Aspects of the Ecology of the Earth Snakes (Virginia
valeriae and V. striatula) in the Upper Coastal Plain
Brian D. Todd, John D. Willson, Christopher T. Winne,
and J. Whitfield Gibbons
Southeastern Naturalist, Volume 7, Number 2 (2008): 349–358
Full-text pdf (Accessible only to subscribers.To subscribe click here.)
Site by Bennett Web & Design Co.
2008 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 7(2):349–358
Aspects of the Ecology of the Earth Snakes (Virginia
valeriae and V. striatula) in the Upper Coastal Plain
Brian D. Todd1,*, John D. Willson1, Christopher T. Winne1,
and J. Whitfield Gibbons1
Abstract - Relatively little is known about the ecology and population biology of
Virginia striatula (Rough Earth Snake) and Virginia valeriae (Smooth Earth Snake),
especially in the southeastern portion of their geographic ranges. We studied populations
of the two species on the Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, SC from 1971
to 2007. We found sexual size dimorphism in both species, in which females were
longer and heavier than males, but had relatively shorter tails. Overall, Rough Earth
Snakes were longer and heavier than Smooth Earth Snakes, but maximum sizes of
both species were smaller on the SRS than at other localities from which data are
reported. Additionally, all gravid female Smooth Earth Snakes that we captured on
the SRS were smaller than their reported size at sexual maturity from other parts of
their range. Seasonal activity of Smooth Earth Snakes peaked in May and October,
but both Smooth Earth Snakes and Rough Earth Snakes were frequently captured
during all warm months. Distinct age classes in the two species were not readily apparent
other than several neonates that we captured. We strongly encourage future
studies to determine growth rates, longevity, and minimum size at sexual maturity of
earth snakes in the Southeast.
Recent reports of global amphibian and reptile declines have highlighted
the contribution of herpetofauna to regional biodiversity and have prompted
increased investigation of the functional role of amphibians and reptiles in
ecosystems. Although the secretive nature of snakes often makes population
estimation difficult (Parker and Plummer 1987), studies have shown that
snakes may reach high densities, playing important roles as both predators
and prey. For example, Godley (1980) found that Regina alleni (Garman)
(Striped Crayfish Snake) and Seminatrix pygaea (Cope) (Black Swamp
Snake) exist at high densities (1200 individuals/ha) in Florida Eichhornia
crassipes (Mart.) Solms (water hyacinth) communities and estimated that
juvenile Striped Crayfish Snakes consume >90% of aquatic odonate larvae
annually in that ecosystem. For uncommon or secretive snake species, even
basic natural history information (e.g., habitat preferences, diet, activity,
growth, and reproduction) remains poorly understood, hampering management
and conservation decisions.
Of the 52 snake species found in the southeastern United States,
perhaps the most abundant but least studied are small, fossorial “litter
1The University of Georgia, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Drawer E, Aiken,
SC 29802. *Corresponding author - firstname.lastname@example.org.
350 Southeastern Naturalist Vol.7, No. 2
snakes,” including the genera Carphophis, Diadophis, Rhadinaea, Storeria,
Tantilla, and Virginia (Willson and Dorcas 2004). Because litter snakes
are unsuitable for radio-telemetry and because their secretive habits lead to
few recaptures (Semlitsch and Moran 1984; Todd et al., in press; Willson
and Dorcas 2004), the ecology and population biology of some species remains
unknown, particularly in the Southeast. Virginia striatula (Linnaeus)
(Rough Earth Snake) and Virginia valeriae Baird and Girard (Smooth
Earth Snake), are diminutive, natricine snakes which, despite their extensive
geographic ranges in the Southeast, are infrequently encountered.
Indeed, although the Rough Earth Snake is abundant in western portions
of its range (Clark and Fleet 1976, Werler and Dixon 2000) and has served
as a model laboratory organism for studies of reproductive allocation and
placental morphology in snakes (Stewart 1989, 1990; Stewart and Brasch
2003; Sangha et al. 1996), very little has been published about the natural
history of earth snakes in the Southeast.
The Savannah River Site (SRS), an 803-km2 US Department of Energy
facility located in the Upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina, has been the
focus of intense herpetological research since 1951 (Gibbons et al. 1997).
Since establishment, researchers have amassed a database of over 25,000
records of the 36 snake species found on the SRS. This extensive database
permits study of species that are usually too secretive or uncommon to be the
focus of directed research. Here, we use this database to examine various aspects
of the natural history of the earth snakes in the Southeast. Specifically,
we examine morphology (body size and sexual size dimorphism), abundance
and seasonal activity, reproduction, and population demography of these uncommon
and secretive species.
The Savannah River Site (SRS) was established in 1951 in Aiken,
Barnwell, and Allendale counties in South Carolina. The site, protected
from extensive anthropogenic disturbance and development since 1951,
generally comprises managed pine forests and second-growth hardwood
habitats, but supported agriculture prior to federal establishment (Gibbons
et al. 2006).
Data collection and analysis
Although earth snakes are apparently less common than some other small
snakes (e.g., Tantilla coronata Baird and Girard [Southeastern Crowned
Snake]; Todd et al. 2008), Rough Earth Snakes and Smooth Earth Snakes are
encountered fairly frequently during herpetological research on the SRS. We
captured earth snakes on the SRS from 1971 to 2007 using coverboards (e.g.,
Grant et al. 1992), drift fences with pitfall traps (Gibbons and Semlitsch
1982), and by turning natural cover objects during active searches. Recent
2008 B.D. Todd, J.D. Willson, C.T. Winne, and J.W. Gibbons 351
studies (2004–2007) using extensive drift fence and pitfall trapping have
generated considerable captures of Smooth Earth Snakes on the SRS (Todd
and Andrews 2008, Todd and Rothermel 2006). In general, we measured the
mass (nearest mg), snout–vent length (SVL; nearest mm), and tail length
(nearest mm) of field-captured animals in the laboratory. We determined the
sex of individuals by manual eversion of the hemipenes, cloacal probing, or
dissection (for any animals that died in the field or during transport), and in
some cases, we palpated females to note the presence and number of follicles
or developing embryos. Marking effort varied from 1971–2007, but we did
mark many earth snakes by clipping ventral scales or by heat branding ventral
and lateral scales (Winne et al. 2006).
We used two-way analyses of variance to test for effects of sex and
species on the SVL and mass of captured animals, excluding any intrayear
recaptures from analyses. We used a two-way analysis of covariance
to test for effects of sex and species on relative tail length, using SVL as
a covariate and excluding from analysis any intra-year recaptures and any
animals that had shortened tails due to injury. We log-transformed all data
prior to analyses to ensure that statistical assumptions were met (King et
To examine seasonal activity of Smooth Earth Snakes, we used data
collected from a recent intensive pitfall trapping study with known trapping
effort (Todd and Andrews, in press; Todd and Rothermel 2006), which
allowed us to adjust monthly captures for trapping effort and eliminate effort-
related sampling biases. Specifically, we divided monthly captures by
the number of total trap nights in each month. We used chi-square tests for
each month from 1971–2007 in which sample sizes were large enough to
determine whether monthly captures of Smooth Earth Snakes were sex-biased.
Additionally, we used all SRS data for both Smooth Earth Snakes and
Rough Earth Snakes to examine demographic structure by plotting the SVL
of captured animals according to their date of capture.
From 1971–2007, we captured 222 Smooth Earth Snakes and 40 Rough
Earth Snakes on the SRS. For some older captures, morphological data, sex,
and/or the completeness of the tails were not always recorded, rendering
some measurements unusable in analyses. Overall, Rough Earth Snakes
were significantly longer (F1,92 = 42.1, p < 0.001) and significantly heavier
than Smooth Earth Snakes (F1,82 = 19.9, p < 0.001; Table 1). For both species,
females were significantly longer (F1,92 = 22.3, p < 0.001) and heavier
(F1,82 = 11.0, p = 0.001) than males (Table 1). When we analyzed tail lengths,
we found a significant interaction between sex and species (F1,91 = 6.1, p =
0.016). Subsequent one-way analyses of covariance indicated that relative
tail lengths of males and females differed significantly in Smooth Earth
352 Southeastern Naturalist Vol.7, No. 2
Snakes, but were only marginally different in Rough Earth Snakes (Smooth
Earth Snake: F1,71 = 56.6, p < 0.001; Rough Earth Snake: F1,19 = 4.0, p = 0.06;
Table 1). Interaction terms for all other analyses were non-significant (SVL:
F1,92 = 2.6, p = 0.11; Mass: F1,82 = 2.8, p = 0.10).
Generally, Smooth Earth Snakes were most active during warmer months
of the year compared to colder months (Fig. 1). However, captures in pitfall
traps were greatest in May and October (Fig. 1). Although no Smooth Earth
Snakes were captured in pitfall traps in January or February during an intensive
study from 2004–2006, they have been captured on the SRS in pitfall traps
during all months of the year in other years. The earliest recorded capture in a
year of an active Smooth Earth Snake was 19 January 2001, and the latest was
1 December 2004. Too few Rough Earth Snakes were captured to determine
seasonal activity patterns, but most captures from 1971–2007 were recorded
in the spring and fall. The earliest recorded capture of a Rough Earth Snake
Table 1. Mean body sizes of Virginia valeriae (Smooth Earth Snake) and V. striatula (Rough
Earth Snake) captured from 1971–2007 on the Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC.
Snout–vent Tail length/
Mass (g) length (mm) Tail length (mm) total length (%)
Species Mean (range) n Mean (range) n Mean (range) n Mean (range)
Male 1.97 (0.9–3.1) 40 138.5 (103–174) 43 30.3 (11–41) 43 17.9 (8.9–21.7)
Female 3.37 (1.3–6.4) 29 173.6 (119–222) 31 25.0 (8–37) 31 12.6 (5.4 –15.4)
Male 3.5 (2.5–5.6) 9 184.4 (151–209) 13 41.6 (23–52) 13 22.6 (13.6–26.0)
Female 4.3 (2.4–6.7) 8 204.9 (174–256) 9 38.2 (29–49) 9 18.8 (13.6–24.2)
Figure 1. Monthly
on the Savannah
River Site, Aiken,
are adjusted for
by dividing total
by trap nights for
that month and
multiplying by 106. “n.d.” indicates that no data were collected in August from 2004–2006.
2008 B.D. Todd, J.D. Willson, C.T. Winne, and J.W. Gibbons 353
Figure 2. Monthly sex ratios of Virginia valeriae (Smooth Earth Snakes) captured from
1971 –2007 on the Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC. Sample sizes of known-sex animals
are listed above the bars. An asterisk “*” denotes a significant sex bias in captures for a
was 9 March 2004, and the latest recorded capture occurred on 12 November
1985. Captures of Smooth Earth Snakes were sex-biased in favor of females in
April (χ2 = 6.7, p = 0.01), but were sex-biased in favor of males in August (χ2 =
5.4, p = 0.02; Fig. 2).
We recaptured one female Smooth Earth Snake initially captured in
the fall of 2006 and recaptured twice in the spring and early summer of
2007. Although she had not increased in length, her body mass had increased
from 3.98 g to 5.84 g and she had developed 4 large embryos.
One male Rough Earth Snake was recaptured over a one-month interval
in spring of 1985 with no change in size. No other individually marked
snakes were ever resighted.
In both species, neonates were easily distinguishable from other age
classes in the populations (Smooth Earth Snake: Fig. 3; Rough Earth
Snake: Fig. 4). However, animals entering their second calendar year
of life (i.e., reaching one year of life) and older could not easily be assigned
to any particular age class (Figs. 3, 4). From 1971–2007, six
gravid Smooth Earth Snakes measuring 155–181 mm SVL were captured
between March 30–July 17 with clutch sizes ranging from 3–6 embryos
(mean = 4.2).
354 Southeastern Naturalist Vol.7, No. 2
Figure 4. Snout-to-vent length versus julian day of capture for Virginia striatula (Rough
Earth Snakes) captured from 1971–2007 on the Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC.
Figure 3. Snout-to-vent length versus julian day of capture for Virginia valeriae
(Smooth Earth Snakes) captured from 1971–2007 on the Savannah River Site,
2008 B.D. Todd, J.D. Willson, C.T. Winne, and J.W. Gibbons 355
We found evidence of sexual size dimorphism in Smooth Earth Snakes
and Rough Earth Snakes that is generally consistent with observations of
other North American colubrid snakes (Kaufman and Gibbons 1975, King
1989). Specifically, females tended to be larger and heavier than males but
had relatively shorter tails. Also, our observation that Rough Earth Snakes
were larger than Smooth Earth Snakes is consistent with other reports of
the species from elsewhere in their ranges (summarized in Ernst and Ernst
2003). Interestingly, samples of both species captured on the SRS were
smaller than those collected in at least one other part of their range. For
example, Palmer and Braswell (1995) report the five longest males (Rough
Earth Snake: 212–220 mm; Smooth Earth Snake: 189–199 mm) and females
(Rough Earth Snake: 239–268 mm; Smooth Earth Snake: 209–242 mm) of
both species captured across North Carolina, all but one of which were larger
than the five largest males and females of both species captured on the SRS
(see Table 1 for size ranges).
Like all North American natricine snakes, the earth snakes are viviparous.
Birthing of neonates reportedly occurs from the end of June through
September, and the young measure 64–123 mm SVL in Smooth Earth Snakes
and 74–127 mm SVL in Rough Earth Snakes (Ernst and Ernst 2003). Neonates
of both species on the SRS were recognizable from other cohorts by
their small size, and the timing of their capture was consistent with reported
birthing dates. However, larger earth snakes on the SRS did not readily fall
into distinguishable age classes. The shortest sexually mature male Smooth
Earth Snake reported by Mitchell (1994) was captured in Virginia at an SVL
of 153 mm. The shortest pregnant Smooth Earth Snakes reported were 183
and 185 mm SVL (Blem and Blem 1985, Mitchell 1994), also in Virginia.
All pregnant Smooth Earth Snakes that we captured on the SRS were smaller
than pregnant females reported from elsewhere in their range, suggesting
that Smooth Earth Snakes reach reproductive maturity at a smaller size on
the SRS than in other parts of their range. This finding coincides with the
generally smaller body sizes of earth snakes on the SRS compared with
Both Smooth Earth Snakes and Rough Earth Snakes are described as
being most active from April to November (Ernst and Ernst 2003). Additionally,
Palmer and Braswell (1995) and Gibbons and Semlitsch (1987) report
bimodal seasonal activity patterns for Smooth Earth Snakes in the Southeast;
our results are generally consistent with these earlier findings. Smooth
Earth Snakes on the SRS were most active in May and October, but were
also frequently captured in all warm months, as were Rough Earth Snakes.
Male-biased captures of Smooth Earth Snakes in August suggest that this
species may breed in the late summer to early fall, as has been suggested for
other small southeastern snakes such as Carphophis amoenus (Say) (Eastern
356 Southeastern Naturalist Vol.7, No. 2
Wormsnake) (Russell and Hanlin 1999, Willson and Dorcas 2004) and Southeastern
Crowned Snakes (Aldridge and Semlitsch 1982; Todd et al., in press).
Female-biased captures of Smooth Earth Snakes in the spring may be a result
of increased foraging by females as they prepare for reproduction following
several cooler months of reduced activity.
Small-bodied snakes are generally under-represented in scientific literature,
possibly because their secretive habits often preclude the capture
of adequate numbers of them for study. As a result, little is known about
the ecology and natural history of many small-bodied snakes. Although
our study provides insight into the ecology and life history of two species
of earth snakes in the Southeast, we strongly encourage additional
study to elucidate the ecology of small snakes, both in the Southeast and
throughout their ranges.
We thank J. Greene and J. Nestor for assisting with data entry and for constructing
and maintaining the long-term snake database. We also thank all past and present
members of the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory’s Herpetology Lab for collecting
study animals and recording data used in this study over the past 50 years. Snakes were
collected under South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Scientific Collection
permits (07-2004, G-05-03, G-06-04), and procedures used in the study were
approved by the University of Georgia animal care and use committee. Some data used
in this study were collected as part of an ongoing research project funded by the National
Science Foundation (Award DEB-0242874). Research support and manuscript
preparation were aided by the Environmental Remediation Sciences Division of the
Office of Biological and Environmental Research, US Department of Energy through
Financial Assistance Award No. DE-FC09-96SR18546 to the University of Georgia
Aldridge, R.D., and R.D. Semlitsch. 1982. Male reproductive biology of the Southeastern
Crowned Snake (Tantilla coronata). Amphibia-Reptilia 13:219–225.
Blem, C.R., and L.B. Blem. 1985. Notes on Virginia (Reptilia: Colubridae) in Virginia.
Clark, D.R., Jr., and R.R. Fleet. 1976. The Rough Earth Snake (Virginia striatula):
Ecology of a Texas population. Southwestern Naturalist 20:467–478.
Ernst, C.H., and E.M. Ernst. 2003. Snakes of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian
Press, Washington, DC.
Gibbons, J.W., and R.D. Semlitsch.1982. Terrestrial drift fences with pitfall traps: An
effective technique for quantitative sampling of animal populations. Brimleyana
Gibbons, J.W., and R.D. Semlitsch. 1987. Activity patterns. Pp. 396–421, In R.A.
Seigel, J.T. Collins, and S.S. Novak (Eds.). Snakes: Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology. MacMilllan Publishing Co., New York, NY.
Gibbons, J.W., V.J. Burke, J.E. Lovich, R.D. Semlitsch, T.D. Tuberville, J.R. Bodie,
J.L. Greene, P.H. Niewiarowski, H.H. Whiteman, D.E. Scott, J.H.K. Pechmann,
C.R. Harrison, S.H. Bennett, J.D. Krenz, M.S. Mills, K.A. Buhlmann, J.R. Lee,
2008 B.D. Todd, J.D. Willson, C.T. Winne, and J.W. Gibbons 357
R.A. Seigel, A.D. Tucker, T.M. Mills, T. Lamb, M. E. Dorcas, J.D. Congdon,
M.H. Smith, D.H. Nelson, M.B. Dietsch, H.H. Hanlin, J.A. Ott, and D.J. Karapatakis.
1997. Perceptions of species abundance, distribution, and diversity: Lessons
from four decades of sampling on a government-managed reserve. Environmental
Gibbons, J.W., C.T. Winne, D.E. Scott, J.D. Willson, X. Glaudas, K.M. Andrews,
B.D. Todd, L. A. Fedewa, L. Wilkinson, R.N. Tsaliagos, S.J. Harper, J.L. Greene,
T.D. Tuberville, B.S. Metts, M.E. Dorcas, J.P. Nestor, C.A. Young, T. Akre, R.N.
Reed, K.A. Buhlmann, J. Norman, D.A. Croshaw, C. Hagen, and B.B. Rothermel.
2006. Remarkable amphibian biomass and abundance in an isolated wetland: Implications
for wetland conservation. Conservation Biology 20:1457–1465.
Godley, J.S. 1980. Foraging ecology of the Striped Swamp Snake, Regina alleni, in
Southern Florida. Ecological Monographs 50:411–436.
Grant, B.W., A.D. Tucker, J.E. Lovich, A.M. Mills, P.M. Dixon, and J.W. Gibbons.
1992. The use of coverboards in estimating patterns of reptile and amphibian
biodiversity. Pp.379–403, In D.R. McCullough and R.H. Barrett (Eds.). Wildlife
2001. Elsevier Science Publishing, Inc., London, UK.
Kaufman, G.A., and J.W. Gibbons. 1975. Weight-length relationships in thirteen species
of snakes in the southeastern United States. Herpetologica 31:31–37.
King, R.B. 1989. Sexual dimorphism in snake tail length: Sexual selection, natural
selection, or morphological constraint? Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society
King, R.B., T.D. Bittner, A. Queral-Regil, and J.H. Cline. 1999. Sexual dimorphism
in neonate and adult snakes. Journal of Zoology, London 247:19–28.
Mitchell, J.C. 1994. The Reptiles of Virginia. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington,
Palmer, W.M., and A.L. Braswell. 1995. Reptiles of North Carolina. University of
North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
Parker, W.S., and M.V. Plummer. 1987. Population ecology. Pp. 253–301, In R.A.
Seigel, J.T. Collins and S.S. Novak (Eds.). Snakes: Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY.
Russell, K.R., and H.G. Hanlin. 1999. Aspects of the ecology of Worm Snakes (Carphophis
amoenus) associated with small isolated wetlands in South Carolina.
Journal of Herpetology 33:344–348.
Sangha, S., M.A. Smola, S.L. McKinney, D.R. Crotzer, C.A. Shadrix, and J.R. Stewart.
1996. The effect of surgical removal of oviductal eggs on placental function
and size of neonates in the viviparous snake Virginia striatula. Herpetologica
Semlitsch, R.D., and G.B. Moran. 1984. Ecology of the Redbelly Snake (Storeria
occipitomaculata) using mesic habitats in South Carolina. American Midland
Stewart, J.R. 1989. Facultative placentotrophy and the evolution of squamate placentation:
Quality of eggs and neonates in Virginia striatula. American Naturalist
Stewart, J.R. 1990. Development of the extraembryonic membranes and histology of
the placentae in Virginia striatula (Squamata, Serpentes). Journal of Morphology
358 Southeastern Naturalist Vol.7, No. 2
Stewart, J.R., and K.R. Brasch. 2003. Ultrastructure of the placentae of the natricine
snake, Virginia striatula (Reptilia: Squamata). Journal of Morphology 255:
Todd, B.D., and K.M. Andrews. In Press. Response of a reptile guild to forest harvesting.
Todd, B.D., and B.B. Rothermel. 2006. Assessing quality of clearcut habitats for
amphibians: Effects on southern toad abundances versus vital rates. Biological
Todd, B.D., J.D. Willson, C.T. Winne, R.D. Semlitsch, and J.W. Gibbons. In Press.
Ecology of the Southeastern Crowned Snake, Tantilla coronata. Copeia.
Werler, J.E., and J.R. Dixon. 2000. Texas Snakes: Identification, Distribution, and
Natural History. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
Willson, J.D., and M.E. Dorcas. 2004. Aspects of the ecology of small fossorial snakes
in the western Piedmont of North Carolina. Southeastern Naturalist 3:1–12.
Winne, C.T., J.D. Willson, K.M. Andrews, and R.N. Reed. 2006. Efficacy of marking
snakes with disposable medical cautery units. Herpetological Review 37:52–54.