2011 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 10(3):389–398
Long-distance Movement by American Alligators in
Valentine A. Lance1,*, Ruth M. Elsey2, Phillip L. Trosclair III2,
and Leisa A. Nunez2
Abstract - As part of an ongoing study on growth and sexual maturation of Alligator
mississippiensis (American Alligator) on Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge, LA, 3601 specimens,
ranging in total length from 28 to 361 cm, were captured from June 2000 through
August 2004. Additionally, 70 alligators were collected opportunistically as part of a
teaching exercise in August 2005, and 248 more were collected in 2006 (and one in
January 2007) as part of a study evaluating the effects of Hurricane Rita on alligators.
Representative samples from size classes greater than 60 cm were collected in most
months of the year between 2000 and 2004. Each animal was tagged, measured, sexed,
and released immediately at the site of capture. A large number of these marked alligators
were recaptured outside the refuge boundaries during annual alligator hunts in
September. Of the 286 recaptured alligators, 214 were males, 68 were females, and four
were of undetermined sex. From each recaptured alligator, total body length and date
of recapture were recorded, and minimum distance from initial capture site estimated.
From these preliminary data, we calculated the time interval between captures, and
plotted minimum distance moved. The number of days between first capture and recapture
ranged from 29 to 3336 days (9.1 years). Distance moved from initial capture site
to final capture site ranged from 0.3 to 90.2 km. Eleven alligators moved between 30.0
and 39.9 km, and eight moved ≥40 km. Six of these moved between 40.0 and 49.9 km,
and the others moved 87.4 and 90.2 km. These results greatly extend previous estimates
of long-distance movement by alligators and demonstrate that both sub-adult and sexually
mature animals move considerable distances. These data also showed that smaller
alligators moved greater distances than larger alligators (P = 0.0002), and that the longer
the time between captures, the greater the distance moved (P < 0.0001).
Home range and dispersal (total distance moved) have been studied in a
number of Alligator mississippiensis Daudin (American Alligator) populations
using capture-recapture of marked animals or radiotelemetry. One of the earliest
studies (Chabreck 1965) involved a total of 2024 alligators marked over a sevenyear
period on Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge (RWR) and Sabine National Wildlife
Refuge in coastal southwest Louisiana. Of these marked alligators, 131 were
recaptured; of these, eighteen were recaptured twice, and two were recaptured
three times. The conclusions of the study were that immature alligators moved
greater distances than adults, and that the longer the interval between first and
second capture the greater the distance moved. The longest movement recorded
was approximately 16 km for an animal recaptured after four years. This study
1Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92128.
2Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge, Grand
Chenier, LA 70643. *Corresponding author - email@example.com.
390 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 10, No. 3
was limited to recapture attempts made within the refuge boundaries, and it is
likely that any alligators that had moved greater distances to surrounding private
lands would not have been recaptured. In the Florida Everglades, Hines et al.
(1968) marked approximately 1000 alligators and recaptured 33. The longest
reported distance moved was 11 km for an alligator recaptured after 850 days.
Joanen and McNease (1970) were the first to use radio-telemetry to study the
movement of alligators on Rockefeller Refuge. Five adult females were fitted
with radio-collars and monitored for a period of six months. The results showed
that nesting females did not move far from the nesting/den site, with home ranges
of 2.6 to 16.5 ha. Taylor (1984) fitted radio-collars on nine adult female alligators
in a lake habitat in north Louisiana and reported home ranges of 0.6 to 256 ha. A
study by Rootes and Chabreck (1993a), in which fifteen adult female alligators
(in southwest Louisiana) were fitted with radio-collars and followed for one year,
indicated home ranges of 6.1 to 165 ha. In none of these studies on female alligators
was the longest distance from initial site of capture reported. On the other
hand, 14 adult male alligators on Rockefeller Refuge fitted with radio-collars
and followed for up to one year, moved considerable distances and had estimated
home ranges of 183 to 5083 ha (Joanen and McNease 1972). The greatest distance
an adult male alligator moved from the initial capture site to where it was
observed 146 days later was approximately 53 km; another adult male moved 22
km (Joanen and McNease 1972). Elsey (2005) reported an adult alligator photographed
in the Gulf of Mexico some 63 km from the nearest land.
Studies on juvenile alligators fitted with radio-collars (McNease and Joanen
1974, Taylor et al. 1976) reported no differences in home range between male
and female alligators, but found that juveniles exhibited greater daily activity
than adults and moved greater distances overall. Rootes (1989) suggested that
radio-telemetry units attached as “collars” placed over the neck of alligators are
likely stressors that could greatly limit mobility. Thus, distances moved by alligators
monitored with telemetry units might be biased toward lower distances due
to restricted movement. Similar observations on juvenile alligator activity (i.e.,
that they generally moved greater distances than adults) were made by Chabreck
(1965) and Hines et al. (1968) using mark-recapture rather than telemetry.
In this paper, we present data on long-distance movements of alligators based
on a large sample of juveniles and adults of both sexes captured and recaptured
over a period of nine years in southwestern Louisiana.
Materials and Methods
Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge (RWR) is a coastal marsh in southwestern Louisiana
encompassing some 29,380 ha (Fig. 1) of wetlands of varying salinities
(fresh: <2 ppt, intermediate: 2 to 6 ppt, brackish: 6 to15 ppt, and saline: >15 ppt;
Keddy et al. 2007). As part of an ongoing study on growth and sexual maturation
of American Alligators (immature: 50 to 180 cm; adult: >180 cm TL) on RWR,
3920 specimens (1960 males, 1926 females, 34 of unknown sex) ranging in total
length (TL) from 28 to 361 cm were captured from June 2000 through January
2007; however, the majority of captures (3601) were made by August 2004.
Representative samples from size classes ≥ 60 cm were taken in most months.
2011 V.A. Lance, R.M. Elsey, P.L. Trosclair III, and L.A. Nunez 391
Small alligators were caught by hand from an airboat, and larger animals were
captured using a cable noose snare attached to a long pole (see Lance et al. 2009
for details). Each animal was marked with a monel tag in the webbing of both
rear feet (Elsey et al. 2000), TL was measured, a blood sample was collected from
the spinal vein (Zippel et al. 2003), a dorsal scute was removed from the tail, and
sex was determined before being immediately released near the site of capture.
During the annual fall alligator harvest, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and
Fisheries (LDWF) employees were stationed at checkpoints where harvested alligators
were brought for processing. Recaptures were identified by presence of
tail notches and web tags; these specimens were measured, and distance from site
of original capture was calculated by plotting the minimum distance between the
property where the alligator was captured to the capture site on RWR. Alligator
trappers are issued harvest tags to be used on specific wetlands they own or
lease, thus enabling determination of the approximate capture area. Additional
data were provided on mail-in forms for reporting the take of a marked alligator,
which were supplied to all licensed trappers prior to the harvest season.
Data were analyzed using SAS® statistical software. First, multiple regressions
were used to determine if there was a linear relationship between total
distance moved and either initial body size or number of days between release
and recapture. Multiple rather than simple regression was used because the data
collected on a single alligator are not independent from one another. Data were
Figure 1. Satellite map of coastal southwest Louisiana showing Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge
(outlined) and locations of alligators that moved the greatest distance from site of first
capture (white-filled circles). The Gulf of Mexico is due south of the Refuge.
392 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 10, No. 3
separated by sex, as plots of the raw data suggested an obvious difference between
males and females. These regressions were performed without an intercept,
as the distance moved should be zero when either initial body size or number of
days is zero. The model for each sex was: Distance = 1 (Days) + β2 (Length) + ε,
where ε represents the random variation for each subject. Both models violated
the assumption of normality of residuals (P-values for both sexes were <0.0001),
and also showed evidence of violating the assumption of homogeneity of variance.
Consequently, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient was calculated to
determine the nature of the relationship between total distance moved and either
initial size or number of days between release and recapture. This statistic does
not require the relationships to be linear, and the distribution need not be either
normal or defined. The values of this coefficient fall between -1 and 1, with negative
values indicating a decreasing relationship, and positive values indicating
an increasing relationship. The P-values correspond to the hypothesis that the
coefficient is zero (no relationship). Alligators recaptured on Rockefeller Refuge
were not included in the analysis.
A total of 286 alligators were recaptured outside of RWR, including 214 males,
68 females, and four of unknown sex. Eleven alligators moved between 30.0
and 39.9 km, and eight moved more than 40 km. Six of these moved between
40.0 and 49.9 km, and the other two moved 87.4 km, and 90.2 km (Table 1). Although
more than half of the alligators (155) moved <10 km from point of first
capture, there was a significant positive relationship between number of days since
capture and distance moved (Fig. 2). There was also a significant negative relationship
between size at initial capture and distance moved; i.e., smaller alligators
moved greater distances than larger alligators (Fig. 3). Although the correlation
coefficients for each of these relationships are low, the results were highly signifi-
cant (Spearman Rank Correlation [n = 281] for distance moved and number of days
since first capture, ρ = 0.26652, P < 0.0001; distance moved and length at first capture,
ρ = -0.22354, P = 0.0002) when a non-parametric analysis is conducted. Thus,
smaller alligators tended to move greater distances, and distances moved were
greater with increasing time since first capture.
Table 1. Distances moved by American Alligators marked on Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge, LA and
later recaptured outside of the refuge boundaries. Of the 286 total, only data for those that moved
≥10 km are shown.
Distance moved (km) Number of alligators
2011 V.A. Lance, R.M. Elsey, P.L. Trosclair III, and L.A. Nunez 393
The multiple regression analysis for females had an r2 value of 0.8273 (F2,65 =
161.5, P < 0.0001), and for males had an r2 = 0.5544 (F2,212 = 134.15, P < 0.0001).
Larger females tended to move greater distances than smaller females (regression
parameter = 0.11808, P < 0.0001); this relationship was not evident in males;
i.e., smaller males tended to move greater distances. Greater distances were
moved over longer time periods (number of days) for both sexes, with regression
Figure 2. Plot of days between first and final capture and distance moved of American Alligators
(n = 286) captured outside of the boundaries of Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge, LA.
Figure 3. Plot of distance moved and total length at first capture for American Alligators
(n = 286) captured outside of the boundaries of Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge, LA.
394 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 10, No. 3
parameters of 0.00664 (r2 = 0.8325, P = 0.0035) for females and 0.00302 (r2 =
0.5586, P < 0.0001) for males.
In addition to obtaining recapture data from the recovery of marked alligators
outside RWR during annual hunts, 551 of previously marked alligators were captured
alive during mark-recapture efforts on RWR. Of these, 423 were recaptured
once, 54 were recaptured twice, and six individuals were recaptured three times.
As these were all caught within the refuge boundaries, we did not expect many
to have traveled a great distance (minimum distance between eastern and western
boundaries of sampling sites = 22.9 km). However, seven alligators moved over
10 km (range = 12.5 to 21.3 km) within RWR, and 154 (27.9%) moved from the
impoundment in which they were initially caught to adjacent areas, although
distances were <10 km. Most live recaptures (390 of 551, 70.8%) within RWR remained
within the same impoundment in which they were originally caught. This
result was not unexpected as live recapture efforts were limited to the original
area wherein the alligators were marked. Most of these impoundments are rectangular
in shape, 2 to 3 km in length and width, and encompassing areas of 600 to
800 ha; thus alligators could move substantial distances, but still remain within a
single impoundment. Additionally, 208 marked alligators were recaptured in the
nuisance harvest on RWR. As expected, most did not move long distances, and
recoveries were all within the boundaries of RWR. However, five of the nuisance
alligators moved >10 km from the initial capture site (range of minimum dispersal
distance = 10.7 to 16.3 km), and two others moved a minimum of 9.1 and 9.3
km from the initial capture site to the harvest site.
The results of this study document unusually long distance movements by juvenile
and adult alligators over a nine-year period. In this study, we were able to
collect data unavailable to previous researchers, and thus greatly increase both
recovery of marked individuals and confirmation of distances moved. One of
the unplanned benefits of a well-regulated hunting program is the ability to collect
biological data from captured alligators; thus, with a small number of trained
biologists and technicians, we were able to monitor numerous sites for marked
animals captured during the hunt. Hence, we were able to collect data that previous
studies, carried out before legal hunting was established, were unable to do. For example,
Chabreck (1965) marked 2024 alligators, but only recaptured 131 (6.4%).
Likewise, Hines et al. (1968) marked approximately 1000 alligators and recaptured
only 33 (3.3%). In contrast, we marked 3920 alligators on RWR and obtained data
on 286 (7.3%) recaptured on lands outside of the refuge, a considerably greater
number than recovered in previous studies, in part because of the long duration of
our study. Long-term studies obviously have a higher likelihood of detecting longrange
dispersal over time. For example, Campos et al. (2006) studied a population
of Caiman crocodilus yacare Daudin (Caiman) in the Brazilian Pantanal over a 16-
year period and recovered 532 of 7618 marked individuals (6.9%).
We previously reported a male bias (58%) among sub-adult alligators in Louisiana
(Lance et al. 2000). In the present study, 216 of 283 (76%) alligators were
males, a higher percentage than previously reported for this population (Lance et
2011 V.A. Lance, R.M. Elsey, P.L. Trosclair III, and L.A. Nunez 395
al. 2000). As these alligators were collected during the annual September hunt, a
male bias is not unexpected, because this harvest is timed such that most females
with young will not be accessible to trappers (Elsey et al. 1994). Instead, predominantly
surplus adult males are harvested, limiting the incidental take of breeding
females that occupy a different habitat (Elsey et al. 1994). Despite a harvest that selects
for males, when the percentage of total males is compared with the percentage
of total females at the 10 to 20 km (27.6% and 19.1%) and 20 to 30 km distances
(14.5% and 10.3%), these differences were not as pronounced (Table 2). In fact,
the longest distance traveled (90.2 km) was by a female. This female was initially
marked on 10 August 2000, and recaptured on RWR on 17 October 2000 at a site
24.9 km from the initial capture. The alligator was then harvested on private wetlands
outside the refuge on 16 September 2003, some 65.2 km from where it was
caught in October 2000. Clearly, a large portion of the total distance moved (90.2
km) occurred within the first two months after capture.
The total number of recoveries (n = 1045) by all methods (286 harvested
on private wetlands outside the refuge boundaries, 551 recaptured alive on the
refuge and released, and 208 recaptured on the refuge during the controlled nuisance
harvest) indicates 29.7% of marked individuals were recovered. These data
support the long-held dogma that alligators have few predators, excepting other
alligators (Rootes and Chabreck 1993b), after reaching a total length of about 60
cm (approximately two years of age).
One factor that appears to facilitate the dispersal of alligators is flooding (Chabreck
1965). High winds and strong currents caused by Hurricane Audrey in 1957
swept alligators northward from RWR for distances “ranging from three to ten
miles” (4.8–16.1 km). For alligators marked in our study, a small number (between
two and seven annually) were caught from 2001–2005 on privately owned wetlands,
north of RWR. Some of these had moved 10 to 20 km in the interval between
being marked and recaptured. Following Hurricane Rita in late 2005, the number of
marked alligators recovered in this area increased markedly to 22 in 2006. Another
15 were recovered north of RWR in 2007 (one recovered 33.9 km from the initial
capture site), and 16 in 2008, one of which moved 39.8 km from the initial capture
location. Some of these may have simply attained a harvestable size, having earlier
moved onto privately owned wetlands when they were too small to be harvested.
However, a far more likely explanation is that these alligators were pushed northward
by the extensive storm surge of Hurricane Rita.
Table 2. Sex ratio of American Alligators marked on Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge, LA and later
recaptured ≥10 km away, outside of the refuge boundaries.
Distance moved (km) Males Females
10.0–19.9 59 13
20.0–29.9 31 7
30.0–39.9 8 3
40.0–49.9 4 2
50.0–59.9 0 0
60.0–69.9 0 0
70.0–79.9 0 0
80.0–99.9 1 1
396 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 10, No. 3
A few previous reports of long-distance movements by individual adult alligators
are available. A 1.5-m female alligator first captured on Wasaw Island,
GA was seen on Hilton Head Island 15 days later, a straight-line distance of >50
km (Tamarack 1989). Similarly, Joanen and McNease (1972) and Elsey (2005)
documented individual alligator movements of 53 km and 63 km, respectively.
In contrast to adult alligators, there is a notable paucity of published data concerning
long-distance movements by juveniles. The distances moved by some
juvenile alligators in our study exceed previous estimates by a wide margin. One
juvenile was captured >90 km and another >80 km from site of first capture;
several others moved >40 km. These findings are consistent with earlier studies
by Chabreck (1965) and Hines et al. (1968) that found juvenile alligators move
greater distances than adults. However, at the time of final capture, some juveniles
in our study had attained adult size; therefore, it is possible that some long-distance
movements occurred after these alligators reached sexual maturity. Of note, in May
2007, we incidentally recovered an immature (total length = 103 cm) nuisance alligator,
which had moved >80 km from the site of its initial capture on 20 May 2002.
A long-term study of C. crocodilus in the Brazilian Pantanal reported movements
of up to 18 km in males and 16 km in females over a 15-year period
(Campos et al. 2006). Direct comparison with our study is not possible, because
this tropical habitat differs markedly from coastal south Louisiana by having
distinct wet and dry seasons and widespread flooding in the wet season. During
the dry season, caiman are restricted to small pools and rivers, but during the
wet season they are able to disperse throughout the flooded Pantanal. However,
similar to our study, smaller caiman moved greater distances than larger caiman,
and there was a significant positive relationship between the number of days from
first capture to distance moved (Campos et al. 2006).
Long-distance movements by adult crocodiles are well documented. Allen
(1974) estimated that a large adult male Crocodylus porosus Schneider (Estuarine
Crocodile) observed on Ponape, Eastern Caroline Islands had traveled
>1300 km across open ocean. Juvenile and sub-adult C. porosus disperse long
distances up and down river systems in northern Australia (Kay 2004, Webb and
Messel 1978). It is difficult to compare marsh-dwelling alligators with crocodiles
inhabiting rivers, but most species of crocodilians appear to exhibit a pattern of
juvenile dispersal, usually beginning one to two years after hatching (Chabreck
1965, Cintra 1989, Dietz 1979). Dispersal in juvenile Crocodylus johnstoni
Krefft (Australian Freshwater Crocodile) was studied by Tucker et al. (1997,
1998). Similar to alligators, immature C. johnstoni had larger home ranges than
adults, and males approaching sexual maturity entered a “nomadic” phase before
establishing an adult home range (Tucker et al. 1998).
Earlier studies indicated that juvenile alligators have larger home ranges than
adults (McNease and Joanen 1974, Taylor et al. 1976). However, movements of
30 to 90 km are clearly too large to be considered part of the home range of a juvenile
alligator. The fact that smaller alligators moved greater distances than larger
alligators suggests that juveniles are less able to defend a territory from larger conspecifi
cs. Aggression towards juveniles and even cannibalism by adults is known
to occur in crocodilians (Cott 1961, Hunt 1977, McNease and Joanen 1977, Rootes
2011 V.A. Lance, R.M. Elsey, P.L. Trosclair III, and L.A. Nunez 397
and Chabreck 1993b). It is unlikely that juvenile crocodilians actually have large
home ranges; instead, the reportedly larger home ranges may be dispersal events
that occur when juveniles are driven out of an area by adults.
In conclusion, our long-term study clearly documents the great distances alligators
move over extended periods. Although many alligators remain within a
relatively small area for long periods of time, others move unusually long distances.
Additional research may provide information on why alligators select one
location over another, despite similar habitat and prey availability.
We thank Lisa Morris of Louisiana State University for help with the statistics and numerous
LDWF employees for assistance with capture and sampling of alligators at night
and collection of harvest data in the field, especially Dwayne LeJeune, Jeb Linscombe,
George Melancon, and Karen McCall.
Allen, G.R. 1974. The marine crocodile, Crocodylus porosus, from Ponape, Eastern
Caroline Islands, with notes on food habits of crocodiles from the Palau Archipelago.
Campos, Z., M. Coutinho, G. Mourão, P. Bayliss, and W.E. Magnusson. 2006. Longdistance
movement by Caiman crocodilus yacare: Implications for management of
the species in the Brazilian Pantanal. Herpetological Journal 16:123–132.
Chabreck, R.H. 1965. The movement of alligators in Louisiana. Proceedings of the
Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners 19:102–110.
Cintra, R. 1989. Maternal care and daily pattern of behavior in a family of caimans, Caiman
yacare in the Brazilian Pantanal. Journal of Herpetology 23:320–322.
Cott, H.B. 1961. Scientific results of an inquiry into the ecology and economic status of
the Nile Crocodile (Crocodilus niloticus) in Uganda and Northern Rhodesia. Transactions
of the Zoological Society of London 29:211–356.
Dietz, D.C. 1979. Behavioral ecology of young American Alligators. Ph.D. Dissertation,
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 152 pp.
Elsey, R.M. 2005. Unusual offshore occurrence of an American Alligator. Southeastern
Elsey, R.M., T. Joanen, and L. McNease. 1994. Louisiana's alligator research and management
program: An update. Pp. 199–229, In Proceedings of the 12th Working
Meeting of the Crocodile Specialist Group. IUCN Publications, Gland, Switzerland.
Elsey, R.M., L. McNease, and T. Joanen. 2000. Louisiana’s alligator ranching programme:
A review and analysis of releases of captive-raised juveniles. Pp. 426–441,
In G.C. Grigg, F. Seebacher, and C.E. Franlin (Eds.). Crocodilian Biology and Evolution.
Surrey Beatty and Sons, NSW, Australia. 446 pp.
Hines, T.C., M.J. Fogarty, and L.C. Chappell. 1968. Alligator research in Florida: A
progress report. Proceedings of the Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners
Hunt, R.H. 1977. Aggressive behavior by adult Morelet’s Crocodiles, Crocodylus moreletii,
toward young. Herpetologica 33:195–201.
Joanen, T., and L. McNease. 1970. A telemetric study of nesting female alligators on
Rockefeller Refuge, Louisiana. Proceedings of the Southeastern Association of Game
and Fish Commissioners 24:175–193.
398 Southeastern Naturalist Vol. 10, No. 3
Joanen, T., and L. McNease. 1972. A telemetric study of adult male alligators on Rockefeller
Refuge, Louisiana. Proceedings of the Southeastern Association of Game and
Fish Commissioners 26:252–275.
Kay, W.R. 2004. Movements and home ranges of radio-tracked Crocodylus porosus in the
Cambridge Gulf region of Western Australia. Wildlife Research 31:495–508.
Keddy P.A., D. Campbell, T. McFalls, G.P. Shaffer, R. Moreau, C. Draguet, and R. Heleniak.
2007. The wetlands of Lakes Ponchartrain and Maurepas: Past, present, and
future. Environmental Review 15:43–77.
Lance, V.A., R.M. Elsey, and J.W. Lang. 2000. Sex ratios of American Alligators (Crocodylidae):
Male or female biased? Journal of Zoology 252:71–78.
Lance, V.A., D.C. Rostal, R.M. Elsey, and P.L. Trosclair III. 2009. Ultrasonography of
reproductive structures and hormonal correlates of follicular development in female
American Alligators, Alligator mississippiensis, in southwest Louisiana. General and
Comparative Endocrinology 162:251–256.
McNease, L., and T. Joanen. 1974. A study of immature alligators on Rockefeller Refuge,
Louisiana. Proceedings of the Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners
McNease, L., and T. Joanen. 1977. Alligator diets in relation to marsh salinity. Proceedings
of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 31:36–40.
Rootes, W.L. 1989. Behavior of the American Alligator in a Louisiana freshwater marsh.
Ph.D. Dissertation. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA. 84 pp.
Rootes, W.L., and R.H. Chabreck. 1993a. Reproductive status and movement of adult
female alligators. Journal of Herpetology 27:121–126.
Rootes, W.L., and R.H. Chabreck. 1993b. Cannibalism in the American Alligator. Herpetologica
Tamarack, J.L. 1989. Georgia’s coastal alligators, variation in habitat and prey availability.
Pp. 105–118, In Proceedings of the 8th Working Meeting of the Crocodile
Specialist Group. IUCN Publications, Gland, Switzerland. 405 pp.
Taylor, D. 1984. Management implications of an adult female telemetry study. Proceedings
of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 38:222–227.
Taylor, D., T. Joanen, and L. McNease. 1976. A comparison of native and introduced immature
alligators in northeast Louisiana. Proceedings of the Southeastern Association
of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 30:362–370.
Tucker, A.D., C.J. Limpus, H.I. McCallum, and K.R. McDonald. 1997. Movements and
home ranges of Crocodylus johnstoni in the Lynd River, Queensland. Wildlife Research
Tucker, A.D., H.I. McCallum, C.J. Limpus, and K.R. McDonald. 1998. Sex-biased dispersal
in a long-lived polygynous reptile (Crocodylus johnstoni). Behavioral Ecology
and Sociobiology 44:85–90.
Webb, G.J.W., and H. Messel. 1978. Movement and dispersal patterns of Crocodylus porosus
in some rivers of Arnem land, northern Australia. Wildlife Research 5:263–283.
Zippel, K.C., H.B. Lillywhite, and C.R.J. Mladinich. 2003. Anatomy of the crocodilian
spinal vein. Journal of Morphology 258:327–335.