Southeastern Naturalist
R.C. Viadero, Jr. and R.H. Fortney
2015 Vol. 14, Special Issue 7
112
Canaan Valley & Environs
2015 Southeastern Naturalist 14(Special Issue 7):112–120
Water-Quality Assessment and Environmental Impact
Minimization for Highway Construction in a Miningimpacted
Watershed: The Beaver Creek Drainage
Roger C. Viadero, Jr.1, 2,* and Ronald H. Fortney1, 3
Abstract - Beaver Creek, a tributary of the Blackwater River just north of Canaan
Valley in northeastern West Virginia, runs parallel to the proposed alignment of a major
four-lane highway called Appalachian Corridor H. Beaver Creek and many of its
major tributaries are characterized by low pH, little alkalinity, and high levels of dissolved
metals due to the geochemical characteristics of the soil’s parent material and
continuing impacts from past coal mining. During the planning phase of this road
project, we identified two major environmental concerns: (1) our ability to predict and
manage water-quality impairments that will likely result from the cuts and fills of new
material, and (2) the legacy effects of mine refuse from historic coal mines. In the latter
case, although many refuse sites are located outside the proposed highway’s alignment,
drainage from these sites will be intercepted by the highway’s water-control structures.
We (West Virginia University [WVU]) have collaborated with the West Virginia Division
of Highways (WVDOH) to minimize construction-related impacts to Beaver
Creek’s water quality. More specifically, we have evaluated strategies by which water
collection and conveyance structures can be integrated with passive water-remediation
processes during the highway’s design and construction. In March 2000, we began
monitoring water quality in the Beaver Creek drainage. We measured physical, chemical,
and biological indicators of water quality and present these data here to serve as a
baseline for future comparisons. In general, the water in Beaver Creek was acidic with
an average pH of 5.1 in its headwaters and 6.1 above its confluence with the Blackwater
River. The water also carried little or no alkalinity. The untreated water seeping from
mine-waste piles was highly acidic, with an average pH of 3.0, carried high levels of
dissolved sulfate and iron, and featured excess acid-production capacity. After we identified
the main sources of water-quality impairment—the locations of mine-waste piles
and acidic seeps—we formulated preliminary recommendations for minimizing the
impacts of highway construction on the Creek’s water quality. For example, we recommended
the implementation of acid-base accounting on the overburden that would be
disturbed during construction. We also suggested special material-handling procedures.
Based on our preliminary water-quality data, we recommended a series of passive treatment
processes that could be incorporated into the road’s design, construction, and
operation. Future treatment decisions will be informed by our growing dataset. Further,
because many sources of water-quality impairment are located within the basin but
beyond the road’s proposed alignment, efforts must be made to engage diverse stakeholders
to leverage support for protecting and restoring the Beaver Creek watershed.
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Virginia University, PO Box
6103, Morgantown, WV 26506. 2Current address - Institute for Environmental Studies,
Western Illinois University, 1 University Circle, Macomb, IL 61455. 3Deceased. *Corresponding
author - rc-viadero@wiu.edu.
Southeastern Naturalist
R.C. Viadero, Jr. and R.H. Fortney
2015 Vol. 14, Special Issue 7
113
Introduction
In the early 1960s, the Appalachian Regional Commission proposed a system
of 26 highway corridors to promote economic and social development in the
region. In West Virginia, Appalachian Corridor H is the last of these roads to be
built. When completed, Corridor H, a divided four-lane highway, will span 144
mi (232 km), from Weston, WV, eastward to Wardensville, WV, near the border
with Virginia.
Beaver Creek, located in Tucker County in northeastern West Virginia, flows
parallel to the proposed alignment of Corridor H (Fig. 1). Located in the watershed
of the Middle Fork of the Blackwater River (HUC 05-020004020293), the
Beaver Creek basin covers 14,522 ac (5877 ha), with elevations ranging from
2963 feet (903 m) above sea level at its confluence with the Blackwater River
to 4131 ft (1259 m) in its headwaters. The Beaver Creek drainage is just north
of Canaan Valley. Brown Mountain separates Canaan Valley and the Blackwater
River basin.
Most of the surface and near-surface rocks in the Beaver Creek drainage have
been classified in the Conemaugh and Allegheny Groups of the Pennsylvanian
System (Reger 1923). The Conemaugh Group begins at the bottom of the Pittsburgh
coal seam and extends downward about 600 ft (183 m) to the top of Upper
Freeport coal. The Allegheny Group begins at the top of the Upper Freeport coal
seam and extends downward about 300 ft (91 m) to the top of the Homewood
Sandstone in the Pottsville Group. Significantly, Upper Freeport coal and its associated
strata hold high sulfur concentrations and are known to yield drainage
with elevated levels of dissolved metals (Reger 1923).
Figure 1. Map of the Middle Blackwater River watershed.
Southeastern Naturalist
R.C. Viadero, Jr. and R.H. Fortney
2015 Vol. 14, Special Issue 7
114
Within the Beaver Creek watershed, about 2286 acres (925 ha) have been
surface-mined for coal. Most of the mined lands lie between the historic community
of Gatzmer and the confluence of Beaver Creek with the Blackwater River
near Davis, WV. Because much of this mining occurred before enactment of the
Surface Mine Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) (US Code 1977), effective
reclamation had not occurred in the basin.
The Beaver Creek watershed has been heavily impacted by prior surface-mining
of coal and is drained by tributaries with low pH, little to no alkalinity, and
high metals loads. Consequently, construction through the Beaver Creek basin
will not impact sensitive native species. In contrast, threatened and endangered
species including Plethodon nettingi Green (Cheat Mountain Salamander), Myotis
sodalist Miller & Allen (Indiana Bat), Corynorhinus townsendii virginianus
Cooper (Virginia Big-eared Bat), and Glaucomys sabrinus fuscus (Shaw) (West
Virginia Northern Flying Squirrel) have been documented at other locations
along the alignment of Corridor H (US Fish and Wildlife Service 2013).
The geochemical features of soil parent materials on the project site favor the
formation of acidic, metals-laden drainage. The potential exists for additional
acid production and higher metals loading because of new disturbances of old
mine refuse. New cuts and fills during construction may cause water-quality impairment.
These factors are compounded by the study area’s rugged topography,
which necessitates large cuts and fills.
In 1999, we (WVU) began collaborating with the West Virginia Division
of Highways (WVDOH) to proactively minimize the environmental impacts of
building Corridor H through the Beaver Creek watershed. In March 2000, we
began collecting data on physical, chemical, and biological indicators of water
quality. We also studied key sources of water impairment, like mine-waste piles
and acidic seeps. These data will inform decisions on management alternatives
before and during construction and document baseline conditions for evaluating
post-construction conditions. With the goal of maximizing water quality,
environmental and hydrotechnical engineers evaluated the potential to integrate
water-collection and conveyance mechanisms and passive water treatment into
the highway’s design and construction.
In this paper, we report the water-quality baseline for Beaver Creek,
identify features likely to be construction-related sources of water-quality
impairment, and demonstrate the benefits of having detailed water-quality data
for designing remediation projects. Our work is complemented by the work of
Lanham et al. (2015) and Stevens et al. (2015) that appear in this special issue;
their papers contribute to understanding the geochemical features of mined
and undisturbed soils, acid-drainage impacted and undisturbed wetland soils,
and the baseline dataset.
Methods
In March 2000, we began regular water-quality sampling at 14 sites in the
Beaver Creek watershed (Fig. 1). Four sites (1, 3, 6, and 9) were located on
Southeastern Naturalist
R.C. Viadero, Jr. and R.H. Fortney
2015 Vol. 14, Special Issue 7
115
the Creek’s mainstem and five (2, 4, 5, 7, and 8) were sited on tributaries. We
sampled each site a total of 14 times, approximately monthly. For insights into
conditions outside the proposed alignment of Corridor H, we sampled 5 additional
sites (10, 11, 12, 13, and 14) less regularly. Further, to evaluate the suitability
of the Creek’s headwaters for fish, we used rapid bioassessment (Plafkin et al.
1989) to survey the fish community at site 1.
Table 1 lists the water-quality parameters, analytic methods, and detection
limits relevant to our study. With the exception of flow measurements, we used
standard methods (Cleseri and Greenberg 1999). We estimated stream-discharge
rates by integrating our measures of water velocity, obtained with a Global Water
Flow Probe (Xylem, Inc., White Plains, NY) fitted with an EM Flow Probe, and
the stream’s cross-sectional area, obtained by measuring water depth at incremental
stream widths (USEPA 1997).
Results and Discussion
For an overview of water quality in the Beaver Creek drainage, we list representative
data from 3 mainstem Beaver Creek stations (Table 2): site 1 at the
headwaters, site 3 approximately half-way between the headwaters and the confluence
of Beaver Creek and the Blackwater River, and site 9 just upstream
of the confluence of Beaver Creek and the Blackwater River. We also include
data collected at site 5, located on a tributary dominated by reclaimed and pre-
SMCRA mine lands, because we suspected that this site was a source of acid,
dissolved sulfate, and metals.
Site 1—headwaters
Located in the headwaters of Beaver Creek, site 1 was upstream of most of
the basin’s mined sites. With an average pH of 5.1, the water at site 1 was acidic
(Table 2). However, dissolved sulfate and iron concentrations were lower than
Table 1. Water-quality parameters, analytic methods, and corresponding detection limits. Methods,
as well as detection limits, follow the American Public Health Association (Cleseri and Greeberg
1999). Detection limits were measured for manganese, aluminum, and magnesium but not reported
in this study.
Parameter Method Detection limit
pH 4500 H+ - B -
Turbidity 2130 B 1 NTU
Total suspended solids 2540 D 100 mg residual filter mass
Specific conductivity 2510 B 10 μS/cm
Alkalinity 2320 B 0.75 mg/L as CaCO3
Acidity 2310 B (4d) 0.75 mg/L as CaCO3
Sulfate 4500 - SO4 - E 7.0 mg/L
Iron 3120 B 0.10 mg/L
Manganese 3120 B 0.10 mg/L
Aluminum 3120 B 0.10 mg/L
Magnesium 3120 B 0.10 mg/L
Southeastern Naturalist
R.C. Viadero, Jr. and R.H. Fortney
2015 Vol. 14, Special Issue 7
116
those at other sites. Based on its acidity and alkalinity measurements, the water
flowing past site 1 contained little pH-buf fering capacity.
Our sampling of the fish assemblage at site 1 yielded 25 Semotilus atromaculatas
(Mitchill) (Creek Chub), 2 Lepomis cyanellus Rafinesque (Green Sunfish),
and 3 Catostomus commersonii Lacepede (White Sucker). Each of these species
can tolerate non-specific stressors (Plafkin et al. 1989). We also recorded a single
Salvelinus fontinalis (Mitchill) (Brook Trout). The species is moderately tolerant
of stressors (Plafkin et al. 1989), and the presence of a single Brook Trout may have
significance, but the origin of the fish was uncertain. Because we documented few
fish, and species richness and diversity were low, we believe that the headwaters of
Beaver Creek provided scant fish habitat (Plafkin et al. 1989).
Based on the alkalinity measures, the water at site 1 was vulnerable to further
acidification if new acid-bearing materials were to be exposed to air during highway
construction. This water-quality alteration would impact the headwaters’
already limited fish community. Consequently, measures should be taken to avoid
disturbing acidic materials during construction.
If acidic materials are exposed during road construction, special handling
practices established by the mining industry to address this situation should be
employed. For instance, materials from soil cores can be used for acid–base
accounting to determine the likely production of acidic drainage. In case acidproducing
strata must be handled, the amount of alkaline material needed to mix
with disturbed soils can be quantitatively determined (Skousen et al. 2001). The
costs of alkaline materials, special mixing techniques, and added construction
logistics can be weighed against the option of avoiding construction through a
particular area.
Site 3—streams treated for acid mine drainage
The chemical features of the water at site 3 were representative of a stream
impacted by both mine-water seeps and the active treatment of mine water. This
site was located downstream of an active mine-water treatment project in which
anhydrous ammonia was being used as the main reagent. The West Virginia
Table 2. Summary of water-quality data (average values with the range given in parentheses below)
at four selected sites. TSS = total suspended solids. - indicates pH below tiritimetric endpoint.
Specific Alkalinity Acidity
TSS conductivity (mg/L as (mg/L as Sulfate
Site (mg/L) pH (μS/cm) CaCO3) CaCO3) (mg/L) Iron (mg/L)
1 2.2 5.1 60.7 12.3 7.0 11.5 0.22
(0.2–5.0) (4.5–6.1) (28.7–105) (1.6–18.6) (5.2–8.2) (7.5–23.6) (0.13–0.31)
3 2.6 6.5 145 22.0 16.3 43.2 2.61
(0.5–7.4) (0.5–7.4) (76.4–381) (6.6–34.0) (less than 0.75–158) (20.2–135) (0.20-16.60)
5 2.9 3.0 721 - 129 209 8.70
(0.3–8.6) (2.1–3.9) (129–1107) (18–172) (61.2–356) (3.70-16.30)
9 8.0 6.1 142 17.0 5.3 54.5 0.70
(2.5–23) (5.2–6.9) (63–248) (14.0–22.1) (3.2–10) (42.3–87.5) (0.30–1.20)
Southeastern Naturalist
R.C. Viadero, Jr. and R.H. Fortney
2015 Vol. 14, Special Issue 7
117
Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) periodically dumped bulk
limestone sands at this site. The water at site 3 carried low levels of suspended
solids, average levels of dissolved total iron, and a high concentration of sulfate.
Its total iron was almost 12 times the amount that we measured at site 1 (Table 2).
High values of iron and sulfate indicated a difference in land uses between site 1,
which was relatively unimpacted, and this site, which was degraded by historic
and current coal-mining operations.
Site 5—site untreated for acid
The water at site 5 carried a lot of acid. We measured an average pH of 3.0
and an average acidity of 129 mg/L as CaCO3, both of which suggested that water
quality was impaired by drainage from mine-spoil piles. Because the water’s pH
was below the titrimetric endpoint of 4.5, we were unable to measure alkalinity.
Based on the high concentration of sulfate we observed—an average of 209
mg/L, with a high of 356 mg/L—the potential for additional stream acidification
was high (Table 2). High specific conductance and an average iron concentration
~40 times greater than the value we measured at site 1 further supported our
suspicion that site 5 was a source of Beaver Creek’s acid and dissolved ions. We
observed no fish at site 5. We suggest that other sites that drain spoils-piles probably
have similar chemical characteristics and should be given special attention
as managers plan highway construction and remediation.
Site 9—Beaver Creek discharge site
Just upstream of its discharge into the Blackwater River, the Beaver Creek’s
average pH, specific conductance, and sulfate concentrations were comparable
to those at site 3 (Table 2). However, the average iron concentration at site 9 was
almost 4 times lower than the value measured at site 3, indicating that dilution
was drowning the acid in Beaver Creek’s mainstem.
Treatment before and during construction
Because water quality varied throughout the Beaver Creek drainage, we
recommend that managers consider a variety of approaches to manage the watershed’s
water quality. The exception is that Beaver Creek would benefit from
added alkalinity at all sites. Before highway construction, alkaline materials
should be added to the Creek’s main channel to neutralize acidic drainage that
might infiltrate the creek during and after construction.
In the past, some workers considered the bulk addition of limestone aggregate
to have been ineffective due to the formation of an armor layer that renders
the limestone non-reactive (Porcella et al. 1990). More recently, though, several
investigators have reported that sand-sized limestone particles remain reactive
in receiving waters (Clayton et al. 1998, Downey et al. 1994). These same investigators
successfully restored downstream fish populations after they dumped
truckloads of sand-sized limestone directly into streams and/or on the streambanks
of acid-impacted streams. In addition to its effectiveness, Menendez et al. (2000)
reported that adding sand-sized limestone costs less than $55 per short ton ($50/
Southeastern Naturalist
R.C. Viadero, Jr. and R.H. Fortney
2015 Vol. 14, Special Issue 7
118
metric ton) of acid neutralized. This cost compared favorably to two other approaches—
the rotary limestone drum and addition of hydrated lime, at about $99
and $193 per short ton ($90 and $175/metric ton), respectively, of acid neutralized.
We suggest 2 locations for sand-sized limestone treatments: upstream of site
1 and just above key tributaries with chemical characteristics similar to those at
site 5. Alkalinity not used in neutralizing local acid will be conveyed downstream
and will buffer against pH changes lower in the drainage.
Although the origin of the Brook Trout individual at site 1 was unclear, the
presence of a fish that is moderately tolerant to stressors provides insight into
conditions that could be established. The Brook Trout’s presence hints at an
opportunity to restore Beaver Creek’s headwaters for this species. At site 1, the
main water-quality concern was inadequate resistance to pH changes. Consequently,
we recommend that alkaline materials be added to raise the headwaters’
buffering capacity. This added stability in pH could facilitate reestablishment of
a Brook Trout fishery, particularly since the fish was found near site 1.
Because the continuous, active addition of alkaline reagents to Beaver Creek
does not seem probable over the long term, we recommend that limestone sands
be added to its headwaters. To maximize the benefits of improved alkalinity,
a complementary investment should be made to improve in-stream habitat.
Because streambeds and streambanks are owned and managed by diverse stakeholders—
government agencies, private organizations, and individual landowners—
engaging all stakeholders will be crucial to achieve success.
In areas more directly impacted by historic and active mining operations, such
as those at site 3, full restoration to pre-impacted conditions may not be feasible.
Consequently, remediating existing water-quality impairments should also be
focused on minimizing future impacts. Representative approaches to mitigate
impacts include: (1) avoid or minimize the disturbance of mine spoils to limit
the exposure of additional pyretic material, (2) perform a quantitative acid–base
accounting of cut-and-fill to estimate alkaline admix needs (Skousen et al. 2001),
Figure 2. Schematic cross-section of passive treatment proposed for downstream of site
3 (see map in Fig. 1).
Southeastern Naturalist
R.C. Viadero, Jr. and R.H. Fortney
2015 Vol. 14, Special Issue 7
119
(3) defend against the inadvertent liberation of acidic water during road building
by implementing active treatment during highway construction, and (4) design
and implement a series of passive treatment processes to minimize future degradation
and affect a positive change in water quality that will persist long after the
road is built.
Integrating treatment and construction
In Figure 2, we offer a schematic drawing of passive treatment processes
that could be used to mitigate downstream solids-loading, impart alkalinity to
receiving waters, facilitate the removal of dissolved metals, and allow for the
biochemical reduction of dissolved sulfate at site 3. The principles of natural
stream design should be incorporated to increase the overall benefits of remediation
while supporting the development of a sustainable stream ecosystem.
It is clearly necessary to address potential sources of acidic drainage caused
by building the road through mine spoils. It is equally important to address
sources of water impairment that originate above the roadway alignment. Failing
to address up-grade sources of acid, metals, and sediment would cause additional
loading to any passive treatment processes incorporated into the road’s design
and construction, which would render those mechanisms less effective.
The work reported here will be followed by a more extensive, long-term
study of water quality, soil properties, and passive treatment processes, with
the goal of developing effective approaches to science-based management
before, during, and after road construction. We recommend that the WVDOH
partner with regulatory and resource agencies, such as the WVDEP (Mining
and Reclamation) and the WV Department of Natural Resources, to coordinate
management of the sources of water-quality impairment that originate outside
the highway’s alignment to leverage resources for projects aimed at watershedlevel
water-quality improvements.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the West Virginia Division of Highways as a supplement
to State Project No. x142-H-38-99 05. The authors are grateful to Charles Riling,
WVDOH environmental monitor, and Norse Angus and Neal Carte from the WVDOH
environmental section for their strong support of this work.
Literature Cited
Clayton, J.L., E.S. Dannaway, R. Menendez, H.W. Rauch, J.J. Renton, S.M. Sherlock,
and P.E. Zurbuch. 1998. Application of limestone to restore fish communities in acidified
streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18:347–360.
Clesceri L., and A. Greenberg (Eds.) 1999. Standard Methods for the Examination of
Water and Wastewater, 20th Edition. American Public Health Association (APHA).
Washington, DC. 1220 pp.
Downey, D.M., C.R. French, and M. Odom. 1994. Low-cost limestone treatment of acidsensitive
trout streams in the Appalachian mountains of Virginia. Water, Air, and Soil
Pollution 77:49–77.
Southeastern Naturalist
R.C. Viadero, Jr. and R.H. Fortney
2015 Vol. 14, Special Issue 7
120
Lanham, J. Sencindiver, and J. Skousen. 2015. Characterization of Soil Developing in
Reclaimed Upper Freeport Coal Surface Mines. Southeastern Naturalist 14(Special
Issue 7):58–64.
Menendez, R., J. Clayton, P. Zurbuch, S. Sherlock, H. Rauch, and J. Renton. 2000. Sandsized
limestone treatment of streams impacted by acid mine drainage. Water, Air, and
Soil Pollution 124:411–428.
Plafkin, J., M. Barbour, K. Porter, S. Gross, and R. Hughes. 1989. Rapid bioassessment
protocols for use in streams and rivers: Benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. US
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Regulations and Standards (EPA
440-4-89-001). Washington, DC. 179 pp.
Porcella, D.B., C.L. Schofield, J.V. DePinto, C.T. Driscoll, P.A. Buckaveckas, S.P. Gloss,
and T.C. Young. 1990. Mitigation of acidic conditions in lakes and streams. Pp. 59–
186, In S.A. Norton, S.E. Linberg, and A.L. Page (Eds.). Advances in Environmental
Science, Vol. IV: Soils, Aquatic Processes, and Lake Acidification Series, Springer-
Verlag, New York, NY. 294 pp.
Reger, D.B. 1923. Tucker County geologic report. West Virginia Geologic and Economic
Survey, Morgantown, WV. 542 pp.
Skousen, J., J. Simmons, and P. Ziemkiewicz. 2001. The use of acid-base accounting
to predict post-mining drainage quality on West Virginia surface mines. Pp. 55–73,
In West Virginia Surface Mine Drainage Task Force Symposium, Morgantown, WV.
Available online at http://wvmdtaskforce.com/proceedings/01/SKOUSEN.PDF. Accessed
15 December 2014.
Stephens, K., J. Sencindiver, and J. Skousen. 2015. Characteristics of wetland soils impacted
by acid mine drainage. Southeastern Naturalist 14(Special Issue):40–57.
US Code. 1977. Surface Mine Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) of 1977, United
States Code Public Law (PL) 95–87.
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1997. Volunteer stream monitoring:
A methods manual, Chapter 5, water quality conditions (EPA 841-B-97-003). Pp.
125–199. Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC. 227 pp.
US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2013. Known and potential distribution of federally
listed endangered and threatened species and proposed species in West Virginia.
Available online at http://www.fws.gov/westvirginiafieldoffice/PDF/Known%20
and%20Potential%20Distribution%20of%20Federally_Oct%202013.pdf. Accessed
6 February 2014.