Southeastern Naturalist
293
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
22001155 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 1V4o(2l.) :1249,3 N–3o0. 72
Are Wintering Areas Shifting North? Learning from Lesser
Snow Geese Banded in Southwest Louisiana
Jón Einar Jónsson1,* and Alan D. Afton2
Abstract - Several avian species have shifted their wintering or staging areas north in
response to advancing onset of spring. Our objectives were to determine whether (1) the
latitudinal distribution of recoveries changed for Chen caerulescens caerulescens (Lesser
Snow Goose; hereafter Snow Goose) banded in southwest Louisiana, and (2) annual proportions
of recoveries within Louisiana relative to other locations in the midcontinent flyways
were related to local weather or Snow Goose population estimates for southwest Louisiana.
We collated and analyzed population indices from the annual midwinter waterfowl survey
for the period 2002–2013 with band recovery and local weather data. Latitudes of recovery
shifted north during the period, and the increases were independent of season (fall, midwinter,
and late winter/spring migration). Annual proportions of recoveries within Louisiana
(all from southwest Louisiana), were lower during wet winters when the largest numbers of
Snow Geese were counted in southwest Louisiana. We concluded that Snow Geese banded
in our study area have shifted their wintering range northwards. Furthermore, the probability
of recovery in Louisiana was somewhat dependent on Snow Goose numbers present,
apparently because hunters shoot proportionally fewer banded birds during years with more
Snow Geese, which in turn were related to high amounts of precipitation in the area.
Introduction
Several avian species, including some goose species, have advanced their migratory
schedules and shifted their wintering or staging areas further north in response
to an advance in the onset of spring (Fox and Walsh 2012, Gunnarsson and Tómasson
2010, Lehikoinen et al. 2008, Tombre et al. 2008). Historically, wintering
geese were reported to be site-tenacious, but recent data have shown them to be
more flexible and opportunistic, especially so for sub-adult geese, when selecting
annual wintering sites (Kruckenberg and Borbach-Jaene 2004, Owen 1980, Prevett
and MacInnes 1980, Raveling 1979). Hatch-year geese learn migratory paths from
after-hatch-year geese, which generally return to previous staging, wintering, and
breeding areas (Prevett and MacInnes 1980), whereas sub-adult geese are more
mobile and exploratory in nature (Kruckenberg and Borbach-Jaene 2004).
Investigations of waterfowl band-recoveries have indicated northward shifts,
although such changes may be largely explained by changes in hunting pressure
rather than actual bird distribution (Lehikoinen et al. 2008). In North America,
winter ranges of Chen caerulescens caerulescens L. (Lesser Snow Goose; hereafter
1University of Iceland, Research Centre at Snæfellsnes, Hafnargata 3, Stykkishólmur,
Iceland. 2US Geological Survey, Louisiana Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit,
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803. *Corresponding author - joneinar@hi.is.
Manuscript Editor: Michael Steinberg
Southeastern Naturalist
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
2015 Vol. 14, No. 2
294
Snow Goose) have shifted in response to changes in food availability (Alisauskas
et al. 2011). Throughout each of 4 administrative waterfowl flyways, local Snow
Goose numbers vary annually because of varying breeding success among colonies;
food availability at breeding, staging, or wintering areas; hunting pressure; and
weather (Mowbray et al. 2000).
Our first objective was to determine whether Snow Geese banded in Louisiana
during winters of 2001–2004 shifted their wintering range northward between 2001
and 2013, perhaps because of the increasingly milder winters (US Environmental
Protection Agency 2013). There are indications that waterfowl can winter further
north during milder winters (Schummer et al. 2010).
Our second objective was to examine whether annual proportions of recoveries
within Louisiana, relative to the sum of recoveries from other US states or Canadian
provinces, were related to local weather or annual variations in Snow Goose numbers
within southwest Louisiana. A higher proportion of recoveries in Louisiana
would indicate that Snow Geese migrated all the way south, whereas a low proportion
in Louisiana would indicate that either the birds stopped north of the state
or there was low hunting pressure in Louisiana. Annual proportions of recoveries
within Louisiana could be a function of vulnerability to hunting pressure—the primary
source of recoveries. In turn, vulnerability to hunting may depend on hunter
access and less so on hunter numbers, which can be restricted by environmental
parameters. For example, local rainfall determines water levels in marshes, Oryza
sativa L. (Rice) fields, and other wetlands (i.e., increased availability of standing
water that may offer greater safety from hunters). Thus, temperature and precipitation
in winter could affect whether Snow Geese move south to Louisiana earlier in
the fall or back northwards from Louisiana within a given winter. Accordingly, we
included local weather data in our analyses. Prior to conducting our analyses, we
evaluated and were prepared to account for potential annual and spatial variation in
hunting pressure, if needed.
Methods
We banded and neck-collared 1123 Snow Geese, (n = 993 after-hatch-year-plumage,
n = 130 hatch-year-plumage) in southwest Louisiana in winters of 2001–2002,
2002–2003, and 2003–2004 (Jónsson 2005, Jónsson et al. 2014). We analyzed 12
winters (2002–2013) of recoveries of these banded Snow Geese. From November
2001 to March 2013, the US Geological Survey’s Bird Banding Lab received 219
recoveries, of which 205 (93.6%) were reported as shot by hunters. Of the 14 recoveries
not reported by hunters, 2 birds were reportedly found dead (one from southwest
Louisiana on 20 December 2002 and the other from South Dakota on 27 November
2003); 1 bird was reported as band only from Colorado in 2006 with no date provided;
1 bird was caught and released at Anahuac National Wildlife Refuge, TX, on 20
January 2004; and 10 birds were reported as sight records by neck-collar observers.
We included the 14 non-hunter recoveries in our analysis because most of them were
comparable to other recoveries within the same states and range of dates. Among the
Southeastern Naturalist
295
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
2015 Vol. 14, No. 2
sight recoveries were 2 exceptional recoveries from more distant regions, i.e., from
Pennsylvania in March 2006 and Colorado in September 2006. A majority (60.7%)
of the 219 recoveries were from the Gulf Coast or Upper South, although there were
notable recoveries from the Midwest as well (Table 1).
Spring and fall migration routes are similar for midcontinent Snow Geese,
which generally arrive in southwest Louisiana in November and December, and
initiate spring migration north in January and February (Bateman et al. 1988,
Jónsson 2005, Jónsson et al. 2014, Mowbray et al. 2000). Snow Geese stage and
sometimes overwinter in Arkansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Kansas, Iowa, Illinois
and Tennessee, in addition to southern Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas (Davis
et al. 1989, Mowbray et al. 2000). We grouped recoveries into 3 seasons, based on
observed Snow Goose migration schedules and gaps within the range of recovery
dates: (1) fall migration, which included all recoveries in September through 6
November; (2) midwinter, which spanned from 16 November (the date of the next
recovery after 6 November) through 12 January; and 3) late winter/spring, from 15
January (the next recovery after 11 January, and around that date recoveries from
Table 1. Number of recoveries (%) of Lesser Snow Geese within the midcontinent region for winters
2002–2013, from Snow Geese banded in southwest Louisiana during winters 2002–2004.
Region State 2002–2007 2008–2013 Total
Gulf Coast Louisiana 65 (73.9) 23 (26.1) 88
Texas 6 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 6
Total 71 (75.5) 23 (24.5) 94
Upper South Arkansas 24 (70.6) 10 (29.4) 34
Mississippi 4 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 4
Oklahoma 1 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 1
Total 29 (74.4) 10 (25.6) 39
Lower Midwest Missouri 7 (50.0) 7 (50.0) 14
Kansas 1 (25.0) 3 (75.0) 4
Kentucky 1 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 1
Illinois 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0) 2
Total 10 (47.6) 11 (52.4) 21
Upper Midwest Nebraska 7 (63.6) 4 (36.4) 11
Iowa 5 (83.3) 1 (16.7) 6
South Dakota 7 (63.6) 4 (36.4) 11
North Dakota 9 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 9
Colorado 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0) 2
Pennsylvania 1 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 1
Total 30 (75.0) 10 (25.0) 40
Canada Saskatchewan 11 (68.7) 5 (31.3) 16
Manitoba 3 (50.0) 3 (50.0) 6
Nunavut 1 (33.3) 2 (66.7) 3
Total 15 (60.0) 10 (40.0) 25
Grand Total 155 (70.8) 64 (29.2) 219
Southeastern Naturalist
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
2015 Vol. 14, No. 2
296
north of Louisiana, especially Arkansas, were initially reported) through 21 April.
During late winter/spring, most hunting occurred under liberalized hunting regulations
during the Snow Goose Special Conservation Order (Kruse and Fronczak
2014), but dates varied by goose-hunting zones (within and among states). Used
as a tool to limit increasing populations, this annual order sets harvest targets for
light geese—Chen caerulescens L. (Greater Snow Geese), Lesser Snow Geese, and
C. rossii Cassin (Ross’s Geese).
The midwinter waterfowl survey is conducted annually by US Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) and Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (LDWF)
personnel during the first week of January and provides estimates of waterfowl
numbers within major wintering areas throughout the US (Blohm et al. 2006, Eggeman
and Johnson 1989, Sharp et al. 2002). This survey serves as an annual index of
Snow Goose distribution, including its relative abundance within specific regions
in each state and among administrative flyways. The midwinter survey is conducted
from fixed-wing aircraft or helicopters and occasionally is supplemented by land
counts. Instead of using specific transects, the midwinter survey relies on each
counting crew knowing their area and how best to cover it for an assumed minimum
count of all waterfowl within the predefined survey units and zones within units.
We banded Snow Geese at 4 locations within Louisiana Zone 3 of the midwinter
waterfowl survey, which corresponds to southwest Louisiana (for a map, see Jónsson
et al. 2014:57). The midwinter survey is the only available estimate for Snow
Goose abundance and relative use of the survey units in this area. Bateman et al.
(1988), Jónsson (2005), and Jónsson et al. (2014) provide details regarding habitats
used by Snow Geese in southwestern Louisiana.
Statistical analyses
Our objectives focused on ecological explanations for annual variation in our
data. We used linear models to address the possible relationships with annual variation
and weather data. Where appropriate, we looked into possible effects of hunter
activity on our results.
(1) Did the distribution of recoveries shift northward in 2001-2013? To address
our first objective, we used the latitude of individual recoveries as a continuous
response variable and tested between additive and interactive models with 2
explanatory variables: season (fall migration, midwinter, and late winter/spring
migration) as a categorical variable and winter as a continuous variable. We also
considered single-effect models (e.g., season model, winter model, and null model).
We included winter in all analyses to quantify annual changes across seasons. We
considered it a fixed effect because the study spanned a fixed span of winters and it
was thought to be the main exploratory variable. We included season to control for
temporal variation within winters because migration schedules at different times of
year affected recovery locations (i.e., caused intercepts to differ between seasons).
We used generalized linear model analysis (PROC GENMOD; SAS Institute 1999).
We designated each individual recovery as the sampling unit for which we obtained
the recovery latitude. A model based on the normal distribution fit reasonably well
Southeastern Naturalist
297
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
2015 Vol. 14, No. 2
for this analysis (Pearson scaled-deviance for normal model was 213.0, whereas it
was 242.5 for the comparable Poisson model).
The interactive model was the most parameterized model and included the latitude–
season interaction because it was important to determine whether regression
slopes differed among seasons; different slopes would indicate that Snow Geese exhibited
different degrees of faithfulness to staging areas in either fall or spring, or to
the wintering areas. The central and southern states comprise the largest geographical
area of 3 main wintering areas for Snow Geese in North America (Mowbray et
al. 2000), but for our sample of banded Snow Geese, the Gulf Coast represented the
southernmost point of Snow Goose migration (the migratory terminus); the South
represented both a wintering and staging area, whereas the remaining regions were
primarily staging areas with potential for overwintering.
(2) Do local weather or Snow Goose numbers affect annual proportion of recoveries
within Louisiana? We previously used weather data from Lake Charles
Airport (93°13'24''N, 30°07'3''W) to index winter weather at our banding sites in
southwest Louisiana from 2001 to 2013 (Jónsson and Afton 2006, 2009). Here,
we used January averages for precipitation (in) and temperature (°C) from Lake
Charles Airport as our indices of local weather (Louisiana Office of State Climatology
2014). We regressed 4 explanatory variables, i.e., winter, precipitation,
temperature, and Snow Goose numbers on the response variable, annual proportion
of recoveries from within Louisiana (PROC REG, SAS Institute 1999). The saturated
least-square regression model that we originally consider ed was as follows:
Annual proportion of recoveries within Louisiana (Y) = β0 + β1(Snow
Goose numbers in southwest Louisiana) + β2(winter) + β3(precipitation) +
β4(temperature)
We used Akaike’s information criterion (Akaike 1973) adjusted for small
sample size (AICc) to inform model selection in all analyses. We obtained deviance
estimates (error sum of squares for each mode; SSE) from these analyses and
then proceeded by calculating AICc from maximum-likelihood and log(L) values
(Anderson 2008:66). For AICc calculations, we followed Burnham and Anderson
(2002:63) when determining the number of parameters (K) and included the
intercept and the error term (σ2) in the parameter count with the regression coefficients
(β). We included null models in all analysis and used cumulative weights to
compare importance of explanatory variables. We stratified data by winter (September–
May), with winter defined by January for the given calendar year for all
data analyses.
Assessing time and space variation in hunting pressure
Temporal and spatial variation in hunting pressure could influence our results;
thus, prior to conducting our model analyses, we evaluated and were prepared to
control for varying hunting pressure in our analysis if needed. We first compared
light goose harvest (i.e., hunter-activity data for all states that reported 9 or more
recoveries during our study—Louisiana, Arkansas, Missouri, Nebraska, South
Southeastern Naturalist
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
2015 Vol. 14, No. 2
298
Dakota, and North Dakota; Table 1). These 6 states reported 167 of 219 recoveries
(76%) in this study, whereas the remaining 52 recoveries (24%) came from 9 US
states and 3 Canadian provinces (Table 1).
We first inspected annual survey data on total light goose harvest (regular season
plus conservation order), number of active hunters, and estimates of days hunted by
active hunters (Kruse and Fronczak 2014). Interrelationships of these 3 variables
were investigated with principal components analysis (PCA), which indicated that
the first principal score (with all 3 loadings meaningful) explained 63–84% of the
overall variation within the 6 states. This result indicated that all 3 variables behaved
similarly, and thus, we simplified our approach by choosing total light goose
harvest as our index of hunting pressure. Number of active hunters and estimates of
days hunted by active hunters generally declined in these 6 states during the period
2002–2013 (Kruse and Fronczak 2014).
Total light goose harvest increased or showed no annual trend in Arkansas, Missouri,
Nebraska, South Dakota, and North Dakota during the period 2001–2013;
thus, we concluded that there was little or no annual or spatial variation in hunting
pressure in these 5 states because the number of recoveries declined in all the states
throughout the period. Conversely, total Snow Goose harvest declined in Louisiana
from 201,548 birds in 2002 to 64,193 birds in 2013 (Kruse and Fronczak 2014).
Thus, hunter effort may have declined temporally in Louisiana, perhaps causing the
recovery probability within the state to decline during 2001–2013, relative to the
other 5 states (Appendix 1). We subsequently evaluated effects of hunting pressure
within Louisiana on our findings.
Reduced light goose harvest in Louisiana could result in fewer recoveries there
in the late years of our study. Thus, we conducted a second analysis of latitude of recovery
to evaluate the possible effect of declining light goose harvest in Louisiana
(relative to the other states) and created a data sub-set by excluding all recoveries
from Louisiana and Texas, i.e., all recoveries south of 31°N latitude (n = 128 instead
of n = 219). We present both analyses in our results. We hypothesized that if
the results from the 2 analyses differed, we could infer an effect of declining light
goose harvest in Louisiana; similar findings from the 2 regressions would indicate
little or no effect of declining light goose harvest.
Our analysis of annual proportion of recoveries within Louisiana could be adjusted
directly, if needed, by total light goose harvest in Louisiana for each year
(2002–2013). We thus considered accounting for potential differences in hunting
pressure in Louisiana by regressing total light goose harvest in Louisiana on annual
proportion of recoveries within Louisiana, and then using the residuals from that
regression as the response variable. However, we found no relationship between
these 2 variables (F = 0.01, P = 0.99). Thus, we concluded that this adjustment was
not necessary and subsequently conducted our analysis on unadjusted data, which
are presented in the results.
Results
Of our 219 recoveries of Snow Geese banded in southwest Louisiana, 194 were
from 4 regions within the US: the Gulf Coast, Upper South, Lower Midwest and
Southeastern Naturalist
299
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
2015 Vol. 14, No. 2
Upper Midwest (Table 1). The remaining 25 recoveries were from 3 Canadian provinces
(Table 1). All recoveries within Louisiana were from the southwestern part of
the state, which corresponds to Louisiana zone 3 of the annual midwinter waterfowl
survey. As expected, annual numbers of recoveries declined throughout the study
period as our sample population aged: 155 recoveries (70.8%) were from the first
6 years (2002–2007), whereas 64 (29.2%) were from the last 6 years (2008–2013)
(Table 1).
Has latitude of recovery shifted northwards?
For the full data set (n = 219), our main effects model, season + winter, was the
highest-ranked model (Table 2), with a model R2 = 0.482 and model weight = 0.81.
The competing model that included an interaction of winter and season was not
supported (ΔAICc = 3.7); thus, regression slopes were similar among seasons. Latitude
was positively related to winter for all 3 seasons (Fig. 1), indicating that mean
latitudes of band recoveries had shifted northwards during 2002–2013. The null
model was the lowest-ranked model (ΔAICc = 139.9; Table 1). As expected, recovery
latitude was highest in fall and lowest in midwinter, and the latter overlapped
somewhat with late winter/spring migration (see intercept and slope estimates in
Fig. 1).
The data sub-set excluding all recoveries from Gulf Coast Louisiana and Texas,
i.e., all recoveries south of 31° N latitude (n = 128) yielded results similar to those
that employed the full data set. Our main effects model, season + winter, remained
the highest-ranked model (Table 2), with a model R2 = 0.393 and model weight (wi)
= 0.64. The closest competing model was the season model (ΔAICc = 1.7), indicating
that the year trend was relatively weakly supported for recoveries north of
31°N latitude. As with the full dataset, the null model was the lowest-ranked model
(ΔAICc = 59.5; Table 1).
Table 2. Summary of model selections for effects of winter and season on latitude of recovery from
2002–2013 for Snow Geese banded in southwest Louisiana during winters 2001–2004. The model
used for interpretation of results is Season + Winter; + indicates an additive model with main effects
only, whereas * indicates an interactive model including interaction and both main effects. K includes
the intercept, error term (σ2), and the regression coefficients (β) in the parameter count. Log(L) =
Log-likelihood. Winter = 2002–2013, Season: fall, midwinter, and late winter/spring. See methods
for details. An analysis of the full dataset is presented in the left-hand side of the table (n = 219). To
evaluate possible effects of declining light goose harvest in Louisiana (relative to AR, MO, NE, SD
and ND) on the results, a data sub-set was created by excluding all recoveries from Gulf Coast Louisiana
and Texas, i.e., all recoveries south of 31°N latitude (n = 128 instead of n = 219). The analysis
of the sub-dataset is shown in the right-hand side of the table.
Full dataset (n = 219) Sub-dataset (n = 128)
Model K AICc ΔAICc wi Log(L) K AICc ΔAICc wi Log(L)
Season + winter 4 1395.7 0.0 0.81 -383.0 4 815.1 0.0 0.64 -379.0
Season * winter 5 1399.4 3.7 0.13 -382.7 5 819.2 4.1 0.08 -379.4
Season 3 1400.7 5.0 0.07 -386.5 3 816.7 1.7 0.28 -382.6
Winter 3 1532.0 136.3 0.00 -453.2 3 873.9 58.9 0.00 -433.4
Null model 2 1535.6 139.9 0.00 -455.0 2 874.6 59.5 0.00 -433.9
Southeastern Naturalist
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
2015 Vol. 14, No. 2
300
Do local weather or goose numbers influence proportion of recoveries in
Louisiana?
Our top-ranked model that included only Snow Goose numbers in Louisiana
zone 3 was the best-supported model for predicting the annual proportion of recoveries
within Louisiana, with cumulative wi = 0.92 and an R2 = 0.59 (Table 3).
Interestingly, the proportion of recoveries within Louisiana was inversely related
to Snow Goose numbers each winter (Fig. 2A). The competing model that included
Snow Goose numbers + precipitation (R2 = 0.67) had less support (ΔAICc = 2.3)
than did the Snow Goose numbers model (Table 3), and both models outperformed
the null model (ΔAICc = 7.2). The proportion of recoveries within Louisiana was
inversely related to precipitation (Fig. 2B), albeit with much less overall support
with cumulative wi = 0.26.
Discussion
Prior to conducting our analyses, we evaluated temporal and spatial variation in
hunting pressure because such variation could affect our results. We found that total
Figure 1. Relationships between winter of recovery (2002–2013) and latitude of recovery,
for lesser Snow Geese banded in southwest Louisiana during winters 2002–2004. In the
model selection, the best model was additive, i.e., had similar regression slopes for the
3 seasons; the R2, slopes and intercepts shown are based on that model. To avoid overlap
between data points, 0.5 were added to x-values for late winter/spring in the figure, but
equations presented are unaltered from the model.
Southeastern Naturalist
301
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
2015 Vol. 14, No. 2
light goose harvest, our index of hunting pressure, showed similar trends in the 6
states with 10 or more recoveries, except for Louisiana where harvest was lower
for 3 of the last 4 years of study. Nevertheless, annual differences in total Snow
Goose harvest in Louisiana was not related to any variables we considered, nor did
the apparent decrease in hunting pressure in Louisiana contribute to the positive
relationship between latitude of recovery and year. Furthermore, an adjustment for
varying hunter pressure in Louisiana was not needed in our analysis of factors influencing
proportion of annual recoveries in Louisiana. Thus, we believe that spatial
and temporal variation in hunting pressure had little effect on our results.
Have Snow Geese shifted their wintering range northward?
We found that the distribution of Snow Goose recoveries shifted, on average, 4º
latitude northwards from 2002 to 2013. The linear trend in more northerly recoveries
was independent of season, as indicated by the result that the main effects model
outperformed the interactive model. The evidence favored equal slopes among
seasons, which we interpret to indicate that Snow Geese were short-stopping (i.e.,
stopping short and staying north of their traditional wintering grounds) throughout
the year in response to local environmental conditions and have shifted their distribution
northward from fall to spring. Geese may adjust their movement to the
next staging site based on conditions at the present site (Tombre et al. 2008); Snow
Geese can delay fall migration and stay north longer in mild winters, or leave wintering
areas earlier in midwinter and arrive early on the northern staging grounds
in spring. Geese do not always respond to climate change (Tombre et al. 2008),
Table 3. Summary of model selection for effects of Snow Goose numbers, local weather, and winter on
the annual proportion of recoveries from Snow Geese banded in southwest Louisiana during winters
2002–2004. Models used for interpretation of results are Survey and Survey Precip (first 2 lines of
table). Legend: Winter = 2002–2013; Precip = precipitation average (January) for Lake Charles Airport;
Temp: temperature average (January) for Lake Charles airport: Survey = Snow Goose numbers
counted in midwinter survey in Louisiana zone 3; K includes the intercept, error term (σ2), and the
regression coefficients (β) in the parameter count. Log(L) = Log-likelihood.
Variables in model K AICc ΔAICc wi Log(L)
Survey 3 -48.5 0.0 0.57 28.7
Survey precip 4 -46.2 2.3 0.18 29.9
Survey winter 4 -44.6 3.8 0.08 29.2
Survey temp 4 -43.8 4.6 0.06 28.8
Precip 3 -43.5 4.9 0.05 26.3
None 2 -41.3 7.2 0.02 23.3
Survey precip temp 5 -40.8 7.6 0.01 30.4
Survey precip winter 5 -40.0 8.5 0.01 30.0
Precip temp 4 -39.5 8.9 0.01 26.6
Precip winter 4 -39.2 9.2 0.01 26.5
Survey winter temp 5 -38.6 9.9 0.00 29.3
Winter 3 -37.7 10.7 0.00 23.4
Temp 3 -37.6 10.8 0.00 23.3
Precip winter temp 5 -33.7 14.8 0.00 26.8
Winter temp 4 -33.0 15.4 0.00 23.4
Survey winter precip temp 6 -32.1 16.3 0.00 30.5
Southeastern Naturalist
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
2015 Vol. 14, No. 2
302
although some species clearly have advanced spring migration (Fox and Walsh
2012, Gunnarsson and Tómasson 2010, this study).
Our banded sample of after-hatch-year birds aged during the 12 years during our
study, thus recoveries in the later years probably included many older geese. Older
geese—birds at least 10–11 years old or older (Black et al. 2007) or pairs that have
been together 9 years or longer (Black et al. 1996)—generally are less productive
Figure 2. Annual proportion
of recoveries
within Louisiana for
Snow Geese banded
in southwest Louisiana
during winters
2002–2004, relative
to the other midcontinent
states and Canadian
provinces in
winters 2002–2013,
in relation to (A) total
number of Snow
Geese wintering in
southwest Louisiana
(estimated by midwinter
waterfowl surveys),
and (B) average
January precipitation
(in) at Lake Charles
Airport, LA.
Southeastern Naturalist
303
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
2015 Vol. 14, No. 2
than younger breeders. Thus, our sample of recoveries could be somewhat biased
towards conservatism because older birds are more reluctant to seek out new habitats
or staging areas. Accordingly, we speculate that the northward winter range
expansion of Snow Geese is driven by high recruitment during the population increase
(Alisauskas et al. 2011) and subsequent exploratory nature of large numbers
of younger Snow Geese.
Why were there fewer recoveries when larger numbers of Snow Geese were
present?
Interestingly, the annual proportion of recoveries within Louisiana was inversely
related to Snow Goose numbers surveyed in southwest Louisiana, suggesting
there was a dilution effect, wherein hunters were less likely to shoot one of our
banded birds when large numbers of Snow Geese were present. Moreover, Snow
Geese were more likely to be recovered in southwest Louisiana in drier winters,
which concomitantly were winters in which relatively fewer Snow Geese were
counted in early January. We suggest that winters with greater precipitation, leading
to more abundant standing water, may result in lower vulnerability of Snow Geese
to hunters within southwest Louisiana, independent of hunter numbers or number
of goose-hunting days.
In southwest Louisiana, dry winters can limit availability of wetland habitat,
either in agricultural fields (Rice, Lolium sp. [ryegrass], or pasture), refuges, or
wetlands. Dry conditions mean that fewer fields are attractive foraging sites, which
in turn may make geese more willing to land in hunted foraging sites. Many hunted
fields in southwest Louisiana are kept somewhat flooded by artificially pumping
water from wells, so these sites are the ones that remain wet in the dry winters.
Annual variation in hunting pressure also could cause Snow Geese to avoid certain
locations and select others. We suggest that wet winters in Louisiana, with high
standing water, provide optimal conditions for Snow Geese to choose locations
based on hunting pressure.
Hunting pressure can cause stressful effects on surviving birds. Pearse et al.
(2012) reported that the lipid content of Snow Geese in hunted areas was reduced
by 25% (57 g) compared to those in non-hunted areas. In addition to responding
to hunters, geese may alter their migration patterns to avoid certain areas because
of stress from perceived danger from avian predators (Jonker et al. 2010) or active
hazing by farmers (Klaassen et al. 2006). Snow Geese are commonly hazed from
unharvested fields in southwestern Louisiana, either by approaching Snow Geese
on foot or using bird-scare gas guns (J.E. Jónsson, pers. observ.).
The annual proportion of recoveries within Louisiana was lowest (<0.4) in the
wettest winters, compared to drier winters (when annual proportion of recoveries
within Louisiana was >0.4). During wet winters, there also were relatively more
recoveries (13%, on average) from the fall period, relative to midwinter or late
winter/spring. We speculate that the observed lower annual proportion of recoveries
within Louisiana (more recoveries from the other states) in wetter winters
may coincide with a relatively early fall migration in years when larger numbers
of Snow Geese reached southwest Louisiana. Such “fast migration” may facilitate
Southeastern Naturalist
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
2015 Vol. 14, No. 2
304
what hunters term a “new bird” effect while on migration, i.e., birds that have just
arrived to an area are especially vulnerable to hunting. Such an effect could be more
likely if migratory flocks are migrating southward relatively qu ickly.
Conclusion
The probability of recovery in Louisiana was somewhat dependent on Snow
Goose numbers present, apparently because hunters shoot proportionally fewer
banded birds during years of larger Snow Goose numbers, which in turn were related
to high precipitation in the area. The midcontinent population increase of Snow
Geese may have resulted in crowding and interference competition (see Jónsson
and Afton 2009), which could have caused more Snow Goose flocks to explore for
suitable winter areas in the northern staging areas or leave wintering areas earlier
in the spring. Food resources have become abundant and more available in northern
regions due to combined effects of improved conditions for agriculture and milder
winter temperatures that have reduced snow cover. We found evidence that the
latitudinal distribution of recoveries shifted northwards for Snow Geese during our
study. Greater numbers of Snow Geese were counted in southwest Louisiana during
wet winters, suggesting that local weather events affect the probability of early
spring migration from this wintering area within a given winter.
Acknowledgments
We thank Larry Reynolds, Randy Wilson, Dave Fronczak, Tom Edwards, Fred Roetker,
and Barry Wilson for help in accessing midwinter waterfowl survey data for Louisiana;
Hannu Pöysä for discussing hunting pressure indices; Matthew Rogosky and Jennifer
McNicoll for providing a summary of band recoveries; and Kammie Kruse for providing information
on Snow Goose harvest. We also thank Kyle Brehe and Barry D. Keim for help in
accessing climate data. We captured and banded Snow Geese under the following permits:
banding permit 08810 from the US Geological Survey Bird-Banding Lab; USFWS special
use permits 43612-03004 (Cameron Prairie National Wildlife Refuge) and 43640-02028
(Sabine National Wildlife Refuge); and Louisiana State University Animal Care and Use
permit Ag IACUC number A01-09. We thank Ken Burnham, Todd Arnold, and Mike Kaller
for advice regarding AIC calculations and interpretation; Mike Schummer for providing his
insight on weather indices for waterfowl; and Bruce Davis, 2 anonymous reviewers, and the
editor for comments and suggestions that greatly improved earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply
endorsement by the US Government.
Literature Cited
Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle,
Pp. 267–281, In B.N. Petrov and F. Csáki (Eds.). 2nd International Symposium on Information
Theory, Tsahkadsor, Armenia, USSR, 2–8 September 1971. Akadémiai Kiadó,
Budapest, Hungary.
Alisauskas, R.T., R.F. Rockwell, K.W. Dufour, E.G. Cooch, G. Zimmerman, K.L. Drake,
J.O. Leafloor, T.J. Moser, and E.T. Reed. 2011. Harvest, survival, and abundance of
midcontinent Lesser Snow Geese relative to population-reduction efforts. Wildlife
Monographs 179:1–42.
Southeastern Naturalist
305
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
2015 Vol. 14, No. 2
Anderson, D.R. 2008. Model-based Inference in the Life Sciences: A Primer on Evidence.
Springer, New York, NY. 184 pp.
Bateman, H.A., T. Joanen, and C.D. Stutzenbaker. 1988. History and status of midcontinent
Snow Geese on their Gulf Coast winter range. Pp. 495–515, In M.W. Weller (Ed.). Waterfowl
in Winter. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN. 624 pp.
Black, J.M., S. Choudbury, and M. Owen. 1996. Do Barnacle Geese benefit from life-long
monogamy? Pp. 91–117, In J.M. Black (Ed.). Partnerships in Birds. Oxford University
Press, Oxford, UK. 420 pp.
Black, J.M., J. Prop, and K. Larsson. 2007. Wild Goose Dilemmas. Branta Press, Groningen,
Netherlands. 254pp.
Blohm, R.J., D.E. Sharp, P.I. Padding, and K.D. Richkus. 2006. Pp. 495–515, In G.C.
Boere, C.A. Galbraith, and D.A. Stroud (Eds). Waterbirds Around the World. The Stationery
Office, Edinburgh, UK. 960 pp.
Burnham, K.P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model Selection and Multi-model Inference, 2nd
Edition. Springer, New York, NY. 488 pp.
Davis, S.E., E.E. Klaas, and K.J. Koehler. 1989. Diurnal time-activity budgets and habitat
use of Lesser Snow Geese, Anser caerulescens, in the Middle Missouri River Valley
during winter and spring. Wildfowl 40:45–54.
Eggeman, D.R., and F.A. Johnson. 1989. Variation in effort and methodology for the
midwinter waterfowl inventory in the Atlantic Flyway. Wildlife Society Bulletin
17:227–233.
Fox, A.D., and A. Walsh. 2012. Warming winter effects, fat-store accumulation, and timing
of spring departure of Greenland White-fronted Geese, Anser albifrons flavirostris, from
their winter quarters. Hydrobiologia 697:95–102.
Gunnarsson, T.G., and G. Tómasson. 2011. Flexible spring arrival of migratory birds at
northern latitudes under rapid temperature changes. Bird Study 58:1–12.
Jonker, R.M, G. Eichhorn, F. van Langevelde, and S. Bauer. 2010. Predation danger can
explain changes in timing of migration: The case of the Barnacle Goose. PloS One
5:e11369.
Jónsson, J.E. 2005. Effects of body size and habitat use on goose behavior: Lesser Snow
Goose and Ross’s Goose. Ph.D. Dissertation. School of Renewable Natural Resources,
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA. 234 pp.
Jónsson, J.E., and A.D. Afton. 2006. Differing time and energy budgets of Lesser
Snow Geese in rice-prairies and coastal marshes in southwest Louisiana. Waterbirds
29:451–458.
Jónsson, J.E., and A.D. Afton. 2009. Time budgets of Snow Geese and Ross’s Geese in
mixed flocks: Implications of body size, ambient temperature, and family associations.
Ibis 151:134–144.
Jónsson, J.E., M. Frederiksen, and A.D. Afton. 2014. Movements and survival of Lesser
Snow Geese, Chen caerulescens caerulescens, wintering in two habitats along the Gulf
Coast, Louisiana. Wildfowl 64:54–74.
Klaassen, M., S. Bauer, J. Madsen, and I. Tombre. 2006. Modelling behavioral and fitness
consequences of disturbance for geese along their spring flyway. Journal of Applied
Ecology 43:92–100.
Kruckenberg, H., and J. Borbach-Jaene. 2004. Do Greylag Geese (Anser anser) use traditional
roosts? Site fidelity of color-marked Nordic Greylag Geese during spring migration.
Journal of Ornithology 145:117–122.
Southeastern Naturalist
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
2015 Vol. 14, No. 2
306
Kruse, K.L., and D. Fronczak. 2014. Light geese in the Central Mississippi Flyways. Updated
for 2012–2013 Harvest and Conservation Order Take. Unpublished report, April
2014. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, Lakewood,
CO. 72 pp.
Lehikoinen, A., T.K. Christensen, M. Öst., M. Kilpi, P. Saurola, and A. Vattulainen. 2008.
Large-scale change in the sex ratio of a declining Eider, Somateria mollissima, population.
Wildlife Biology 14:288–301.
Louisiana Office of State Climatology. 2014. Around-the-state climate information: Station
Lake Charles. Available online at http://www.losc.lsu.edu/ . Accessed 2 January 2015.
Mowbray, T.B., F. Cooke, and B. Ganter. 2000. Snow Goose (Chen caerulescens). Number
514, In A. Poole (Ed.). The Birds of North America Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology,
Ithaca, NY. Available online at http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/
bna/species/514. Accessed 15 July 2014.
Owen M. 1980. Wild Geese of the World: Their Life History and Ecology. Batsford Ltd.,
London, UK. 236 pp.
Pearse, A.T., G.L. Krapu, and R.R. Cox. 2012. Spring Snow Goose hunting influences
body composition of waterfowl staging in Nebraska. Journal of Wildlife Management
76:1393–1400.
Prevett, J.P., and C.D. MacInnes. 1980. Family and other social groups in Snow Geese.
Wildlife Monographs 71:6–46.
Raveling, D.G. 1979. Traditional use of migration and winter-roost sites by Canada Geese.
Journal of Wildlife Management 43:229–235.
SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/SYSTAT user’s guide. Version 8. Cary, NC.
Schummer, M.L., R.M. Kaminski, A.H. Raedeke, and D.A. Graber. 2010. Weather-related
indices of autumn–winter dabbling duck abundance in middle North America. Journal
of Wildlife Management 74:94–101.
Sharp, D.E., K.L. Kruse, and P.P. Thorpe. 2002. The midwinter waterfowl survey in the Central
Flyway. US Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory
Bird Management, Denver, CO. 11 pp. Available online at https://migbirdapps.fws.gov/
mbdc/databases/mwi/CF_MWS_Assessment_2002.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2014.
Tombre, I.M., K.A. Høgda, J. Madsen, L.R. Griffin, E. Kuijken, P. Shimmings, E. Rees, and
C. Verscheure. 2008. The onset of spring and timing of migration in two arctic-nesting
goose populations: The Pink-footed Goose, Anser brachyrhynchus, and the Barnacle
Goose, Branta leucopsis. Journal of Avian Biology 39:691–703.
US Environmental Protection Agency 2013. Climate-change indicators in the United States:
Temperatures in the contiguous 48 states 1901–2011. Available online at http://www.
epa.gov/climatechange/science/indicators/weather-climate/temperature.html. Accessed
8 April 2013.
Southeastern Naturalist
307
J.E. Jónsson and A.D. Afton
2015 Vol. 14, No. 2
Appendix 1. Total light goose harvest in Louisiana and 5 other states, where 9 or more Snow
Geese, banded in Louisiana, were recovered in winters 2002–2013. There was an inverse
trend in Louisiana (R2 = 0.426) but no linear trends were observed in the other 5 states. Note
differing scales on the y-axis. Compiled after Kruse and Fronczak (2014).