Regular issues
Special Issues

Southeastern Naturalist
    SENA Home
    Range and Scope
    Board of Editors
    Editorial Workflow
    Publication Charges

Other EH Journals
    Northeastern Naturalist
    Caribbean Naturalist
    Urban Naturalist
    Eastern Paleontologist
    Eastern Biologist
    Journal of the North Atlantic

EH Natural History Home

Canals as Vectors for Fish Movement: Potential Southward Range Expansion of Lepisosteus osseus L. (Longnose Gar) in South Florida
David A. Gandy, Jennifer S. Rehage, Jay W. Munyon, Kelly B. Gestring, and John I. Galvez

Southeastern Naturalist, Volume 11, Issue 2 (2012): 253–262

Full-text pdf (Accessible only to subscribers.To subscribe click here.)


Site by Bennett Web & Design Co.
2012 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 11(2):253–262 Canals as Vectors for Fish Movement: Potential Southward Range Expansion of Lepisosteus osseus L. (Longnose Gar) in South Florida David A. Gandy1,*, Jennifer S. Rehage1, Jay W. Munyon2, Kelly B. Gestring3, and John I. Galvez4 Abstract - Lepisosteus osseus (Longnose Gar) is a large-bodied predator, whose Florida distribution remains unclear at the southern edge of its range. We reviewed available literature and museum voucher specimens to provide a more accurate range description, and we discuss recent collections in south Florida. Longnose Gar has not been previously reported in natural habitats south of Lake Okeechobee. Instead, records south of the lake are from canals, and most are recent (since 2000), including our own southernmost 2011 record. No records from Everglades natural habitats have been collected. Previous studies have shown native range expansions in anthropogenically disturbed landscapes. We suggest that the Longnose Gar is expanding its range southward in Florida using canals as dispersal vectors and/or suitable habitat. Introduction Lepisosteus osseus L. (Longnose Gar) is one of seven extant species in the fish family Lepisosteidae. Longnose Gar has anatomically distinct characteristics— primarily its thin, elongate snout, which more than doubles head length and is significantly longer than that of close relatives (Suttkus 1963)—that easily distinguish it from other Lepisosteids. Aside from snout length, a single row of sharp villiform teeth in the upper jaw allows this species to be easily distinguishable from Atractosteus spatula Lacepede (Alligator Gar; Page and Burr 1991). The coloration of Longnose Gar is olivaceous brown dorsally and into the sides, fading to a pale yellow or white ventrally (Becker 1983, Suttkus 1963). Young have a pronounced broad, dark mid-lateral stripe that runs from the snout to the base of the caudal fin with a distinct white stripe directly below it (Becker 1983, Smith 2002). Coloration varies in relation to water clarity; dark spots on unpaired fins extending into the body and the dorsal region of the head in clear water, and a deeper green coloration with stronger brown hues in murky waters (Suttkus 1963). Longnose Gar is more common in freshwater, although individuals have been caught at salinities as high as 33 psu (Goodyear 1967, Hildebrand and Schroeder 1928, Jean 1946, Schwartz 2003, Swift et al. 1977). Once geographically widespread, fossils of all seven extant species of gar have been found throughout North America, Europe, Africa, and Asia, and date to the lower Cretaceous period (Helfman et al. 2009, Stiassny et al. 2004, Wiley 1976). 1Earth and Environment Department, Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University, Miami, fl33199. 2Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, fl33199. 3Non-Native Fish Laboratory, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Boca Raton, fl33431. 4 US Fish and Wildlife Service, Peninsular Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, Vero Beach, FL 32960. *Corresponding author - 254 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 11, No. 2 However, its present-day range is considerably narrower, extending from Quebec to Florida, into the Mississippi and Rio Grande drainages (Hubbs et al. 2008, Page and Burr 1991). In Florida, the delineation of its distribution is somewhat unclear. Some authors have described Longnose Gar’s distribution to be statewide (Briggs 1958, Carr and Goin 1955, Stevenson 1976), while others suggest a southern boundary. Kilby and Caldwell (1955) conducted the first survey of fishes in south Florida, and considered Lake Okeechobee to be the southern end of its range. Ager (1971) also reported Longnose Gar in Lake Okeechobee, while Lee et al. (1980) mapped a central Florida boundary and vaguely stated its distribution as “Florida”, and Page and Burr (1991) delineated its range as “central Florida”. To clarify the natural range of Longnose Gar in Florida, particularly along the southern boundary of its distribution, we compiled available records of its occurrence in natural habitats from the published and available grey literature and from museum voucher specimens. By natural habitats, we refer to lakes, ponds, rivers, wetlands, and estuaries, but exclude artificial habitats such as canals. We also noted icthyofaunal studies that report no observations or collections of this species. Lastly, we highlight recent records of this species south of Lake Okeechobee, all from canals, including the southernmost record to date, which is from our own sampling. Our objectives were to (1) clarify the native range distribution of Longnose Gar in natural waters of Florida, and (2) discuss the possibility that the Longnose Gar is undergoing a recent southern range expansion in the Everglades region, facilitated by canals. Methods Our literature review yielded 15 studies (1935–1990) showing 32 records of Longnose Gar from nine of the 14 major Florida drainages excluding south Florida (Table 1). We complemented the literature findings with over 160 museum voucher specimens (1948–2009) obtained from the Florida Museum of Natural History and the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s Fish and Wildlife Research Institute. We plotted these records, which span the past 74 years, using ArcGIS 9 (Fig. 1). For the museum specimens, we plotted only those that constituted new locations from those already reported in the field studies, totaling 37 additional records (Fig. 1). To explore the possibility of a southward range expansion of Longnose Gar, we then noted at least 17 observations reported from the Everglades region, beginning with the first reports by Dineen (1974) (Table 2). These new records include the southernmost record to date, in western Miami-Dade County, from our own monitoring efforts of fishes in canals bordering Everglades National Park (ENP). Similarly, we used ArcGIS 9 to map these new south Florida records (Fig. 2). Results and Discussion Our review indicates that the Longnose Gar occurs naturally throughout Florida, extending as far south as Lake Okeechobee and the Loxahatchee River, but we found no records from natural habitats in the extreme southern part of Florida, including the Everglades (Table 1, Fig. 1). Four studies indicated that Longnose Gar commonly occur throughout the Florida panhandle (Table 1, Fig. 1), whereas 11 studies 2012 D.A. Gandy, J.S. Rehage, J.W. Munyon, K.B. Gestring, and J.I. Galvez 255 describe their occurrence in water bodies spanning from the St. Johns and southward to the Peace and Kissimmee drainage basins. The voucher specimens contributed records for an additional two drainages (Aucilla-Waccasassa and East Coastal) along the coastal panhandle and the Atlantic coastal region of central Florida. For the Greater Everglades region, we examined 20 fish studies south of Lake Okeechobee conducted between 1955 and 2011, none of which reported Longnose Gar occurrences from natural habitats (Table 1, Fig. 1). Collectively, Table 1. Summary of 35 studies noting the occurrence or absence of L. osseus in Florida. All of these studies are shown in Figure 1. For habitat type: E = estuarine, C = canal, CC = coastal creeks, L = lake, M = marsh, P = pond, R = river, S = spring. For notes on occurrence: O = observed, C = collected, NS = not specified, A = not observed or collected. For sampling gear: A = angling, D = drop trap, E = electrofishing, EG = entanglement gear, O = other, R = rotenone, SP = spear fishing, T = throw trap, V = visual. Sampling Source Habitat type Drainage basin Occurrence gear Goff 1935 L St. Johns O O Fowler 1940 L St. Johns O V Hubbs and Allen 1943 S St. Johns C SP Allen 1946 S St. Johns O, C V Herald and Strickland 1949 R, S Tampa O O Moody 1954 L Tampa, St. Johns C EG Holloway 1954 L, R St. Johns C SP McLane 1955 R St. Johns O, C EG, O Hellier 1967 R Suwannee O, C EG, O Tagatz 1967 R St. Johns NS EG Ager 1971 L Kissimmee C EG Beecher et al. 1977 R Escambia O, C E, EG Swift et al. 1977 R, E Ochlockonee C EG, O Beecher and Hixson 1982 R Choctawhatchee, O, C E Apalachicola, Escambia Champeau 1990 R Peace O, C E Kilby and Caldwell 1955 M, C South Florida A O Kahl 1964 M South Florida A EG, O Kushlan 1972 M South Florida A O Kushlan and Lodge 1974 M, C South Florida A O Kushlan 1976 M South Florida A O Carlson and Duever 1977 M South Florida A O Loftus and Kushlan 1987 M, R, C South Florida A A, E, EG, O, R, T Lorenz et al. 1997 M, E South Florida A D Fury et al. 1995 M, C South Florida A EG Trexler et al. 2001 M, C South Florida A E, T Chick et al. 2004 M South Florida A E Ellis et al. 2003 M, R, P, C South Florida A E, EG, O, V Trexler et al. 2005 M South Florida A T Ruetz et al. 2005 M South Florida A T Kline and Bamford 2006 M, C South Florida A O, T Lorenz and Serafy 2006 M, E South Florida A D Rehage and Trexler 2006 M South Florida A E, T Rehage and Loftus 2007 HC South Florida A E Kline and Fratto 2008 M, C South Florida A O, T Parkos et al. 2011 M South Florida A E 256 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 11, No. 2 these studies surveyed wide expanses of the Greater Everglades region, from the water conservation areas (WCAs), south to ENP, and stretching into the marsh-mangrove ecotone (Table 1, Fig. 1). The studies used different sampling techniques and targeted a variety of habitats, including freshwater marshes, coastal mangroves, alligator holes, and ponds. Additionally, eight of those studies also surveyed canals but reported no records (Table 1). Similarly, a number of studies by P. Shafland (Non-Native Fish Laboratory, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Boca Raton, FL) conducted between 1975–2008 largely in canals, reported no occurrences over this period (e.g., Shafland et al. 2008). Loftus and Kushlan (1987) sampled 181 sites encompassing a range of freshwater and coastal habitats in urban Miami and the southern Everglades and noted Longnose Gar to be a species of “doubtful occurrence” that had not been collected in extreme southern Florida. In contrast, recent records indicate that Longnose Gar is in fact present in south Florida, but appear confined to canal habitats (Table 2, Fig. 2). We report 12 observations (totaling at least 17 fish) beginning with several specimens reported in 1974, and a number of recent observations since 2000, which include one museum specimen (Table 2, Fig. 2). Dineen (1974) collected the species in the northern Everglades as part of a 12-year monitoring project (1962–1974) conducted by the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. He reported several Longnose Gar collected from the south side of the L-39 canal in northern WCA 2A in 1965 (collected via rotenone and netting), and noted one other specimen caught by an Figure 1. Map of the State of Florida showing presence or absence of L. osseus in natural habitats (e.g., marshes, rivers, lakes). Presence studies are from 1935 to 1990, while absence studies date from between 1950 to 2011 (see Table 1). Museum voucher specimens are shown in grey symbols (37 records), while field studies are shown in black symbols (32 records). 2012 D.A. Gandy, J.S. Rehage, J.W. Munyon, K.B. Gestring, and J.I. Galvez 257 angler in 1972 from the L-39B canal (Fig. 2). The remaining 15 specimens collected or observed between 2000 and 2011 are also exclusively from Everglades or urban canals. This includes the southernmost record to date (one specimen, 118 cm TL), collected in November 2011 from the L-31W canal via boat-mounted electrofi shing (Table 2, Fig. 2). Interestingly, most records are of adults (80–118 cm TL), whereas the five juvenile records (41–47.5 cm TL) are from the L-40 and L-7 canals (closer to Lake Okeechobee than all adult records). These new records south of Lake Okeechobee suggest a southern range expansion for Longnose Gar into south Florida. Its presence in south Florida exclusively in a large, interconnected network of canals indicates that canals may be serving as conduits for its dispersal, and/or suitable habitat for this species since no specimens have been collected in natural Everglades marshes or other deep-water habitats. Elsewhere, Longnose Gar is commonly observed over a range of low to moderate flow conditions and salinities, and is more commonly Figure 2. Map of south Florida showing new occurrences of L. osseus from 1974 to 2011 in canals both in the Everglades region and urbanized south Florida (see Table 2). 258 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 11, No. 2 found in deep and structurally complex portions of lakes and river channels (McGrath 2010, Suttkus 1963). Robertson et al. (2008) examined the association between hydrologic connectivity and habitat partitioning among three gar species in a Texas river, and found that 84% of Longnose Gar were captured in the river channel rather than in shallower, associated oxbows. Relatively little is known about the movement or home range of this species, except for migratory movements during the reproductive season. Johnson and Noltie (1996) found that resident lake Longnose Gar move into stream tributaries to spawn, and reported post-spawning recaptures as far as 48 km away from spawning grounds. Spawning migrations of Longnose Gar were positively correlated to stream flow, and individuals exhibited high annual site fidelity to spawning grounds. In our canals, the majority of records are adults; thus, it remains unclear whether the use of canals is related to spawning. The exact source population for this range expansion is not known, but we hypothesized that movement out of Lake Okeechobee, or via the lake from other water bodies, is most likely because of its connectivity to south Florida’s canal network. The modern Everglades canals date back to the 1880s, and currently amount to 2500 km of canals and levees that compartmentalize the system, disrupting sheet flow and hydrologic connectivity (Light and Dineen 1994, Sklar et al. 2002). Canals in the system play a number of roles, by acting as sources of nutrients, pollutants, and non-native species (Harvey et al. 2010). From a biotic standpoint, their role as thermal refugia for non-native fishes is of importance, and likely a key factor in the persistence of non-native populations (Schofield et al. 2010, Trexler et al. 2001). Canals may also provide permanent deep-water refuge for biota that were historically rare or absent in the ecosystem (Gunderson and Loftus 1993), and whose habitat quality is unknown. Their role as dispersal vectors, Table 2. Summary of new records of L. osseus in south Florida in artificial canals, 1974–2011, also mapped in Figure 2. For occurrence (occur.): A = caught by recreational angler, C = collected, O = observed, NS = not specified and number in parenthesis refers to the number of specimens reported. For sampling gear type: A = angling, E = electrofishing, EG = entanglement gear, R = rotenone. Sampling Water body Rec. # Yr Northing Easting Occur. gear Source L-35B Canal 1 1974 2895649 555367 A (1) A Dineen 1974 L-39 Canal 1 1974 2916862 564586 C (NS) EG, R Dineen 1974 N New River Canal (G-15) 2 2000 2889937 563592 C (3) E This study W Palm Beach Canal (C-51) 3 2006 2947448 593424 C (1) E This study Hillsboro Canal (G-08) 4 2007 2913997 574002 C (2) E This study L-67 Ext. Canal 5 2009 2844965 532847 C (1) E Museum specimen* C-1W 6 2010 2828223 562775 O (1) E This study L-30 Canal 7 2011 2851843 551886 A (1) A This study L-31W Canal† 8 2011 2816214 542367 C (1) E This study L-7 Canal 9 2011 2949185 560630 C (2) E This study L-7 Canal 10 2011 2944924 557692 C (1) E This study L-7 Canal 11 2011 2941148 555308 C (1) E This study L-40 Canal 12 2011 2942696 571439 C (1) E This study †Denotes the southernmost and most recent record in southern Miami-Dade County. *Denotes a voucher specimen provided by University of Florida, Florida Museum of Natural History, Division of Ichthyology, Gainesville, FL; collected by J. Kline; and deposited by L.M. Page. 2012 D.A. Gandy, J.S. Rehage, J.W. Munyon, K.B. Gestring, and J.I. Galvez 259 suitable year-around deep habitats, and as corridors for range expansion of native fishes has been previously noted (Ellis et al. 2003, Harvey et al. 2010, Loftus and Kushlan 1987). Loftus and Kushlan (1987) found that Esox niger Lesueur (Chain Pickerel), Ictalurus punctatus Rafinesque (Channel Catfish), and Pomoxis nigromaculatus Lesueur (Black Crappie) were widely distributed in central Florida, but were common in south Florida only in canals. We can now add Longnose Gar to the list of species that use canals as dispersal corridors or suitable habitat in extreme southern Florida. South Florida canals may break down dispersal barriers previously provided by shallow-vegetated wetlands that experience seasonal dry-down. The pattern of seasonal dry down of Everglades marshes is known to limit the abundance of large-bodied fishes (Chick et al. 2004, Parkos et al. 2011, Rehage and Loftus 2007, Trexler et al. 2005). Biogeographic barriers (e.g., oceans, mountain ranges, and catchment basins) typically limit faunal exchanges, but anthropogenic alterations such as canals, can remove these natural barriers, resulting in biotic homogenization (Rahel 2002). For instance, Mills et al. (1999) noted the expansion of Morone americana Gmelin (White Perch), and Alosa psuedoharengus Wilson (Alewife) beyond their historical distributions due to the construction of the Erie Canal. Despite ongoing restoration efforts, only a small portion of south Florida canals will be removed, making canals a permanent feature of the Everglades ecosystem (CERP 1999). Thus, understanding the role of canals in the ecosystem, including their role in native range expansions and as dispersal corridors and habitat for native and non-native fishes, is a critical component of understanding the ecology of south Florida. Acknowledgments We thank A. Brown at the USFWS Welaka National Fish Hatchery for the identification of five specimens. We thank R.H. Robins, Florida Museum of Natural History, and J. Herrera, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission for providing voucher collection records. We thank collaborators with the National Park Service, particularly J. Kline. We thank R. Boucek, C. Henry, M. Anderson, and numerous volunteers and interns for field assistance, as well as S. Lee and B. Feger for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this paper. This project was funded by the National Park Service’s Critical Ecosystems Studies Initiative (CESI; project # J5298-10-011), and developed in collaboration with the Florida Coastal Everglades LTER program under NSF DEB-0520409. This is contribution #555 of the Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University. Literature Cited Allen, E.R. 1946. Fishes of Silver Springs, Florida. Privately Printed. 36 pp. Ager, L.A. 1971. The fishes of Lake Okeechobee. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences 34:53–62. Becker, G.C. 1983. Fishes of Wisconsin. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI. 1052 pp. Beecher, H.A., and W.C. Hixson. 1982. Seasonal abundance of fishes in three northwest Florida rivers. Florida Scientist 45:145–171. Beecher, H.A., W.C. Hixson, and T.S. Hopkins. 1977. Fishes of a Florida oxbow lake and its parent river. Florida Scientist 40:140–148. 260 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 11, No. 2 Briggs, J.C. 1958. A list of Florida fishes and their distribution. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum. 2:223–318. Carlson, J.E., and M.J. Duever. 1977. Seasonal fish population fluctuations in south Florida swamp. Proceedings of the annual conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 31:603–611. Carr, A.F., and C.J. Goin. 1955. A Guide to Reptiles, Amphibians, and Freshwater Fishes of Florida. University of Florida Press, Gainsville, FL. 341 pp. Champeau, T.R. 1990. Ichthyofaunal evaluation of the Peace River, Florida. Florida Scientist 53:302–311. Chick, J.H., C.R. Ruetz III, and J.C. Trexler. 2004. Spatial scale and abundance patterns of large fish communities in freshwater marshes of the Florida Everglades. Wetlands 24:652–664. Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP). 1999. US Army Corps of Engineers and South Florida Water Management District, Jacksonville, FL. Available online at Accessed 7 May 2010. Dineen, J.W. 1974. The fishes of the Everglades. Pp. 375–385, In P.J. Gleason (Ed.). Environments of South Florida: Present and Past, II. Miami Geological Society Coral Gables, FL. 551 pp. Ellis, G.M., J. Zokan, J. Lorenz, and W.F. Loftus. 2003. Inventory of the freshwater fishes of the Big Cypress National Preserve, with a proposed plan for a long-term aquatic sampling program. Annual Project Report to the USGS Priority Ecosystems Science Program, Davie, FL. 104 pp. Fowler, H.W. 1940. A collection of fresh-water fishes obtained in Florida, 1939–1940, by Francis Harper. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 92:227–234. Fury J.R., J.D. Wikert, J. Cimbaro, and F. Morello. 1995. Everglades Fisheries Investigations Completion Report: 1993–1995, Project F-56. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL. 42 pp. Goff, C.C. 1935. A case of melanism in Lepisosteus osseus. Copeia 1:41. Goodyear, C.P. 1967. Feeding habits of three species of gars, Lepisosteus, along the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 95:296–300. Gunderson, L.H., and W.F. Loftus. 1993. The Everglades. Pp. 199–255, In W.H. Martin, S.G. Boyce and A.C. Echternacht (Eds.). Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States: Lowland Terrestrial Communities. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 373 pp. Harvey, R.G., W.F. Loftus, J.S. Rehage and F.J. Mazzotti. 2010. Effects of canals and levees on Everglades ecosystems. UF/IFAS Publication WEC304. Available online at Accessed 15 April 2010. Hellier, T.R., Jr. 1967. The fishes of the Santa Fe river system. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum 11:1–46. Helfman G.S., B.B. Collette, D.E. Facey, and B.W. Bowen. 2009. The Diversity of Fishes: Biology, Evolution, and Ecology. Second Edition. Wiley-Blackwell Oxford, UK. 736 pp. Herald, E.S., and R.R. Strickland. 1949. An annotated list of fishes of Homasassa Springs, Florida. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences 11:99–109. Hildebrand, S.F., and W.C. Schroeder. 1928. Fishes of Chesapeake Bay. Fishery Bulletin 43:1–366. Holloway, A.D. 1954. Notes on the life history and management of the Shortnose and Longnose Gars in Florida waters. The Journal of Wildlife Management 18:438–449. Hubbs, C.L., and E.R. Allen. 1943. Fishes of Silver Springs, Florida. Proceedings of the Florida Academy of Sciences 6:110–130. Hubbs, C., R.J. Edwards, and G.P. Garrett. 2008. An annotated checklist of the freshwater fishes of Texas, with keys to identification of species. Texas Journal of Science, Supplement, Second Edition 43:1–87. 2012 D.A. Gandy, J.S. Rehage, J.W. Munyon, K.B. Gestring, and J.I. Galvez 261 Jean, Y. 1946. Two Northern Longnose Gar, Lepisosteus osseus oxyurus Rafinesque, caught in the estuary of the St. Lawrence, Quebec. Copeia 1946(2):100. Johnson, B.L., and D.B. Noltie. 1996. Migratory dynamics of stream-spawning Longnose Gar (Lepisosteus osseus). Ecology of Freshwater Fish 5:97–107. Kahl, M.P. 1964. Food ecology of the Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) in Florida. Ecological Monographs 34:97–117. Kilby, J.D., and D.K. Caldwell. 1955. A list of fishes from the southern tip of the Florida peninsula. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences 18:195–206. Kline, J.L., and D. Bamford. 2006. Development of comprehensive fish and macroinvertebrate monitoring programs in Everglades National Park for evaluation of effects of hydrological restoration projects. Annual Report. South Florida Natural Resources Center, Everglades National Park, Homestead, FL. 35 pp. Kline, J.L., and Z.W. Fratto. 2008. Development of comprehensive fish and macroinvertebrate monitoring programs in Everglades National Park for evaluation of effects of hydrological restoration projects. Annual report. South Florida Natural Resources Center, Everglades National Park, Homestead, FL. 37 pp. Kushlan, J.A. 1972. An Ecological Study of an alligator pond in Big Cypress Swamp of southern Florida. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL. 215 pp. Kushlan, J.A. 1976. Environmental stability and fish community diversity. Ecology 57:821–825. Kushlan, J.A., and T.E. Lodge. 1974. Ecological and distributional notes on the freshwater fish of southern Florida. Florida Scientist 37:110–128. Lee, D.S., C.R. Gilbert, C.H. Hocutt, R.E. Jenkins, D.E. McAllister, and J.R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, NC. 854 pp. Light, S.S., and J.W. Dineen. 1994. Water control in the Everglades: A historical perspective. Pp. 47–84, In S.M. Davis, and J.C. Ogden (Eds.). Everglades: The Ecosystem and its Restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL. 797 pp. Loftus, W.F., and J.A. Kushlan. 1987. Freshwater fishes of southern Florida. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum 31:147–344. Lorenz, J.J., and J.E. Serafy. 2006. Subtropical wetland fish assemblages and changing salinity regimes: Implications for Everglades restoration. Hydrobiologia 569:401–422. Lorenz, J.J., C.C. McIvor, G.V.N Powell, and P.C. Frederick. 1997. A drop net and removable walkway used to quantitatively sample fishes over wetland surfaces in the dwarf mangroves of the southern Everglades. Wetlands 17:346–359. McGrath, P.E. 2010. The life history of Longnose Gar, Lepisosteus osseus, an apex predator in the tidal waters of Virginia. Ph.D. Dissertation. College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, VA. 145 pp. McLane, W.M. 1955. The fishes of the St. Johns River system. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 362 pp. Mills E.L., J.R. Chrisman, and K.T. Holeck. 1999. The role of canals in the spread of nonindigenous species in North America. Pp. 347–379, In R. Claudi and J.H. Leach (Eds.). Nonindigenous Freshwater Organisms: Vectors, Biology, and Impacts. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. 464 pp. Moody, H.L. 1954. Adult fish populations by haul seine in seven Florida lakes. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences 17:147–167. Page, L.M., and B.M. Burr. 1991. A Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes of North America North of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA. 417 pp. Parkos, J.J., C.R. Ruetz, and J.C. Trexler. 2011. Disturbance regime and limits on benefits of refuge use for fishes in a fluctuating hydroscape. Oikos 120:1519–1530. Rehage, J.S., and J.C. Trexler. 2006. Assessing the net effect of anthropogenic disturbance on aquatic communities in wetlands: Community structure relative to distance from canals. Hydrobiologia 569:359–373. 262 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 11, No. 2 Rehage, J.S., and W.F. Loftus. 2007. Seasonal fish community variation in headwater mangrove creeks in the southwestern Everglades: An examination of their role as dry-down refuges. Bulletin of Marine Science 80:625–645. Rahel, F.J. 2002. Homogenization of freshwater faunas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:291–315. Robertson, C.R., S.C. Zeug, and K.O. Winemiller. 2008. Associations between hydrological connectivity and resource partitioning among sympatric gar species (Lepisosteidae) in a Texas river and associated oxbows. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 17:119–129. Ruetz, C.R., III, J.C. Trexler, F. Jordan, W.F. Loftus, and S.A. Perry. 2005. Population dynamics of wetland fishes: Spatiotemporal patterns shaped by hydrological disturbance? Journal of Animal Ecology 74:322–332. Schofield, P.J., W.F. Loftus, R.M. Kobza, M.I. Cook, and D.H. Slone. 2010. Tolerance of nonindigenous cichlid fishes (Cichlasoma urophthalmus, Hemichromis letourneuxi) to low temperature: Laboratory and field experiments in south Florida. Biological Invasions 12:2441–2457. Schwartz, J. 2003. Longnose gar, Lepisosteus osseus (Family Lepisosteidae) in North Carolina, especially the Cape Fear River. Journal of the North Carolina Academy of Science 119:26–32. Shafland, P.L., K.B. Gestring, and M.S. Stanford. 2008. Florida’s exotic freshwater fishes - 2007. Florida Scientist 3:220–245. Sklar, F.H., C. McVoy, R. Van Zee, D.E. Gawlik, K. Tarboton, D. Rudnick, S. Miao, and T. Armentano. 2002. The effects of altered hydrology on the Everglades. Pp. 39–82, In J.W. Porter and K.G. Porter (Eds.). The Everglades, Florida Bay, and Coral reefs of the Florida Keys: An Ecosystem Sourcebook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 1000 pp. Smith, P.W. 2002. The Fishes of Illinois. University of Illinois Press, Chicago, IL. 352 pp. Stevenson, H.M. 1976. Vertebrates of Florida: Identification and distribution. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 579 pp. Stiassny, M.L.J, E.O. Wiley, G.D. Johnson, and M.R. de Carvalho. 2004. Gnathostome fishes. Pp. 410–429, In J.B. Cracraft, and M.J. Donoghue (Eds.). Assembling the Tree of Life. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 592 pp. Suttkus, R.D. 1963. Order lepisostei. Pp. 61–68, In H.B. Bigelow, C.M. Cohen, G.W. Mead, D. Merriman, Y.H. Olsen, W.C. Schroeder, L.P. Schultz, and J. Tee-Van (Eds.). Fishes of the Western North Atlantic. Memoir 1. Part Three. Sears Foundation for Marine Research, New Haven, CT. 655 pp. Swift, C., R.W. Yerger, and P.R. Parrish. 1977. Distribution and natural history of the fresh and brackish water fishes of the Ochlockonee River, Florida and Georgia. Bulletin of Tall Timbers Research Station 20:1–111. Tagatz, M.E. 1967. Fishes of the St. Johns River, Florida. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences 30:25–50. Trexler, J.C., W.F. Loftus, C.F. Jordan, J.H. Chick, K.L. Kandl, and O.L. Bass, Jr. 2001. Ecological scale and its implications for freshwater fishes in the Florida Everglades. Pp. 154–181, In K.G. Porter and J.W. Porter (Eds.). The Everglades, Florida Bay, and Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 1044 pp. Trexler, J.C., W.F. Loftus, and S. Perry. 2005. Disturbance frequency and community structure in a twenty-five year intervention study. Oecologia 145:140–152. Wiley, E.O. 1976. The phylogeny and biogeography of fossil and recent gars (Actinopterygii: lepisosteidae). The University of Kansas Museum of Natural History miscellaneous publication 64:1–111.