nena masthead
NENA Home Staff & Editors For Readers For Authors

First Record of Creaserinus fodiens (Digger Crayfish) from Pennsylvania
Zachary J. Loughman, Peter Woods, and David A. Lieb

Northeastern Naturalist, Volume 25, Issue 2 (2018): N15–N18

Full-text pdf (Accessible only to subscribers. To subscribe click here.)

 

Access Journal Content

Open access browsing of table of contents and abstract pages. Full text pdfs available for download for subscribers.



Current Issue: Vol. 30 (3)
NENA 30(3)

Check out NENA's latest Monograph:

Monograph 22
NENA monograph 22

All Regular Issues

Monographs

Special Issues

 

submit

 

subscribe

 

JSTOR logoClarivate logoWeb of science logoBioOne logo EbscoHOST logoProQuest logo

N15 2018 Northeastern Naturalist Notes Vol. 25, No. 2 Z.J. Loughman, P. Woods, and D.A. Lieb First Record of Creaserinus fodiens (Digger Crayfish) from Pennsylvania Zachary J. Loughman1,*, Peter Woods2, and David A. Lieb3 Abstract - Pennsylvania’s stream crayfishes have received considerable conservation attention and survey efforts in the past decade. Burrowing crayfishes have begun to receive the same level of effort as stream species, resulting in the discovery of Creaserinus fodiens (Digger Crayfish) in a state game land in the Glaciated Plateau of Crawford County, PA. Herein, we describe the collection of this species in Pennsylvania, and determine that C. fodiens is native to the state and is worthy of additional survey efforts and associated conservation assessments. There has been a surge in crayfish conservation efforts over the past 2 decades (Richman et al. 2015, Taylor et al. 2007). Historically, most crayfish-survey efforts focused on tertiary burrowing species—crayfishes that occur in permanent lotic and lentic waterways (Hobbs 1981). Ecological studies and surveys of primary burrowing species—crayfishes that inhabit a burrow for the bulk of their life history (Hobbs 1981)—were rare, due to difficulties in collecting burrowers. Most recent regional- or watershed-survey efforts for crayfishes have included these enigmatic and ecologically important species (Kilian et al. 2010, Loughman and Simon 2011, Loughman and Welsh 2013, Simmons and Fraley 2010). These efforts have expanded the documented range of several burrowing crayfishes and resulted in a better understanding of burrower ecology and conservation (Kilian et al. 2010, Loughman and Simon 2011, Simons and Fraley 2010). In recent years, more crayfish surveys have been conducted in Pennsylvania than any other northeastern state (Lieb et al. 2008, 2011a, 2011b). The bulk of efforts have focused on assessing the replacement of native species by invasive crayfish (Lieb et al. 2011a, b), as well as the documentation of native species distributions and conservation status (Lieb et al. 2008, 2011a, 2011b). All of the aforementioned efforts focused on tertiary burrowers; primary burrowing crayfishes were largely ignored. With the exception of a single recent publication by Loughman et al. (2017), few contemporary data are available for Pennsylvania’s burrowing crayfish, though substantial historical information does exist. The state’s burrowing crayfish fauna was first documented by Arnold Ortmann, Curator of Crustacea and Mollusks at Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh, PA, whose surveys in the late 1800s and early 1900s are the foundation for all subsequent efforts. Ortmann (1905, 1906) collected 4 burrowing crayfish species from Pennsylvania and determined that Cambarus dubius Faxon (Upland Burrowing Crayfish), Cambarus monongalensis Ortmann (Blue Crawfish), and Cambarus thomai Jezerinac (Little Brown Mudbug) were restricted to the Appalachian Plateau and Allegheny Mountains of western Pennsylvania (Appalachian physiographic provinces), and Cambarus diogenes Girard (Devil Crayfish) was restricted to the Coastal Plain of southeastern Pennsylvania. Given the need for updated information on burrowing crayfish, we surveyed western Pennsylvania’s burrowing crayfishes from 2014 to 2016 (Loughman et al. 2017). In the 1West Liberty University, Department of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, PO Box 295, West Liberty, WV 26074. 2Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, 800 Waterfront Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15222. 3Western Pennsylvania Conservancy and Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, 595 East Rolling Ridge Drive, Bellefonte, PA 16823. *Corresponding author - zloughman@westliberty.edu. Manuscript Editor: David Yozzo Notes of the Northeastern Naturalist, Issue 25/2, 2018 2018 Northeastern Naturalist Notes Vol. 25, No. 2 N16 Z.J. Loughman, P. Woods, and D.A. Lieb spring of 2014, P. Woods received photographs documenting burrowing crayfish chimneys in roadside ditches (RSD) on State Game Land (SGL) 101 in Crawford County, PA (Fig. 1). This documentation is significant because (1) burrowing crayfishes had not previously been found that far north in Pennsylvania, and (2) that portion of Crawford County is in the Northwestern Glaciated Plateau, outside of Pennsylvania’s Appalachian physiographic Figure 1. (A) Location (yellow dot) of the first documentation of Creaserinus fodiens in Pennsylvania, (B) roadside ditch adjacent to Pennsylvania State Game Land 101 with C. fodiens burrows and associated chimneys at site of capture, and (C) chimney in foreground of close-up view. N17 2018 Northeastern Naturalist Notes Vol. 25, No. 2 Z.J. Loughman, P. Woods, and D.A. Lieb provinces. Furthermore, none of the primary burrowing species that were known to occur in Pennsylvania had previously been documented in this physiographic region in either Pennsylvania, neighboring Ohio (Thoma and Jezerinac 2000), or New York (Crocker 1957). On 14 August 2014, Z.J. Loughman investigated the SGL 101 burrows and collected a single juvenile male Creaserinus fodiens (Cottle) (Digger Crayfish) via burrow excavation, and procured an additional juvenile female by hand at 24:30 h from a portion of a RSD with standing water at the same location. Burrows were plentiful in all RSD habitats in the general vicinity where both animals were captured. Upland habitat consisted of mesophytic forests dominated by Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. (American Beech), various Acer spp. (maples), and Betula lenta L. (Black Birch). The collection of C. fodiens from SGL 101 adds another species and genus to Pennsylvania’s crayfish fauna. Given the extent of crayfish introductions globally, determination of the status of C. fodiens (native or exotic) is critical in deciding if conservation or eradication efforts are warranted for this species. We consider C. fodiens to be native to Pennsylvania. Creaserinus fodiens is the dominant burrowing crayfish in neighboring Ashtabula County, OH (Thoma and Jezerinac 2000), with records for the species extending back to the 1800s and it has long been documented in ephemeral wetlands along Lake Erie (Crocker and Barr 1968), north of the Pennsylvania population in Ontario, Canada. Furthermore, in the central and northern parts of its range, C. fodiens is an ephemeral pool specialist, often associated with pools that occur within forested environments similar to those that are plentiful in SGL 101(Crocker and Barr 1968, Loughman and Simon 2011, Loughman et al. 2012, Thoma and Jezerinac 2000). Such environments are not typically frequented by anglers; thus the pools are unlikely to be directly exposed to introduced crayfishes via bait-bucket releases. We hypothesize that C. fodiens populations in Pennsylvania immigrated from Midwestern populations in neighboring Ohio following retreating glaciers at the end of the last glacial advance. Currently, the statewide distribution and conservation standing of C. fodiens remains unknown; surveys are currently underway to determine the true extent of its distribution in Pennsylvania. Figure 2. Juvenile male Creaserinus fodiens collected at Pennsylvania State Game Land 101 on 14 August 2014. 2018 Northeastern Naturalist Notes Vol. 25, No. 2 N18 Z.J. Loughman, P. Woods, and D.A. Lieb Acknowledgments. This work was only possible through funds provided by the Pennsylvania Wild Resource Conservation Program and the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy. We acknowledge 2 anonymous reviewers whose comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript increased its scope and quality. Literature Cited Crocker, D.W., and D.W. Barr. 1968. Handbook of the Crayfishes of Ontario. Miscellaneous Publications of the Royal Ontario Museum. Toronto, ON, Canada. 158 pp. Hobbs, H.H., Jr. 1981. The crayfishes of Georgia. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 318:1–549. Kilian, J.V., A.J. Becker, S.A. Stranko, M. Ashton, R.J. Klauda, J. Gerber, and M. Hurd. 2010. The status and distribution of Maryland crayfishes. Southeastern Nat uralist 9:11–32. Lieb, D.A., R.F. Carline, J.L. Rosenberger, and V.M. Mengel. 2008. The discovery and ecology of a member of the Cambarus acuminatus complex (Decapoda: Cambaridae) in Valley Creek, southeastern Pennsylvania. Journal of Crustacean Biology 28:439–450. Lieb, D.A., R.W. Bouchard, and R.F. Carline. 2011a. The crayfish fauna of southeastern Pennsylvania: Distributions, ecology, and changes over the last century. Journal of Crustacean Biology 31:166–178. Lieb, D.A., R.W. Bouchard, R.F. Carline, T.R. Nuttall, J.R. Wallace, and C.B. Wengert. 2011b. Conservation and management of crayfishes: Lessons from Pennsylvani a. Fisheries 36:489–507. Loughman, Z.J., and T.P. Simon. 2011. Zoogeography, taxonomy, and conservation of West Virginia’s Ohio River floodplain crayfishes (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Zookeys 74:1–78. Loughman, Z.J., and S.A. Welsh. 2013. Conservation assessment and atlas of the crayfishes of West Virginia. Final project report submitted to the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources Heritage Program, South Charleston, WV. 62 pp. Loughman, Z.J., S.A. Welsh, and T.P. Simon. 2012. Occupancy rates of primary burrowing crayfish in natural and disturbed large-river bottomlands. Journal of Crustacean Biology 32:557–564. Loughman, Z.J., D.A. Lieb, R.K. Scott, Z.W. Dillard, and N.M. Sadecky. 2017. Historical and current distribution of Appalachian primary burrowing crayfishes (Decpaoda: Astacoidea: Cambaridae) in western Pennsylvania: A century of change or stasis. Journal of Crustacean Biology 37:535–543. Ortmann, A.E. 1905. The crawfishes of Western Pennsylvania. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 3:387–406. Ortmann, A.E. 1906. The crawfishes of the state of Pennsylvania. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum 2:343–523. Richman, N.I., M. Böhm, S.B. Adams, C. Alvarez, E.A. Bergey, J.J.S. Bunn, Q. Burnham, J. Cordeiro, J. Coughran, K.A. Crandall, K.L. Dawkins, R.J. DiStefano, N.E. Doran, L. Edsman, A.G. Eversole, L. Füreder, J.M. Furse, C. Gherardi, P. Hamr, D.M. Holdich, P. Horwitz, K. Johnston, C.M. Jones, J.P.G. Jones, R.L. Jones, T.G. Jones, T. Kawai, S. Lawler, M. López-Mejía, R.M. Miller, C. Pedraza-Lara, J.D. Reynolds, A.M.M. Richardson, M.B. Schultz, G.A. Schuster, P.J. Sibley, C. Souty-Grosset, C.A. Taylor, R.F. Thoma, J. Walls, T.S. Walsh, and B. Cohen. 2015. Multiple Drivers of Decline in the Global Status of Freshwater Crayfish (Decapoda: Astacide). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society:Biological Sciences 370:20140060. 11 pp. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2014.0060. Simons, J.W., and S.J. Fraley. 2010. Distribution, status, and life-history observations of the crayfishes in western North Carolina. Southeastern Naturalist 9:79–1 26. Taylor, C.A., G.A. Schuster, J.E. Cooper, R.J. DiStefano, A.G. Eversole, P. Hamr, H.H. Hobbs III, H.W. Robison, C.E. Skelton, and R.F. Thoma. 2007. A reassessment of the conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada after 10+ years of increased awareness. Fisheries 32:372–389. Thoma, R.F., and R.C. Jezerinac. 2000. Ohio crayfish and shrimp atlas. Ohio Biological Survey Miscellaneous Contributions 7. 28 pp.