Regular issues
Special Issues

Southeastern Naturalist
    SENA Home
    Range and Scope
    Board of Editors
    Editorial Workflow
    Publication Charges

Other EH Journals
    Northeastern Naturalist
    Caribbean Naturalist
    Urban Naturalist
    Eastern Paleontologist
    Eastern Biologist
    Journal of the North Atlantic

EH Natural History Home

Avian Feeding on Seed of the Exotic Ornamental Lagerstroemia indica (Crapemyrtle)
Gary R. Graves

Southeastern Naturalist, Volume 17, Issue 2 (2018): 293–297

Full-text pdf (Accessible only to subscribers.To subscribe click here.)


Site by Bennett Web & Design Co.
Southeastern Naturalist 293 G.R. Graves 22001188 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 1V7o(2l.) :1279,3 N–2o9. 72 Avian Feeding on Seed of the Exotic Ornamental Lagerstroemia indica (Crapemyrtle) Gary R. Graves* Abstract - The ornamental plant Lagerstroemia indica (Crapemyrtle) was introduced to American gardens before 1796, but little is known about its use as a food resource by avian species. Local wintering populations of Spinus tristis (American Goldfinch), Junco hyemalis (Dark-eyed Junco), and Haemorhous mexicanus (House Finch) feed heavily on Crapemyrtle seeds, and I observed 5 additional bird species occasionally extracting seeds from dehiscent capsules in Fairfax County, VA. Planted and naturalized Crapemyrtle may be an important food resource for finches and sparrows in southe astern US. Introduction Birds feed on the fruits and seeds of many introduced plant species (Martin et al. 1951) but surprisingly little has been published on avian use of introduced ornamental shrubs and trees in eastern North America, with the exception of the non-native invasive plants Ligustrum spp. (privets), Lonicera spp. (honeysuckles), and Rosa spp. (roses). Lagerstroemia indica (Crapemyrtle) was introduced to Charleston, SC, from eastern Asia between 1787 and 1796 by André Michaux (Cothran 2004, Favretti and DeWolf 1972). Their showy blossoms, attractive bark, cold and drought hardiness, and ability to grow in a wide range of soil types have made Crapemyrtle cultivars and hybrids (taxonomy follows ITIS: http://www. attractive to gardeners, and they are the most widely planted ornamental shrubs and small trees in public spaces, highway rights-of-way, and private gardens in the southeastern US (Apgar 1910, Ashe 1908, Chappell et al. 2012). More than 5 million Crapemyrtles were sold by nurseries in 2012 alone (USDA Census of Agriculture 2014). Most cultivars are cold hardy to USDA zone 7 (Daly et al. 2012), which extends north to Virginia, Tennessee, and northern Arkansas. Crapemyrtle has been widely planted and naturalized in the Gulf-coast states since the 19th century (Earle 1902, Harper 1931, Mohr 1901, Sanborn and Scholl 19 08). Avian feeding on Crapemyrtle seed in North America has been mentioned on a few gardening websites, but a search of scholarly databases revealed only a single peer-reviewed paper, which reported Psittacara holochlorus (P.L. Sclater) (Green Parakeet) feeding on the blossoms and seed in the lower Rio Grande Valley (Alexander 2016). Here I report the assemblage of avian species that feeds on Crapemyrtle seed in northern Virginia. *Department of Vertebrate Zoology, MRC-116, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, and Center for Macroecology, Evolution, and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Denmark ; Manuscript Editor: Doug McNair Southeastern Naturalist G.R. Graves 2018 Vol. 17, No. 2 294 Study-site Description Crapemyrtle is commonly used as a landscaping-accent plant in residential neighborhoods surrounding the study site (~38º46'N, 77º5'W) in suburban Fairfax County, VA. I monitored birds feeding at a single multi-stemmed specimen (height = 6 m) that produced ~35,000–45,000 flowers annually. Pollinated flowers produce brown, ovoid capsules (8–10 mm in diameter) with 6 locules, each containing 4 winged seeds (Fig. 1) arranged in 2 longitudinal rows on either side of a secondary septum. Capsules begin to dehisce in late October, and most seeds are dispersed by wind by February. Extrapolated seed mass from a sample of air-dried seeds (n = 200) was ~570,000 per kilogram. Methods I monitored the focal specimen for a minimum of 30 min per day on a total of 280 days over 5 consecutive winters. Inclusive observation periods extended from 26 December 2013–26 February 2014 (48 observation days), 11 November 2014– 28 February 2015 (95 observation days), 9 November 2015–29 February 2016 (97 observation days), 13 November–19 December 2016 (25 observation days), and 30 November–19 December 2017 (15 observation days). I made repeated scans of the Crapemyrtle specimen and counted birds observed extracting seeds. I did not count birds that perched but did not extract seed. I employed daily-high counts (by species) as proxies for the importance of Crapemyrtle seed in the winter diets of local populations. None of the birds were banded or color marked, so I was seldom able to monitor individuals for more than a few minutes. To illustrate the seasonal pattern in Spinus tristis (American Goldfinch) feeding visitations, I pooled observations over 5 winters and conducted a distance-weighted least-square (DWLS) regression of daily-high counts, including days on which none were observed, on the elapsed time since 31 October. In this procedure, Figure 1. Left panel: winged seed of Lagerstroemia indica (Crapemyrtle). Right panel: Spinus tristis (American Goldfinch) feeding on Crapemyrtle seed. Southeastern Naturalist 295 G.R. Graves 2018 Vol. 17, No. 2 a polynomial regression was calculated for each value of X to determine the corresponding Y value such that the influence of individual data points on the regression decreases with distance from the particular X value. I performed analyses in SYSTAT Version 12 (SYSTAT 2007). Results American Goldfinch is a frequent seed predator of Crapemyrtle and was present on 40% of the observation days and comprised 49% of all birds recorded extracting seed (Table 1). Singletons or small flocks often spent several hours partially concealed in dense clusters of seed capsules extracting and consuming seeds. Although I did not measure handling times or husking proficiency (Zweers et al. 1994), the bill morphology, body size, and foraging agility of goldfinches appear to be fortuitously scaled for extraction of seeds from the dehisced Crapemyrtle capsules (Fig. 1). Goldfinch feeding activity increased steeply in early December, peaked in mid-December, and gradually declined through late February (Fig. 2). Table 1. Avian species feeding on Crapemyrtle seed during 280 observation days over 5 consecutive winters (2013–2017) in Fairfax County, VA. Number of Total number days observed of individuals Common name Scientific name feeding observed American Goldfinch Spinus tristis (L.) 111 355 Dark-eyed Junco Junco hyemalis (L.) 60 145 House Finch Haemorhous mexicanus (P.L. Statius Müller) 51 144 Northern Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis (L.) 30 43 House Sparrow Passer domesticus (L.) 14 24 White-throated Sparrow Zonotrichia albicollis (J.F. Gmelin) 3 9 Song Sparrow Melospiza melodia (A. Wilson) 1 1 Pine Siskin Spinus pinus (A. Wilson) 1 1 Figure 2. Daily-high counts of Spinus tristis (American Goldfinch) observed extracting seed from capsules of Lagerstroemia indica (Crapemyrtle) in Fairfax County, VA. Curved line represents the distance-weighted least-square regression of daily-high counts (including zero values) recorded during 5 consecutive winters (2013–2017). Southeastern Naturalist G.R. Graves 2018 Vol. 17, No. 2 296 I also frequently observed Junco hyemalis (Dark-eyed Junco; 21% of observation days), Haemorhous mexicanus (House Finch; 18%), and Cardinalis cardinalis (Northern Cardinal;11%) feeding on Crapemyrtle seed. Passer domesticus (House Sparrow) and Zonotrichia albicollis (Gmelin) (White-throated Sparrow) frequently perched in the focal tree but I seldom observed them extracting seed from capsules (only 3% and 1% of observation days, respectively). Feeding activity of all species was less frequent during significant precipitation events and the day after, perhaps owing to the increased difficulty of extracting seed from sodden capsules. Seed retained in capsules decreased rapidly in January and relatively little remained by late February. Fallen seed was gleaned regularly from the ground by Northern Cardinals, Dark-eyed Juncos, and sparrows but not American Goldfinches. Crapemyrtle seed contains alkaloids, phenols, flavonoids, and cardiac glycosides (Ajaib et al. 2016, Ferris et al. 1971). The extent to which secondary compounds have an inhibitory effect on avian seed predators is unknown. Discussion and Conclusions The horticultural and naturalized Crapemyrtle populations in eastern North America represent an anthropogenic experiment set in motion by the plant’s introduction in the late 18th century. Native birds in this region have had more than a century to discover this novel food resource and learn to extract the winged seeds from the hexamerous seed capsules. I observed 8 granivorous bird species extract seed from Crapemyrtle capsules in this study. Fieldwork in other parts of the introduced geographic range of Crapemyrtle will likely add additional species to the roster. In any event, I hypothesize that the millions of Crapemyrtles present on the coastal plain, from Virginia to Texas, are an important winter food resource for Cardueline finches and sparrows. This introduced ornamental plant also provides abundant nesting and roosting sites for birds in suburban areas (Small et al. 2005, Telfair 2010), although there have been no comprehensive field studies focused on avian use of Crapemyrtle plantings. The leaves, bark, and fruit of Crapemyrtle contain a number of phytochemicals that make them unpalatable to herbivorous insects (Ajaib et al. 2016, Chappell et al. 2012, Ferris et al. 1971). As a result, this plant species hosts relatively few arthropods for avian insectivores. Acknowledgments I thank K.V. Miller and D.W. Tallamy for helpful comments on the manuscript and the Smoketree Trust for support. Literature Cited Ajaib, M., T. Arooj, K.M. Khan, S. Farid, M. Ishtiaq, S. Perveen, and S. Shah. 2016. Phytochemical, antimicrobial, and antioxidant screening of fruits, bark, and leaves of Lagerstroemia indica. Journal of the Chemical Society of Pakistan 38:538–545. Alexander, C. 2016. Green Parakeets feeding on Wool-bearing Gall-wasp larvae (Andricus quercuslanigera). Bulletin of the Texas Ornithological Society 49:100–102. Southeastern Naturalist 297 G.R. Graves 2018 Vol. 17, No. 2 Apgar, A.C. 1910. Ornamental shrubs of the United States. American Book Company, New York, NY. 352 pp. Ashe, W.W. 1908. Shade trees for North Carolina. North Carolina Geological and Economic Survey Bulletin 16:1–74. Chappell, M.R., S.K. Braman, J. Williams-Woodward, and G. Knox. 2012. Optimizing plant health and pest management of Lagerstroemia spp. in commercial production and landscape situations in the southeastern United States: A review. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 30:161–172. Cothran, J.R. 2004. Treasured ornamentals of southern gardens: Michaux’s lasting legacy. Castanea 69:149–157. Daly, C., M.P. Widrlechner, M.D. Halbleib, J.I. Smith, and W.P. Gibson. 2012. Development of a new USDA plant-hardiness zone map for the United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 51:242–264. Earle, F.S. 1902. The flora of the metamorphic region of Alabama. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 119:1–120. Favretti, R.J., and G.P. DeWolf. 1972. Colonial garden plants. Arnoldia 31:172–255. Ferris, J.P., R.C. Briner, and C.B. Boyce. 1971. Lythraceae alkaloids. IX. Isolation and structure Elucidation of the alkaloids of Lagerstroemia indica. Journal of American Chemical Society 93:2958–2962. Harper, R.M. 1931. Persistence of exotic plants under forest conditions. Torreya 31:1–7. Martin, A.C., H.S. Zim, and A.L. Nelson. 1951. American Wildlife and Plants—A Guide to Wildlife Food Habits: The Use of Trees, Shrubs, Weeds, and Herbs by Birds and Mammals of the United States. Dover Publications, New York, NY. 500 pp. Mohr, C. 1901. Plant Life of Alabama: An Account of the Distribution, Modes of Association, and Adaptations of the Flora of Alabama, Together with a Systematic Catalogue of the Plants Growing in the State. USDA. Division of Botany , Washington, DC. 921 pp. Sanborn, C.E., and E.E. Scholl. 1908. Texas honey plants. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 102:1–31. Small, M.F., C.L. Schaefer, J.T. Baccus, and J.A. Roberson. 2005. Breeding ecology of White-winged Doves in a recently colonized urban environment Wilson Bulletin 117:172–176. SYSTAT. 2007. SYSTAT Version 12. Systat Software, San Jose, CA. Telfair, R.C. 2010. Abandonment of a unique breeding colony of Great-tailed Grackles in north-central Texas. Bulletin of the Texas Ornithological Society 43:78–80. US Department of Agriculture Census of Agriculture. 2014. 2014 Census of horticultural specialties. Available online at Resources/Census_of_Horticulture_Specialties/hortic_1_021_022.pdf. Accessed 19 February 2017. Zweers, G.A., H. Berkhoudt, and J.C. Vanden Berge. 1994. Behavioral mechanisms of avian feeding. Advances in Comparative Environmental Physiology 18:241–279.