2007 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 6(4):743–751
Feeding Habits and Mouth Morphology of Young
Silver Perch (Bairdiella chrysoura) from the North-Central
Gulf of Mexico
Gretchen L. Waggy1,2,*, Mark S. Peterson1, and Bruce H. Comyns1
Abstract - We examined predator-prey relationships of young Bairdiella chrysoura
(Silver Perch) collected in Mississippi Sound by comparing the diet to fish standard
length (2.5–30.0 mm SL) and mouth width (MW). Silver Perch displayed a diel
feeding pattern, with the most active feeding occurring from midnight until noon.
As Silver Perch SL increased, prey number, frequency, and volume plus prey width
increased. Calanoid copepods and mysid shrimp were the dominant prey, with
mysids becoming prominent as Silver Perch SL increased. Cluster analysis supported
this pattern as Silver Perch ≤5 mm SL consumed a homogenous material and
a few copepods, fish 5–10 mm SL preyed upon calanoid copepods, and then fish in
larger size classes shifted their diet to mysid shrimp as MW increased and fish became
more robust. Silver Perch SL was linearly related to MW (MW = 0.097 [SL] +
0.245; r2 = 0.891).
Bairdiella chrysoura Lacepède, (Silver Perch) is a numerically abundant
estuarine resident fish that is ecologically important because it is prey for
a great number of economically important predators (Danker 1979, Darnell
1958, Hildebrand and Cable 1930) and also forages on a wide array of species
within the estuarine food web (Brooks 1985, Carr and Adams 1973,
Chao and Musick 1977, Darnell 1958). They are predators that shift habitat,
grow, and mature throughout their life history (Geary et al. 2001, Mok and
Gilmore 1983, Peterson and Ross 1991, Rooker et al. 1998), and appear to
consume larger, more energetically beneficial prey as they increase in size.
However, feeding data are available mainly for fish >30 mm SL, and typically
in the studies, diets are presented as coarsely pooled categories across
multiple size classes. Finally, studies present no relationships between diet,
mouth size, and prey size in small size classes where marked changes in
these morphometrics occur. Therefore, this study focused on larvae and
young juvenile Silver Perch in size-class increments of 5 mm SL in order to
elucidate ontogenetic shifts in feeding habits, mouth morphology, and preysize
spectra. The objectives of this study were to 1) examine ontogenetic
changes in feeding habits of larvae and young juvenile (≤30 mm SL) Silver
Perch in spring and summer, and 2) relate prey species and their body-width
distribution to Silver Perch size-specific mouth morphology.
1Department of Coastal Sciences, The University of Southern Mississippi, 703 East
Beach Drive, Ocean Springs, MS 39564. 2Current address - Grand Bay National
Estuarine Research Reserve, 6005 Bayou Herron Road, Moss Point, MS 39562.
*Corresponding author - email@example.com.
744 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 4
Methods and Materials
Stomach contents were examined from young juvenile Silver Perch captured
in July 2002 along the marsh edge in Mississippi Sound, and Silver
Perch larvae (≤5 mm body length [BL]) were collected from the plankton in
Mississippi Sound in April 2003. Young larvae were collected with a 330-
μm plankton net, whereas older larvae and young juveniles were collected
with a 1.83-m Beam Plankton Trawl (0.8-mm outer mesh and a 505-μm cod
end). Larvae and juvenile fish were preserved in 95% ethanol, and larvae
were measured for BL, whereas juveniles were measured for total (TL) and
standard (SL) length (mm), and all were weighed (± 0.001 g). We recognize
that the diet of the two stages of Silver Perch may incorporate annual
variation in prey availability with our interest in body-size diet variation;
however, the potential difference in prey availability between years was
probably minimal and likely added no more variation to the diet than collecting
fish in different locations given the patchy nature of zooplankton in
estuarine systems (Steen 1981).
Stomachs were removed from fish ≤30 mm SL, and the contents
were separated, identified to the lowest taxon possible, and counted, the
% frequency was calculated, and the % volume of each prey item measured
with a squash plate of known depth (Snyder and Peterson 1999).
The squash plate was calibrated with a glycerin-alcohol solution prior
to measurements, and the squash area was calculated with a digital camera
attached to a dissecting microscope. The image was transported into
MetaVue™ 5.0 (Universal Imaging Corporation), and the squash outline
was traced until two areas (mm2) came within 0.1 mm2 of each other. The
mean was calculated and multiplied by the depth of the squash plate to
calculate the volume (mm3) of the squashed prey.
Prey body widths (BW; ± 0.01 mm) of the common prey were measured
with an ocular micrometer. The mouth width (MW; ± 0.05 mm) of each fish
was measured as the distance between the outer maxillary edges directly
beneath the eyes (Lawrence 1958), which is a good estimate of the distance
between the cleithral bones, the true limiting factor associated with prey
consumption (Peterson and VanderKooy 1996).
Ontogenetic changes in diet and prey BW were examined by comparing
the primary food item(s) to the individual’s SL and MW. The fish examined
ranged from 2.5 to 30 mm SL, and were separated into six 5-mm SL size
classes: 1.01–5.0 mm, 5.01–10.0 mm, 10.01–15.0 mm, 15.01–20.0 mm,
20.01–25.0 mm, and 25.01–30.0 mm (n = 15 for each size class except the
largest which contained 10). Additionally, time of the most active feeding
was estimated by collecting ten or more fish ≤30 mm SL every four hours
for 24 h from multiple marsh-edge habitat types, and determining stomach
fullness, as a ratio of stomach weight (± 0.001 g) to body weight (± 0.001 g),
from each time period (Keast and Welsh 1968).
2007 G.L. Waggy, M.S. Peterson, and B.H. Comyns 745
Cumulative prey curves were constructed for each of the six size classes
to determine if the sample size was sufficient to describe the diet. Cluster
analysis based on a hierarchical agglomerative method with the group-average
linkage procedure was used to compare percent volume of prey among
size classes of Silver Perch with the Bray-Curtis similarity coefficient. The
cluster analysis based on Bray-Curtis values was computed using PRIMER
(PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth, UK); these values range from 0–100%, with 0%
being no similarity and 100% being identical (Clark and Warwick 2001).
Linear regression was used to compare fish size (mm SL) to prey volume
(mm3) or mean prey body width (mm) or fish mouth width (mm), and if the
assumptions were not met, we log10 transformed the data prior to analysis.
SPSS 11.5 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used to conduct all statistical tests,
and all results were considered significant if p < 0.05.
Cumulative prey curves reached an asymptote in each of the six size
classes between 4 and 12 individuals, indicating that the sample size we used
was sufficient to describe the diet (Waggy 2004). Stomach-fullness ratios
of Silver Perch ranging from 9.4 to 29.6 mm SL were highest at 24:00 and
lowest at 20:00. The most-active feeding was at night through the morning
(24:00–12:00), tapering off into the afternoon and evening (Fig. 1).
Fifteen prey taxa were identified in the diet of Silver Perch <30 mm SL
(Table 1), with copepods and mysids being the most frequently consumed.
A homogenous material (a dense, granular, translucent substance) was
present in all stomachs of all fish in the smallest size class (1.1–5.0 mm
SL). Furthermore, 46.7% of the larvae approaching 5 mm SL (upper end of
size class) had also consumed copepods. The second size class (5.1–10.0
mm SL) ate mostly copepods, with mysid shrimp becoming a chief prey
item in the larger size classes. Generally, as Silver Perch SL increased,
prey composition changed (Table 1) and both prey volume and BW increased
(Fig. 2). Calanoid copepods and mysid shrimp were the dominant
prey, with mysids becoming more prominent as SL increased. Calanoid
copepods (r2 = 0.318, p < 0.001, N = 71) and mysid shrimp (r2 = 0.563, p
< 0.001, N = 47) both significantly increased in volume (both log10 transformed)
as fish SL increased (Fig. 2A). In contrast, BW did not increase
significantly with SL for calanoid copepods (r2 = 0.145, p > 0.05, N = 21),
but did increase significantly with SL for mysid shrimp (r2 = 0.231, p <
0.001, N = 30) (Fig. 2B, both log10 transformed).
Silver Perch SL was linearly related to mouth width (MW = 0.097 [SL] +
0.245; r2 = 0.891, p < 0.001, N = 85), which enabled prey of greater BW to
be eaten (Fig. 2). The majority of prey with BWs <0.4 mm were copepods,
whereas mysids had BWs >0.6 mm (Fig. 3). The mean MW for size classes
746 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 4
Figure 1. Plot of
ratio (± 1
SE) over a 24-hr
period to determine
pattern of young
Silver Perch. The
ratio is stomach
weight (g) divided
body weight (g).
Table 1. Prey frequency of occurrence (%) for each size class of Silver Perch.
Size classes (mm)
1.1–5.0 5.1–10.0 10.1–15.0 15.1–20.0 20.1–25.0 25.1–30.0
Prey Category (N = 15) (N = 15) (N = 15) (N = 15) (N = 15) (N = 10)
Calanoida 46.7 100.0 73.3 100.0 100.0 90.0
Cyclopoida 13.3 20.0 20.0 20.0
Parasitic copepod 10.0
Bopyridae 13.3 6.7 6.7 10.0
Gammaridae 6.7 20.0
Unidentified amphipod 13.3
Mysida 20.0 73.3 80.0 93.3 70.0
Unidentified Shrimp 13.3
Crab megalopae 13.3
Grapsidae megalopae 6.7 6.7 6.7
Caridean shrimp zoea 6.7 10
Bivalvia 6.7 6.7
Mollusc siphon 6.7
Homogenous material 100.0
Amorphous debris 13.3 26.7 46.7 26.7 40.0
2007 G.L. Waggy, M.S. Peterson, and B.H. Comyns 747
1 (1.1–5.0 mm), 2 (5.0–10.1 mm), and 3 (10.1–15.0 mm) were 0.45, 1.10,
and 1.58 mm, respectively (Fig. 3). These MW differences coincided with
Figure 2. Plot
of volume (A)
and mean prey
body width (B)
of calanoid copepods
shrimp (± 1 S.E.)
compared to Silver
class. Data and
least squares regression
presented in nontransformed
748 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 4
the shift in diet from a homogenous material and a few copepods in size
class 1 to solely calanoid copepods to mysid shrimp as a major portion of
the diet (Table 1, Fig. 3). A cluster analysis on prey volume also indicated
ontogenetic feeding shifts at about 5 mm and 10 mm SL (Fig. 4). It also indicated
size classes 3 and 4 were most similar in relation to percent volume
of prey (73.74%). Size class 5 ranked next in similarity (65.08%), followed
by 6 (62.34%) and 2 (46.89%). Size class 1 (16.23%) was the least similar
to the other size classes.
Silver Perch in the Mississippi Sound were most actively feeding at
night and into the morning hours and exhibited ontogenetic diet shifts.
These occurred in Silver Perch first at ≤5 mm SL, and then around 10
mm SL, with a shift from larval feeding to a stage of juvenile feeding.
Figure 3. Prey body width (mm) in relation to predator mouth width (mm) with 1:1
line that has been adjusted to axis scale. Prey items: = Calanoida, = Mysida,
= Cyclopoida, = other prey; also displayed is the mean mouth width for size class
1 (0.45 mm), 2 (1.10 mm), and 3 (1.58 mm) Silver Perch.
2007 G.L. Waggy, M.S. Peterson, and B.H. Comyns 749
At this size, mysids became more prominent within the diet, and prey
BW increased along with the volume of a prey consumed. The first shift
illustrated the rather abrupt change in diet in fish approaching 4–5 mm SL
from homogenous material with a few copepods. This shift was followed
by another ontogenetic shift coinciding with an increase in the mean MW
between size classes 5.1–10.0 and 10.1–15.0 mm SL, and was evidenced
by mysids appearing in the diet. Several other studies that used wider
size-class intervals reported a dietary shift in Silver Perch from copepods
and few mysids to a diet of mysids, caridean shrimp, and penaeid shrimp
around 50 mm SL (Brooks 1985, Carr and Adams1973, Darnell 1958).
Another dietary shift was reported to occur around 70 mm SL, with fish
becoming an important component (Carr and Adams 1973, Chao and Musick
1977, Dietz 1976). Because we only examined individuals up to 30
mm SL, these ontogenetic dietary shifts had not yet occurred. However,
the increasing importance of mysids in the diet of Silver Perch >15.0 mm
SL precedes these ontogenetic shifts seen in the larger size classes.
According to optimal foraging theory, a predator utilizes available prey
in the most energy efficient manner possible (Pyke et al. 1977). Silver Perch
between 5.1 and 10.0 mm SL primarily preyed upon calanoid copepods and
then shifted toward mysid shrimp in larger size classes (i.e., MW increased
and fish became more robust). As Silver Perch become larger, more energy is
needed for general survival activities (Brooks 1985). Mysids likely become
increasingly more important in the diet because an average-sized mysid
shrimp provides 26 times more energy than an average-sized calanoid copepod
(Thayer et al. 1974). Unless calanoid copepods are extremely abundant,
Figure 4. Percent similarity (Bray-Curtis) dendrogram based on a hierarchical agglomerative
method with the group-average linkage cluster analysis comparing prey
volume (mm3) to Silver Perch size class (mm SL).
750 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 6, No. 4
the same volume of copepods equal to one mysid would still be less energy
efficient due to prey-handling time.
In conclusion, we found that young juvenile Silver Perch fed primarily
on copepods with an ontogenetic shift toward mysid shrimp in fish larger
than 10 mm SL. These small Silver Perch are preyed upon by larger predators
and become one of the pathways in the estuarine energy flow. Because
Silver Perch are very abundant and are important in estuarine systems at
lower trophic levels, they need to be examined as closely as some of the
more commercial species.
This paper is a result of a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for a Master of
Science degree from The University of Southern Mississippi by G.L. Waggy. Nancy
Brown-Peterson made valuable comments as a committee member on an earlier version.
Partial funding was provided by the Lytle Coastal Sciences Scholarship. We
thank B. Lezina and P. Grammer for field and laboratory assistance.
Brooks, H.A. 1985. Energy utilization model for Silver Perch, Bairdiella chrysoura.
Ph.D. Dissertation. The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA. 147 pp.
Carr, W.E.S., and C.A. Adams. 1973. Food habits of juvenile marine fishes occupying
seagrass beds in the estuarine zone near Crystal River, Florida. Transactions
of the American Fisheries Society 102:511–540.
Chao, L.N., and J.A. Musick. 1977. Life history, feeding habits, and functional morphology
of juvenile sciaenid fishes in the York River Estuary, Virginia. Fishery
Clark, K.R., and R.M. Warwick. 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach
to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd Edition. PRIMER-E, Plymouth,
Danker, S.A. 1979. A food-habit study of the Spotted Seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus)
in Mississippi Sound and adjacent areas. M.Sc. Thesis. Mississippi State
University, Starkville. MS. 45 pp.
Darnell, R.M. 1958. Food habits of fishes and larger invertebrates of Lake Pontchartrain,
Louisiana, an estuarine community. Publication of the Institute of Marine
Science, University of Texas 5:353–416.
Dietz, R.A. 1976. Food and feeding habits of Cynoscion arenarius (Ginsburg),
Cynoscion nebulosus (Cuvier), and Bairdiella chrysoura (Lacepede) (Pisces:
Sciaenidae) in the Anclote Anchorage, Tarpon Springs, Florida. M.Sc. Thesis.
University of South Florida, Tampa, FL. 83 pp.
Geary, B.W., J.R. Rooker, and J.W. Webb. 2001. Utilization of saltmarsh shorelines
by newly settled sciaenids in a Texas estuary. Gulf and Caribbean Research
Hildebrand, S.F., and L.E. Cable. 1930. Development and life history of fourteen
teleostean fishes of Beaufort, North Carolina. Bulletin of the US Bureau of Fisheries
Keast, A., and L. Welsh. 1968. Daily feeding periodicities, food uptake rates, and
dietary changes with hour of day in some lake fishes. Journal of the Fisheries
Research Board of Canada 25:1133–1144.
2007 G.L. Waggy, M.S. Peterson, and B.H. Comyns 751
Lawerence, J.M. 1958. Estimated sizes of various forage fishes Largemouth Bass can
swallow. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the S.E. Association of Game
and Fish Commission 11:220–225.
Mok, H., and R.G. Gilmore, Jr. 1983. Analysis of sound production in estuarine aggregations
of Pogonias cromis, Bairdiella chrysoura, and Cynoscion nebulosus
(Sciaenidae). Bulletin of the Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica 22:157–186.
Peterson, M.S., and S.T. Ross. 1991. Dynamics of littoral fishes and decapods
along a coastal river-estuarine gradient. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science
Peterson, M.S., and S.J. VanderKooy. 1996. Preservation-induced changes in morphometrics
of fishes: Influence on prey size-choice in juvenile Walleye, Stizostedion
vitreum (Mitchill). Ecology of Freshwater Fish 5:133–139.
Pyke, G.H., H.R. Pulliam, and E.L. Charnov. 1977. Optimal foraging: A selective review
of theory and tests. Quarterly Review of Biology. 52:137–154.
Rooker, J.R., S.A. Holt, M.A. Soto, and G.J. Holt. 1998. Post-settlement patterns
of habitat use by sciaenid fishes in subtropical seagrass meadows. Estuaries
Snyder, D.J., and M.S. Peterson. 1999. Foraging and prey selection by Bluespotted
Sunfish Enneacanthus gloriosus (Holbrook) in backwater, vegetated ponds in
coastal Mississippi. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 14:187–196.
Steen, J.P. 1981. Spatial and temporal distributions of zooplankton in a low salinity
Mississippi bayou system. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Mississippi,
Oxford, MS. 183 pp.
Thayer, G.W., D.E. Hoss, M.A. Kjelson, W.F. Hettler, Jr., and M.W. LaCroix. 1974.
Biomass of zooplankton in the Newport River estuary and the influence of postlarval
fishes. Chesapeake Science 15:9–16.
Waggy, G.L. 2004. Life history of Silver Perch, Bairdiella chrysoura, from the northcentral
Gulf of Mexico. M.Sc. Thesis. The University of Southern Mississippi,
Hattiesburg, MS. 74 pp.