Southeastern Naturalist
357
M.R. Gül, and B.D. Griffe
22001188 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 1V7o(2l.) :1375,7 N–3o6. 42
A Reliable Bioindicator of Anthropogenic Impact on the
Coast of South Carolina
Mustafa R. Gül1,* and Blaine D. Griffen1,2
Abstract - Sandy beaches are frequently visited for recreational purposes. Although such
recreational activities are economically beneficial, they cause disturbances to these habitats.
Every ecosystem has unique properties; thus, ecosystem-specific species are often used as
bioindicators of human disturbances. Here, we pioneer the use of an indirect burrow-counting
technique on 20 sandy South Carolina beaches that experience different levels of human
disturbance. Our results show that Ocypode quadrata (Atlantic Ghost Crab) is a reliable bioindicator
of human disturbance on sandy beaches in South Carolina. The burrow density and
width declined significantly as human disturbance increased. We also report that females
outnumber males in highly disturbed sites. We conclude that the indirect burrow-counting
technique employed in this study could minimize the cost and the effort of determining the
human disturbances on coastal regions.
Introduction
Certain species have been defined as bioindicators because they are sensitive
to ecological changes (Siddig et al. 2016). Collecting all possible data related to a
habitat is not realistic (Carignan and Villard 2002, Pérez-Garciá et al. 2016); thus,
scientists and managers have increasingly used bioindicators to examine a variety
of natural and human impacts across spatial and ecological scales (Carignan and
Villard 2002, Cortes et al. 2013, Siddig et al. 2016). Indicator species provide
useful but limited information about a viable species or a species assemblage at
local and regional scales (Cortes et al. 2013), which is particularly helpful in the
development of conservation and management plans (Solomon et al. 2003). Selecting
an appropriate bioindicator species is especially critical in coastal systems
where evaluating human alterations in marine ecosystems is difficult (Vitousek et
al. 1997). Thus, selection of an appropriate bioindicator species to determine the
human impacts on long-stressed sandy beaches (Davenport and Davenport 2006,
McLachlan et al. 2013) is important to assess the level and effects of human disturbance
and determine if ecosystem services are being maintained (Barbier et al.
2011) in coastal regions.
Invertebrates are often chosen as bioindicators because they are more sensitive
to human stresses than vertebrate taxa in terrestrial and aquatic systems (Carginan
and Vilard 2002). For this reason, many invertebrate taxa have been used as bioindicators
in a number of sandy-beach regions including Donax spp. (clams; Defeo
and de Alava 1995, Schlacher et al. 2008, Sheppard et al. 2009), Phaleria spp.
1Marine Science Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208. 2Current
address - Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602. *Corresponding
author- mremzigul@gmail.com.
Manuscript Editor: Matthew Heard
Southeastern Naturalist
M.R. Gül, and B.D. Griffe
2018 Vol. 17, No. 2
358
(coleoptera; González et al. 2014), Emerita spp. (mole crabs; Cardoso et al. 2016),
and Ocypode spp. (ghost crabs; Schlacher et al. 2016a and citations). Ghost crabs,
in particular, are used globally as bioindicators for sandy beaches (Schlacher et al.
2016a) due to their sensitivity to both human (Neves and Bemvenuti 2006) and
natural impacts (Hobbs et al. 2008). Here, we examine the usefulness of Ocypode
quadrata (Fabricius) (Atlantic Ghost Crab) as a bioindicator of human stress on
South Carolina sandy beaches.
The Atlantic Ghost Crab is the only ghost crab species found on the sandy beaches
of the western Atlantic (Milne and Milne 1946), with a range extending from
Rhode Island to Brazil (Williams 1984). The mono-specific nature of ghost crabs
in the western Atlantic increases their utility as a bioindicator by eliminating any
possibility of species or burrow misidentification (Pombo and Turra 2013). Atlantic
Ghost Crabs also play an important ecological role in food webs on sandy beaches
by consuming small invertebrates (Wolcott 1978), thus acting as an energetic link
to higher trophic levels (Fisher and Tevesz 1979). Ghost crabs are often studied by
examining their burrows on sandy beaches, because burrow width and abundance
are well-established proxies for crab-population size and structure (Schlacher et al.
2016b). Examining the Atlantic Ghost Crab burrows provides a low-cost and efficient
sampling design (Pombo and Turra 2013).
Study-site Description
We selected our study sites (Fig. 1) based on differences in the intensity of
human visitors, whether or not the beach experienced mechanical cleaning, and
Figure 1. Location of the study sites. HV = heavily impacted by people and vehicles, HI =
heavily impacted by only people, MI = moderately impacted only by people, and P = pristine).
We examined a total of 20 sites. Each human impact type is represented by 5 sites as
shown on the map.
Southeastern Naturalist
359
M.R. Gül, and B.D. Griffe
2018 Vol. 17, No. 2
presence or absence of vehicles. We considered the sites that are accessible by only
boat (North Island 1 and 2, South Island 1 and 2, and Debordieu Island) as pristine
because we observed no pedestrians. In order to determine the intensity of human
disturbance on the beaches, we used binoculars to count the number of pedestrians
on each site over a 2-h period from 0800 to 1000 over ~1 linear kilometer of beach.
We considered the sites to be highly impacted if the number of pedestrians was
greater than 50 per hour. The average number of pedestrians was 39.3(SD = ± 17.5)
for moderately impacted and 60.2 ± 32.08 for highly impacted sites.
Although recreational off-road vehicles are not allowed on South Carolinian
beaches, some highly visited sites, such as Myrtle Beach, are mechanically cleaned.
At some sites, municipality agents use vehicles to empty garbage bins and collect
the litter on dunes. Moreover, security agents and life guards often use four-wheel–
drive vehicles on the beaches. We also observed whether the sites were mechanically
cleaned and whether other vehicles were present during night hours. Some
other sites, such as Surfside beach, are highly visited during peak tourism months
and are mostly the destinations for extended vacations due to local accommodations
and entertainment. In contrast, sites like Pawley’s Island are mostly visited
by locals and thus tend to experience little anthropogenic impact. Finally, we added
some pristine sites to our study, such as South Island. These sites can only be accessed
by boat and experience no anthropogenic impact.
The North Myrtle Beach 1 and 2, Myrtle Beach 1 and 2 and Garden City Beach
sites experienced mechanical cleaning and high disturbance by pedestrians; we
considered them highly disturbed by vehicles and people. We classified the Surfside
Beach 1 and 2, Sullivan’s Island, Isle of Palm 2, and Burkes Beach sites as highly
disturbed sites by only people because they were not mechanically cleaned, and we
observed no vehicles at those sites. We considered Pawley’s Island 1 and 2, Folly
Beach, Isle of Palm 2, and Edisto Beach to be moderately impacted sites due to the
fact that they experienced only human impacts (less than 50 pedestrians per hour).
Methods
To determine whether Atlantic Ghost Crab is a useful bioindicator species for
South Carolina sandy beaches, we deployed 3 replicate rectangular transects (10 m
x 5 m) parallel to the shore, randomly located within 2.5 m above and below the
back-shore (i.e., dune) vegetation at each of the 20 sites. Transects were spaced
~200 m apart. We counted and used Vernier calipes to measure to the nearest 0.1
mm the width of the opening of all burrows within the transect. We sampled transects
at each site just after sunrise to both diminish the impact of humans on the
burrows and to allow individual crabs to return to their burrows following their
nocturnal activities.
In addition to anthropogenic impacts, morphological characteristics of sandy
beaches such as sand compaction (Pombo and Turra 2013) and grain size (Defeo
and McLachlan 2011) may also influence the density of Atlantic Ghost Crab burrows
and the burrow width. We determined grain size at each site by sieving, which
Southeastern Naturalist
M.R. Gül, and B.D. Griffe
2018 Vol. 17, No. 2
360
is a widely used method for sand-dominated material (Cheetham et al. 2008, Folk
1980). Specifically, we collected three 500-g sand samples from each site, which
we then sieved through a variety of mesh sizes (2 mm, 1 mm, 0.5 mm, 0.42 mm,
0.25 mm, 0.177 mm, 0.125 mm and 0.074 mm). We measured the sand compaction
with a pocket penetrometer (AMS, E-280, Zoro, Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL) 5 times at
each site. Sand resistance was extremely low; thus, we used an adaptor foot on the
penetrometer to increase the surface area of the measurement by 16-fold. At the end
of each measurement, we divided our result by 16 to obtain the true compaction. To
determine if the sex ratio of Atlantic Ghost Crabs differed between sites, we caught
all opportunistically encountered individuals using a dip-net around the strand line
over a distance of ~1 km for 2 h during a time of day when crabs are often out of
their burrows (between 0000 and 0200) .
To examine which factors impacted burrow density and diameter, we used
separate generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with poisson and gaussian distributions,
respectively, with impact level, sand compaction, grain size, and latitude
as predictor variables for both models. We also included sampling day to control for
seasonal and daily (i.e., weather) changes and transects nested within sites to control
for the site differences as random effects in each model. We employed Akaike’s
information criterion (AICc) values to determine the best model. When there was
more than 1 model with ΔAICc < 2, these models were averaged (Burnham and
Anderson 2002). We employed a chi-square test to examine the difference in sex
ratio of observed Atlantic Ghost Crabs between sites with various impact levels. We
conducted all statistical analyses in R, version 3.3.2 (R Core Team 2016).
Results
We found that human impacts had a significant influence on both burrow density
and diameter of Atlantic Ghost Crabs on South Carolinian sandy beaches. Both the
density (min–max = 0.3–1.146/m2) and opening diameter (min–max = 11.0–76.0
Table 1. summary of generalized linear mixed-effects models showing the outcomes of the best
models explaining the changes of burrow diameter (mm) and burrow density (burrow/m2) compared
to pristine sites. Coeff. = coefficient. HV = heavily impacted by people and vehicles, HI = heavily
impacted by only people, and MI = moderately impacted by only people. Sampling days and transects
nested within sites were random factors. An asterisk (*) indicates the significant values.
Burrow diameter Burrow density
Fixed factor Coeff. SE t P Fixed factor Coeff. SE Z P
MI -9.91 3.57 -2.77 0.016* MI -0.45 0.13 -3.24 0.001*
HI -42.91 10.67 -4.01 0.001* HI -0.78 0.18 -4.13 less than 0.001*
HV -28.62 7.88 -3.63 0.002* HV -1.41 0.24 -5.8 less than 0.001*
Compaction 193.01 93.51 2.06 0.060 Compaction 1.32 2.98 0.44 0.65
Grain size -19.89 83.14 -0.23 0.810 Grain size 1.19 1.11 0.17 0.86
Latitude 14.25 3.72 3.82 0.004* Latitude 0.04 0.1 0.45 0.64
MI X grain size 5.82 86.36 0.067 0.940
HI X grain size 789.54 251.79 3.13 0.008*
HV X grain size -131.79 124.17 -1.06 0.301
Southeastern Naturalist
361
M.R. Gül, and B.D. Griffe
2018 Vol. 17, No. 2
mm) of the Atlantic Ghost Crab burrows declined significantly with increased human
impact level (Table 1, Fig. 2). Latitudinal variation also significantly impacted
the burrow diameter but not the density (Table 1). The burrow diameter significantly
increased with the latitude. Sand compaction in the study sites varied between
0.071 kg/cm2 (South Island 1) and 0.288 kg/cm2 (Myrtle Beach 2) and the average
Figure 2. Burrow measurements under different impact types. HV = heavily impacted by
people and vehicles, HI = heavily impacted only by people, MI = moderately impacted only
by people, and P = pristine. (a) burrow density (burrow/m2 ± SD) among impact types. The
burrow density declines steadily with increasing disturbance. (b) Burrow diameter (mm
± SD) showed a similar, but weaker trend with burrow density, declining with increasing
disturbance.
Figure 3. Change in the
sex ratio (male:female)
of Atlantic Ghost Crab
among impact types.
HV = heavily impacted
by people and vehicles,
HI = heavily impacted
only by people, MI =
moderately impacted
only by people, and P =
pristine. Females outnumbered
males with
increasing disturbance.
The sex ratio was similar
between pristine and
moderately impacted
sites, and between the
sites highly impacted
only by humans and highly impacted by humans and vehicles.
Southeastern Naturalist
M.R. Gül, and B.D. Griffe
2018 Vol. 17, No. 2
362
sand-grain size at the sites was between 0.22 mm (Burkes Beach) and 0.38 mm
(Pawley’s Island 2). The sex ratio (males/females) varied from 0.88 at sites highly
impacted only by people to 1.64 in pristine sites (chi-squared test: χ2 = 659.1,8, P less than
0.0001). However, sites appeared to group into 2 distinct categories in terms of sex
ratio; pristine and moderately impacted sites showed similar ratios (chi-squared
test: χ2 = 0.10, P = 0.75) and sites highly impacted by people only and highly impacted
by both people and vehicles showed similar ratios (chi-squared test: χ2 =
0.079, P = 0.99; Fig. 3).
Discussion
Here, we provided the first record of Atlantic Ghost Crab as a useful bioindicator
species for human impacts on South Carolina sandy beaches. Atlantic Ghost Crabs
provide useful information for human impacts by displaying a dramatic decline in
burrow density and diameter in disturbed beaches. Similar decreases have been
reported for Atlantic Ghost Crab on the coast of North Carolina at sites affected
by off-road vehicles (Hobbs et al. 2008, Wolcott and Wolcott 1984), as well as in
Texas (Maccarone and Mathews, 2007) and Brazil (Neves and Bemvenuti 2006).
Our results are also consistent with the results of the studies of different ghost crab
species in other regions of the world (see citations in Schalacher et al. 2016a). For
conservation and management purposes, it is vital to have empirical biological data
to make informed planning decisions (Solomon et al. 2003). For sandy beaches,
these data are often obtained through the study of ghost crabs (Schalacher et al.
2016a and citations). We also present the first evidence that human disturbance
impacts the sex-ratio of Atlantic Ghost Crabs. Further research is required to understand
the consequences of the shift in this ratio and to understand the mechanism
of anthropogenic impacts causing a decline in the Atlantic Ghost Crab population
density and size structure on sandy beaches.
Overall, in both marine and terrestrial systems, human disturbances have been
increasing, and coping with those disturbances may be a serious challenge for
their conservation and management. Every ecosystem is unique; thus, studies
such as this one, which determine an area-specific bioindicator species (Solomon
et al. 2003), are necessary for reliable and accurate management. We have shown
that, the Atlantic Ghost Crab is a viable bioindicator species for sandy beaches in
South Carolina that allows for examination of human impacts with relatively low
cost and effort.
Acknowledgments
We thank the staff of Baruch Marine Field Laboratory and Tom Yawkey Wildlife Center for
their help. We extend special thanks to Esra Erdil Gül for her great help during data collection.
Literature Cited
Barbier, E.B., S.D. Hacker, C. Kennedy, E.W. Koch, A.C. Stier, and B.R. Silliman.
2011. The value of estuarine and coastal-ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs
81(2):169–193.
Southeastern Naturalist
363
M.R. Gül, and B.D. Griffe
2018 Vol. 17, No. 2
Burnham, K.P., and D.R. Anderson. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A
Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd Edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
515 pp.
Cardoso, R.S., C.A.M. Barboza, V.B. Skinner, and T.M.B. Cabrini. 2016. Crustaceans
as ecological indicators of metropolitan sandy-beach health. Ecological Indicators
62:154–162.
Carignan, V., and M.A. Villard. 2002. Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological
integrity: A review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 78(1):45–61.
Cheetham, M.D., A.F. Keene, R.T. Bush, L.A. Sullivan, and W.D. Erskine. 2008. A comparison
of grain-size analysis methods for sand-dominated fluvial sediments. Sedimentology
55:1905–1913.
Cortes, R.M.V., S.J. Hugher, V.R. Pereira, and S.G.P. Varandas. 2013. Tools for bioindicator
assessment in rivers: The importance of spatial scale, land-use patterns, and biotic
integration. Ecological Indicators 34:460–477.
Davenport, J., and J.L. Davenport. 2006. The impact of tourism and personal-leisure
transport on coastal environments: A review. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science
67:280–292.
Defeo, O., and A. de Alava. 1995. Effects of human activities on long-term trends in sandybeach
populations: The Wedge Clam, Donax hanleyanus, in Uruguay. Marine Ecology
Progress Series 123:72–82.
Defeo, O., and A. McLachlan. 2011. Coupling between macrofauna community structure
and beach type: A deconstructive meta-analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 433:
29–41.
Fisher, J., and M. Tevesz. 1979. Within-habitat spatial patterns of Ocypode quadrata (Fabricius)
(Decapoda Brachyura). Crustaceana 5:31–36.
Folk, R.L. 1980. Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphill Publishing Company, Austin,
TX. 182 pp.
González, S.A., K. Yáñez-Navea, and M. Muñoz. 2014. Effect of coastal urbanization on
sandy beach coleoptera Phaleria maculate (Kulzer, 1959) in northern Chile. Marine
Pollution Bulletin 83(1):265–274.
Hobbs, C.H., C.B. Landry, and J.E. Perry. 2008. Assessing anthropogenic and natural impacts
on Ghost Crabs (Ocypod quadrata) at Cape Hatteras National Seashore, North
Carolina. Journal of Coastal Research 24(6):1450–1458.
Maccarone, A.D., and P.L. Mathews. 2007. Effect of human disturbance on the abundance
and spatial distribution of the Atlantic Ghost Crab (Ocypode quadrata) (Fabricius 1798)
on a Texas beach. The Texas Journal of Science 59:51–60.
McLachlan, A., O. Defeo, E. Jaramillo, and A.D. Short. 2013. Sandy-beach conservation
and recreation: Guidelines for optimizing management strategies for multi-purpose use.
Ocean and Coastal Management 71:256–268.
Milne, L.J., and M.J. Milne. 1946. Notes on the behavior of the Ghost Crab. American
Naturalist. 80:362–380.
Neves, F.M., and C.E. Bemvenuti. 2006. The ghost crab Ocypode quadrata (Fabricius,
1787) as a potential indicator of anthropogenic impact along the Rio Grande do Sul
coast, Brasil. Biological Conservation 133(4):431–435.
Pérez-Garciá, J.M., E. Sebastián-González, F. Botella, and J. Sánchez-Zapata. 2016. Selecting
indicator species of infrastructure impacts using network analysis and biological
traits: Bird electrocution and power lines. Ecological Indicators 60:428–433.
Pombo, M., and A. Turra. 2013. Issues to be considered in counting burrows as a measure
of Atlantic Ghost Crab populations, an important bioindicator of sandy beaches. PLoS
ONE. 8(12):e83792.
Southeastern Naturalist
M.R. Gül, and B.D. Griffe
2018 Vol. 17, No. 2
364
R Core Team. 2016 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation
for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Schaleher, T.A., L.M.C. Thompson, and S.J. Walker. 2008. Mortalities caused by off-road
vehicles (ORVs) to a key member of sandy-beach assemblages, the Surf Clam, Donax
deltoids. Hydrobiologia 610:345–350.
Schlacher, T.A., S. Lucrezi, R.M. Connolly, C.H. Peterson, B.L. Gilby, B. Maslo, A.D.
Olds, S.J. Walker, J.X. Leon, J.M. Huijbers, M.A. Weston, A. Turra, G.A. Hyndes, R.A.
Holt, and D.S. Schoeman. 2016a. Human threats to sandy beaches: A meta-analysis of
ghost crabs illustrates global anthropogenic impacts. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science
169:56–73.
Schalacher, T.A., S. Lucrezi, C.H. Peterson, R.M. Conolly, A.D. Olds, F. Althaus, G.A.
Hyndes, B. Maslo, B.L. Gilby, J.X. Leo, M.A. Weston, M. Lastra, A.Williams, and D.S.
Schoeman. 2016b. Estimating animal populations and body sizes from burrows: Marine
ecologists have their heads buried in the sand. Journal of Sea Research 112:55–64.
Sheppard, N., K.A. Pitt, and T.A. Schlacher. 2009. Sub-lethal effects of off-road vehicles
(ORVs) on Surf Clams on sandy beaches. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and
Ecology. 380:113–118.
Siddig, A.A.H., A.M. Ellison, A. Ochs, C. Villar-Leeman, M.K. Lau. 2016. How do ecologists
select and use indicator species to monitor ecological change? Insights from 14
years of publication in ecological indicators. Ecological Indicators 60:223–230.
Solomon, M., A.S.V. Jaarsveld, H.C. Biggs, and N.H. Knight. 2003. Conservation targets
for viable species assemblages? Biodiversity and Conservation12:2435–2441.
Vitousek, P.M., H.A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco, and J.M. Melillo. 1997. Human domination of
Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499.
Williams, A.B. 1984. Shrimps, Lobsters, and Crabs of the Atlantic Coast of the Eastern
United States, Maine to Florida. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. 550 pp.
Wolcott, T.G. 1978. Ecological role of Ghost Crabs, Ocypode quadrata (Fabricius), on an
ocean beach: Scavengers or predators? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and
Ecology 31(1):67–82.
Wolcott, T.G., and D.L. Wolcott. 1984. Impact of off-road vehicles on macroinvertebrates
of a mid-Atlantic beach. Biological Conservation 29:217–240.