Gizzard shad, Dorosoma cepedianum Lesueur 8 3296 8.8 10 3210 18.1 4 1830 11 Centrarchidae 3 103.1 0.3 6 503 3 Sunfish, Lepomis spp. Rafinesque 1 80 0.2 5 351 2 Warmouth L. gulosus Cuvie in Curvier and Valenciennes 1 144 1 Redear sunfish, L. microlophus Günther 3 257 2 Spotted sunfish, L. punctatus Valenciennes in Cuvier and Valenciennes 1 136 1 Black crappie, Pomoxis nigromaculatusLesueur in Cuvier and Valenciennes 2 785 2.1 1 253 1.4 1 80 0.5 Largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides Lacepède 1 2696 26.4 Bluegill, Lepomis Macrochirus Rafinesque 4 26 0.1 Gar, Lepisosteus spp. Lacepède 6 4489 12 2 2826 16 1 424 3 Catfish, Ameiurus spp. Rafinesque 11 3890 10.4 7 1387 7.8 3 1600 10 Brown bullhead, A. nebulosus Lesueur 11 4586 12.2 2 701 4 Yellow bullhead, A. natalis Lesueur 2 577 1.5 Mosquito fish, Gambusia holbrooki Girard 2 0.2 0.001 Cichlidae 1 200 1.1 Tilapia, Oreochromis spp.Günther 1 700 1.9 8 3378 19.1 Bowfin, Amia calva Linnaeus 1 411 1.1 1 1763 11 Sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna Lesueur 1 0.4 0.001 Killifish, Fundulus spp. Lacepède 2 8.6 0.02 Lake Eustis pupfish, Cyprinodon variegatus hubbsi Lacepède 1 1.2 0.003 Golden shiner, Notemigonus crysoleucas Mitchill 1340.2 Needlefish, Strongylura marina Walbaum 21821 2007 A.N. Rice, J.P. Ross, A.R. Woodward, D.A. Carbonneau, and H.F. Percival 109 Lake Griffin Lake Apopka Lake Woodruff Mass Mass Mass Prey ng % ng% ng% Catfish, Pterygoplichthys spp. Gill 1 250 2 Undetermined Fish species 1 60 0.2 Total fish 55 20,309.5 54.2 78 15,869 90 30 10,216 80 Birds Anhinga, Anhinga anhinga Linnaeus 1 1235 3.3 1 1235 7 Double Crested Cormorant, Phalacrocorax auritus Lesson 2 3628 9.7 White Ibis, Eudocimus albus Linnaeus 1 900 2.4 Total birds 4 5763 15.4 1 1235 7 0 0 0 Reptiles Kinosternidae 1 105 0.3 Stinkpot Turtle, Sternotherus odoratus Latreille in Sonnini and Latreille 6 385 1.0 1 35 0.2 1 108 0.6 Loggerhead Musk Turtle, Sternotherus minor Agassiz 2 150 0.4 Redbelly Turtle, Pseudemys nelsoni Carr 1 1148 3.1 Turtle, Pseudemys spp. Gray 1 13 0.03 Gopher Tortoise, Gopherus polyphemus Daudin 1 582 1.6 1 113 0.6 Florida Softshell Turtle, Apalone ferox Schneider 1 386 1.0 Cottonmouth, Agkistrodon piscivorus Lacépède 1 686 1.8 Brown Water Snake, Nerodia taxispilota Holbrook 1 300 0.8 Mud Snake, Farancia abacura Holbrook 1100.1 Total reptiles 15 3755 10.0 3 158 1 1 108 0.6 Mammals Cotton mouse, Peromyscus gossypinus LeConte 1400.2 Eastern wood rat, Neotoma floridana Ord 1 291 1.6 Hispid cotton rat, Sigmodon hispidus Say and Ord 1 155 0.4 Raccoon, Procyon lotor Linnaeus 1 4705 12.6 Round-tailed muscrat, Neofiber alleni True 1 289 1.8 Total mammals 2 4860 13.0 2 331 2 1 289 1.8 110 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 1 Lake Griffin Lake Apopka Lake Woodruff Mass Mass Mass Prey n g % n g % n g % Amphibians Greater Siren, Siren lacertina Linnaeus 1 387 1 2 1325 8.2 Two-toed Amphiuma, Amphiuma means Garden in Smith 1 287 0.8 Frog, Rana spp. 3 700.4 1.9 Total amphibians 5 1374.4 3.7 0 0 0 2 1325 8.2 Gastropods Apple snails, Pomacea paludosa Say 64 1321.9 4.0 3 68 0.4 30 694.1 4.3 Total gastropods 64 1321.9 4.0 10 69 0.4 32 695.4 4.4 All other invertebrates combined 224 127.4 0.32 41 87.2 0.558 40 172.3 1.04