Southeastern Naturalist
303
J.M. Salinger and R.L. Johnson
22001199 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 1V8o(2l.) :1380,3 N–3o1. 32
Host Usage and Evidence of Chestnut Lamprey Distribution
in Selected Arkansas Streams
Jeremiah M. Salinger1,* and Ronald L. Johnson2
Abstract - We documented distributional evidence of the parasitic fish Ichthyomyzon castaneus
(Chestnut Lamprey) in selected Arkansas streams to provide information on host
usage and selection of attachment sites. The species was at one point considered common
in Arkansas streams, yet our sampling using boat electrofishing during late summer and fall
collected Chestnut Lampreys in only 3 of the 12 streams for a total of just 8 individuals. We
found evidence of Chestnut Lamprey parasitism in 7 of the 12 streams. Of the 2166 nonlamprey
fishes collected, 11 individuals (0.5%) from 4 species bore evidence of Chestnut
Lamprey parasitism. The most frequently parasitized host was the large-bodied, non-native
Cyprinus carpio (Common Carp). There were no obvious patterns in the attachment/wound
site location of parasitized fish. Further surveys of Arkansas streams are needed to evaluate
trends in Chestnut Lamprey abundance and distribution.
Introduction
Parasitic lampreys have acquired a negative reputation throughout North America
owing to the historically catastrophic damage inflicted on sportfish populations
of the Great Lakes by invasive Petromyzon marinus L. (Sea Lamprey; Irwin et al.
2012, Madenjian et al. 2008, Szalai et al. 2005). Consequently, conservation of
native parasitic lamprey species, other than Entosphenus tridentatus (Richardson)
(Pacific Lamprey; PLTW 2017), historically has not been a high priority, although
conservation attention for lampreys has increased in recent years (Maitland et al.
2015). Lack of conservation emphasis carries significant implications for both
lampreys (Mesa and Copeland 2009) and indigenous peoples with economic and
sociocultural interests in lampreys (Close et al. 2002, Wang and Schaller 2015).
For example, lampreys have historically been a component of subsistence fisheries
for Native Americans (Buklis 2002, Close et al. 2002) and are still commonly
consumed outside of North America (Beaulaton et al. 2008).
Species conservation efforts are likely to be ineffective without basic knowledge
of identifying morphological characteristics (Neave et al. 2007), life history (Mesa
and Copeland 2009), and regional distribution (Robison et al. 2011a). To illustrate
the latter, only recently has the second of the 2 parasitic lamprey species found in
Arkansas, Ichthyomyzon unicuspis Hubbs and Trautman (Silver Lamprey), been
documented in Arkansas (Robison et al. 2011a). On the other hand, the commonly
occurring I. castaneus Girard (Chestnut Lamprey) has been known from Arkansas
since 1928 (Salinger et al. 2018).
1Department of Aquaculture and Fisheries, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Pine Bluff,
AR 71601. 2Department of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, State University,
AR 72467. *Corresponding author - salingj4692@uapb.edu.
Manuscript Editor: Hayden Mattingly
Southeastern Naturalist
J.M. Salinger and R.L. Johnson
2019 Vol. 18, No. 2
304
Although the Chestnut Lamprey is a parasite of a variety of fishes (Cochran 2014),
its impact on host populations has not been well-studied. This species is known to occur
throughout eastern North America west of the Appalachian Mountains, in Canada
from Manitoba in the northwest to Québec in the east, and in the US as far south as
Louisiana and northwestern Alabama (Mayden et al. 1989, Renaud 2011, Renaud
and de Ville 2000, Robison and Buchanan 1988). Parasitism by this species has been
studied to some degree in northern areas of its range (Cochran 2014, Hall 1963, Morman
1979). Curiously, they are considered threatened in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska,
yet few studies have been conducted focusing on lamprey distribution in these areas
(Flammang and Olson 2010, Mesa and Copeland 2009, Steffensen 2015). Additionally,
this species is considered data deficient in areas of its Canadian distribution and
is believed to be threatened by various anthropogenic activities (COSEWIC 2010).
Within Arkansas, Chestnut Lampreys are historically considered to be common
(Robison and Buchanan 1988). They have been found in 43 streams of the Arkansas,
Ouachita, Red, St. Francis, and White river drainages, the Mississippi River, and 4
lakes (DeGray, Hamilton, Norfork, and Webb) in Arkansas (Buchanan et al. 2003,
Connior et al. 2011, Robison and Buchanan 1988, Robison et al. 2006, Salinger et
al. 2018, Tumlison and Robison 2010). Apart from aspects of its spawning behavior
in the Antoine River (Robison et al. 1983), biological information for Chestnut
Lampreys in Arkansas has been limited to incidental captures occurring during qualitative
fish sampling of streams. The objectives of our study were to (1) evaluate host
usage of the Chestnut Lamprey in a state where the species has been understudied
and (2) investigate evidence of its distribution using boat electrofishing in selected
streams with historical records of Chestnut Lamprey presence.
Field-Site Description
We sampled a total of 29 river km located in 12 Arkansas streams (Fig. 1) from
mid-July to early November 2015, during a time of year when Chestnut Lampreys
are most actively feeding (Robison and Buchanan 1988). Streams were selected for
sampling if they had a record of Chestnut Lamprey presence (Salinger et al. 2018)
and availability of boat access. Streams were excluded from consideration if they
had any records of Silver Lampreys (e.g., the upper White River drainage of northwest
Arkansas; Robison et al. 2011a). We avoided streams with confirmed presence
of the Silver Lamprey because of difficulties in differentiating wounds between
lamprey species. In an attempt to representatively sample all of Arkansas’s ecoregions,
we selected streams from 5 of the state’s 6 ecoregions (Cadron Creek and
Little Red River from the Arkansas River Valley; Little Missouri River and Sulphur
River from the Gulf Coastal Plain; Black River, Current River, and St. Francis River
from the Mississippi Alluvial Plain; Fourche LaFave River, Ouachita River, and
Petit Jean River from the Ouachita Mountains; and Spring River and Strawberry
River from the Ozark Mountains). We did not sample Crowley’s Ridge Ecoregion
due to its longitudinal narrowness and lack of higher-order streams. We selected ten
250-m reaches on each stream except Little Missouri River for sampling, with at
least 1 km separating sampling reaches. Only 6 reaches were sampled in the Little
Southeastern Naturalist
305
J.M. Salinger and R.L. Johnson
2019 Vol. 18, No. 2
Missouri River at the request of the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission to avoid
electrofishing in sensitive trout-stocked areas. We excluded reaches from sampling
if they were inaccessible or too shallow. All streams sampled were mid-order
streams (Strahler numbers 4–6; Strahler 1957). The streams exhibit a diversity of
habitats throughout the state, varying from the rocky substrate of the cold tailwaters
of the Little Red River, to the sandy-bottomed, warmwater Strawberry River.
Land use surrounding our field sites was similarly variable, varying from forested
(Petit Jean River) and agricultural areas (St. Francis River) to relatively urban areas
(Ouachita and Spring rivers).
Methods
We conducted electrofishing during daylight hours via single-pass, 60–120-Hz
pulsed DC boat electrofishing using a 6-m aluminum-framed boat equipped with
a 50-hp generator and GPP 5.0 electrofishing unit (Smith-Root, Inc., Vancouver,
Figure 1. Ovals indicate sections of Arkansas streams sampled by boat electrofishing for
evidence of Chestnut Lampreys, July-November 2015.
Southeastern Naturalist
J.M. Salinger and R.L. Johnson
2019 Vol. 18, No. 2
306
WA). Stunned fishes estimated to have a standard length (SL) greater than 127 mm
(smallest known host size of Chestnut Lampreys; Cochran 1985) were held in an
aerated 200-L live-well. The live-well was supplemented with Prime Water Conditioner
(SeaChem Laboratories, GA) at a ratio of 0.1 mL/L of water to encourage
mucus layer growth and protection (Harnish et al. 2011).
We obtained SL (mm) and mass (g) for each captured fish immediately following
the end of a reach. At the same time, we identified fish to species and examined
them for the presence of lamprey wounds (Fig. 2). Lamprey wound locations on
the host were assigned using a subtle modification of the system developed by Lennon
(1954). Unlike Lennon (1954), we subdivided regions I and VI into dorsal (A)
and ventral (B) sections (Fig. 3). Other body regions were consistent with Lennon
(1954). Once measurements were taken, we released fish in the same reach in
which they were captured. We measured parasitic lampreys for SL to the nearest
mm, identified to species, noted as attached or free-swimming, photographed, and
released them. Parasitic lampreys were determined to be Chestnut Lampreys if they
possessed 6 bicuspid inner lateral teeth (COSEWIC 2010, Renaud 2011, Robison
and Buchanan 1988).
Figure 2. A Chestnut Lamprey wound on the dorsal fin of a Common Carp. This places the
wound in Lennon’s (1954) Region II.
Southeastern Naturalist
307
J.M. Salinger and R.L. Johnson
2019 Vol. 18, No. 2
Results
We captured 2166 fishes representing 13 families and 58 species (Table 1). Of
these, 11 individuals (0.5%) from 4 species displayed wounds attributable to a
parasitic lamprey (Table 2; Figs. 2, 3). Seven of these wounded fishes were mature
adult Common Carp, with a mean (± SE) SL of 621.1 ± 33.5 mm and mass of 3778.6
± 607.7 g. No other host species had more than 2 parasitized individuals captured
(Table 2, Fig. 3). No consistent positional wounding pattern was identified. Six of
the 11 wounded fishes were wounded dorsally, with 2 Common Carp wounded on
the dorsal fin, whereas the remainder were wounded ventrally, including 1 wounded
on a pectoral fin. Wounds on 2 Common Carp occurred cranially (Table 2, Fig. 3).
Eight Chestnut Lampreys were captured from 3 of the streams sampled in northeastern
Arkansas (Black, Current, and Spring rivers; Fig. 1). Mean (± SE) SL of
Table 1. Fishes >127 mm SL captured in 12 Arkansas streams by boat electrofishing in 2015 with
evidence of Chestnut Lamprey parasitism, grouped by family.
# of individuals with
Number of Number of evidence of Chestnut
Family species captured individuals captured Lamprey parasitism
Amiidae 1 21 0
Anguillidae 1 8 0
Catostomidae 15 673 2
Centrarchidae 17 527 2
Clupeidae 3 152 0
Cyprinidae 3 125 7
Esocidae 1 1 0
Ictaluridae 5 245 0
Lepisosteidae 4 131 0
Moronidae 3 17 0
Percidae 3 4 0
Salmonidae 3 70 0
Sciaenidae 1 192 0
Figure 3. Position of attachment for fishes with evidence of Chestnut Lamprey parasitism in
selected Arkansas streams, July–November 2015 (modified from Lennon 1954). Key: CC =
Common Carp, RR = River Redhorse, SB = Spotted Bass, SS = Spotted Sucker.
Southeastern Naturalist
J.M. Salinger and R.L. Johnson
2019 Vol. 18, No. 2
308
the 8 captured lampreys was 205.0 ± 17.9 mm. Of these, 4 were captured while attached
to hosts (all Common Carp) or self-dislodged from their hosts upon or after
capture (Table 2). Mean self-dislodged lamprey SL was 236.2 ± 16.2 mm. No Silver
Lampreys were captured. We collected parasitized fishes from 7 of the 12 streams
sampled, including 1 from Cadron Creek (Arkansas River drainage); 3 from Black
River, 1 from Current River, 3 from Spring River, and 1 from Strawberry River
(Black River drainage); 1 from Little Missouri River (Ouachita River drainage);
and 1 from Little Red River (White River drainage) (T able 3, Fig. 1).
Table 2. Lamprey-wounded fishes captured in 12 Arkansas streams (July–November 2015) by boat
electrofishing, grouped by species. Individuals marked with an asterisk were captured with an attached
Chestnut Lamprey. Attachment site or wound locations are illustrated in Figure 3.
Attachment site
Host species or wound location SL (mm) Mass (g) Stream
Common Carp II 493 1830 Current River
Common Carp* IA 505 1640 Black River
Common Carp* II 630 3530 Spring River
Common Carp II 660 4080 Black River
Common Carp* II 660 4100 Spring River
Common Carp VIB 670 4500 Spring River
Common Carp* IA 730 6770 Black River
River Redhorse III 480 900 Little Missouri River
Spotted Bass II 260 200 Strawberry River
Spotted Bass III 162 100 Cadron Creek
Spotted Sucker II 263 202 Little Red River
Mean (± SE) 501 (56) 2532 (633)
Table 3. Twelve streams located in 5 ecoregions sampled for Ichthyomyzon castaneus (Chestnut Lamprey)
by boat electrofishing, July–November 2015, to assess host usage and distribution. Chestnut
Lamprey attached to a host fish was considered to be direct evidence of parasitism, whereas a wounded
host without a lamprey attached at the time of the host’s capture was considered indirect evidence.
Evidence of Chestnut
Chestnut Lamprey Parasitism
Stream Ecoregion Lamprey collected? Direct Indirect
Cadron Creek Arkansas River Valley No No Yes
Little Red River Arkansas River Valley No No Yes
Little Missouri River Gulf Coastal Plain No No Yes
Sulphur River Gulf Coastal Plain No No No
Black River Mississippi Alluvial Plain Yes Yes Yes
Current River Mississippi Alluvial Plain Yes No Yes
St. Francis River Mississippi Alluvial Plain No No No
Fourche LaFave River Ouachita Mountains No No No
Ouachita River Ouachita Mountains No No No
Petit Jean River Ouachita Mountains No No No
Spring River Ozark Mountains Yes Yes Yes
Strawberry River Ozark Mountains No No Yes
Southeastern Naturalist
309
J.M. Salinger and R.L. Johnson
2019 Vol. 18, No. 2
Discussion
Robison and Buchanan (1988) stated that the Chestnut Lamprey was common
in Arkansas. However, the results of our study and other studies may indicate
otherwise (Buchanan et al. 2003, Connior et al. 2011; McAllister et al. 2010; Robison
et al. 2006, 2011b; Tumlison and Robison 2010). However, it must be noted that
our study was of limited geographic scope (i.e., only 12 streams were sampled),
did not sample stream sections lower than 4th order or higher than 6th order, and
was performed during late summer and fall, which may limit its utility in drawing
conclusions about the distribution and abundance of Chestnut Lampreys. Sampling
during the spring spawning migration of the Chestnut Lamprey may be more informative,
but heavy rainfall resulting in high flows and turbidity during this time may
prohibit effective sampling.
We documented evidence of Chestnut Lampreys from only 7 of 12 study
streams, with only sporadic evidence of lamprey attacks in central or southern
Arkansas. Each Chestnut Lamprey individual that we collected was from northeastern
Arkansas. It is plausible that some wounded fishes reported in Table 2 were
parasitized by Silver Lampreys, despite our avoidance of streams in northwestern
Arkansas where Silver Lampreys have been documented. The presence of the Silver
Lamprey in Arkansas was only recently established (Robison et al. 2011a), and
its statewide distribution has not been adequately studied.
Particularly notable was the lack of evidence of Chestnut Lampreys from the
Ouachita River, where 27 of the 250 Arkansas Chestnut Lamprey collection records
occur (Salinger et al. 2018). Chestnut Lampreys have been collected over a 44-year
period from this stream, and as recently as 2013. Therefore, we find it unlikely that
the species has been extirpated from the Ouachita River. Of the 177 fishes collected
in the Ouachita River, none were parasitized by lampreys, yet the sample included
several species (e.g., Hypentelium nigricans Lesueur [Northern Hog Sucker], Ictalurus
punctatus Rafinesque [Channel Catfish], Micropterus salmoides Lacepède
[Largemouth Bass], and assorted Moxostoma spp. [redhorse suckers]) previously
identified as Chestnut Lamprey hosts (Cochran 2014). Further, only 1 parasitized
fish was collected from southern Arkansas (Little Missouri River), despite a recent
documented southern range expansion for the Chestnut Lamprey in Arkansas (Robison
et al. 2006).
Despite a low number of captures, the frequency of fish parasitized in the present
study (0.5%) is similar to that of Hubley (1961), who observed 0.2% of fishes in
the Upper Mississippi River in Wisconsin to be parasitized by Chestnut Lampreys.
In contrast, Hall (1963) noted that up to one-third of Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill
(Brook Trout) and S. namaycush Walbaum in Artedi (Lake Trout) observed during
field sampling and creel surveys in Michigan’s Manistee River were parasitized
by Chestnut Lampreys. None of the 70 salmonids, primarily Oncorhynchus mykiss
Walbaum (Rainbow Trout), we captured in the Little Red River were parasitized.
It must be noted that the sampling in this section was performed in hypolimnetic
waters, which severely alters and restricts species diversity (Johnson et al. 2006),
and may possibly limit the local presence of the Chestnut Lamprey.
Southeastern Naturalist
J.M. Salinger and R.L. Johnson
2019 Vol. 18, No. 2
310
Three of the four fish species parasitized have previously been identified in
the literature as serving as Chestnut Lamprey hosts (Common Carp, Moxostoma
carinatum Cope [River Redhorse], and Minytrema melanops Rafinesque [Spotted
Sucker]; Cochran 2014; Flammang and Olson 2010; Hubley 1961; Mayden et al.
1989; Ryon and Loar 1988; Sever and Mould 1981; Tumlison and Robison 2010).
If the wounds we observed were indeed caused by Chestnut Lamprey, Micropterus
punctulatus Rafinesque (Spotted Bass) would represent a new host record for the
Chestnut Lamprey, although other members of the genus Micropterus have been
previously identified as hosts (Cochran 2014).
The most frequently parasitized fish in our study were mature Common Carp. A
small sample size limits conclusions resulting from these findings. However, one
potential explanation could be selection for larger hosts maximizing blood meal
size, as demonstrated by laboratory feeding experiments (Cochran 1985). However,
we collected other equally large-sized potential hosts such as Ictiobus spp. (buffalo;
Cochran 2014) and Atractosteus and Lepisosteus spp. (gars; Cochran 2004), yet
none of these were documented as hosts in our study.
A second potential explanation for the more frequent parasitism of Common
Carp is its non-native status. Other studies have documented native lamprey species
often feeding on non-native hosts (Hume et al. 2013, Inger et al. 2010, Lubinski et
al. 1986, Weitkamp et al. 2015). This occurrence may be an example of behavioral
plasticity leading to host-switching (Bush 2009, Hoberg and Brooks 2008), a hypothesis
that merits further study.
It is possible that we would have found more evidence of Chestnut Lampreys
if we had attempted to sample with other gear types as suggested by Moser et al.
(2007); however, many of the traditionally used methods for sampling lampreys
were either unavailable to us or impractical for logistical reasons. As we were
sampling mid-order streams, we were limited to sampling using boat electrofishing.
We would suggest that future researchers attempt to use multiple gear types.
Future researchers may also find it beneficial to incorporate sampling techniques
not traditionally used in aquatic biology research, such as pheromone-baited traps
(Johnson et al. 2005, Yun et al. 2014) or environmental DNA sampling (Gingera et
al. 2016, Takahara et al. 2012). Finally, we would also encourage future researchers
to describe the occurrence of Chestnut Lampreys in relation to stream habitat
variables, as this aspect of Chestnut Lamprey ecology remains understudied.
Acknowledgments
This research was conducted under Arkansas Game and Fish Commission Scientific
Collection Permit #051420151, issued to J.M. Salinger. This research would not have been
possible without the assistance of our field technicians, Joshua Lukac and Taylor Mackey,
as well as Justin Stroman, Kyle Swallow, Brian Wagner, and the many other members of
the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission’s Fisheries Division, past and present, who have
put forth the time and effort to make this research possible. The Arkansas Department of
Environmental Quality generously allowed us access to several Chestnut Lamprey records
heretofore unavailable to us, which were indispensable in selection of study sites. We are
Southeastern Naturalist
311
J.M. Salinger and R.L. Johnson
2019 Vol. 18, No. 2
also indebted to Jennifer Bouldin and Jerry Farris for loaning us equipment used during
the field season, as well as to Casey Cox and Tracy Klotz for their invaluable boat maintenance
advice. Helpful input from Richard Grippo, Paul Sikkel, and the late Philip Cochran
improved the design of the study. Shannon Smith and Douglas Zentner assisted in the
construction of Figure 1. A review of the manuscript by Steve Lochmann improved the te
final manuscript product. Lastly, we are grateful to the faculty and staf f, particularly Pablo
Bacon, of the L.A. Logan Biological Field Station, Southern Arkansas University, for housing
the research team during part of its field season.
Literature Cited
Beaulaton, L., C. Taverny, and G. Castelnaud. 2008. Fishing, abundance, and life-history
traits of the anadromous Sea Lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) in Europe. Fisheries Research
92:90–101.
Buchanan, T.M., D. Wilson, L.G. Claybrook, and W.G. Layher. 2003. Fishes of the Red
River in Arkansas. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science 57:18–26.
Buklis, L.S. 2002. Subsistence fisheries management on federal public lands in Alaska.
Fisheries 27:10–18.
Bush, S.E. 2009. Does behavioural flexibility facilitate host switching by parasites? Functional
Ecology 23:578–586.
Close, D.A., M.S. Fitzpatrick, and H.W. Li. 2002. The ecological and cultural importance
of a species at risk of extinction, Pacific Lamprey . Fisheries 27:19–25.
Cochran, P.A. 1985. Size-selective attack by parasitic lampreys: Consideration of alternate
null hypotheses. Oecologia 67:137–141.
Cochran, P.A. 2004. Historical notes on lampreys in Wisconsin. American Currents 30:4–8.
Cochran, P.A. 2014. Field and laboratory observations on the ecology and behavior of the
Chestnut Lamprey, Ichthyomyzon castaneus. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 29:491–505.
Connior, M.B., R. Tumlison, and H.W. Robison. 2011. New records and notes on the natural
history of vertebrates from Arkansas. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science
65:160–165.
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). 2010. COSEWIC
assessment and status report on the Chestnut Lamprey Ichthyomyzon castaneus (Great
Lakes–Upper St. Lawrence populations and Saskatchewan–Nelson River populations)
in Canada. Ottawa, ON, Canada. 35 pp.
Flammang, M.K., and J.R. Olson. 2010. The occurrence of Chestnut Lamprey (Ichthyomyzon
castaneus; Pisces: Petromyzontidae) in the Chariton River in south-central Iowa.
Journal of the Iowa Academy of Sciences 117:1–3.
Gingera, T.D., T.B. Steeves, D.A. Boguski, S. Whyard, W. Li, and M.F. Docker. 2016. Detection
and identification of lampreys in Great Lakes streams using environmental DNA.
Journal of Great Lakes Research 42:649–659.
Hall, J.D. 1963. An ecological study of the Chestnut Lamprey, Ichthyomyzon castaneus
Girard, in the Manistee River, Michigan. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, MI. 101 pp.
Harnish, R.A., A.H. Colotelo, and R.S. Brown. 2011. A review of polymer-based water
conditioners for reduction of handling-related injury. Reviews in Fish Biology and
Fisheries 21:43–49.
Hoberg, E.P., and D.R. Brooks. 2008. A macroevolutionary mosaic: Episodic host-switching,
geographical colonization, and diversification in complex host–parasite systems.
Journal of Biogeography 35:1533–1550.
Southeastern Naturalist
J.M. Salinger and R.L. Johnson
2019 Vol. 18, No. 2
312
Hubley, R.C., Jr. 1961. Incidence of lamprey scarring on fish in the Upper Mississippi
River, 1956-1958. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 90:83–85.
Hume, J.B., C.E. Adams, C.W. Bean, and P.S. Maitland. 2013. Evidence of a recent decline
in River Lamprey, Lampetra fluviatilis, parasitism of a nationally rare whitefish, Coregonus
lavaretus: Is there a diamond in the Ruffe, Gymnocephalus cernuus? Journal of
Fish Biology 82:1708–1716.
Inger, R., R.A. McDonald, D. Rogowski, A.L. Jackson, A. Parnell, S.J. Preston, C. Harrod,
C. Goodwin, D. Griffiths, J.T.A. Dick, R.W. Elwood, J. Newton, and S. Bearhop. 2010.
Do non-native invasive fish support elevated lamprey populations? Journal of Applied
Ecology 47:121–129.
Irwin, B.J., W. Liu, J.R. Bence, and M.L. Jones. 2012. Defining economic injury levels for
Sea Lamprey control in the Great Lakes Basin. North American Journal of Fisheries
Management 32:760–771.
Johnson, N.S., M.J. Siefkes, and W. Li. 2005. Capture of ovulating female Sea Lampreys in
traps baited with spermiating male Sea Lampreys. North American Journal of Fisheries
Management 25:67–72.
Johnson, R.L., S.C. Blumenshine, and S.M. Coghlan. 2006. A bioenergetic analysis of factors
limiting Brown Trout growth in an Ozark tailwater river. Environmental Biology of
Fishes 77:121–132.
Lennon, R.E. 1954. Feeding mechanism of the Sea Lamprey and its effects on host fishes.
Fishery Bulletin 56:248–293.
Lubinski, K.S., A. van Vooren, G. Farabee, J. Janecek, and S.D. Jackson. 1986. Common
Carp in the Upper Mississippi River. Hydrobiologia 136:141–154.
McAllister, C.T., W.C. Starnes, M.E. Raley, and H.W. Robison. 2010. Geographic distribution
records for fishes of central and northern Arkansas. Texas Journal of Science
62:271–280.
Madenjian, C.P., B.D. Chipman, and J.E. Marsden. 2008. New estimates of lethality of Sea
Lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) attacks on Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush): Implications
for fisheries management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
65:535–542.
Maitland, P.S., C.B. Renaud, B.R. Quintella, D.A. Close, and M.F. Docker. 2015. Conservation
of native lampreys. Pp. 375–428, In M.F. Docker (Ed.). Lampreys: Biology, Conservation,
and Control. Vol. 1. Springer Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 438 pp.
Mayden, R.L., R.H. Matson, B.R. Kuhajda, J.M. Pierson, M.F. Mettee, and K.S. Frazer.
1989. The Chestnut Lamprey, Ichthyomyzon castaneus Girard, in the Mobile Basin.
Proceedings of the Southeastern Fishes Council 20:10–13.
Mesa, M.G., and E.S. Copeland. 2009. Critical uncertainties and research needs for the
restoration and conservation of native lampreys in North America. American Fisheries
Society Symposium 72:311–321.
Morman, R.H. 1979. Distribution and ecology of lampreys in the Lower Peninsula of
Michigan, 1957–75. Great Lakes Fishery Commission Technical Report No. 33. Ann
Arbor, MI. 61 pp.
Moser, M.L., J.M. Butzerin, and D.B. Dey. 2007. Capture and collection of lampreys: The
state of the science. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 17: 45–56.
Neave, F.B., N.E. Mandrak, M.F. Docker, and D.L. Noakes. 2007. An attempt to differentiate
sympatric Ichthyomyzon ammocoetes using meristic, morphological, pigmentation,
and gonad analyses. Canadian Journal of Zoology 85:549–560.
Southeastern Naturalist
313
J.M. Salinger and R.L. Johnson
2019 Vol. 18, No. 2
Pacific Lamprey Technical Workgroup (PLTW). 2017. Practical guidelines for incorporating
adult Pacific Lamprey passage at fishways. June 2017. Whitepaper. 47 pp. + Appendix.
Available online at https://www.fws.gov/pacificlamprey/documents/2017.06.20%20
lampreypsgfinal.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2018.
Renaud, C.B. 2011. Lampreys of the world: An annotated and illustrated catalogue of lamprey
species known to date. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization Species
Catalogue for Fishery Purposes. No. 5. Rome, Italy. 109 pp.
Renaud, C.B., and N. de Ville. 2000. Three records of the Chestnut Lamprey, Ichthyomyzon
castaneus, new to Québec. Canadian Field-Naturalist 114:333–335.
Robison, H.W, and T.M. Buchanan. 1988. Fishes of Arkansas. University of Arkansas
Press, Fayetteville, AR. 536 pp.
Robison, H.W., E. Laird, and D. Koym. 1983. Fishes of the Antoine River, Little Missouri
River system, southwestern Arkansas. Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science
37:74–77.
Robison, H.W., R. Tumlison, and J.C. Petersen. 2006. New distributional records of lampreys
from Arkansas. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science 60:194–196.
Robison, H.W., S.G. George, W.T. Slack, and C.T. McAllister. 2011a. First record of the
Silver Lamprey, Ichthyomyzon unicuspis (Petromyzontiformes: Petromyzontidae), from
Arkansas. American Midland Naturalist 166:458–461.
Robison, H.W., C.T. McAllister, and K.E. Shirley. 2011b. The fishes of Crooked Creek
(White River drainage) in northcentral Arkansas, with new records and a list of species.
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science 65:111–116.
Ryon, M.G., and J.M. Loar. 1988. A checklist of fishes on the Department of Energy Oak
Ridge Reservation. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 63:97–102.
Salinger, J.M., B.K. Wagner, and R.L. Johnson. 2018. Update of distribution of the Chestnut
Lamprey in Arkansas. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science 72:161–166.
Sever, D.M., and E.D. Mould. 1981. The occurrence of Ichthyomyzon castaneus (Petromyzontidae)
in the Saint Joseph River drainage, Indiana. Journal of the Indiana Academy
of Science 91:618–620.
Steffensen, K.D. 2015. The status of fishes in the Missouri River, Nebraska: Selected ancient
fishes. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences 35:53–60.
Strahler, A.N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Eos, Transactions
of the American Geophysical Union 38:913–920.
Szalai, E.B., J.R. Bence, and M.L. Jones. 2005. Estimating Sea Lamprey damage to fish
populations in lakes Michigan and Huron. Great Lakes Fish Commission QFC Technical
Report T2008-08. Ann Arbor, MI. 29 pp.
Takahara, T., T. Minamoto, H. Yamanaka, H. Doi, and Z. Kawabata. 2012. Estimation of
fish biomass using environmental DNA. PLoS ONE 7(4):e35868.
Tumlison, R., and H.W. Robison. 2010. New records and notes on the natural history of
selected vertebrates from southern Arkansas. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science
64:145–150.
Wang, C., and H. Schaller. 2015. Conserving Pacific Lamprey through collaborative efforts.
Fisheries 40:72–79.
Weitkamp, L.A., S.A. Hinton, and P.J. Bentley. 2015. Seasonal abundance, size, and host
selection of Western River (Lampetra ayresii) and Pacific (Entosphenus tridentatus)
lampreys in the Columbia River estuary. Fishery Bulletin 113:213–226.
Yun, S.-S., A. Szeitz, A. Wildbill, M. Siefkes, and D. Close. 2014. Sulfated bile acids as
putative sex pheromone components in Pacific Lamprey. Transactions of the American
Fisheries Society 143:1455–1459.