Site by Bennett Web & Design Co.
2012 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 11(1):99–110
Phenology of Shorebird Migration in Western Kentucky
Nicole Ranalli1 and Gary Ritchison1,*
Abstract - Staging areas along the coasts provide reliable food resources, and shorebirds
may use the same stopover locations every year. However, shorebirds use sites
opportunistically in the interior of North America because of the transient nature of
many habitats. Little is known, however, about the use of wetlands by migrating shorebirds
in many areas of the Mississippi Alluvial Valley (MAV), including Kentucky.
During 2004 and 2005, we examined the phenology of migration by shorebirds using
stopover habitats in Kentucky. From March to October, we surveyed shorebirds in
each moist soil unit as well as at other natural and man-made wetlands at each wildlife
management area. Species abundance was recorded a minimum of once every 10-day
period. We observed 25 species and 12,307 individual shorebirds during our study, with
Charadrius vociferous (Killdeer; n = 4134), Calidris melanotos (Pectoral Sandpiper;
n = 2912), Calidris minutilla (Least Sandpiper; n = 1138), Tringa melanoleuca (Gmelin)
(Greater Yellowlegs; n = 942), and Tringa flavipes (Lesser Yellowlegs; n = 911)
being most abundant. We observed nearly 75% more shorebirds during fall migration
than during spring migration, possibly because less suitable habitat is available in the
fall and shorebirds concentrate in those areas. In addition, shorebird migration extended
over a longer period in the fall than in the spring, a pattern that likely results because
adults migrate earlier in the fall and juveniles migrate later. Our results provide additional
evidence that the MAV provides important stopover habitat for many species of
shorebirds during both spring and fall migration.
Migrating shorebirds use stopover sites to renew and store energy to continue
migration. Staging areas in coastal regions provide reliable food resources, and
shorebirds may use the same stopover locations every year (Myers 1983). However,
stopover sites are often used opportunistically in interior North America
because of the transient nature of many habitats (Skagen and Knopf 1994). In
addition, wet and dry cycles make it difficult for shorebirds to predict the location
and availability of food resources and the duration of suitable conditions in
inland areas (de Szalay et al. 2000).
Most studies of shorebird migration in the United States have focused on
major stopover locations, such as Cheyenne Bottoms, KS (e.g., Helmers 1991)
or Delaware Bay (e.g., Tsipoura and Burger 1999). However, smaller, less frequently
visited sites could prove essential for shorebirds in the future because
of unpredictable hydrologic patterns (Skagen and Knopf 1993). Furthermore,
shorebirds may increasingly use inland sites rather than coastal areas affected by
human disturbance (Lafferty 2001) and climate change (Barlein and Exo 2007).
During fall migration, sites throughout the Mississippi Alluvial Valley (MAV)
support roughly 500,000 shorebirds representing an estimated 30 species (Loesch
1Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY 40475.
*Corresponding author - email@example.com.
100 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 11, No. 1
et al. 2000). Historically, habitat for migrating shorebirds in the MAV included
extensive mudbars, sandbars, drying oxbows, and sloughs. With the construction
of levees and other changes in hydrology, the natural function of such systems
has been altered (MAVGCP Working Group 2000), lessening the value of the
MAV to many wildlife species (Murray et al. 2009) and changing the abundance
and dispersion of refueling sites for shorebirds (Twedt et al. 1998). Little is currently
known about the use of the remaining wetlands in western Kentucky by
migrating shorebirds. Therefore, our objectives were to determine the species and
numbers of shorebirds that use wildlife management areas in western Kentucky
as stopover sites, as well as the timing of their migration.
We studied shorebird migration at three wildlife management areas in western
Kentucky: Ballard-Boatwright Wildlife Management Area (WMA; hereafter,
Ballard WMA), Peabody WMA, and Sloughs WMA (Table 1). Sloughs WMA
is a 4449-ha area of alternating ridges and sloughs with agricultural fields interspersed.
Ballard WMA encompasses 6640 ha of agriculture fields, cypress
swamps, oxbow lakes, and upland forest. Peabody WMA is a 19,016-ha area of
reclaimed emergent wetlands and mine lands.
We conducted shorebird (suborder Charadrii) surveys during the spring (11
March to 20 June) and summer–fall (11 July to 31 October) migration in 2004
and 2005. Methods used for shorebird surveys were taken from the Program
for Regional and International Shorebird Monitoring and the International
Shorebird Survey (http://www.manomet.org/our-initiatives/shorebird-recovery-
project/iss-prism/iss/prism-protocols). Although widely used, these
methods can produce biased estimates because no adjustments are made for
Table 1. Names, locations, and area of sites surveyed for shorebirds at three wildlife management
areas in Kentucky, 2004–2005.
WMA Site name Longitude, latitude Area (ha)
Ballard Olmstead unit 89°06'39.72"E, 37°05'18.70"N 7
Swan Lake 1 89°08'26.22"E, 37°02'04.70"N 3
Swan Lake 2 89°08'08.20"E, 37°02'00.96"N 5
Ballard Shorebird Unit 89°07'15.98"E, 37°00'08.12"N 8
Mitchell Lake 89°02'45.23"E, 37°09'06.25"N 158
B-2 89°02'01.29"E, 37°08'54.00"N 4
Happy Hollow 89°04'38.61"E, 37°08'44.79"N 26
B-3 89°04'13.26"E, 37°07'52.86"N 3
Peabody Peabody Sinclair Shorebird Unit 87°01'33.58"E, 37°14'27.70"N 1
Slough adjacent to S-7 road 86°59'05.40"E, 37°14'30.05"N 16
Paradise Slough 86°59'15.38"E, 37°14'45.40"N 2
Peabody Holmstead Shorebird Unit 86°55'42.68"E, 37°14'35.88"N 1
Sloughs Slough adjacent to State Route 268 87°47'56.53"E, 37°52'03.94"N 41
Slough adjacent to State Route 136 87°48'01.08"E, 37°51'05.82"N 25
Sloughs Shorebird Unit 87°45'26.22"E, 37°50'51.34"N 7
Muddy slough 87°45'18.62"E, 37°51'00.28"N 32
Hardy slough 87°45'10.47"E, 37°50'54.14"N 9
2012 N. Ranalli and G. Ritchison 101
detectability or variation in stopover duration (i.e., the average length of stay
at sites may be longer or shorter than the interval between successive counts).
For example, Farmer and Durbian (2006) found that surveys conducted without
such adjustments can significantly underestimate the number of shorebirds
using stopover sites.
Our surveys were conducted at least once during each 10-day period. Because
most shorebirds migrate at night and move to roost sites by late afternoon
(Skagen et al. 2003), all surveys began during the period from 0700–0900 h, and
were conducted on days with wind ≤25 kph and no rain. During surveys, we recorded
the species and numbers of each species present at each site. A potential
bias associated with shorebird surveys is measurement bias, e.g., the height of
vegetation can change during the survey period, and taller plants could limit visibility
(Skagen et al. 2003). We attempted to reduce the likelihood of such bias
by surveying from as many as three or four locations around each site.
Bird identification guides (Peterson and Peterson 2002, Sibley 2000) were
used to aid in identification. However, even experienced individuals sometimes
have trouble identifying some species (Skagen et al. 2003). As a result, shorebirds
were sometimes combined into size (e.g., small shorebirds categorized as
“peeps”) or taxonomic categories (e.g., yellowlegs or dowitchers). When large
numbers of shorebirds were present and counting individuals was difficult,
estimation techniques were used. As suggested by Skagen et al. (2003), the estimation
techniques used included counting a small number of birds, e.g., 10 birds,
to gain a sense of what 10 birds “look like”, then using this approach to determine
what groups of 50, 100, and 1000 birds “look like”.
During 2004 and 2005, we observed 25 species and 12,307 shorebirds at the
three wildlife management areas (Table 2). More species and shorebirds were observed
during summer–fall (25 species and 7818 individuals) than during spring
(17 species and 4489 individuals) migration, and more shorebirds were observed
in 2005 (6689 individuals) than 2004 (5618 individuals; Table 2). We observed
22 species of shorebirds in 2004 and 21 in 2005. Overall, the most frequently
observed species were Charadrius vociferous (Killdeer; n = 4134, 33.6%), Calidris
melanotos (Pectoral Sandpiper; n = 2912, 23.7%), Calidris minutilla (Least
Sandpiper; n = 1138, 9.2%), Tringa melanoleuca (Greater Yellowlegs; n = 942,
7.7%), and Tringa flavipes (Lesser Yellowlegs; n = 911, 7.4%) (Table 2).
During spring migration, we commonly observed Pectoral Sandpipers (n =
1052, or 23.4% of shorebirds observed), Greater Yellowlegs (n = 852, or 18.9%),
Lesser Yellowlegs (n = 665, or 14.8%), and Charadrius semipalmatus (Semipalmated
Plover; n = 512, or 11.4%) (Table 2). During summer–fall migration, the
most commonly observed species were Killdeer (n = 3906, or 49.9% of all shorebirds),
Pectoral Sandpipers (n = 1860, or 23.8%), and Least Sandpipers (n = 799,
or 10.2%) (Table 2).
During 2005, we observed fewer Killdeer (n = 1673) than during 2004 (n =
2461). However, several other species were observed in greater numbers in 2005
102 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 11, No. 1
Table 2. Species and numbers of shorebirds observed during spring (S) and fall (F) migration in 2004 and 2005 at the Ballard, Sloughs, and Peabody Wildlife
Management Areas, KY.
Ballard Sloughs Peabody
2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 % of
Species S F S F S F S F S F S F Total total
Charadrius vociferus L. (Killdeer) 10 2010 24 1101 30 293 113 271 19 99 32 132 4134 33.6%
Calidris melanotos (Vieillot) (Pectoral Sandpiper) 2 1312 50 389 23 74 975 46 0 17 2 22 2912 23.7%
Calidris minutilla (Vieillot) (Least Sandpiper) 0 231 3 235 9 86 261 103 5 71 61 73 1138 9.3%
Tringa melanoleuca (Gmelin) (Greater Yellowlegs) 62 24 186 33 97 2 465 22 6 3 36 6 942 7.7%
Tringa flavipes (Gmelin) (Lesser Yellowlegs) 198 45 96 127 183 5 180 58 0 2 8 9 911 7.4%
Charadrius semipalmatus Bonaparte (Semipalmated Plover) 2 33 34 7 0 7 421 11 0 26 55 0 596 4.8%
Calidris alpina (L.) (Dunlin) 0 9 0 5 21 149 336 0 0 46 20 0 586 4.8%
Calidris pusilla (L.) (Semipalmated Sandpiper) 0 98 31 35 5 21 20 20 17 55 32 12 346 2.8%
Tringa solitaria Wilson (Solitary Sandpiper) 5 58 7 64 4 2 13 21 6 4 3 0 187 1.5%
Gallinago delicato Ord (Wilson’s Snipe) 6 0 21 19 0 1 18 36 0 0 0 1 102 0.8%
Limnodromus griseus Gmelin (Short-billed Dowitcher) 0 1 9 1 0 0 82 4 0 0 0 0 97 0.8%
Actitis macularia L. (Spotted Sandpiper) 1 17 5 20 0 10 6 12 0 1 14 1 87 0.7%
Calidris himantopus Bonaparte (Stilt Sandpiper) 0 21 0 32 9 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 65 0.5%
Tringa spp.A 1 0 1 0 5 0 42 0 0 0 0 1 50 0.4%
Limnodromus scolopaceus Say (Long-billed Dowitcher) 0 0 0 0 0 11 38 0 0 0 0 0 49 0.4%
PeepsB 0 0 9 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0.3%
Calidris fuscicollis Vieillot (White-rumped Sandpiper) 0 0 8 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 2 0 19 0.2%
Pluvialis dominica (Statius Muller) American Golden Plover 0 0 0 8 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 < 0.1%
Phalaropus tricolor (Vieillot) (Wilson’s Phalarope) 0 1 1 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 9 < 0.1%
Calidris mauri Cabanis (Western Sandpiper) 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 < 0.1%
Limnodromus spp.C 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 7 < 0.1%
Himantopus mexicanus Müller (Black-necked Stilt) 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 < 0.1%
Calidris bairdii Coues (Baird's Sandpiper) 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 < 0.1%
Tryngites subruficollis Vieillot (Buff-breasted Sandpiper) 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 < 0.1%
Tringa semipalmata Gmelin (Willet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 < 0.1%
Calidris alba Pallas (Sanderling) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 < 0.1%
Pluvialis squatarola L. (Grey Plover) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 < 0.1%
Scolopax minor Gmelin (American Woodcock) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 < 0.1%
Total 287 3871 485 2086 411 663 2988 604 53 333 265 261 12,307
ATringa spp. included Tringa melanoleuca and Tringa flavipes.BPeeps included Calidris minutilla, C. pusilla, C. mauri, and C. fuscicollis.
CLimnodromus spp. included Limnodromus griseus and Limnodromus scolopaceus.
2012 N. Ranalli and G. Ritchison 103
than 2004 (Table 2), including Greater Yellowlegs (n = 748 vs. 194), Semipalmated
Plovers (n = 528 vs.68), and Least Sandpipers (n = 736 vs. 402).
During spring, shorebird numbers peaked from mid-April to mid-May
(Fig. 1A). During summer–fall migration, shorebird numbers were highest in
Figure 1. Mean number of shorebirds observed per 10- or 11-day survey period at Ballard,
Sloughs, and Peabody Wildlife Management Areas in western Kentucky during
spring (A) and summer–fall (B) migrations during a two-year period (2004–2005).
104 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 11, No. 1
late July–early August, but shorebirds were observed through the end of October
We found interspecific variation in the timing of peak migration among
species of shorebirds observed in the greatest numbers. During the spring,
peak migration of Greater and Lesser Yellowlegs occurred during mid-March
Figure 2. Mean number of Greater Yellowlegs, Lesser Yellowlegs, Semipalmated Plovers,
and Dunlins observed per 10- or 11-day survey period at Ballard, Sloughs, and Peabody
Wildlife Management Areas in western Kentucky during spring (A) and summer–fall (B)
migrations during a two-year period (2004–2005).
2012 N. Ranalli and G. Ritchison 105
and again in late April and early May (Fig. 2A). Numbers were highest from
mid- to late April for Semipalmated Plovers, and from late April through mid-
May for Least Sandpipers (Fig. 2A). Numbers of Calidris alpina (Dunlin;
Fig. 2A) and Pectoral Sandpipers (Fig. 3A) peaked during early to mid-May;
whereas, Killdeer numbers were similar from mid-March through mid-June
Figure 3. Mean number of Killdeer, Pectoral Sandpipers, and Least Sandpipers observed
per 10- or 11-day survey period at Ballard, Sloughs, and Peabody Wildlife Management
Areas in western Kentucky during spring (A) and summer–fall (B) migrations during a
two-year period (2004–2005).
106 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 11, No. 1
During summer–fall migration, several species of shorebirds were observed
in similar numbers during the period from mid- to late July through October,
including Least Sandpipers (Fig. 3B), Greater and Lesser Yellowlegs (but with
a slight peak in early-August; Fig. 2B), and Semipalmated Plovers (Fig. 2B). In
contrast, numbers peaked in late July and early August for Killdeer and Pectoral
Sandpipers (Fig. 3B), and in mid- to late October for Dunlins (Fig. 2B).
We observed 25 species of shorebirds during our study. Similarly, a previous
study indicated that 28 species of shorebirds use the MAV as a migratory corridor
(Loesch et al. 2000). Shorebirds observed most often during our study were
Killdeer, Pectoral Sandpipers, and Least Sandpipers. Similarly, Killdeer were the
most common overwintering shorebird reported in east Tennessee (Laux 2008)
and in managed wetlands in the MAV (Twedt et al. 1998).
Pectoral Sandpipers were the second most abundant shorebird overall and the
most commonly observed shorebird during spring migration. Interior wetlands
in North America are thought to be important for calidridine sandpipers during
spring migration (Skagen 2006, Skagen et al. 1999). Pectoral Sandpipers concentrate
in a relatively narrow corridor extending east from 100°W to the Mississippi
Valley (Holmes and Pitelka 1998); fewer typically migrate along the east coast
(Clark et al. 1993, Placyk and Harrington 2004). In contrast, during the summer
and fall, Pectoral Sandpipers, particularly juveniles, migrate across North
America in a wide front (Holmes and Pitelka 1998). However, even during summer–
fall migration, an estimated 121,000 Pectoral Sandpipers use the MAV, and
were second in abundance only to Least Sandpipers (Loesch et al. 2000). Thus,
during migration, particularly spring migration, the MAV and Western Gulf Coast
Plain are likely as important to Pectoral Sandpipers as any other region (MAV/
Least Sandpipers were the third most abundant shorebird in our study, with
more observed during summer–fall than spring migration. Least Sandpipers
might be the most abundant shorebird in the MAV, with an estimated 151,000 individuals
migrating through the MAV during fall migration (Loesch et al. 2000).
Our results, and the estimates of Loesch et al. (2000), suggest that the MAV is an
important migratory pathway for Least Sandpipers.
Greater and Lesser Yellowlegs were the fourth and fifth most common shorebirds,
respectively, observed during our study, and both species were observed
in greater numbers during spring than summer–fall migration. Lesser Yellowlegs
migrate primarily in the interior of North America during spring migration, but
are found both on the Atlantic coast and interior during fall migration (Tibbitts
and Moskoff 1999). Greater Yellowlegs migrate across much of the Americas
during both spring and fall migration (Elphick and Tibbitts 1998), but numbers
are generally reduced in interior locations during fall migration (Bent 1927).
Overall, we observed nearly 75% more shorebirds during summer–fall
migration than during spring migration. More shorebirds were also observed
during fall migration than during spring migration in western Tennessee (Short
2012 N. Ranalli and G. Ritchison 107
1999). Floodwaters may create more shallow-water and mudflat habitat for
shorebirds in the spring than in the fall, when there is generally less precipitation
(Loesch et al. 2000). As a result, shorebirds are likely limited to fewer
areas of suitable habitat in the fall, with a greater concentration of birds in those
areas contributing to the greater numbers observed.
We observed nearly five times as many shorebirds during spring 2005 than
during spring 2004. Shorebird habitat in the MAV during spring is dynamic and
unpredictable compared to coastal areas (Skagen and Knopf 1994, Brown et al.
2001). Despite flood-control structures, agricultural land is often inundated during
the spring (Twedt et al. 1998), creating shorebird habitat in unpredictable
locations. The potential increase of foraging habitat throughout the region may
disperse shorebirds from managed wetlands. Two of our study areas (Ballard and
Sloughs WMAs) were inundated during spring 2004 because of rain and subsequent
flooding of both the Mississippi and Ohio rivers; therefore, little mudflat
and shallow-water habitat was available. In contrast, water levels were lower
during spring 2005, which increased the amount of available habitat.
In spring, we observed shorebirds during a 91-day period, with peak numbers
occurring during a four-week period from mid-April through mid-May. During
summer–fall migration, we observed shorebirds for a longer period (113 days),
and with the exception of Killdeer and Pectoral Sandpipers, peaks in numbers
of shorebirds during that period were generally less apparent. Similar results,
with fall migration of shorebirds occurring during a longer period than spring
migration, have been reported by others (Andrei et al. 2006, Smith et al. 1991).
Fall migration of shorebirds generally occurs over a longer period because adults
migrate earlier in the fall and juveniles migrate later (Colwell et al. 1988). For
example, in Canada, male Pectoral Sandpipers moving south from breeding areas
arrive in July, most females arrive in late July and into August, and juveniles arrive
in September and October (Semenchuk 1992). Similar delays by juveniles in
initiating migration have been reported for other species of shorebirds that were
observed in the greatest numbers during our study, including Lesser Yellowlegs
(Tibbitts and Moskoff 1999), Least Sandpipers (Nebel and Cooper 2008), and
Semipalmated Sandpipers (Hicklin and Gratto-Trevor 2010).
Among the shorebirds observed in the greatest numbers during our study,
Greater and Lesser Yellowlegs exhibited early peaks in the spring (mid-March to
mid-April), closely followed by Pectoral Sandpipers (beginning in mid-April).
Similarly, Greater and Lesser Yellowlegs and Pectoral Sandpipers were found to
be the first shorebirds to appear at stopover sites in Arkansas, first arriving in numbers
in mid-March (Smith et al. 1991). All three of these species breed at relatively
high latitudes (Greater Yellowlegs: 48–58°N [Elphick and Tibbitts 1998], Lesser
Yellowlegs: 51–69°N [Tibbitts and Moskoff 1999], Pectoral Sandpiper: primarily
above the Arctic circle at 66.33°N [Holmes and Pitelka 1998]) and initiate spring
migration early to permit timely arrival on their breeding grounds.
During summer–fall migration, we found that numbers of most species were
similar during the period from mid-July through October. However, peak Dunlin
migration was later than that of other shorebirds (mid- to late October). Dunlins
108 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 11, No. 1
are generally one of the last shorebird species to leave the breeding grounds
(coastal Alaska and Canada) and, in contrast to most other shorebirds, most
adults and juveniles migrate together (Warnock and Gill 1996).
In sum, our study areas in western Kentucky provided habitat for several species
of shorebirds. The MAV, including Kentucky, may become more important
for migrating shorebirds in the future because shorebirds may increase use of
inland locations with increasing human disturbance in coastal areas (Lafferty
2001), loss of intertidal habitat resulting from sea-level rise caused by climate
change (Galbraith et al. 2002), or with habitat losses in other migratory corridors.
In addition, smaller sites, which are currently visited less frequently by shorebirds,
may prove essential for shorebirds in the future because of unpredictable
hydrologic patterns (Skagen and Knopf 1993).
We thank Jennifer Adler, Troy Evans, Amber Heramb, Kelly Vowells, Lance Watt,
Kristen Collins, Brian Scofield, Quinten Tolliver, David Roemer, Hap Chambers, Robert
Dever, and Brainard Palmer-Ball, Jr. for help in the field, J. Michael Meyers and two
anonymous reviewers for helpful comments, and the Kentucky Department of Fish and
Wildlife Resources for financial support.
Andrei, A.E., L.M. Smith, D.A. Haukos, and J.G. Surles. 2006. Community composition
and migration chronology of shorebirds using the saline lakes of the southern Great
Plains, USA. Journal of Field Ornithology 77:372–383.
Bairlein, F., and K.M. Exo. 2007. Climate change and migratory waterbirds in the Wadden
Sea. Wadden Sea Ecosystem 23:43–52.
Bent, A.C. 1927. Life histories of North American shore birds, Pt. 1. US National Museum
Bulletin No. 142, Washington, DC.
Brown, S., C. Hickey, B. Harrington, and R. Gill (Eds.). 2001. The US Shorebird
Conservation Plan, 2nd Edition. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, Manomet,
Clark, K.E., L.J. Niles, and J. Burger. 1993. Abundance and distribution of migrant
shorebirds in Delaware Bay. Condor 95:694–705.
Colwell, M.A., S.D. Fellows, and L.W. Oring. 1988. Chronology of shorebird migration
at Last Mountain National Wildlife Area, Saskatchewan, Canada. Wader Study Group
de Szalay, F., P. Helmers, D. Humburg, S.J. Lewis, B. Pardo, and M. Shieldcastle. 2000.
US Shorebird Conservation Plan: Upper Mississippi Valley/ Great Lakes Regional
Shorebird Conservation Plan, version 1.0. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences,
Manomet, MA. Available online at http://www.fws.gov/shorebirdplan/RegionalShorebird/
downloads/UMVGL5.pdf. Accessed 31 August 2011.
Elphick, C.S., and T.L. Tibbitts. 1998. Greater Yellowlegs (Tringa melanoleuca). In A.
Poole (Ed.). The Birds of North America Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca,
NY. Available online at http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/355. Accessed 12
Farmer, A., and F. Durbian. 2006. Estimating shorebird numbers at migration stopover
sites. Condor 108:792–807.
2012 N. Ranalli and G. Ritchison 109
Galbraith, H., R. Jones, R. Park, J. Clough, S. Herrod-Julius, B. Harrington, and G. Page.
2002. Global climate change and sea-level rise: Potential losses of intertidal habitat
for shorebirds. Waterbirds 25:173–183.
Helmers, D.L. 1991. Habitat use by migrant shorebirds and invertebrate availability in a
managed wetland complex. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Hicklin, P., and C.L. Gratto-Trevor. 2010. Semipalmated Sandpiper (Calidris pusilla).
In A. Poole (Ed.). The Birds of North America Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology,
Ithaca, NY. Available online at http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/006. Accessed
12 November 2010.
Holmes, R.T., and F.A. Pitelka. 1998. Pectoral Sandpiper (Calidris melanotos). In A.
Poole (Ed.). The Birds of North America Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca,
NY. Available online at http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/348. Accessed 12
Lafferty, K.D. 2001. Birds at a southern California beach: Seasonality, habitat use, and
disturbance by human activity. Biodiversity and Conservation 10:1949–1962.
Laux, J.W. 2008. Waterbird responses to drawdown of two East Tennessee River Valley
reservoirs. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
Loesch, C.R., D.J. Twedt, K. Tripp, W.C. Hunter, and M.S. Woodrey. 2000. Development
of management objectives for waterfowl and shorebirds in the Mississippi Alluvial
Valley. Pp. 8–11, In R. Bonney, D.N. Pashley, R.J. Cooper, and L. Niles (Eds.). Strategies
for Bird Conservation: The Partners in Flight Planning Process. US Department
of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT.
Mississippi Alluvial Valley/West Gulf Coastal Plain (MAV/WGCP) Working Group.
2000. US Shorebird conservation plan: Lower Mississippi Valley/Western Gulf
Coastal Plain. L. Elliott and K. McKnight (Coordinators). Manomet Center for Conservation
Sciences, Manomet, MA.
Murray, B., A. Jenkins, R. Kramer, and S.P. Faulkner. 2009. Valuing ecosystem services
from wetland restoration in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Ecosystem Services Series,
Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University, Durham,
Myers, J.P. 1983. Conservation of migrating shorebirds: Staging areas, geographic
bottlenecks, and regional movements. American Birds 37:23–25.
Nebel, S., and J.M. Cooper. 2008. Least Sandpiper (Calidris minutilla). In A. Poole
(Ed.). The Birds of North America Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca,
NY. Available online at http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/115. Accessed 12
Peterson, R.T., and V.M. Peterson. 2002. A Field Guide to the Birds of Eastern and Central
North America. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA.
Placyk, J.S., Jr., and B.A. Harrington. 2004. Prey abundance and habitat use by migratory
shorebirds at coastal stopover sites in Connecticut. Journal of Field Ornithology
Semenchuk, G.P. 1992. The Atlas of Breeding Birds of Alberta. Federation of Alberta
Naturalists, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Short, M.R. 1999. Shorebirds in western Tennessee: Migration and ecology and
evaluation of management effectiveness. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Tennessee,
Sibley, D.A. 2000. The Sibley Guide to Birds. Chanticleer Press Inc., New York, NY.
110 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 11, No. 1
Skagen, S.K. 2006. Migration stopovers and the conservation of Arctic-breeding calidridine
sandpipers. Auk 123:313–322.
Skagen, S.K., and F.L. Knopf. 1993. Toward conservation of mid-continental shorebird
migrations. Conservation Biology 7:533–544.
Skagen, S.K., and F.L. Knopf. 1994. Migrating shorebirds and habitat dynamics at a
prairie wetland complex. Wilson Bulletin 106:91–105.
Skagen, S.K., P.B. Sharpe, R. G. Waltermire, and M.B. Dillon. 1999. Biogeographical
profiles of shorebird migration in midcontinental North America. US Geological Survey
Biological Science Report 2000-0003, Washington, DC.
Skagen, S.K., C.P. Melcher, and J. Bart. 2003. Managers’ monitoring manual: Ground
counts of shorebirds at non-breeding sites. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center,
Patuxent, MD. Available online at http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/monmanual/techniques/
shorebirdsnonbreedingsites.htm. Accessed 31 August 2011.
Smith, K.G., J.C. Neal, and M.A. Mlodinow. 1991. Shorebird migration at artificial fish
ponds in the prairie-forest ecotone of northwestern Arkansas. Southwestern Naturalist
Tibbitts, T.L., and W. Moskoff. 1999. Lesser Yellowlegs (Tringa flavipes). In A. Poole
(Ed.). The Birds of North America Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.
Available online at http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/427. Accessed 14 November
Tsipoura, N., and J. Burger. 1999. Shorebird diet during spring migration stopover on
Delaware Bay. Condor. 101:635–644.
Twedt, D.J., C.O. Nelms, V.E. Rettig, and S.R. Aycock. 1998. Shorebird use of managed
wetlands in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. American Midland Naturalist
Warnock, N.D., and R.E. Gill. 1996. Dunlin (Calidris alpina). In A. Poole (Ed.). The
Birds of North America Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY. Available
online at http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/203. Accessed 15 November 2010.