nena masthead
SENA Home Staff & Editors For Readers For Authors

Increase of Unionid Mussel Populations in the Verdigris River, Kansas, from 1991 to 2003
Edwin J. Miller and Sean T. Lynott

Southeastern Naturalist, Volume 5, Number 3 (2006): 383–392

Full-text pdf (Accessible only to subscribers.To subscribe click here.)

 



Access Journal Content

Open access browsing of table of contents and abstract pages. Full text pdfs available for download for subscribers.

Issue-in-Progress: Vol. 23 (2) ... early view

Current Issue: Vol. 23 (1)
SENA 22(3)

Check out SENA's latest Special Issue:

Special Issue 12
SENA 22(special issue 12)

All Regular Issues

Monographs

Special Issues

 

submit

 

subscribe

 

JSTOR logoClarivate logoWeb of science logoBioOne logo EbscoHOST logoProQuest logo


2006 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 5(3):383–392 Increase of Unionid Mussel Populations in the Verdigris River, Kansas, from 1991 to 2003 Edwin J. Miller1,* and Sean T. Lynott1 Abstract - Periodic quantitative surveys to monitor populations of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) were conducted at eight sites in the Verdigris River, KS during 1991, 1997, and 2003. Twenty-two species were collected including several on the Kansas rare-species list. Overall mussel abundance increased from 1991–2003. Abundance of 10 species (Cyprogenia aberti, Fusconaia flava, Lasmigona complanata, Pleurobema sintoxia, Ptychobranchus occidentalis, Quadrula metanevra, Quadrula nodulata, Quadrula pustulosa, Tritogonia verrucosa, and Truncilla donaciformis) increased significantly while only Lampsilis teres decreased. This positive trend in unionid abundance could be due to various factors that have improved habitat quality of this reach of river. Introduction The Verdigris River in southeast Kansas has a high diversity and density of freshwater mussels (Family Unionidae) including 24 extant species (Obermeyer et al. 1997). The existence of this mussel assemblage in the region is attributable to local geology, land use, rainfall, and sufficient habitat quality. The operation of two federal reservoirs affects the flow rate of the Verdigris River at the survey sites. The watershed above these reservoirs is nearly 90% native grassland (United States Geological Survey 2000). Below the reservoirs, land use is about one-third cropland with the majority of cover in grassland. The chert and limestone gravel that forms favorable substrate for unionid mussels inhabiting this river has been eroded from limestone bedrock and streambank deposits of the Flint Hills and Osage Questas physiographic regions. This survey was initiated in 1991 to determine the effect of commercial mussel harvest in the Verdigris River and gather baseline data to monitor mussel populations. Because mussels are long-lived, relatively sedentary suspension feeders that use fish as hosts to complete their life cycle, their trends are suitable long-term indicators of a watershed’s ecological condition (Bogan 1993, Goudreau et al. 1993, Prophet and Edwards 1973, Sparks and Strayer 1998). Moreover, monitoring of population trends is essential in the regulation and management of commercially harvested and imperiled unionid species. 1Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks, 5089 County Road 2925, Independence, KS 67301. *Corresponding author - edm@wp.state.ks.us. 384 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 5, No. 3 Methods Mussel surveys were conducted along a 13.2-km reach of the Verdigris River in Montgomery and Wilson Counties in Kansas during 1991, 1997, and 2003. The upper-most site is located just below the confluence of the Verdigris and Fall Rivers (Fig. 1) and downstream from two federal reservoirs. This portion of the Verdigris River includes a 10.7-km reach designated as a refuge from commercial mussel harvest since 1988. Eight sites were sampled (Fig. 1): four within the protected reach, two Figure 1. Map showing a portion of the Verdigris River in Kansas and the location of the eight sample sites (A–H). 2006 E.J. Miller and S.T. Lynott 385 upstream, and two downstream of the refuge boundaries. We selected these sites because they had been sampled previously (Cope 1983), were identified as sites of high commercial harvest, or had stable gravel substrates due to upstream bedrock exposures. Sampling was conducted during summer low flows (< 150 cfs). All sample sites measured 100 m in length by 10 m in width, beginning from the shallow (gravel bar) side of the river and 1 m from the shore. At each site, 40 one-m2 quadrats were chosen from coordinates drawn from a random number table. This sample size was based on results from a previous survey (Cope 1983) and our pilot study that showed 95% of the species present were encountered by sampling 4% of the site area. Each quadrat was sampled by hand excavating the substrate to about 15–20 cm depth or until bedrock or a compacted layer of gravel was reached. Collected mussels were identified and measured before we returned them to the substrate. Total abundance of mussels (all species, mean number/m2) was calculated for each site and each sample year. Mean reach-wide abundance of total unionids and individual species was calculated across all eight sites for each sample year. We tested for reach-wide differences in mussel abundance between 1991/1997 and between 1997/2003 using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test for paired samples. Mean overall shell length was compared between sample years for species that showed significant density increases between 1997/2003 using the Kruskal-Wallis test. We constructed length-frequency histograms using 20- mm length classes for each year on species that comprised > 4% of total relative abundance. Results We collected a total of 22 mussel species and 9775 individuals during the course of the study. Mussel abundance varied widely among sites, ranging from 1.88-56.38 mussels/m2 (Table 1). Number of mussels in individual 1- m2 quadrats ranged from 0–149. Twelve species found in the study have conservation status in Kansas, and four have a history of recent commercial harvest in the river (Table 2). Table 1. Total mussel abundance at eight sites in the Verdigris River from 1991, 1997, and 2003. Number of mussels/m2 (1SE) Site 1991 1997 2003 A 5.23 (0.50) 3.88 (0.80) 5.10 (1.20) B 3.05 (0.39) 4.53 (0.56) 8.78 (0.89) C 7.60 (0.92) 7.17 (0.92) 16.25 (1.6) D 10.05 (1.13) 24.88 (1.95) 56.38 (3.51) E 6.05 (1.05) 8.28 (1.00) 10.78 (1.73) F 4.45 (0.54) 1.88 (0.42) 4.60 (0.82) G 5.18 (0.46) 5.53 (0.52) 10.05 (1.07) H 5.63 (0.66) 12.03 (1.04) 17.08 (1.57) 386 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 5, No. 3 Between 1991/2003, unionid abundance increased markedly at six of eight sites, both within and outside of the mussel refuge (Table 1). Only three species increased significantly between 1991/1997: Cyprogenia aberti (Conrad) (western fanshell), Quadrula metanevra (Rafinesque) (monkeyface), and Quadrula nodulata (Rafinesque) (wartyback) (Table 2). However, 10 species increased significantly between 1997/2003: C. aberti, Fusconaia flava (Rafinesque) (Wabash pigtoe), Lasmigona complanata (Barnes) (white heelsplitter), Pleurobema sintoxia (Rafinesque) (round pigtoe), Ptychobranchus occidentalis (Conrad) (Ouachita kidneyshell), Q. metanevra, Q. nodulata, Quadrula pustulosa (Lea) (pimpleback), Tritogonia verrucosa (Rafinesque) (pistolgrip), and Truncilla donaciformis (Lea) (fawnsfoot) (Table 2). Shell length-frequency histograms are shown for these species that make up > 4% of the total relative abundance (Fig. 2). Only one species, Lampsilis teres (Rafinesque) (yellow sandshell), decreased during the study. Abundance of six species that constituted > 1% of Table 2. Mean mussel abundance across eight sites in the Verdigris River from 1991, 1997, and 2003. Estimates with different superscripted numbers were significantly different at P 􀂔 0.05 (Wilcoxon paired-sample test). Kansas status is indicated by superscripted letter following name (Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks 2000). Mean number of mussels/m2 (% relative abundance) Species 1991 1997 2003 Amblema plicataC 0.861 (14.6) 0.541 (6.4) 0.631 (3.9) Cyprogenia abertiE 0.011 (0.2) 0.052 (0.6) 0.343 (2.1) Ellipsaria lineolataT 0.021 (0.3) 0.041 (0.4) 0.051 (0.3) Fusconaia flavaS 0.581 (9.7) 1.291 (15.2) 3.252 (20.2) Lampsilis cardium 0.151 (2.6) 0.101 (1.2) 0.181 (1.1) Lampsilis rafinesqueanaE 0.021 (0.3) 0.011 (0.1) 0.021 (0.1) Lampsilis teresS 0.041 (0.7) 0.002 (0.0) 0.012 (< 0.1) Lasmigona complanata 0.021 (0.3) 0.021 (0.2) 0.072 (0.4) Leptodea fragilis 0.201 (3.4) 0.221 (2.5) 0.201 (1.2) Megalonaias nervosaS 0.021 (0.4) 0.011 (0.1) 0.041 (0.3) Obliquaria reflexa 0.321 (5.4) 0.491 (5.7) 0.821 (5.1) Pleurobema sintoxiaS 0.131 (2.2) 0.231 (2.7) 0.682 (4.2) Potamilus purpuratusC 0.081 (1.4) 0.041 (0.4) 0.081 (0.5) Ptychobranchus occidentalisT 0.021 (0.4) 0.071 (0.8) 0.422 (2.6) Quadrula metanevraC 1.581 (26.6) 3.032 (35.6) 4.733 (29.4) Quadrula nodulataS 0.031 (0.6) 0.062 (0.7) 0.263 (1.6) Quadrula pustulosa 1.031 (17.5) 1.461 (17.1) 2.322 (14.4) Quadrula quadrulaC 0.271 (4.5) 0.371 (4.3) 0.481 (3.0) Strophitus undulatusS 0.121 (2.0) 0.081 (0.9) 0.151 (0.9) Tritogonia verrucosa 0.261 (4.4) 0.361 (4.3) 0.812 (5.0) Truncilla donaciformisS 0.141 (2.4) 0.071 (0.9) 0.592 (3.7) Truncilla truncataS 0.001 (0.0) 0.001 (0.0) < 0.011 (< 0.1) Total abundance (no/m2) 5.91 8.51 16.12 Area sampled (m2) 320 320 320 Total number of mussels 1889 2726 5160 CCommercially harvestable from 1992-2003. EListed as endangered in Kansas. TListed as threatened in Kansas. SListed as “species in need of conservation” in Kansas. 2006 E.J. Miller and S.T. Lynott 387 total unionids did not change during the study: Amblema plicata (Say) (threeridge), Lampsilis cardium Rafinesque (plain pocketbook), Leptodea fragilis (Rafinesque) (fragile papershell), Obliquaria reflexa Rafinesque (threehorn wartyback), Quadrula quadrula (Rafinesque) (mapleleaf), and Strophitus undulatus (Say) (creeper) (Table 2). Overall, community composition remained relatively similar during the study period. Fusconaia flava, O. reflexa, Q. metanevra, and Q. pustulosa were among the five most abundant species in all three years. However, C. aberti, and P. occidentalis increased at a disproportionately high rate; abundance increased 34- and 21-fold, respectively, with the highest rate of increase occurring between 1997/2003 for both species (Table 2). Of the 10 species that showed a significant increase in abundance between 1997/2003, the mean shell length decreased significantly for P. sintoxia, P. occidentalis, T. verrucosa, and T. donaciformis (Table 3). Discussion Past surveys that documented both diversity and density of unionid mussels in the Verdigris River are sparse (Cope 1983, Isely 1925) but valuable benchmarks for comparison to our survey results. Our 1991 overall density estimate (5.9 mussels/m2) was similar to densities at three Verdigris River sites surveyed in 1981 and 1982 (5.7, 4.1, and 3.9 mussels/m2; Cope 1983). By 2003, the overall density of unionids (16.5 mussels/m2) were comparable to densities reported in 1912 at two Verdigris River sites in northern Oklahoma (41.2 and 26.6 mussels/m2; Isely 1925). The increase in mussel density and the number of juvenile mussels sampled suggests the general habitat condition is improving. Mussel species responded at different times to the improved conditions over the survey period. Quadrula metanevra began to respond in the early 1980s, when the 2– 4 year age class comprised the greatest percentage of individuals (Cope 1983). Previously, Q. metanevra was considered to be uncommon to rare in the Verdigris River (Cope 1979, Murray and Leonard 1962, Schuster 1979). In Table 3. Mean length of mussels that increased in abundance in the Verdigris River from 1997– 2003. Means with different superscripted numbers were significantly different at P 􀂔 0.05. Mean length (mm) ± 1SE Species 1997 2003 Cyprogenia aberti 67.21 (3.47) 58.31 (1.76) Fusconaia flava 68.11 (0.85) 64.71 (0.74) Lasmigona complanata 129.01 (5.40) 126.61 (4.00) Pleurobema sintoxia 67.91 (2.03) 59.52 (1.45) Ptychobranchus occidentalis 87.61 (3.30) 56.32 (2.64) Quadrula metanevra 74.31 (0.54) 75.31 (0.51 Quadrula nodulata 46.91 (2.19) 45.51 (1.19) Quadrula pustulosa 51.71(0.56) 50.01 (0.62) Tritogonia verrucosa 108.41 (2.32) 95.02 (2.43) Truncilla donaciformis 20.11 (1.46) 24.72 (0.45) 388 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 5, No. 3 Figure 2a–f. Length-frequency histograms comparing the six most common mussels (from most to least common) found in the Verdigris River, KS, in 1991, 1997, and 2003. Quadrula metanevra increased significantly in abundance between 1991/1997 and 2006 E.J. Miller and S.T. Lynott 389 1997/2003. Fusconaia flava, Quadrula pustulosa, and Tritogonia verrucosa increased significantly in abundance between 1997/2003. Obliquaria reflexa and Amblema plicata sample data showed no significant change in abundance. 390 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 5, No. 3 our study, Q. metanevra continued to increase from 1991 to 2003 (Fig. 2a). Fusconaia flava responded later than Q. metanevra, but showed a strong increase in most shell-length classes by 2003 (Fig. 2b). Three species that appear to have more recently responded to improved conditions are P. occidentalis, P. sintoxia, and T. verrucosa, as exhibited by their significantly smaller shell sizes in 2003 than 1997 (Table 3). These three species may have achieved adequate population densities for more optimal reproduction and recruitment. This would indicate that the improvement of habitat conditions for mussels in the Verdigris River is continuing. We have no fish-density trends to show that mussels may be responding to an increased abundance of their host fishes. However, fish-host abundance does not appear to be a limiting factor for nearly half of the mussel species in the Verdigris River. Mussel species showing significant increases in density use hosts representing five fish families. Those that share a common fish host were inconsistent in their density response. For instance, Aplodinotus grunniens Rafinesque (freshwater drum) is the known host for T. donaciformis, Ellipsaria lineolata (Rafinesque) (butterfly), and Potamilus purpuratus (Lamarck) (bleufer) (Oesch 1984), and is a common fish in the Verdigris River, but only T. donaciformis showed a significant increase in density between 1997/2003. Formerly, A. plicata was the most common species in this reach of the Verdigris River (Cope 1983, Schuster 1979). Although A. plicata did not show significant declines during our survey period, it comprised only 3.9% of the mussel abundance by 2003 (Table 2). It is possible that this species was greatly reduced by commercial harvest occurring as late as 1995 and 1996 (Mosher 1996, 1997). This population may have been reduced to such low numbers that it has as yet been unable to rebound. In 2003, a 10-year moratorium was implemented on commercial harvest of mussels from Kansas waters, and additional surveys during this time span will determine future regulation of commercial shell harvest. Several factors could be responsible for the apparently favorable habitat conditions for mussels in the Verdigris River. Minimum-flow releases from the two upstream reservoirs to satisfy municipal needs downstream of the sampling sites may have alleviated summer no-flow conditions that could have otherwise occurred over the last 20 years, but no long-term droughts have occurred on the Verdigris River since 1955 (Miller and Obermeyer 1997). Conversely, the occasional dry March–April, such as was evident in 2002, may enhance reproductive success by precluding extended high-flow reservoir discharges. The resulting lower flow rates improve water clarity and concentrate fish, thus increasing the probability of glochidia and fish host making contact. There were no policy changes in reservoir management (T. Lyons, US Army Corps of Engineers, Fall River, KS, pers. comm., 2004) that altered water releases in a way that might enhance mussel populations. By the late 1970s, an oil refinery was closed at Neodesha, KS, 8 km upstream from site A, and wastewater from local industry was incorporated into the city’s wastewater 2006 E.J. Miller and S.T. Lynott 391 treatment system rather then being treated on site. Although no formal studies were conducted to monitor the effects of these factors on downstream water quality (R. Angelo, Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Topeka, KS, pers. comm., 2004), either of these changes could have removed a limiting factor affecting mussel populations. Finally, total suspended solids have decreased in Kansas streams statewide in the last two decades (Angelo et al. 2004). This reduction in turbidity may have enhanced recruitment of mussel species that use sight lures (e.g., P. occidentalis, C. aberti) to attract darters (family Percidae) as host fish (Barnhart and Roberts 1997). If nonpoint-source pollution reduction is largely responsible for improved conditions in the Verdigris River, then we should see similar improvements in nearby river systems given statewide changes in agricultural land-use practices. On the other hand, if abatement of point-source pollution is responsible for improved conditions for mussels, the increase will probably be noted only in the Verdigris River below the former input sites. Ongoing mussel survey work currently funded by a federally cost-shared State Wildlife Grant on the upper Verdigris, Fall, Neosho, Spring, Marais des Cygnes, Walnut, and Marmaton Rivers will help answer this question. A follow-up paper comparing commercially harvested mussel populations between refuge and nonrefuge sites is being prepared. Acknowledgments We would first like to acknowledge the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks for allowing field personnel to spend time monitoring mussel populations. We would also like to thank the cooperation we received from landowners, especially the Small family, who allowed us access to the river for research and aquatic education. We would like to thank the following for advice or for the physical labor of hand-digging the substrate for mussels: Bob Andrews, Bob Angelo, Chris Barnhart, Aaron Baugh, Doug Blex, Katelyn Brunson, Ken Brunson, Bill Busby, Colin Busby, Charlie Cope, Philip Dickerson, Chris Duermyer, Tim Eaton, Nathan Eckert, Brian Foreman, Lloyd Fox, Luke Freeman, Hank Guarisco, Jason Goeckler, Bob Hartmann, Jerry Horak, Joe Hutto, Dennis Knuth, Tim Leakey, Chris Mammoliti, Kirsten Miller, Lina Miller, Jim Minnerath, Tom Mosher, Ben Mulhern, Dan Mulhern, Keith Rather, Daren Riedle, Marvin Schwilling, Rick Tush, and Karen Yates. Finally, we would like to thank guest editor Robert Butler of the US Fish and Wildlife Service and two anonymous reviewers whose diligence greatly improved this manuscript. Partial funding for this project was received through a State Wildlife Grant from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Literature Cited Angelo, R.T., M.S. Cringan, and S.G. Haslouer. 2004. Response of stream biological communities to agricultural disturbances in Kansas: An historical overview with comments on the potential for aquatic ecosystem restoration. Pp. 1–22, In D. Baker, L. Bennett, and D.G. Huggins (Eds.). Proceedings of the Plains Aquatic Bioassessment and Biocriteria Symposium, Central Plains Center for BioAssessment, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS. 392 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 5, No. 3 Bogan, A.E. 1993. Freshwater bivalve extinctions: Search for causes. American Zoologist 33:599–609. Barnhart, M.C., and A. Roberts. 1997. Reproduction and fish hosts of unionids from the Ozark Uplifts. Pp. 16–21, In K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan, C.A. Mayer, and T.J. Naimo (Eds.). Conservation and Management of Freshwater Mussels II: Initiatives for the Future. Proceedings of 2nd UMRCC Symposium, 16–18 October 1995, St. Louis, MO. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, IL. Cope, C.H. 1979. Survey of Unionidae considered for conservation status in Kansas. Unpublished report to the Kansas Fish and Game Commission, Pratt, KS. 39 pp. Cope, C.H. 1983. Kansas freshwater mussel investigation, NMFS project 2-378-R. Unpublished report to the Kansas Fish and Game Commission, Pratt, KS. 96 pp. Goudreau, S.E., R.J. Neves, and R.J. Sheehan. 1993. Effects of wastewater treatment plant effluents on freshwater mollusks in the upper Clinch River, VA, USA. Hydrobiologia 252:211–230. Isely, F.B. 1925. The fresh-water mussel fauna of eastern Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 4:43–118. Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks. 2000. Article 15: Nongame, threatened, and endangered species. Kansas Administrative Regulations 5:575–578. Miller, E.J., and B.K. Obermeyer. 1997. Population increase of Quadrula metanevra in southeast Kansas. Pp. 30-36, In K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan, C.A. Mayer, and T.J. Naimo (Eds.). Conservation and Management of Freshwater Mussels II: Initiatives for the Future. Proceedings of 2nd UMRCC Symposium, 16–18 October 1995, St. Louis, MO. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, IL. Mosher, T.D. 1996. 1995 Kansas mussel harvest: A summary. Unpublished report to the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks, Pratt, KS. 5 pp. Mosher, T.D. 1997. 1996 Kansas mussel harvest: A summary. Unpublished report to the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks, Pratt, KS. 6 pp. Murray, H.D., and A.B. Leonard. 1962. Handbook of Unionid Mussels in Kansas. Miscellaneous Publication, Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS. 184 pp. Obermeyer, B.K., D.R. Edds, C.W. Prophet, and E.J. Miller. 1997. Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the Verdigris, Neosho, and Spring River basins of Kansas and Missouri, with emphasis on species of concern. American Malacological Bulletin 14(1):41–55. Oesch, R.D. 1984. Missouri Naiades: A Guide to the Mussels of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MO. 271 pp. Prophet, C.W., and N.L. Edwards. 1973. Benthic macro-invertebrate community structure in a Great Plains stream receiving feedlot runoff. Water Resource Bulletin 9(3):583–589. Schuster, G.A. 1979. Notes on the freshwater mussel fauna of the Verdigris River system in Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 82(1):11–24. Sparks, B.L., and D.L. Strayer. 1998. Effects of low dissolved oxygen on juvenile Elliptio complanata (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Journal of the North American Benthological Society 17(1):129–134. United States Geological Survey. 2000. Estimation and comparison of potential runoff-contributing areas in Kansas using topographic, soil, and land-use information. Report No. 00-4177. Lawrence, KS.